[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[scryptr]

IS TIMETRAVEL10 (BITCORE) A PLANNED ADDITION FOR CPUMINER-OPT? --

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.msg18839947#msg18839947

I TAKE THAT AS A "YES" --

Thank you!       --scryptr

[minerx117]

PALGIN'S WINDOWS BUILD FOR BITCORE SEEMS TO WORK--

He has taken tpruvot's linux CCminer work and compiled for sm_30 and better CUDA GPUs mining on Windows.  His GitHub is "github.com/palginpav".

My GTX 750ti cards hashed at 3+MH/s, and my GTX 960 cards were about twice that speed.  I only experimented a brief while, but I did mine to tpruvot's donation BitCore address: "1LyqZYqDx6FpfotPsTLNmYyTadHtdyD3d8" .  I think I earned ust enough for a payout.
--scryptr

im getting

10.5mhs 1060 3gb @ 90watt
16.8mhs 1070's @120watt

[wacko]

im getting

10.5mhs on a 1060 3gb @ 90watt
16.8mhs on my 1070's @120watt

Is that also what you're seeing in the pool's stats? I stopped mining BTX with nvidia cards because the miner showed me similar to yours hashrates (~11 MH for 1060/3, ~20 MH for 1080), but all the pools I've tried reported ~ 2 times lower hashrates. And I was also paid ~ 2 times less than expected. I didn't have this problem with amd cards, the pools show pretty much the same hashrate that I'm seeing in sgminer. So I kinda assumed that ccminer for BTX is broken and switched my nvidia rigs back to equihash. So how does it work in your case, do the hashrates (miner/pool) match?

[minerx117]

im getting

10.5mhs on a 1060 3gb @ 90watt
16.8mhs on my 1070's @120watt

Is that also what you're seeing in the pool's stats? I stopped mining BTX with nvidia cards because the miner showed me similar to yours hashrates (~11 MH for 1060/3, ~20 MH for 1080), but all the pools I've tried reported ~ 2 times lower hashrates. And I was also paid ~ 2 times less than expected. I didn't have this problem with amd cards, the pools show pretty much the same hashrate that I'm seeing in sgminer. So I kinda assumed that ccminer for BTX is broken and switched my nvidia rigs back to equihash. So how does it work in your case, do the hashrates (miner/pool) match?

had no problems pool is reporting exactly the same as ccminer.. been a great couple days : ) payouts gone through the roof..

[bensam1231]

im getting

10.5mhs on a 1060 3gb @ 90watt
16.8mhs on my 1070's @120watt

Is that also what you're seeing in the pool's stats? I stopped mining BTX with nvidia cards because the miner showed me similar to yours hashrates (~11 MH for 1060/3, ~20 MH for 1080), but all the pools I've tried reported ~ 2 times lower hashrates. And I was also paid ~ 2 times less than expected. I didn't have this problem with amd cards, the pools show pretty much the same hashrate that I'm seeing in sgminer. So I kinda assumed that ccminer for BTX is broken and switched my nvidia rigs back to equihash. So how does it work in your case, do the hashrates (miner/pool) match?

had no problems pool is reporting exactly the same as ccminer.. been a great couple days : ) payouts gone through the roof..

Just as a FYI dude, Epsylon runs his own pool as well... You can find it here http://yiimp.ccminer.org

[pallas]

the ccminer bitcore crash is not a problem with the algos.
as you can see from the sources, all the expected combinations are supported.
that won't be true when/if they increase the number of permutations.
and it won't crash anyways, it would just produce invalid shares.

i think it's a thread race condition when computing the permutations.
to fix it, either use __thread variables (but that will make the same calculations for every thread) or use a mutex.

i think the same problem applies to timetravel (machinecoin) as well, but I did never see it.

[sp_]

Machinecoin is only listed on cryptopia with a micro volume. Why all the fuzz?

