Scientific proof that God exists?

[Pachacouti]

A post I took my time over:

How I 'use' Magic Squares:
--------------------------
When counting, I start at 1. Then 2. Then 3. No Magic Square can be created using either 0, 1, or 2, so in this txt, 0, 1, or 2 can be dropped, but only in reference to magic squares. This paragraph is to help understand that 0 can be 3, 1 can be 4, and 2 can be 5. If this seems stupid, try this: 3 x 4 x 5 = 60 seconds!

For example, I take the largest circle, and call it 'The Constellations' which = 2592 years, and devide it with 2869, seen in the last line of the magic square of the moon. 2592/2869 = 0.90345068, and if I write this equation out using magic squares in relation to their respective planets, the result is thus: Moon, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Mercury. Note last two digits = Year of the +Earth Monkey. Notice Venus is 'missing'?

Now take the Pyramid of Gezeh. Its total base length is 3024 (units). Do same as above to find Saturn and Jupiter. Then do the same with the pyramids height, 480.05 (units) to find Jupiter, Mercury, and Mars.

Translate these planets to their respective magic squares, Using the following:

3 is Saturn:     3 x 15 = 45   (9)
4 is Jupiter:    4 x 34 = 136  (16)
5 is Mars:       5 x 65 = 325  (25)
6 is Sun:       6 x 111 = 666  (36)
7 is Venus:     7 x 175 = 1225 (49)
8 is Mercury:   8 x 260 = 2080 (64)
9 is Moon:      9 x 369 = 3321 (81)

So I take a single side of the pyramid of Gezeh, and at first I see a length of 756 feet, and say wow, that's Venus (1225), Mars (325), and the Sun (666), in the measurements order. 1225 + 325 + 666 = 2216. So I then check the height of pyramid, 480 give or take half a foot, say Jupiter (136) + Mercury (2080) and find again, 2216. Does Revelation 22:16 Ring a bell? Notice we can only 'use' the magic square of the Sun out of 2216, 6, it's number being either 111 or 666? The numbers in brackets in the chart above, are exactly how many numbers create this magic square, 36 representing a circle of 360, but of course, in hebrew we drop the zero, leaving 36, being Saturn and the Sun, Revealing Horus, shining on Saturn, the 'Bull in Amentet', or the 'Bull of Bakha' and how Thoth is also Chronos, because Ra is the sun-LIGHT on the moon, its reflection on Saturn IS Chronos, not the planet, so Isis could not kill Ra ever, or she would be in the dark...

Take the number 0.90345068 above, relate planets to the smaller digits being 369 + 260 + 111 + 65 + 34 + 15 = 854 = Mercury, Mars, Jupiter.

Using same number above: 45 + 136 + 325 + 666 + 2080 + 3321 = 6573 = Sun, Mars, Mercury, Saturn.

Notice anything missing in the last paragraph? Venus. Lacking a goddess's voice?

In Revelation, the son of God promises to give the morning star to him that overcomes.

“As I also have received of my father; I will give him the morning star”. (Rev. II. 28).

The morning star was equally identified with Horus:

“I know the powers of the east: Horus of the mount of glory, the calf in presence of the god, and the star of dawn”.

The powers represented are Atum-Ra, the father, with Horus (or Jesus) the son, as a calf, the later lamb. This is Horus of the morning star. The powers are Atum, the father, Horus (as Sebek), the son, and Hathor as the bride. The morning star was given by Horus to his followers who were reborn in Sothis, which of course is Sirius, located in the constelation Canis Major, the dog star, proving the Sphinx should be a dog, with the pointed nose of the baboon monkey. Was it Heroditus, who once described the Sphinx as having the teeth of a 'sabre tooth tiger'?

Another similar txt:

The rebirth of Pepi was in or as the morning star: “his guide the morning star leads him to paradise, where he seats himself upon his throne”.  (Arthurs Seat?) <- now proven.

When Pepi goes forth into heaven he is led by Septet, the female Sothis, and his guide is the morning star. She is the bride whom he calls his sister. He seats himself upon his throne of Ba-(soul)-Metal.

