[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[antantti]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

[Epsylon3]

mine is not mining... :p

[antantti]

Sorry, no gas talk here, I forgot 

[scryptr]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

[antantti]

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

Thanks scryptr, that's what I wanted to hear.

I would like to send you a beer or two, the thing is that I don't want to donate something that is loosing it's value.  

edit: scryptr, you really need to update your sig. If I send you two cold beers you will only receive one that is really warm. Also whatevernodes not supported.

[Amph]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

how much you can do with eth+pascal as hashrate?

[bensam1231]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

With the memory bus on AMD cards, that's not really all that true. The performance ratios on 480s are pretty ridiculous when you match them with Ethereum. Nvidia got it's niche from being obscure, it's no longer obscure and it no longer has a niche because of it.

You can earn $3.27 mining Eth+Dcr on a 480 or $3.36 per day mining Zcash on a 1070 or $3.54 mining Eth+Dcr. Nvidia is trash right now. Too many people bought in on their cards because they had higher profits on certain things, but those were all niche coins and there really isn't a mega coin that is computationally hardy enough to make Nvidia hardware stretch it's legs. Dual mining depends too heavily on memory bus to make it work and Nvidia doesn't have that.

Furthermore the computationally hardy algos eventually end up with FPGAs on them, which trash the profits... Like SIA for instance. DCR as well, although not nearly as bad. Cryptonote is too hardy and resulted in CPUs still being competitive and botnets took over.

Comparatively speaking. Lyra2v2 is the 'best' coin Nvidia is good at compared to AMD and there is only a handful of really small coins on it. The deck is stacked against Nvidia and too many people flapped their gums in forum threads preaching about the holy efficiency of Nvidia, collectively destroying what we had.

[makaveli0129]

Attempted to compile and get the below...

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -fopenmp  -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML   -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/ccminer-xmr-rpc.Tpo -c -o crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o `test -f 'crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp' || echo './'`crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp: In function ‘void GetScratchpad()’:
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp:907: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o] Error 1

Trying TSIV's version of ccminer (ccminer-cryptonight-0.17) with the cryptonight i get the below when trying to compile.....seems i just have no luck with this..... it would be fabulous if i could find an RPM or something for nivida and cuda that would mine monero...... Not sure where to go from here...


gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64  -o ccminer ccminer-cpu-miner.o ccminer-util.o ccminer-sha2.o cryptonight/cryptonight.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o ccminer-cryptonight.o crypto/ccminer-oaes_lib.o crypto/ccminer-c_keccak.o crypto/ccminer-c_groestl.o crypto/ccminer-c_blake256.o crypto/ccminer-c_jh.o crypto/ccminer-c_skein.o crypto/ccminer-aesb.o -lcurl   compat/jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread  -lcudart -fopenmp -lcrypto -lssl  -lcrypto -lssl
cryptonight/cryptonight.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'

USE TPRUVOT V-2.0RC OR KLAUST'S CCMINER--

TPruvot finally rolled KlausT's CryptoNight work into his latest release, along with a few other algorithms.       --scryptr

the speed is slower though...

[makaveli0129]

Ok so i edited the line and removed the MADV_HUGEPAGE and that let it compile but now i get the below...

