flynn
|
|
October 07, 2012, 09:36:09 PM |
|
Err,
ngzhang ? Weren't you supposed to deliver a faster bitstream for the Lancelot any time ?
|
intentionally left blank
|
|
|
tucenaber
|
|
October 07, 2012, 09:39:00 PM |
|
He seems to have moved on to catch bigger fish. A shame really.
|
|
|
|
makomk
|
|
October 08, 2012, 09:39:10 PM |
|
Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?
|
Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so. SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
October 08, 2012, 09:41:49 PM |
|
Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?
AFAIK yes;
|
intentionally left blank
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2012, 09:45:20 PM Last edit: October 08, 2012, 10:20:33 PM by loshia |
|
Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?
AFAIK yes; Yes it is. The difference between cm1 and icarus should be https://github.com/ngzhang/Icarus/blob/master/FPGA_project/Src/fpgaminer_top.ucf# UCF for a Nexys2 500K board NET "osc_clk" LOC = "J1"; # serial port receive & transmit NET "RxD" LOC = "D1"; NET "TxD" LOC = "B1"; # TTL level serial port: ja3 = rxd, ja2 = txd NET "extminer_txd<0>" LOC = "D22"; NET "extminer_rxd<0>" LOC = "B22"; there is a chance your bitstream to work on one core only.... makomk, what do you think about that? Will your bitstream work?
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2012, 09:48:46 PM |
|
Don't bother loshia. Spartan3 500k will not perform faster than 2MH/s....
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors. Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2012, 09:50:39 PM |
|
Don't bother loshia. Spartan3 500k will not perform faster than 2MH/s....
it is spartan 6 and it is performing...The git file source has been edited probably and what i see is commented
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2012, 10:05:10 PM |
|
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors. Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
October 12, 2012, 07:29:21 PM |
|
bump ...
|
intentionally left blank
|
|
|
luffy
|
|
October 13, 2012, 02:14:08 PM |
|
is the new bitstream project just stale or cancel?
|
|
|
|
irritant
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 473
Merit: 250
Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol
|
|
October 13, 2012, 03:22:07 PM |
|
can anyone confirm?
|
|
|
|
Dexter770221
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 13, 2012, 09:14:04 PM |
|
No one exept ngzhang, but it seems that he is no longer visit this topic. Shame, really shame. And its always about money...
|
Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors. Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
hardcore-fs
|
|
November 01, 2012, 02:03:21 AM |
|
400MH/S from DUAL spartan6 with two cores each. That is FUCKING tragic.
I'm moving my 'demo' single XUPV5 with SINGLE core FROM 160MH/s to 200MH/s later today. so based on that, two XUPV5 should give me 400MH/s, therefore Two spartan 6 with dual core should be hitting 800MH/s!!!
Plus the shit XUPV5 is only hitting 43 deg. C with an ambient of 25 Deg. C.
HC.
|
BTC:1PCTzvkZUFuUF7DA6aMEVjBUUp35wN5JtF
|
|
|
makomk
|
|
November 01, 2012, 12:50:13 PM |
|
I'm moving my 'demo' single XUPV5 with SINGLE core FROM 160MH/s to 200MH/s later today. so based on that, two XUPV5 should give me 400MH/s, therefore Two spartan 6 with dual core should be hitting 800MH/s!!! Nope, single core each. Spartan-6 chips are actually quite a bit worse at Bitcoin mining than comparably-sized Virtex ones, it's just that the price difference more than makes up for it.
|
Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so. SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
|
|
|
punin
|
|
November 01, 2012, 01:48:49 PM |
|
Spartan-6 chips are actually quite a bit worse at Bitcoin mining than comparably-sized Virtex ones, it's just that the price difference more than makes up for it.
Word. I'm running -3I chips and max out at 300Mhps per chip.
|
|
|
|
ngzhang (OP)
|
|
November 04, 2012, 12:50:59 PM Last edit: November 04, 2012, 02:52:15 PM by ngzhang |
|
https://github.com/ngzhang/Lancelotall hardware documents released. also released a 460~ 520 MH/s bitsteam for Lancelot. for test purpose only. please carefully test it with the bit file before flash the MCS file into the EEPROM. Temporarily no technical support for the new bitsteam, Busy with Avalon.
|
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
November 04, 2012, 12:52:41 PM Last edit: November 04, 2012, 01:09:58 PM by flynn |
|
Wow ! very good news ! Thank you Ngzhang ! I'll try that asap ps: it's named "42" of course
|
intentionally left blank
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
November 04, 2012, 02:45:55 PM |
|
With cgminer 2.4.2 (which I know is not showing HW errors) and --icarus-timing=90 GPU 0: 70.0C 1893RPM | 327.7/342.3Mh/s | A:24 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.22/m I: 4 ICA 0: | 344.2/451.4Mh/s | A:43 R:0 HW:0 U: 7.56/m
I have no idea if this is good or bad
|
intentionally left blank
|
|
|
|