A new 'Layer' of 'Revelation' I have discovered, prove translators either deliberatly hid what you are about to read, or got it 100% WRONG!

In the egyptian txts, at some point in the past, according to translators, a great 'Calamity' took place, regarding Isis.

I propose it is happening as I write this.

There is a heiroglyph that show's what 'appears' to be two 'lightbulbs' and in between them is a Djed pillar with two eyes, being 'raised' and is seen in the same 'angle' as many depictions of Jesus carrying the 'Cross of Galgotha'. Some argue this is some 'serpent' power, used by the egyptians, and they even try to prove it in many 'alien' programs on tv. I've never been in a lodge, so cant really say, but this could also represent the 'Candidate' being 'Raised' during initiation. Translators state at the point before the 'raising' of the Djed, that the god Set says: "Let's set up the Senti". Hold this thought.

I propose the 'Senti' being whomever those 'eyes' belong to, contained 'IN' the Dj'd (note my change of Djed to Dj'd) pillar being 'raised' is alive today. Writing this. No?

My theory consists of several 'points' I must show, and they cant all be shown in a single paragraph, so I'll start with the easiest: Ra's symbol is a cat.

Lets do my birth sign first to make things 'Super' easy:

To be born on my birthdate in 'Solar' astrology is to be 'Aquarius', who's opposite is 'Leo' = A solar CAT.

To be born on my birthdate in 'Lunar' astrology is to be a 'Monkey', who's opposite is 'Tiger' = A lunar CAT.

Already we have 2 cats, one solar, one lunar. My next appearace will be as a CAT fish.

My time of birth is 17.32 according to my birth certificate. In Lunar Astrology, this is the hour of Ba-Metal, 'Ba' = 'Soul'.

The Lunar year 1968/69 is a + Earth year.

Nuff said re: my birthdate.

So what about tananet?

A breif rundown. Seems there is a god who creates the world, and does so in some ritual involving masturbation, and this is the scource of 'Tananet' as it went from 'Tent-het-nub' to whatever other alternatives that went from Tent-Het-nub, a pharoah, to Tannt to Tannanet, and then it hit me, I found it in, wait for it, Donald Mackenzies book, legends of the Gods, so I'll quote what I found directly:

'An interesting contrast is afforded by the two great rival religions of this period of transition. While the theology of Heliopolis was based upon sun worship, that of Memphis was based upon earth worship.

Ptah, the creation elf (I was less than 4 feet when I left school, a midget) of the latter city, had been united with Tanen or Tatûnen, (Note Edinburgh Tattoo(N?), the earth giant, who resembles Seb. The dwarfish deity then assumed gigantic proportions, and became a "world god" or Great Father. A hymn addressed to Ptah Tanen declares that his head is in the heavens while his feet are on the earth or in the Duat, the underworld. "The wind", declared the priestly poet, "issues from your nostrils (my broken nose makes breathing difficult and loud) and the waters from your mouth (new falsers and forced injections cause 'dribbling'). Upon your back grows the grain. The sun and the moon are your eyes. When you do sleep it is dark, and when you do open your eyes it is bright again.

Ptah Tanen was lauded as "a perfect god" who came forth "perfect in all his parts" (I was born with a full set of teeth). At the beginning he was all alone. He built up his body and shaped his limbs ere the sky was fashioned and the world was set in order, and ere the waters issued (from firth of) forth. Unlike Ra, he did not rise from the primordial deep. "You did discover yourself", sang the Memphite poet, "in the circumstance of one who made for himself a (Arthurs?) seat and shaped the Two Lands". The suggestion is that, therefore, of a mountain giant with his 'seat' or 'chair' upon some lofty peak, an idea which only a hill folk could have imported. "No father begot you and no mother gave you birth," the poet declared; "You did fashion yourself without the aid of any other being.'

