Scientific proof that God exists?

[GannickusX]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff    

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Those are not proof of non existence of god, as this proof cannot exist.
It *could* be proof of against a religion though, which is a different thing altogether.

No, it is proof for his non existance ( im talking about BIBLE GOD) how to disprove bible god? Easy disprove the bible since its the only book that exists that talks about him if we prove that the bible is bullshit we prove god does not exist so there is the proof

[BADecker]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff    

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.



EDIT: Besides, scientists die. God lives forever.

[GannickusX]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff   

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/

[the joint]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff   

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

[Buffer Overflow]

A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.

People keep asking the question about proof for God. Which would you rather have? My link? Or the whole post? It's is up to you to click the link or not, or accept the proof or not.

Well I guess if you stopped claiming to have proof, people would stop asking to see it. But of course, that's what you want isn't it.  
Anyway I don't want to interupt you. Your no doubt busy researching Sequoia trees at the moment. We await eagerly for your lengthy verbose refute.

[GannickusX]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff   

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)

[the joint]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff   

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)

Okay, well it seems you're making a distinction between Intelligent Design in general and the biblical description of intelligent design, so that's good.  The three cases you mention in no way disprove Intelligent Design in general.

Actually, if I wanted to get really nitpicky, the Earth may accurately be described as ~6,500 years old depending upon your location in spacetime.  Approach the event horizon of a black hole and Earth's age will appear drastically different than the ~4.5 billion years we're familiar with.  But, this is a pretty irrelevant consideration because we both know BadDecker would never present such an argument.

[prints]

All Hail Sequoia!!

All hail woodcoin!

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

While all of the points mentioned can in fact be good arguments to the existence of a creator of sorts, it does not lend any credence to the existence of a christian god. It certainly does not pertain to the bible in any way. The 'proof' that is mentioned could also be transported to defend the existence of the flying spaghetti monster or any other entity you wish to put in it's place.

Religion has been the cause of so much suffering throughout our recorded history. If we could all agree that fighting amongst ourselves isn't the answer then maybe we could make some real progress in this world. People don't seem to acknowledge the fact that all major religions are saying basically the same thing.

I tend to believe that while we are in fact descendants of the great apes, our DNA was in fact 'edited' to create what we know today as homo sapiens. The reasons for this are unclear, but speculations on this predate the bible by thousands of years.

When it comes down to it, we are beings of energy that inhabit a physical body. The law of conservation of energy, the first law of thermodynamics and the theory of special relativity can all be used to strengthen the argument that what we consider to be 'the self' is not a corporeal entity. Take that as you will, but it doesn't support (or deny) the existence of a creator. We cannot prove or disprove that we aren't all trapped in the Matrix.

[Decksperiment]

Be very carefull what you tell my mind.. you CAN, or COULD kill everything with ONE wrong word.. come on, where's your god..?

Wanna test the theory?

DICKHEAD?

I keep telling you to STOP.

You wont. As a representative of the bible, will you or wont you?

EDIT: VERY IMPORTANT:

This was meant to be a direct reply to badeckers post..

(one after the other, I answered when I came home), now who would like to ask another question before I fuck off for good, cause this convo get's stale awfy quick when your speaking the truth, and ON YOUR OWN.

[Decksperiment]

A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Notice: PROffered?

[Decksperiment]

A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.

The dick simply wont accept, not everyone click's here, and here.. not a bad move where I come from..

[Decksperiment]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff    

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)

Oh, look.. someone thinks sequoia tree's exist as long as google say's, fuck me.. notice the dates are changing? I'm literally tearing them to shred's, and I've just walked in the fuckin place..

What if, I appear as a human representative of the GREATEST tree on earth, just to protect it?

How is your humanity now?

So very fuckin small

[Decksperiment]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff    

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.



EDIT: Besides, scientists die. God lives forever.

I AM the TETRAGRAMMATON, my fear is I may be right.. DICKHEAD

[Decksperiment]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff   

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/

Your new, never read the thread from start to finish, so you are 'UNQUALIFIED' to know WTF am talking about..

Nae dis-respect, wee man

I beg to differ.. I suggest taking on the best sage you have to offer.. NO? I'll do it, BADecker, c'mere..

[Decksperiment]

What, no appearance from god since I came back?

[Decksperiment]

I've shown the world who I AM.

I've shown the world is a mental construct..

I know INTUITION is my god..

Who are you to think you can convince me to save you?

After the last 2000 years? FUCK THAT.

[Decksperiment]

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.

Chocolate is good stuff    

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)

What your missing, DICKHEAD, and no one else CAN point out, is that Sequoia is not as high as.. Mt everest.. where even you swam to gain ground..

So if the theory of the flood is TRUE, how is Sequoia still ALIVE?

ARE you denying GOD's miracle, that other's, other than noah and his shit shit egyptian relic's survived?

[Decksperiment]

All HAIL Sequoia.. the only tree, barring the other, that know's from day one, what the fuck is what, from BEFORE christianitie's day one.

Even GOD cant do THAT!!

[Decksperiment]

This bich Sequoia, was ALIVE BEFORE the flood, and SURVIVED!!

(never mind the lesser, but older and wiser wise one..)

What was it's name again, do I really need to scroll back?

Nah, you know wtf am on about..

[Decksperiment]

So who the fuck are you (the reader) to talk to.. me?

IF I AM the TETRAGRAMMATON, and came here to WITNESS what your CRUELTY is doing, do ya think killing me will change what is gonna happen quicker than you can destroy whomever?

Keep in mind.. I am just an observer.. with highly valuated, GENUINE bullshit..