*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-24 22:39:21] POOL 0: nyc-1.xmrpool.net USER 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -s 10
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Starting on stratum+tcp://nyc-1.xmrpool.net
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] restart_threads
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] 1 miner thread started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
* About to connect() to nyc-1.xmrpool.net port 80 (#0)
*   Trying 104.140.201.42... * TCP_NODELAY set
* connected
* Connected to nyc-1.xmrpool.net (104.140.201.42) port 80 (#0)
* Connection #0 to host nyc-1.xmrpool.net left intact
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] > {"method":"login","params":{"login":"42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH","pass":"foo@email.com","agent":"ccminer/2.0"},"id":2}
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] < {"id":2,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40","job":{"blob":"0405deafd7c60591e00ccd0e8f47d6f7c7df1a13f8a22dd174bc667a118b121d08d59d6f9b04a70 0000000d778f88d3c3812e30e234f0edf4c432b0fbf661f82dfd1b67c5701b82b32ef8306","job_id":"r8LHkcJIeKUBqGGmhy8br0DHF6qq","target":"be5c0900","id":"2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40"},"status":"OK"}}
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Auth id: 2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Stratum difficulty set to 7000 (7)
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Stratum detected new block
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] restart_threads
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] sleeptime: 100 ms
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] job r8LHkcJIeKUBqGGmhy8br0DHF6qq target change: 95cbeffffffff (7.0)
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] GPU #0: start=9c000000 end=9c000fff range=00000fff
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: MSI GT 730, 818 MB available, 2 SMX
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: 64 threads (6) with 8 blocks
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: invalid device function cryptonight_extra_cpu_prepare line 217

Attempted to compile and get the below...

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -fopenmp  -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML   -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/ccminer-xmr-rpc.Tpo -c -o crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o `test -f 'crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp' || echo './'`crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp: In function ‘void GetScratchpad()’:
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp:907: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o] Error 1

Trying TSIV's version of ccminer (ccminer-cryptonight-0.17) with the cryptonight i get the below when trying to compile.....seems i just have no luck with this..... it would be fabulous if i could find an RPM or something for nivida and cuda that would mine monero...... Not sure where to go from here...


gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64  -o ccminer ccminer-cpu-miner.o ccminer-util.o ccminer-sha2.o cryptonight/cryptonight.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o ccminer-cryptonight.o crypto/ccminer-oaes_lib.o crypto/ccminer-c_keccak.o crypto/ccminer-c_groestl.o crypto/ccminer-c_blake256.o crypto/ccminer-c_jh.o crypto/ccminer-c_skein.o crypto/ccminer-aesb.o -lcurl   compat/jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread  -lcudart -fopenmp -lcrypto -lssl  -lcrypto -lssl
cryptonight/cryptonight.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'

USE TPRUVOT V-2.0RC OR KLAUST'S CCMINER--

TPruvot finally rolled KlausT's CryptoNight work into his latest release, along with a few other algorithms.       --scryptr

the speed is slower though...

[makaveli0129]

UPDATE:

Finally able to get it to work commented out the sm_50 in the make file and uncommented the sm_35 compiled and worked great. Finally mining. Thank you for all your help!!

Ok so i edited the line and removed the MADV_HUGEPAGE and that let it compile but now i get the below...

*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-24 22:39:21] POOL 0: nyc-1.xmrpool.net USER 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -s 10
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Starting on stratum+tcp://nyc-1.xmrpool.net
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] restart_threads
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] 1 miner thread started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
* About to connect() to nyc-1.xmrpool.net port 80 (#0)
*   Trying 104.140.201.42... * TCP_NODELAY set
* connected
* Connected to nyc-1.xmrpool.net (104.140.201.42) port 80 (#0)
* Connection #0 to host nyc-1.xmrpool.net left intact
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] > {"method":"login","params":{"login":"42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH","pass":"foo@email.com","agent":"ccminer/2.0"},"id":2}
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] < {"id":2,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40","job":{"blob":"0405deafd7c60591e00ccd0e8f47d6f7c7df1a13f8a22dd174bc667a118b121d08d59d6f9b04a70 0000000d778f88d3c3812e30e234f0edf4c432b0fbf661f82dfd1b67c5701b82b32ef8306","job_id":"r8LHkcJIeKUBqGGmhy8br0DHF6qq","target":"be5c0900","id":"2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40"},"status":"OK"}}
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Auth id: 2b77763a-7394-40f6-8368-090b83dc4d40
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Stratum difficulty set to 7000 (7)
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] Stratum detected new block
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] restart_threads
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] sleeptime: 100 ms
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] job r8LHkcJIeKUBqGGmhy8br0DHF6qq target change: 95cbeffffffff (7.0)
[2017-03-24 22:39:21] GPU #0: start=9c000000 end=9c000fff range=00000fff
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: MSI GT 730, 818 MB available, 2 SMX
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: 64 threads (6) with 8 blocks
[2017-03-24 22:39:22] GPU #0: invalid device function cryptonight_extra_cpu_prepare line 217

Attempted to compile and get the below...