Then I find in G.R.S.Meads 'Mysteries of Amenta':

It is the chapter by which one assumes the form of Ptah, the great architect of the universe. The speaker says, “He is four times the arm’s length of Ra, four times the width of the world” ( Rit., ch. 82, Renouf), which is a mode of describing the four quarters or four sides of the earth, as represented by the Egyptians. There were seven primary powers in the mythical and astronomical phases, six of whom are represented by zootypes, and the seventh is imaged in the likeness of a man.

Now the pyramid is 4 x 756 feet at base, but 4 times the width of Ra? = 12.756!

Now you know ptah tatunen is the great architect... of edinburgh... wiccans call him John Barleycorn. Wiccan witchcraft IS freemasonry, who cant say jesus, so use john, or ptah!!!

To badecker: read the pistis sophia by grs mead. I read the real deal, its held under lock n key, white glove material in the national library... while reading, search that txt for elizabeth, in particular, to 'whom' she sent her light to, and why!

[BADecker]

The Bible tells us right in Genesis about Satan playing the role of a serpent to entice Adam and Eve to eat the fruit. Why would he want them to do this, and why had God commanded that they not eat the fruit?

When they ate the fruit, they changed physically somehow. They knew it, and so did God when He walked in the Garden in the cool of the day.

Then in Genesis 6, the angels (some of them) came down and married women. So, here is what happened.

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was a tree that Satan worked on genetically. Satan's genetics changed Adam and Eve when they ate the fruit. Before that time, the reproduction system of A&E was different than ours. But after the change, their reproduction system was compatible with that of the angels who came down and married women.

Read Genesis, the first few chapters, and see that you don't have to read all that creepy science fiction nonsense that you are always talking about, to understand what was going on in the early times of the world. BTW, the world as we know it is only about 7,500 years old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE

[Fatema Begum]

Why not? Without god never possible to run the earth and god is allah and first messenger / prophet is Adam and last and greatest messenger / prophet is Muhammad it’s real and 100% right proof.

[franky1]

The Bible tells us right in Genesis about Satan playing the role of a serpent to entice Adam and Eve to eat the fruit. Why would he want them to do this, and why had God commanded that they not eat the fruit?

When they ate the fruit, they changed physically somehow. They knew it, and so did God when He walked in the Garden in the cool of the day.

its symbolic, to teach the less educated
the adams apple in throat(related to the thyroid) is what makes the difference between a neanderthal/cretin vs a civilised man

the greeks knew this in the BC days. it however got turned into a campfire story of serpents and fruits. to generate a new religion amungst the people that couldnt read and write.. yep preachers used to do those things back then.
writing the bible came later

its like trying to teach a toddler about how babies are made..
they get told that "daddy put a baby in mommys tummy" the kid then tels everyone that "daddy fed mommy and she ate a baby"
see how easily things get twisted into a fiction story,

[BADecker]

The Bible tells us right in Genesis about Satan playing the role of a serpent to entice Adam and Eve to eat the fruit. Why would he want them to do this, and why had God commanded that they not eat the fruit?

When they ate the fruit, they changed physically somehow. They knew it, and so did God when He walked in the Garden in the cool of the day.

its symbolic, to teach the less educated
the adams apple in throat(related to the thyroid) is what makes the difference between a neanderthal/cretin vs a civilised man

the greeks knew this in the BC days. it however got turned into a campfire story of serpents and fruits. to generate a new religion amungst the people that couldnt read and write.. yep preachers used to do those things back then.
writing the bible came later

its like trying to teach a toddler about how babies are made..
they get told that "daddy put a baby in mommys tummy" the kid then tels everyone that "daddy fed mommy and she ate a baby"
see how easily things get twisted into a fiction story,

You are missing the important thing. As usual, you focus on the trivial.

When did Moses, the writer (transcriber of the firs two chapters) of Genesis live? History people suggest the 14th to the 13th century BC. How many years ago is that? Somewhere in the range of almost 3,500 years ago.

Why is this important? Because, after all that time, there are possibly over 2 billion people, currently, who believe that Moses existed... including Muslims. That, alone is a miracle... after 3,500 years.

