CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...  

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

[sp_]

Here is a comparison of the two bins:

Code:

==4948== Profiling application: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 26.59%  18.4119s       796  23.131ms  15.087ms  47.744ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 26.22%  18.1600s       796  22.814ms  14.943ms  48.441ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.68%  13.6279s       796  17.121ms  13.557ms  24.808ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 18.19%  12.5939s       796  15.822ms  12.835ms  23.530ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
  4.66%  3.22608s       796  4.0529ms  3.3128ms  5.7348ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
  4.66%  3.22443s       796  4.0508ms  3.3958ms  6.4411ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)

==5848== Profiling application: ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 25.69%  26.1063s      1164  22.428ms  15.408ms  58.151ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 25.62%  26.0341s      1164  22.366ms  15.171ms  55.874ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.71%  20.0311s      1164  17.209ms  13.479ms  29.562ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.43%  19.7487s      1164  16.966ms  13.272ms  31.282ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
  4.80%  4.88065s      1164  4.1930ms  3.2593ms  6.5728ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
  4.74%  4.82073s      1164  4.1415ms  3.3896ms  7.0174ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)

Here is the full run:

Code:

C:\Boss\>nvprof ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 6.5

  Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
  CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
  Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.

==4948== NVPROF is profiling process 4948, command: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:56:35] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete.  Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:36] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:38] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:56:46] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 656
[2016-01-24 22:56:54] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
==4948== Profiling application: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==4948== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 26.59%  18.4119s       796  23.131ms  15.087ms  47.744ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 26.22%  18.1600s       796  22.814ms  14.943ms  48.441ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.68%  13.6279s       796  17.121ms  13.557ms  24.808ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 18.19%  12.5939s       796  15.822ms  12.835ms  23.530ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
  4.66%  3.22608s       796  4.0529ms  3.3128ms  5.7348ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
  4.66%  3.22443s       796  4.0508ms  3.3958ms  6.4411ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
  0.00%  2.7009ms       796  3.3930us  2.8480us  7.6800us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  2.4198ms       796  3.0390us  1.9200us  5.4080us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  100.13us        58  1.7260us     800ns  4.1280us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

==4948== API calls:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 49.67%  11.0177s       796  13.841ms  1.3506ms  140.87ms  cudaStreamSynchronize
 23.54%  5.22234s         5  1.04447s  958.40ms  1.16171s  cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
 17.14%  3.80248s       798  4.7650ms  147.49us  390.87ms  cudaDeviceSynchronize
  4.61%  1.02323s        35  29.235ms  474.01us  127.75ms  cudaMalloc
  1.36%  302.78ms       796  380.37us  123.16us  39.274ms  cudaMemcpy
  1.12%  247.50ms        17  14.559ms  6.7122ms  57.145ms  cudaGetDeviceProperties
  0.81%  179.27ms      4776  37.535us  17.486us  1.0408ms  cudaLaunch
  0.55%  121.59ms      1592  76.375us  38.392us  1.5406ms  cudaStreamDestroy
  0.39%  86.053ms         1  86.053ms  86.053ms  86.053ms  cudaDeviceReset
  0.22%  49.228ms       796  61.844us  32.310us  3.9833ms  cudaMemset
  0.21%  47.457ms       796  59.618us  35.351us  506.32us  cudaStreamQuery
  0.16%  34.620ms       415  83.422us       0ns  3.8434ms  cuDeviceGetAttribute
  0.12%  26.464ms      1592  16.622us  1.9010us  1.8466ms  cudaStreamCreate
  0.04%  8.1601ms         5  1.6320ms  1.6087ms  1.7045ms  cuDeviceGetName
  0.03%  7.6507ms        58  131.91us  34.591us  724.89us  cudaMemcpyToSymbol
  0.02%  4.2546ms     11940     356ns       0ns  740.10us  cudaSetupArgument
  0.01%  2.2253ms      4776     465ns       0ns  11.024us  cudaConfigureCall
  0.00%  42.193us         5  8.4380us  7.6020us  9.1230us  cuDeviceTotalMem
  0.00%  23.948us         5  4.7890us  4.5620us  4.9420us  cudaSetDevice
  0.00%  4.5620us        10     456ns       0ns  1.1410us  cuDeviceGet
  0.00%  1.9000us         2     950ns     760ns  1.1400us  cudaDriverGetVersion
  0.00%  1.5220us         2     761ns     381ns  1.1410us  cuDeviceGetCount
  0.00%     761ns         3     253ns       0ns     381ns  cudaGetDeviceCount

C:\Boss\>nvprof ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
                        SP-Mod Private #5
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5

  Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
  CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
  Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.