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -fopenmp  -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I/usr/local/cuda/include -DUSE_WRAPNVML   -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -MT crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/ccminer-xmr-rpc.Tpo -c -o crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o `test -f 'crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp' || echo './'`crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp: In function ‘void GetScratchpad()’:
crypto/xmr-rpc.cpp:907: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o] Error 1

Trying TSIV's version of ccminer (ccminer-cryptonight-0.17) with the cryptonight i get the below when trying to compile.....seems i just have no luck with this..... it would be fabulous if i could find an RPM or something for nivida and cuda that would mine monero...... Not sure where to go from here...


gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64  -o ccminer ccminer-cpu-miner.o ccminer-util.o ccminer-sha2.o cryptonight/cryptonight.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o ccminer-cryptonight.o crypto/ccminer-oaes_lib.o crypto/ccminer-c_keccak.o crypto/ccminer-c_groestl.o crypto/ccminer-c_blake256.o crypto/ccminer-c_jh.o crypto/ccminer-c_skein.o crypto/ccminer-aesb.o -lcurl   compat/jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread  -lcudart -fopenmp -lcrypto -lssl  -lcrypto -lssl
cryptonight/cryptonight.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_core.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
cryptonight/cuda_cryptonight_extra.o:(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'

USE TPRUVOT V-2.0RC OR KLAUST'S CCMINER--

TPruvot finally rolled KlausT's CryptoNight work into his latest release, along with a few other algorithms.       --scryptr

the speed is slower though...

[joblo]

Finally able to get it to work commented out the sm_50 in the make file and uncommented the sm_35 compiled and worked great. Finally mining. Thank you for all your help!!

Please trim your posts, we don't need to see all your past errors again, and again. Glad you got it working.

[scryptr]

CONGRATULATIONS!--

Yes, the "commented" lines must be adjusted.  Old trick to me... glad that you figured it out.  Good Luck!       --scryptr

[antonio8]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

With the memory bus on AMD cards, that's not really all that true. The performance ratios on 480s are pretty ridiculous when you match them with Ethereum. Nvidia got it's niche from being obscure, it's no longer obscure and it no longer has a niche because of it.

You can earn $3.27 mining Eth+Dcr on a 480 or $3.36 per day mining Zcash on a 1070 or $3.54 mining Eth+Dcr. Nvidia is trash right now. Too many people bought in on their cards because they had higher profits on certain things, but those were all niche coins and there really isn't a mega coin that is computationally hardy enough to make Nvidia hardware stretch it's legs. Dual mining depends too heavily on memory bus to make it work and Nvidia doesn't have that.

Furthermore the computationally hardy algos eventually end up with FPGAs on them, which trash the profits... Like SIA for instance. DCR as well, although not nearly as bad. Cryptonote is too hardy and resulted in CPUs still being competitive and botnets took over.

Comparatively speaking. Lyra2v2 is the 'best' coin Nvidia is good at compared to AMD and there is only a handful of really small coins on it. The deck is stacked against Nvidia and too many people flapped their gums in forum threads preaching about the holy efficiency of Nvidia, collectively destroying what we had.

You sure do complain a lot.

One day you will figure it out.

No dev wants to do their work for free without people donating or donating to anther dev for "improving" on their work. And don't start with the crap about adding a fee. From what I can see all of these Nvidia dev except for one follow the rule of the spirit of using open software and will not violate it.

Keep the crap over in sp's thread. Or better yet since you have so much negative to say sell your Nvidia and move over to AMD. Sure they would love to hear you every day asking for this or that.

[bensam1231]

That another nvidia thread got flooded () so I will ask here:

980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?

Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.

NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--

With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values.  The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.