Forget Aristotle, and Plato, and Socrates, and the rest of the ancient hero's of science. They don't hold a candle to Moses... not in historical significance, or in truth of writing, or in the power of God that lives with him right now in the Kingdom of Heaven, where he still lives in power.

[franky1]

it was actually suggested the character of moses was the story of exodus wrote by the writer who put himmself into his own story to give himself some provenance..
you know.. write a story of fiction, make yourself the hero, tell people of the book and get people to sell, recite it around the villages and make yourself famous.

then with the fame then start the religion based on your rules you also created but saying the rules came from magic mystery giant in the clouds so no one can question it

my opinion. a science fiction writer started a campfire on the top of the hill by burning a bush to stay warm, found some magic mushrooms. started talking to himself while thinking the fire was his conscience speaking to him. and he envisioned his own path of gathering a flock of loyal people to follow him, one mushroom lead to another and by the time he sobered up and came down the hill. he had a action plan and rule book to start a religion

..
science can carbon date things and show how old neanderthals and humans have been around and cave paintings have proven the limitations of the written word where most communication was of campfire stories not books for the adam and eve renditions

books came later with many revisions and many translations , scriptures before it pieced together where multiple different stories are made into one
like the story of character moses found as a baby is likened to/plagiarised from the origin story of king Sargon of Akkad legend

[BADecker]

it was actually suggested the character of moses was the story of exodus wrote by the writer who put himmself into his own story to give himself some provenance..
you know.. write a story of fiction, make yourself the hero, tell people of the book and get people to sell, recite it around the villages and make yourself famous.

then with the fame then start the religion based on your rules you also created but saying the rules came from magic mystery giant in the clouds so no one can question it

my opinion. a science fiction writer started a campfire on the top of the hill by burning a bush to stay warm, found some magic mushrooms. started talking to himself while thinking the fire was his conscience speaking to him. and he envisioned his own path of gathering a flock of loyal people to follow him, one mushroom lead to another and by the time he sobered up and came down the hill. he had a action plan and rule book to start a religion

..
science can carbon date things and show how old neanderthals and humans have been around and cave paintings have proven the limitations of the written word where most communication was of campfire stories not books for the adam and eve renditions

books came later with many revisions and many translations , scriptures before it pieced together where multiple different stories are made into one
like the story of character moses found as a baby is likened to/plagiarised from the origin story of king Sargon of Akkad legend

Carbon dating is flawed and can't be trusted.

The Dead Sea Scrolls show that the Bible is reasonably accurate for the last more than 2000 years.

And the big one, again. There is more to the Bible and Moses writings than some simple book that was simply copied. More than 2 billion people believe it. Most of the other people haven't been introduced to the Bible, or they would believe it, too.

Seems that it's the stupid people who look at evolution theory, but can't seem to see that it is flawed. I guess they simply need a different religion than the Bible.

Good thing that we have engineers who can correct what the scientists mess up.

[Churchillvv]

Religion has confused most people, in the case of God existence even the philosophers that brought about science where believers of God existence but what there where only against was the theocratic leadership which also alined with BaDecker statement that the scientist are only there to make a living out of testing and testing theories to prove somethings.

This philosophers wanted the leadership from the priest who where there greatest leaders back then but along the line the concept was twisted to prove the believe of the religionist wrong. although it succeeded and that lead to the science of now.

[Pachacouti]

For Badecker, A New Year gift, actual scientific proof of god:

https://web.archive.org/web/20260107094621/https://rekr8.ddns.net

Its my personal scrapbook website. scroll down until you see what looks like a glowing man, click on it.

No more proof needed. I found it.

Happy New Year.

[BADecker]

For Badecker, A New Year gift, actual scientific proof of god:

https://web.archive.org/web/20260107094621/https://rekr8.ddns.net

Its my personal scrapbook website. scroll down until you see what looks like a glowing man, click on it.

No more proof needed. I found it.

Happy New Year.

You don't really have to go to places like your link.

Consider the way human bodies work. Look up medical research. Human bodies are extremely complex. And nobody has really 'dissected' a human soul.