==5848== NVPROF is profiling process 5848, command: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce ccee4c85
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 387
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 00354a70
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 650
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 003764ae
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 532
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4 Found nounce ccf3909e
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 374
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] Total: 590.85 kH/s
[2016-01-24 22:57:38] GPU #3 Found nounce 99b08920
[2016-01-24 22:57:39] GPU #1 Found nounce 336afc90
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete.  Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 655
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2 Found nounce 6692f03e
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 170
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:57:58] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4 Found nounce cd80fddc
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] Total: 1734.83 kH/s
==5848== Profiling application: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 25.69%  26.1063s      1164  22.428ms  15.408ms  58.151ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 25.62%  26.0341s      1164  22.366ms  15.171ms  55.874ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.71%  20.0311s      1164  17.209ms  13.479ms  29.562ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
 19.43%  19.7487s      1164  16.966ms  13.272ms  31.282ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
  4.80%  4.88065s      1164  4.1930ms  3.2593ms  6.5728ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
  4.74%  4.82073s      1164  4.1415ms  3.3896ms  7.0174ms  neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
  0.00%  3.9227ms      1164  3.3690us  2.8470us  7.8720us  [CUDA memset]
  0.00%  3.5539ms      1164  3.0530us  1.9190us  5.5690us  [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
  0.00%  151.10us        90  1.6780us     800ns  4.0960us  [CUDA memcpy HtoD]

==5848== API calls:
Time(%)      Time     Calls       Avg       Min       Max  Name
 92.54%  91.6359s      2330  39.329ms  88.568us  296.98ms  cudaDeviceSynchronize
  4.05%  4.01266s         5  802.53ms  686.43ms  1.01414s  cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
  1.13%  1.11615s      1164  958.89us  17.106us  6.5145ms  cudaStreamSynchronize
  1.13%  1.11531s        35  31.866ms  493.78us  129.53ms  cudaMalloc
  0.33%  323.72ms        25  12.949ms  6.7658ms  43.151ms  cudaGetDeviceProperties
  0.23%  229.81ms      6984  32.905us  19.006us  1.8063ms  cudaLaunch
  0.18%  179.37ms      1164  154.10us  98.831us  699.80us  cudaMemcpy
  0.13%  131.66ms      1164  113.11us  48.655us  27.393ms  cudaStreamQuery
  0.09%  87.075ms         1  87.075ms  87.075ms  87.075ms  cudaDeviceReset
  0.08%  76.789ms      2328  32.984us  26.228us  264.56us  cudaStreamDestroy
  0.04%  39.028ms      1164  33.529us  23.947us  272.93us  cudaMemset
  0.04%  35.107ms       415  84.595us       0ns  3.7119ms  cuDeviceGetAttribute
  0.02%  16.680ms        90  185.33us  33.450us  2.3845ms  cudaMemcpyToSymbol
  0.01%  8.4858ms         5  1.6972ms  1.6140ms  1.8592ms  cuDeviceGetName
  0.01%  5.9565ms     17460     341ns       0ns  990.59us  cudaSetupArgument
  0.01%  5.7767ms      2328  2.4810us     760ns  508.60us  cudaStreamCreate
  0.00%  3.7187ms      6984     532ns       0ns  808.14us  cudaConfigureCall
  0.00%  52.838us         5  10.567us  7.9820us  17.106us  cuDeviceTotalMem
  0.00%  38.012us         5  7.6020us  7.2220us  7.9820us  cudaSetDevice
  0.00%  2.6600us        10     266ns       0ns     380ns  cuDeviceGet
  0.00%  2.2800us         3     760ns       0ns  1.9000us  cudaGetDeviceCount
  0.00%  1.9010us         2     950ns     381ns  1.5200us  cuDeviceGetCount
  0.00%  1.9000us         2     950ns     760ns  1.1400us  cudaDriverGetVersion

I modded and bugfixed the the first version you put out on github. The second version you published (cuda 6.5 nosync) is faster than your first chekin but doesn't work on gtx 970.

I will do another mod and gain more.

[tbearhere]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done   ?

thx

BATCH FILE--

I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt.  Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat":

==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line.  Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them.  Make sure to use the correct PATH  for your personal copy of CCminer.

       --scryptr

How are you using Neoscrypt.exe  that is sp 5  neoscrypt miner in your bat file. When I unpacked it it came out as Neoscrypt  not ccminer.exe  ?

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

Yes thx scryptr   I didn't know it would run all algo's.