If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings.  Short answer, and off topic.  Epsylon3 likes a clean thread.       --scryptr

With the memory bus on AMD cards, that's not really all that true. The performance ratios on 480s are pretty ridiculous when you match them with Ethereum. Nvidia got it's niche from being obscure, it's no longer obscure and it no longer has a niche because of it.

You can earn $3.27 mining Eth+Dcr on a 480 or $3.36 per day mining Zcash on a 1070 or $3.54 mining Eth+Dcr. Nvidia is trash right now. Too many people bought in on their cards because they had higher profits on certain things, but those were all niche coins and there really isn't a mega coin that is computationally hardy enough to make Nvidia hardware stretch it's legs. Dual mining depends too heavily on memory bus to make it work and Nvidia doesn't have that.

Furthermore the computationally hardy algos eventually end up with FPGAs on them, which trash the profits... Like SIA for instance. DCR as well, although not nearly as bad. Cryptonote is too hardy and resulted in CPUs still being competitive and botnets took over.

Comparatively speaking. Lyra2v2 is the 'best' coin Nvidia is good at compared to AMD and there is only a handful of really small coins on it. The deck is stacked against Nvidia and too many people flapped their gums in forum threads preaching about the holy efficiency of Nvidia, collectively destroying what we had.

You sure do complain a lot.

One day you will figure it out.

No dev wants to do their work for free without people donating or donating to anther dev for "improving" on their work. And don't start with the crap about adding a fee. From what I can see all of these Nvidia dev except for one follow the rule of the spirit of using open software and will not violate it.

Keep the crap over in sp's thread. Or better yet since you have so much negative to say sell your Nvidia and move over to AMD. Sure they would love to hear you every day asking for this or that.

Yuh and I've donated to SP and Epsylon, I also mine on Epsylons pool.

Weird, you're talking about paying devs, yet 'fees', which pay developers are silly? LOL... I also like how you're telling me to donate as if I don't in addition to not wanting something that will actually impact your mining operation (a fee). Hypocrite much?

You definitely sound like a dumbass. I literally had to read two sentences before finding something that was wrong and any of the above can easily be disproved by looking at some of my posts (or based off what you know about mining). You can have a fee and the work can still be open source, having it built into the source someone has to take out or have a toggle is one example. Epsylons pool is another example of a fee. Instead of paying a fee to some random pool owner, I'm paying them to him.

Just the way it goes bro. I'm not going to bury my head in the sand like you and pretend Nvidia is doing great when it's not. I go back and forth based on what's doing well - Nvidia right now isn't doing well. I'm not going to sugar coat that, hide that, pretend it doesn't exist (which is terrible from a professional perspective), or not talk about it when other people try to play pretend.

And nou go to SPs thread, this isn't the first time I've been in Epsylons thread. This isn't the 'hidden area no one knows about'. I've posted in this thread and been monitoring it for a few years.

[Nikolaj]

Hey tpruvot

there's something wrong on yiimp with the LBC profitability. Very wrong, 1.45$/Day for a 1070.. half the amount of the other pools.

You can clearly see the issue in the 24h estimate on the right (1x) and the actual earning on the left (2x). It should be 2x.

Tested for 48 hours consecutively with  1070s. Have a look

[Epsylon3]

yep its lower, i even restarted the pool to be sure, i see nothing wrong on my side :/

[rednoW]

decred pool has some bad luck (tech problems?) too

[Epsylon3]

DCR stratum is auto restarted each 24h to prevent issues, no.. just very very high diff

[bensam1231]

Hey tpruvot

there's something wrong on yiimp with the LBC profitability. Very wrong, 1.45$/Day for a 1070.. half the amount of the other pools.

You can clearly see the issue in the 24h estimate on the right (1x) and the actual earning on the left (2x). It should be 2x.

Tested for 48 hours consecutively with  1070s. Have a look

Noticed as well... Weird as Lbry has always been around average payouts as it has 10% of the network on it. Not sure what's going on there.

[Epsylon3]

well its the kind of post i dont want here... i dont have any magic staff, timetravel bus tickets etc...