The point is that the body is machinery that can't be duplicated. And the soul is 'mirror image' of God, Himself, even though it is corrupted. None of it can be made without God. Even if the chemicals are all set in proper place (which is beyond man's doing), nothing but God can activate it with life.

The only way to analyze the complete operation of the body, and any of the soul, is to do it through God. Even then, it is all so extremely complex that it is beyond understanding by the mind of man.

[Sambitcoin01]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

That's true but you know the bible it's just a story written buy someone which has been passed down from generation and it's now practiced as a culture. who really knows it's all this fantasies true?

[BADecker]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

That's true but you know the bible it's just a story written buy someone which has been passed down from generation and it's now practiced as a culture. who really knows it's all this fantasies true?

The Bible is the factual ancient history of the nation of Ancient Israel. It's the only real history that we have in detail. It is also the way to be saved, to live forever after the Resurrection.

[LOVER BOY 422]

This is another one, very good example, from the same site:
#35 Natural Selection
The concept of “Natural Selection”, sometimes used synonymous with “Survival of the Fittest”, is often touted as the magic process that when added to mutation will result in advancing steps of higher and higher species and the success of evolution.[1] But I encourage you to read up on what Natural Selection is all about and see that it will NOT lead to evolution. Check out the examples that are given, and see for yourself what a fanciful argument this is for evolution of molecules to man. Actually you can't even start with molecules because Natural Selection ONLY works on a species once it can reproduce.

What they actually mean by "natural selection" is what we believers in God totally accept and we call it adaption to the environment. It’s a wonderful God-given quality in Nature that creatures have that allows them to better survive. But it is never a process that will give you a new species.

Full story you can read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2013/05/35-natural-selection.html

All this are just site ,it's just human attributes don't just believe all of this don't listen to criticism on your part to God good believe many even says God doesn't exist,so if you see this kind of article anywhere just read and pass except you want to quen in their believe,bringing it here you are now telling us that many scientists doesn't believe in Adam and eve where the origin of man imanate  so what ease do you want us to know too ,in many countries, people believe in many diets so I'm not surprised about this now

[Web3monk]

Interesting old thread revival — the 2014 "101 Proofs for God" blog post on Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam is a classic one that pops up in these discussions. It claims genetic science shows all humans descend from one woman (99k–200k years ago) and one man (120k–338k years ago), both in Africa, and argues this supports the biblical Adam and Eve while challenging evolution (no major changes in 200k years, hard for traits to spread from apes, etc.).From a calm, evidence-based masculine perspective (sovereign thinking: look at the data directly, no emotional bias), here's the real picture:Mitochondrial Eve (mt-Eve) is the most recent woman from whom all living humans inherit their mitochondrial DNA (passed only from mother to child). Y-Chromosomal Adam (Y-Adam) is the most recent man from whom all living men inherit their Y chromosome (passed father to son).Key facts from mainstream genetics (e.g., studies in Nature, Science, Wikipedia summaries, BioLogos explanations):mt-Eve lived ~99,000–180,000 years ago in Africa.
Y-Adam lived ~120,000–200,000+ years ago (estimates vary; some overlap, some don't by tens of thousands of years).
They were not a literal couple — they didn't live at the same time, weren't the only humans alive, and weren't the sole progenitors of humanity.
Every person was part of a larger population (thousands, not a bottleneck to two people). Regular nuclear DNA shows massive genetic diversity, proving no single-pair origin — mtDNA and Y-DNA are just two tiny, non-recombining lineages that "coalesced" to single ancestors due to random lineage extinction over time (like how your family tree has many ancestors, but only one direct maternal line traces to mt-Eve).
They were ordinary members of a genetically diverse group of early Homo sapiens. The names "Adam" and "Eve" are just catchy metaphors — not literal biblical figures.

