KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2435 blocks

[kano]

Yeah with my iPad it does show the user+pass in the top section to login, so the login "should" hopefully be fixed for everyone.

I finally got around to making the menus work on iDevices.
The fix, for anyone curious, was to add onclick='' to the menu parents ... ... ... ... yeah, ok, fine, "that works" I guess is all that matters ...
Also moved the logout button up so it doesn't take 3 lines on the 'mini' header.

its not just idevices. its any touchscreen device.

it is very difficult to get anything but the first item on the drop down on my andriod phone or my windows tablet..

is there a timeout option on it? it seems to just select the first option right away.

You'll find that's probably a 'fat fingers' issue
Yeah it happens for me also, so I have to be more accurate tapping or use a pen.
Though, since I changed it today, I get it happening less often.
Basically it's coz your finger is still on the screen when the menu comes up, and if it's covering a wider area, the browser then also decides that's a tap of the menu box that appears just outside the area of the menu box you tapped.
If you tap higher up, you may find that will stop the other box being tapped also.

[1714685408]

1714685408

[kano]

Payout 369589 sent
4cf185af45ca6fcf18541739323cbbb3c16381fc91270fddea503777dfe20727
and confirmed

Payout 369610 sent
1e2243781c5ad60eb8f910391cdacf91de8e84aac3069c84fb8e5128b1af3d74
and confirmed

[LoneRangir]

Block!

[VirosaGITS]

Anyway to do this or any interest in adding a feature to Shift Graph to allow wild card?

Let say i name all my S3's S3#1, S3#2, etc. .S3* would show a graph for every miner that start with S3.

Not important but could be a cool feature.

[kano]

Anyway to do this or any interest in adding a feature to Shift Graph to allow wild card?

Let say i name all my S3's S3#1, S3#2, etc. .S3* would show a graph for every miner that start with S3.

Not important but could be a cool feature.

OK added to the TODO list
(next to temporary tick boxes allowing you to remove lines from the current display to see overlaps etc)
Though, it will only allow a * on the end to mean match up to the *.
I'm not gonna add pattern matching in there since that leads to people being able to affect the server

[VirosaGITS]

Anyway to do this or any interest in adding a feature to Shift Graph to allow wild card?

Let say i name all my S3's S3#1, S3#2, etc. .S3* would show a graph for every miner that start with S3.

Not important but could be a cool feature.

OK added to the TODO list
(next to temporary tick boxes allowing you to remove lines from the current display to see overlaps etc)
Though, it will only allow a * on the end to mean match up to the *.
I'm not gonna add pattern matching in there since that leads to people being able to affect the server

But if it doesnt let you automatically group up All the S3### together i guess there's no point?

If allowing to group miners together by matching everything that start with "S1" together on the worker graph by using ".S1*" fuck up things then it would probably be easier for me and other users would want to group up their miners like that to just all use the same worker name? ".S1" instead of ".S1#123..."

[kano]

Though, it will only allow a * on the end to mean match up to the *.

means .S3* will match .S3goose .S31PH .S3...

[CapnBDL]

Did something occur about 08:45 EST today with the pool? All my miners did a fail-over & the website went down for me.

[kano]

Did something occur about 08:45 EST today with the pool? All my miners did a fail-over & the website went down for me.

I you mean about 1/2 an hour ago - yep seems to have been a routing issue for a couple of minutes.
Not everyone dropped off, but about 25% did.
It happened for 70 seconds 13 hours ago also.

No information on the cause, and since it wasn't a total disconnect for everyone I can only assume it was a router a few steps up stream from the data centre.
Since it resoved itself pretty quickly there's not much to do to try and track it down.
I also know what to expect the answer from the data centre to be ... just what I said ... since it was so short.
Hopefully no more - but I've not had any such problems for quite a while.

[CapnBDL]

Did something occur about 08:45 EST today with the pool? All my miners did a fail-over & the website went down for me.

I you mean about 1/2 an hour ago - yep seems to have been a routing issue for a couple of minutes.
Not everyone dropped off, but about 25% did.
It happened for 70 seconds 13 hours ago also.

No information on the cause, and since it wasn't a total disconnect for everyone I can only assume it was a router a few steps up stream from the data centre.
Since it resoved itself pretty quickly there's not much to do to try and track it down.
I also know what to expect the answer from the data centre to be ... just what I said ... since it was so short.
Hopefully no more - but I've not had any such problems for quite a while.

OK, thanks. I just happened to have been on-line and saw both of those disconnects occur & wanted to make sure it wasn't on my end. I've had a lot of lightning the past couple of days which kicked me off a few times, sooo...Thanks again....it ain't me!!

