CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[tbearhere]

This is the same rig running djm34's version:

This is not a joke. This is djm34's exe runing on one of my rigs. 680KHASH on the gtx 980.
My private kernal is doing 680 on the gtx 970..

ok but why are mine doing this?

 


GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 209
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 947

[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!

Join   https://i.imgur.com   it's much better.

[1714765638]

1714765638

[scryptr]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

EDIT:  Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower.         --scryptr

[tbearhere]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

scryptr how you going to do that with ccminerNeo as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done   ?

thx

[scryptr]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done   ?

thx

BATCH FILE--

I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt.  Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat":

==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line.  Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them.  Make sure to use the correct PATH  for your personal copy of CCminer.

       --scryptr

[s7icky]

Umm and after letting my 960 run for a bit ....


2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419
2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429
2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422
2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031
2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432
2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425
2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032
2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431

[djm34]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:

EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

EDIT:  Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower.         --scryptr

please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread...  
you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf.

So at least report on the real version... 

[tbearhere]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done   ?

thx

BATCH FILE--

I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt.  Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat":

==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line.  Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them.  Make sure to use the correct PATH  for your personal copy of CCminer.

       --scryptr

How are you using Neoscrypt.exe  that is sp 5  neoscrypt miner in your bat file. When I unpacked it it came out as Neoscrypt  not ccminer.exe  ?

[pokeytex]

Download ccminer1.2 from github in google chrome. It will be blocked.
https://github.com/cbuchner1/ccminer/releases

Most likely because a trojan/virus has included this exefile in their archieve.
Ccminer is safe.

JUST DON'T DOWNLOAD THE ONE I DID FROM CRYPTO MINING BLOG - GAVE ME A TROJAN AND STOLE ALL OF MY COINS A COUPLE WEEKS AGO!

[scryptr]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:


EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done   ?

thx

BATCH FILE--

I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt.  Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat":

==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy  -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line.  Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them.  Make sure to use the correct PATH  for your personal copy of CCminer.

       --scryptr

How are you using Neoscrypt.exe  that is sp 5  neoscrypt miner in your bat file. When I unpacked it it came out as Neoscrypt  not ccminer.exe  ?

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

[djm34]

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

there is no difference in perf... hope he gives you some btc for your trolling

[scryptr]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:

EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

EDIT:  Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower.         --scryptr

please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread...  
you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf.

So at least report on the real version...  

WHAT???--

I have not compared your version to his verrsion.  Are you saying that sp_ has a test copy of your new CCminer that has improved Neoscrypt, and is packaging it?

Sorry, I know that the existing Neoscrypt code was originally crafted by you, and tweaked by sp_.  If he tweaked the older code this much, he did a good job.  You still deserve credit.

If sp_ has just released your NEW code, and tweaked it even a little, it SURE DOES A GOOD JOB!!!  And, you still deserve credit.  Maybe you even deserve to be pissed off, too.  I didn't know that your new code had been released yet.

--scryptr

[djm34]

NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--

Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5.  Below is an initial picture:

EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s

Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4.  I do notice some CPU validation errors.  Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.

I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying.        --scryptr

EDIT:  Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower.         --scryptr

please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread...  
you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf.

So at least report on the real version...  

WHAT???--

I have not compared your version to his verrsion.  Are you saying that sp_ has a test copy of your new CCminer that has improved Neoscrypt, and is packaging it?

Sorry, I know that the existing Neoscrypt code was originally crafted by you, and tweaked by sp_.  If he tweaked the older code this much, he did a good job.  You still deserve credit.

If sp_ has just released your NEW code, and tweaked it even a little, it SURE DOES A GOOD JOB!!!  And, you still deserve credit.  Maybe you even deserve to be pissed off, too.  I didn't know that your new code had been released yet.

--scryptr

sp reported all day long false number from my new release so he can sell his stuff, while picking up the new code I had put on github during the night (he didn't do anything at all except finding a problem on a card I don't own, so no he didn't do a hell of job, he just picked early my new release and bugged me all day with false report)

sorry but right now, you are just supporting his scamming attempt to sell a miner which has just been released for free (except to those who participated in the pledge)

"free" release here: https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

[scryptr]

I SUPPORT CRYPTO-MINING, SHARING CODE, AND GOOD CODERS--

DJM34 deserves support, even if a miner can only afford a sliver of his daily take.  THANKS!!! DJM34!!!

This back-and-forth rivalry does not do good for clarity of The State of the Code.  It does make for better hash, though.  A better line of communication would prevent confusion.

I'll look at your GitHub release, DJM34.  I hope I can run it under Linux soon.  My ZoombieMiner minions need the boost.         --scryptr

[sp_]

I did more. My version is faster.

[kangjooe]

I did more. My version is faster.

even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).

[crsminer]

I did more. My version is faster.

even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).

It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total 

For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.

It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).

[kangjooe]

I did more. My version is faster.

even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).

It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total  

For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.

It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).

yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator).


i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work.

[crsminer]

I did more. My version is faster.

even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).

It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total  

For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.

It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).

yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator).


i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work.

Then you're on the right thread. Here you'll find the fastest free versions.  

[djm34]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...   

[sp_]

I just tested again with your fastest and latest exefile .

2 gtx 960
1 gtx 970
2 gtx 750ti


Results after 200 accepts. My version is 1.48% faster and works on the gtx970 without cpu validation errors.

ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe:

[2016-01-24 22:43:23] accepted: 196/196 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 570
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 401
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 197/197 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 198/198 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060241
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 409
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 644
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 402
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 184
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 380
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] accepted: 199/199 (100.00%), 1691 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 631
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 200/200 (100.00%), 1690 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 75
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 201/201 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 400
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 202/202 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 395
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 203/203 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 204/204 (100.00%), 1680 kH/s (yes!!!)

CCminer private sp5:

[2016-01-24 22:47:08] accepted: 183/183 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 469
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 1701 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 411
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 1703 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 615
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] Stratum set nonce 0804ABB757 with extranonce2 size=3
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 406
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 609
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 173
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 315
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 611
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 188/188 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 397
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] accepted: 189/189 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 190/190 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 168
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 191/191 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 647
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] accepted: 192/192 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 178
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 397