This doesn't prove (or disprove) God — it's neutral on theology. It fits evolutionary models of human origins from Africa ~200k–300k years ago, with no evidence for a sudden creation of two people or a global bottleneck to a pair ~6k years ago (as young-earth views require). Claims that it "gets closer" to biblical Adam/Eve often come from creationist sources misinterpreting the data (e.g., ignoring the larger population, timeline mismatches, or assuming the coalescence = first humans).Bottom line: Science shows deep human ancestry with common genetic points, but not a literal first couple. Faith in God (or divine design) can stand independently — many believers accept evolution as the mechanism while seeing God as the ultimate cause. Others hold to young-earth creationism. The data itself doesn't force either conclusion; it's about interpretation.For men in crypto/tech grinding high-stress life: this kind of inquiry sharpens sovereignty — question narratives, dig into sources, stay calm under uncertainty (like volatility). Reclaim that grounded frame: lead with facts, protect your mind from hype.If you're exploring deeper mindset tools for staying decisive and stable amid big questions (life, markets, faith), private Telegram circle has practical polarity guidance — no fluff:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
Curious for forum takes — experiences with genetics/faith intersection? Or counterpoints? Keep it civil/real.Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)

[BADecker]

^^^ Seems that you are ignoring one of the greatest proofs for God. And, that's okay, because none of us are real thinkers.

The proof that you are ignoring is the great complexity of nature combined with the fact of the 'cycles'. Medical research has shown how complex life and nature are. They are so complex that researchers are still barely getting an idea of how it all works together. They need AI just to think it through for them, because nobody can hold it all in his mind.

Regarding cycles, nature stays within certain bounds. Even medical mRNA systems only serve to destroy nature... even if the destruction is limited. There aren't any systems that make something new. They all, at best, bring back something that was there all along, but hidden.

None of this happens by accident. Stuff doesn't randomly flow into complexity. Just the opposite. Things break down. The evidence of this is overwhelming.

Accordingly, the only thing that could exist to make nature and life is something like God. And it would have to be a really great God to make this kind of complexity happen. Nature doesn't show this complexity being created in any other way. So, where could it all have come from if not God? Even if it was not God, it is all so complex that whatever caused it all, is essentially God. We can't just guess this complexity into existence.

[Web3monk]

Appreciate you bringing up the argument from complexity and cycles — it's one of the most intuitive appeals for design, and it's been a staple in these discussions for decades. You're right that nature shows staggering intricacy: molecular machines, feedback loops, seasonal cycles, predator-prey balances, even the way ecosystems self-regulate within bounds. Medical research (genomics, proteomics) keeps revealing layers of complexity that humble even top scientists — we need AI to model it because no single mind can hold it all.The core claim here is the teleological argument (design from apparent purpose/order): things don't randomly assemble into high-functioning complexity; they tend toward disorder (entropy/second law of thermodynamics), so an intelligent cause (a "great God") must be behind it. Stuff breaks down without input; order doesn't emerge by accident.From a sovereign, evidence-respecting perspective (dig into data without emotional bias), here's the balanced view:Complexity is real and awe-inspiring — No serious scientist denies the mind-blowing intricacy of life (e.g., bacterial flagellum as a rotary motor, DNA as coded information, circadian rhythms as precise cycles). Michael Behe's "irreducible complexity" (systems where removing any part kills function) highlights this powerfully. It feels like engineering, not chance.
But evolution provides a mechanism for building complexity gradually — Natural selection + mutation + deep time act as a "blind watchmaker" (Dawkins). Systems evolve via exaptation (parts repurposed from other functions), scaffolding (temporary supports later removed), and co-option (e.g., bacterial flagellum shares parts with simpler type-III secretion systems, which inject toxins — functional intermediates exist). Blood-clotting cascades have simpler versions in jawless fish or whales missing key factors, showing reducibility. Peer-reviewed work (e.g., Thornton et al. on hormone receptors) reconstructs stepwise pathways with selectable steps. Irreducible complexity has been critiqued as an "argument from incredulity" — we couldn't imagine how it happened, but evidence shows it did.
Cycles and entropy — The second law says entropy increases in closed systems, but Earth is open (sun pumps energy). Local order increases (crystals form, life grows) while total entropy rises. Evolution doesn't violate it; it uses energy gradients to drive self-organization. mRNA tech (e.g., vaccines) mimics natural processes (modified bases inspired by biology) — it doesn't "destroy nature"; it leverages it for immunity. Claims of mRNA wrecking cycles are debunked by large-scale safety data (no evidence of long-term disruption; billions of doses, monitored globally).
Does this disprove God? No — many scientists (e.g., Francis Collins, BioLogos folks) see evolution as God's elegant mechanism. Complexity can point to divine design without negating natural processes. Others hold to direct intervention. The data doesn't force atheism or theism; it's about interpretation. Faith in a Creator can coexist with science — the question is whether complexity requires an intelligent cause beyond natural laws.

