YabaDabaDoo
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
January 04, 2018, 08:39:02 PM |
|
BTCLOCK BTCLOCK BTCLOCK - BTCLOCK PARTY WEEKEND!!! (Any NYC WXRX radio listeners in the 80/90s? No?.. An I Dating myself? ) I'm from Brooklyn and somewhat remember this, what frequency was the station on?
|
|
|
|
HawkmasterUK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2018, 08:42:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
rifleman74
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 21
4 s9's 2 821's
|
|
January 04, 2018, 10:04:11 PM |
|
What he said. You recognize the payout on the 101st block or when the reward/payment is generated on the website? Either can work, just as long as you're consistent.
I recognize it once Kano sends the payment - I believe that's always the 101st confirmation. Makes sense...as long as you're consistent that's good enough for the IRS.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 04, 2018, 10:04:58 PM |
|
140.75% of Diff, come on BLOCK!! Mine On!!
Can someone ELI5 this percentage? New to mining at Kano's and I was used to other interfaces and labels. In general, the numbers of shares should be roughly the difficulty. So at today's difficulty, you'd be expected to find a block after 1,931,136,454,487 shares. However, it isn't a perfect calculation, since there is variance and luck. So when you see 140% diff, it means we've shared 40% over the amount that should give a block, statistically. Thanks a lot! ... and there's a little table I post every so often about that Coz, it's like rolling a dice, you of course expect to get a 6, on average, every 6 rolls, but of course you don't get exactly that. Sometimes you might get two 6's, or no 6's, or three 6's - that's 'chaos' coming into it and giving you 'random' results - as long as the dice isn't weighted So the table, in this case, is a table of CDF probabilities as follows: 0.39346934028737 50.000% 1 in 1.6 0.63212055882856 100.000% 1 in 2.7 0.77686983985157 150.000% 1 in 4.5 0.86466471676339 200.000% 1 in 7.4 0.95021293163214 300.000% 1 in 20.1 0.98168436111127 400.000% 1 in 54.6 0.99326205300091 500.000% 1 in 148.4 0.99752124782333 600.000% 1 in 403.4 0.99872735771441 666.666% 1 in 785.8 0.99908811803445 700.000% 1 in 1096.6 0.99966453737210 800.000% 1 in 2981.0 0.99987659019591 900.000% 1 in 8103.1
... and what this table says, e.g. for the 5th line, you expect, on average, over time, that 1 in 20.1 blocks we find will be over 300% i.e. the most important part to understand in that, is that it's ok to get long blocks every so often, and that table even says, on average, how often to expect them, as long as the long term average is still close to 100% Short term, the averages go up and down dramatically, but long term it should get closer and closer to 100% average. ... see the Pool->Blocks web page
|
|
|
|
rifleman74
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 21
4 s9's 2 821's
|
|
January 04, 2018, 10:06:13 PM |
|
140.75% of Diff, come on BLOCK!! Mine On!!
Can someone ELI5 this percentage? New to mining at Kano's and I was used to other interfaces and labels. In general, the numbers of shares should be roughly the difficulty. So at today's difficulty, you'd be expected to find a block after 1,931,136,454,487 shares. However, it isn't a perfect calculation, since there is variance and luck. So when you see 140% diff, it means we've shared 40% over the amount that should give a block, statistically. Thanks a lot! ... and there's a little table I post every so often about that Coz, it's like rolling a dice, you of course expect to get a 6, on average, every 6 rolls, but of course you don't get exactly that. Sometimes you might get two 6's, or no 6's or three 6's - that's 'chaos' coming into it and giving you 'random' results - as long as the dice isn't weighted So the table, in this case, is a table of CDF probabilities as follows: 0.39346934028737 50.000% 1 in 1.6 0.63212055882856 100.000% 1 in 2.7 0.77686983985157 150.000% 1 in 4.5 0.86466471676339 200.000% 1 in 7.4 0.95021293163214 300.000% 1 in 20.1 0.98168436111127 400.000% 1 in 54.6 0.99326205300091 500.000% 1 in 148.4 0.99752124782333 600.000% 1 in 403.4 0.99872735771441 666.666% 1 in 785.8 0.99908811803445 700.000% 1 in 1096.6 0.99966453737210 800.000% 1 in 2981.0 0.99987659019591 900.000% 1 in 8103.1
... and what this table says, e.g. for the 5th line, you expect, on average, over time, that 1 in 20.1 blocks we find will be over 300% i.e. the most important part to understand in that, is that it's ok to get long blocks every so often, and that table even says, on average, how often to expect them, as long as the long term average is still close to 100% Short term, the averages go up and down dramatically, but long term it should get closer and closer to 100% average. ... see the Pool->Blocks web page Let's just take a 145% block and then an under 15% block to even it out a bit. MINE THE F ON!