[scryptr]

BRAINS!!! BRAAYIINS!!! BRAAAYIIIINS!!!!!--


My ZoombieMiner minions are hungry.  As lomg as it compiles on Linux, they will continue to devour the product of your brains.  I will be testing the open code on GitHub that compiles on Linux.       --scryptr

[sp_]

Here is a profit overview with the current prices.

Rates from Sp-Mod private #5 in a 5 card rig (2x 750ti, 2x 260 1x 970)

On my testrig Neoscrypt is currently the 4th best payed algo on nicehash. quark is 10% more profitable to mine..

[sp_]

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

Yes thx scryptr   I didn't know it would run all algo's.

But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.

[scryptr]

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

Yes thx scryptr   I didn't know it would run all algo's.

But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.

RELEASE #6--

Will release #6 of the Private Miner have a compute 5.2 edition?       --scryptr

[sp_]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

Great job DJM34.

But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.

ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz  - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5

_sp release 69 get 200mh

thanks !

15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..

[djm34]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

Great job DJM34.

But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.

ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz  - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5

_sp release 69 get 200mh

thanks !

15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..

yeah whatever... I am waiting for proper report too... I let you at your full retard thread aimed at scamming people with
software written by others...   (I advertised what I was getting on my cards, and I still stand by it... )
yes keep your noisy trolling to your own thread... and let real dev work...

... and consider making another donation to me  as your next speed increase will probably depends on me and other dev to write the code you can't... ( seriously, aren't you ashamed of yourself just a little )

the big differences between us:
 1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge
 2/ I am more interested in the challenge of getting a better and faster software (rather than in randomly tweaking the stuff out)
 3/ If something doesn't work, I won't hesitate to say it, rather than making people believe that there is a speed increase so I can sell it
 4/ when I make a claim it is a real one, not one I invented just to get donations 

[bensam1231]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...  

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!


In other news as I reported a week or so ago after Cryptsy exploded, all the algos are down right now except for Ethereum. You probably should be mining it. Unfortunately since you guys can't improve it either, there isn't that much to talk about at the moment. Perhaps work continue to work on x11? There is a lot of volume there...

[djm34]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...   

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!

ah ? where ? I said, I just want to get paid for the time I spend and was ok with a 2.5btc goal.
myself and Nicehash agreed on that goal as well as the time frame (which was the 24th...
I could send all the pm except it is private and none of your business  ).
And yes, if you want to reach your goal in time, you won't gonna say it is ok if no one send anything 
(I am not good in marketing, but I am not entirely stupid either... silly goose yourself  )

And if the donation pledge hadn't reached its goal (or close to it), the deal would have been off. Fair and square.
not sure what is all the drama you are making up again 
That was a deal, the deal reached its goal that's it, the rest is just speculation on your side... 

[sambiohazard]

Fleecing the noobs by comparing to ccminer1.2 in cudaminer thread lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg13535824#msg13535824

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

[sp_]

If you buy a copy of my private miner you will see than some of the algos has been optimized more than 10%

Keccak (maxcoin) is up 20%. Nobody cares becaue Keccak is not profitable to mine.
DJM34's did +10-15%  Neoscrypt. Nobody cares becaue Neoscrypt is not profitable to mine.

I optimize the most profitable algos. My private bins are faster on all algos that can be mined on nicehash (750ti)
This is the only way to guarantee profit for the miner.

My buyers are happy.

[sp_]

Todays Nicehash prices.

Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

[sp_]

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

I could also wait 6months and publish nothing. My work is mostly opensource. The numbers are real. If you compare my work to the old version of ccminer you will see that my kernals are 50-100% faster. I have done this in 1.5 year.. I have spendt 1000's of hours..

[rednoW]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

[sp_]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

Right now Ether is bether. However the dag file keeps growing, and your profit will decline rapidly the next months, and then they will go POS.

[rednoW]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

Right now Ether is bether. However the dag file keeps growing, and your profit will decline rapidly the next months, and then they will go POS.

When it becomes true then will speak. Now YOU start comparing Todays prices.

[sp_]

6 months ago Sharkcoin was worth ($3) and the mining revenue for quark was over 1BTC/GHASH (1000% higher than today)

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sharkcoin/

Today the sharkcoin is worth $ 0.08 with a 24hours turnover of 455 BTC / $ 181,009

When the etherum budget is used, and the coin goes POS the same thing could happen.
Etherum is a new coin.. You can only mine it for another 4 months.

[sp_]

When it becomes true then will speak. Now YOU start comparing Todays prices.

Nicehash haven't added the ether algo yet. I am talking about todays nicehash prices.