[VirosaGITS]

Though, it will only allow a * on the end to mean match up to the *.

means .S3* will match .S3goose .S31PH .S3...

Oh that would be excellent, i guess trying to understand what you meant by vulnerable under sedative in the middle of the night wasn't very productive

Did something occur about 08:45 EST today with the pool? All my miners did a fail-over & the website went down for me.

I you mean about 1/2 an hour ago - yep seems to have been a routing issue for a couple of minutes.
Not everyone dropped off, but about 25% did.
It happened for 70 seconds 13 hours ago also.

No information on the cause, and since it wasn't a total disconnect for everyone I can only assume it was a router a few steps up stream from the data centre.
Since it resoved itself pretty quickly there's not much to do to try and track it down.
I also know what to expect the answer from the data centre to be ... just what I said ... since it was so short.
Hopefully no more - but I've not had any such problems for quite a while.

And thats pretty weird that match the time 4 of my miners went unresponsive for no reason and had some connectivity issues till i power cycled them. My S1 are fidgety on a good day so.

[kano]

Payout 369908 sent
9201d9acdbde986622c8b549b7ed618021c489ad4363f782c8520dfe81d78ae2
and confirmed

[thedreamer]

SO what's going on with this Bitcoin Fork thing? Anything we should be worried about with the pool or the wallets?

ps. Thanks for the payment(s).

[727miner]

SO what's going on with this Bitcoin Fork thing? Anything we should be worried about with the pool or the wallets?

ps. Thanks for the payment(s).

Checkout https://bitcoinxt.software/

[thedreamer]

SO what's going on with this Bitcoin Fork thing? Anything we should be worried about with the pool or the wallets?

ps. Thanks for the payment(s).

Checkout https://bitcoinxt.software/

Sooo are you going to support this with this pool?

[kano]

SO what's going on with this Bitcoin Fork thing? Anything we should be worried about with the pool or the wallets?

ps. Thanks for the payment(s).

Checkout https://bitcoinxt.software/

Sooo are you going to support this with this pool?

The only reason I'd take any notice of XT is for block size.

Seeing as our pool is probably the fastest at handling block changes without shitting on bitcoin with empty blocks, and a lot faster than some pools who do shit on bitcoin with empty blocks, I don't see an issue with increasing the block size somewhat.

However, there are changes that may or may not happen with bitcoin regarding block size - yes I don't refer to XT as bitcoin, it's a fork.

So I'm certainly not going to switch to another coin (XT) unless it's necessary - and even then would only be at the latest possible time - so for now I have no reason to make a decision about it.

I'm all for bitcoin and not ANY alt-coins since they are all scams.
I find that XT link full of FUD to make people think they should switch - so I am also wary of considering switching to XT - hopefully bitcoin will implement a block size increase soon.

[727miner]

SO what's going on with this Bitcoin Fork thing? Anything we should be worried about with the pool or the wallets?

ps. Thanks for the payment(s).

Checkout https://bitcoinxt.software/

Sooo are you going to support this with this pool?

The only reason I'd take any notice of XT is for block size.

Seeing as our pool is probably the fastest at handling block changes without shitting on bitcoin with empty blocks, and a lot faster than some pools who do shit on bitcoin with empty blocks, I don't see an issue with increasing the block size somewhat.

However, there are changes that may or may not happen with bitcoin regarding block size - yes I don't refer to XT as bitcoin, it's a fork.

So I'm certainly not going to switch to another coin (XT) unless it's necessary - and even then would only be at the latest possible time - so for now I have no reason to make a decision about it.

I'm all for bitcoin and not ANY alt-coins since they are all scams.
I find that XT link full of FUD to make people think they should switch - so I am also wary of considering switching to XT - hopefully bitcoin will implement a block size increase soon.

Seems that Satoshi weighed in as well.. http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

[-ck]

Seems that Satoshi weighed in as well.. http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

...bound to be faked. Don't be fooled by bullshit like that, even if you agree with what that person says.

[727miner]

Seems that Satoshi weighed in as well.. http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

...bound to be faked. Don't be fooled by bullshit like that, even if you agree with what that person says.

I hear ya  It's amusing whats being said on some of threads on here.

[VirosaGITS]

Seems that Satoshi weighed in as well.. http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

...bound to be faked. Don't be fooled by bullshit like that, even if you agree with what that person says.

I hear ya  It's amusing whats being said on some of threads on here.

And i do agree with what is said there. However he didnt verify his message. But i'm guessing the (Positive) FUD that it will generate will be good if you agree forking like that is the wrong way to go?