|
|
|
|
HawkmasterUK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2018, 11:53:41 PM |
|
Well guys I have pointed my little aliens at the pool and hope to learn more and will learn to DANCE!!! 10x Antminer S9s (140TH) Cheers Paul
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 04, 2018, 11:57:47 PM |
|
Well guys I have pointed my little aliens at the pool and hope to learn more and will learn to DANCE!!! 10x Antminer S9s (140TH) Cheers Paul Welcome! M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
rifleman74
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 21
4 s9's 2 821's
|
|
January 05, 2018, 12:04:26 AM |
|
Well guys I have pointed my little aliens at the pool and hope to learn more and will learn to DANCE!!! 10x Antminer S9s (140TH) Cheers Paul Welcome aboard, all it takes is one.
|
|
|
|
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3780
Merit: 2689
Evil beware: We have waffles!
|
|
January 05, 2018, 12:06:28 AM |
|
Well guys I have pointed my little aliens at the pool and hope to learn more and will learn to DANCE!!! 10x Antminer S9s (140TH) Cheers Paul Welcome aboard!
|
|
|
|
bit2255
Member
Offline
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2018, 12:32:08 AM |
|
Welcome to the party!
Mine on!
|
|
|
|
Maus44
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2018, 12:34:30 AM |
|
Cheers Paul Welcome! Now let us find a block
|
|
|
|
dkincaid
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2018, 02:34:10 AM |
|
Quick question for you Kano. On the rewards page the date format is strange (e.g. 31/Dec 04:29). It didn't used to be like that. The last time I copy and pasted, back in August I think, it was like 8/25/2017 8:22:00. The new format is difficult to get into a spreadsheet. Is it something on my end doing that or was it changed in the last few months in one of your updates? Would it be possible to go back to a more standard format?
Also, is the rewards data available through the API?
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 05, 2018, 02:42:01 AM |
|
Quick question for you Kano. On the rewards page the date format is strange (e.g. 31/Dec 04:29). It didn't used to be like that. The last time I copy and pasted, back in August I think, it was like 8/25/2017 8:22:00. The new format is difficult to get into a spreadsheet. Is it something on my end doing that or was it changed in the last few months in one of your updates? Would it be possible to go back to a more standard format?
Also, is the rewards data available through the API?
The web site never used the messed up american date format in any of the tables The display format is based on space available, so often year isn't included. There's no API for rewards (yet)
|
|
|
|
fjtropepe
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2018, 03:06:56 AM |
|
What is the deal with the two hash rates separated by a forward slash on the top right of the worker's page? The first one seems like the actual and the second one is the one that is being used by the worker's graph. Or is this the share rate / hash rate.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 05, 2018, 03:10:32 AM |
|
What is the deal with the two hash rates separated by a forward slash on the top right of the worker's page? The first one seems like the actual and the second one is the one that is being used by the worker's graph.
The first one in the 5 minute hash rate and the 2nd one is the one hour rash rate. 5 minute is a lot more dynamic and a lot less accurate than the 1 hour one.
|
|
|
|
fjtropepe
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2018, 03:12:49 AM |
|
What is the deal with the two hash rates separated by a forward slash on the top right of the worker's page? The first one seems like the actual and the second one is the one that is being used by the worker's graph.