Good profit in the NEXUS coin now. The price has rised to more than $0.5 a coin.  (24MUSD marketcap)

I get good profit with sp-mod private #6 (0.05btc).

[rednoW]

Machinecoin is only listed on cryptopia with a micro volume. Why all the fuzz?

Good profit in the NEXUS coin now. The price has rised to more than $0.5 a coin.  (24MUSD marketcap)

I get good profit with sp-mod private #6 (0.05btc).

You are buying from yourself for 0.05btc and getting good profit ))

[Epsylon3]

* Epsylon3 opens a Leffe and take some cacahuètes

[djm34]

Machinecoin is only listed on cryptopia with a micro volume. Why all the fuzz?

Good profit in the NEXUS coin now. The price has rised to more than $0.5 a coin.  (24MUSD marketcap)

I get good profit with sp-mod private #6 (0.05btc).

Infestation in your thread ?
this is for you:

[sp_]

Mining Nexus is very profitable at the current pricelevels..

Why waste your power on Machinecoin??...

[pallas]

Why waste your power on Machinecoin??...

I agree, there is better timetravel around ;-)
But I think you shouldn't post this here.

[elbandi]

the ccminer bitcore crash is not a problem with the algos.
as you can see from the sources, all the expected combinations are supported.
that won't be true when/if they increase the number of permutations.
and it won't crash anyways, it would just produce invalid shares.

i think it's a thread race condition when computing the permutations.
to fix it, either use __thread variables (but that will make the same calculations for every thread) or use a mutex.

i think the same problem applies to timetravel (machinecoin) as well, but I did never see it.

if this were the real issue, then you got only invalid shares (=wrong function order -> wrong hash), and not vga crash.

[pallas]

the ccminer bitcore crash is not a problem with the algos.
as you can see from the sources, all the expected combinations are supported.
that won't be true when/if they increase the number of permutations.
and it won't crash anyways, it would just produce invalid shares.

i think it's a thread race condition when computing the permutations.
to fix it, either use __thread variables (but that will make the same calculations for every thread) or use a mutex.

i think the same problem applies to timetravel (machinecoin) as well, but I did never see it.

if this were the real issue, then you got only invalid shares (=wrong function order -> wrong hash), and not vga crash.

it's not a vga crash: it's random data in the s_sequence and/or hashOrder variables, leading to crash in the cpu code.

[bensam1231]

I don't think anyone is talking about Machinecoin here SP... >>

[joblo]

the ccminer bitcore crash is not a problem with the algos.
as you can see from the sources, all the expected combinations are supported.
that won't be true when/if they increase the number of permutations.
and it won't crash anyways, it would just produce invalid shares.

i think it's a thread race condition when computing the permutations.
to fix it, either use __thread variables (but that will make the same calculations for every thread) or use a mutex.

i think the same problem applies to timetravel (machinecoin) as well, but I did never see it.

if this were the real issue, then you got only invalid shares (=wrong function order -> wrong hash), and not vga crash.

it's not a vga crash: it's random data in the s_sequence and/or hashOrder variables, leading to crash in the cpu code.

If it crashes with only one GPU, ie one CPU thread, it's not a thread race condition.

[infinity7th]

BitCore block 1926 and 1927 only got 0.25 coins.

I have checked payment, another 12.25 coins send to this address 15AQndHnBmgD8ZmiQVwQRw2pbEKci5yoRs (12.25)

Why? Can someone explain this?

[Epsylon3]

its a small bonus coming from other pools not found on yiimp so

[infinity7th]

 

Thx for qucik responding...

[mmo_online_1981]

BitCore block 1926 and 1927 only got 0.25 coins.

I have checked payment, another 12.25 coins send to this address 15AQndHnBmgD8ZmiQVwQRw2pbEKci5yoRs (12.25)

Why? Can someone explain this?

In my opinion, there are many people involved in creating new block, coin divided by the contribution of each person. Do you participate in any group?