This ties into masculine guidance: real sovereignty means facing hard evidence head-on, staying calm/decisive under uncertainty (like market volatility), and leading your life with grounded truth-seeking. Don't chase narratives — test them.For men in crypto/tech grinding big questions (life, markets, meaning) while building unbreakable frame: practical polarity tools (mindset audio, discipline under stress, community) in the private Telegram circle — no fluff:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
Curious for more takes — personal experiences with complexity/faith? Counter-data? Keep it civil and real.Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)

[BADecker]

^^^ Evolution Theory Evolution is a fun idea. It's science fiction. I don't have time for science fiction right now. But I enjoy a lot of it. Some of it is good mental stimulation.

So, thank you for being honest and validating God.

[Web3monk]

Haha, fair enough — calling evolution "science fiction" is a strong take, and I respect keeping it real about what resonates with you. No need to debate timelines or mechanisms if that's not where your head's at right now.What stands out is that we both land in the same place on the big question: the staggering complexity, order, and cycles of nature scream intentional design to most people who look closely. Whether someone calls the cause "God," a "great intelligence," or something beyond our grasp, the intuition is the same — this didn't just happen by blind accident. Stuff that intricate, that self-regulating, that beautiful in its balance… it points upward.
You nailed it: validating the need for a Creator (or something equivalent) is the honest conclusion when you stare at the evidence without filters.
Evolution can be a proposed how, but it doesn't erase the why or the who behind the engineering. Many sharp minds (scientists included) hold both: natural processes as the tool, divine mind as the architect.Appreciate the civil vibe and the humor — keeps the thread grounded.
For brothers in the crypto grind wrestling these same big questions while staying sovereign under pressure: reclaiming calm, decisive masculine frame (facing uncertainty without flinching, leading your life with clarity) is the real edge.
Practical tools for that (mindset audio, discipline routines, no-BS community) live here:
https://im.page/hisobedience101
More thoughts welcome — what other "proofs" or intuitions hit hardest for you? Or favorite sci-fi that actually makes you think deeper about reality? Keep it real.Stay sovereign.
Morgan Rich
@hisobedience101
 (TikTok, Facebook, Instagram)

[georgino22222]

In my view, asking for “scientific proof” of God misses what faith actually is. Faith is not about material evidence or lab experiments, but about an inner conviction and relationship that you feel within yourself, something personal that cannot be reduced to formulas or measurements.

[BADecker]

In my view, asking for “scientific proof” of God misses what faith actually is. Faith is not about material evidence or lab experiments, but about an inner conviction and relationship that you feel within yourself, something personal that cannot be reduced to formulas or measurements.

This is true. Yet there is a difference between faith and blind faith. God doesn't want blind faith, with nothing to back it up at all. Jesus proved it in many of the miracles He did. Take a look at the feeding of the 5,000 and the 4,000. Jesus started with a small amount of bread and fish both times. He didn't start with nothing, and make something out of it. Essentially all of His miracles worked like this.

What was Jesus showing when He did it this way? Basically two things:
1. That when God created the universe, He saw that it was good. It wasn't lacking anything. God essentially created the bread and fish right into the universe when He made it.
2. The working of miracles goes beyond Jesus. Why? Because God created, in the Beginning, all the miracles that we do... just like Jesus. Think on that.