The first one in the 5 minute hash rate and the 2nd one is the one hour rash rate. Thanks. One more question. Is there a reason why there is a significant difference between the hash rate reported on there and the one being reported on awesome miner or even the kano app? I have a 14TH model reporting in the 12s but on the app and on awesome miner it is in the 14s. All the other miners are dead on the numbers except that one.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 05, 2018, 03:28:35 AM |
|
What is the deal with the two hash rates separated by a forward slash on the top right of the worker's page? The first one seems like the actual and the second one is the one that is being used by the worker's graph.
The first one in the 5 minute hash rate and the 2nd one is the one hour rash rate. Thanks. One more question. Is there a reason why there is a significant difference between the hash rate reported on there and the one being reported on awesome miner or even the kano app? I have a 14TH model reporting in the 12s but on the app and on awesome miner it is in the 14s. All the other miners are dead on the numbers except that one. Each way of measuring the hash rate is just an estimate based on shares found. The less data used (less shares), the less accurate it will be. Even an hour worth of submitted shares won't get you a finely accurate representation of what the miner thinks the hash rate is. Another way to see that is to turn a miner off, then on again, and watch the hash rate go all over the place for an hour or so. However, your hash rate number is also not really all that relevant either. It's only representative of the expected number of shares you should find over a given time. The actual number that matters is the total difficulty of shares submitted each shift, since that's what you are effectively rewarded (when we find a block) The shift calculated hash rate number is, also, simply a calculation based on how long the shift was and the total difficulty of all the shares accepted in that shift. That varies up and down a lot also. Shares are just like blocks, they have an expected value but vary greatly from that expected value. Paying close attention to your hash rate will not really help much. What you want to look at is your average shift calculated hash rate over a day or two, since, again, the shift data decides what you will be rewarded.
|
|
|
|
fjtropepe
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2018, 03:31:23 AM |
|
What is the deal with the two hash rates separated by a forward slash on the top right of the worker's page? The first one seems like the actual and the second one is the one that is being used by the worker's graph.
The first one in the 5 minute hash rate and the 2nd one is the one hour rash rate. Thanks. One more question. Is there a reason why there is a significant difference between the hash rate reported on there and the one being reported on awesome miner or even the kano app? I have a 14TH model reporting in the 12s but on the app and on awesome miner it is in the 14s. All the other miners are dead on the numbers except that one. Each way of measuring the hash rate is just an estimate based on shares found. The less data used (less shares), the less accurate it will be. Even an hour worth of submitted shares won't get you a finely accurate representation of what the miner thinks the hash rate is. Another way to see that is to turn a miner off, then on again, and watch the hash rate go all over the place for an hour or so. However, your hash rate number is also not really all that relevant either. It's only representative of the expected number of shares you should find over a given time. The actual number that matters is the total difficulty of shares submitted each shift, since that's what you are effectively rewarded (when we find a block) The shift calculated hash rate number is, also, simply a calculation based on how long the shift was and the total difficulty of all the shares accepted in that shift. That varies up and down a lot also. Shares are just like blocks, they have an expected value but vary greatly from that expected value. Paying close attention to your hash rate will not really help much. What you want to look at is your average shift calculated hash rate over a day or two, since, again, the shift data decides what you will be rewarded. Will do. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Waztim
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 15
|
|
January 05, 2018, 04:35:35 AM |
|
Well guys I have pointed my little aliens at the pool and hope to learn more and will learn to DANCE!!! 10x Antminer S9s (140TH) Cheers Paul Thanks for jumping in the Pool. The water is warm!! Mine On with KANO-SAN.
|
|
|
|
2tights
|
|
January 05, 2018, 04:51:36 AM |
|
I'd be totally fine if I woke up tomorrow and we hit two blocks. Good times.
|
|
|
|
|