CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[chrysophylax]

That's the thing - I'm not getting any diff change notifications. The difficulty stays the same during the errors, and when they clear - I double-checked.

Oops, what is that pool? (sp_, sorry for hijacking the thread)

I'm using Suprnova's Ziftr stratum pool.

EDIT: I feel stupid. When it got new work, AND was submitting a share from earlier work, it would use the nTime from the new work, with the nonce from the old. I feel stupid. 

never stupid wolf ... experienced ...

...

#crysx

[1714908374]

1714908374

[1714908374]

1714908374

[tbearhere]

sp  since the difficulty factor -p d=0.02 was taken out, is there another way I can set difficulty in the bat file?

Thx

[bathrobehero]

sp  since the difficulty factor -p d=0.02 was taken out, is there another way I can set difficulty in the bat file?

Thx

Passing difficulty parameters in the password string (-p) is a poolside feature.

[sp_]

I managed to push whirlpoolx 20% faster on the 750ti. 80-90MHASH I guess the 980 will be closer to 400..

Still working on it..

[ol92]

I managed to push whirlpoolx 20% faster on the 750ti. 80-90MHASH I guess the 980 will be closer to 400..

Still working on it..

Thanks. Very interested as you know.

[tbearhere]

sp  since the difficulty factor -p d=0.02 was taken out, is there another way I can set difficulty in the bat file?

Thx

Passing difficulty parameters in the password string (-p) is a poolside feature.

Thx  I understand now. 

[scryptr]

I managed to push whirlpoolx 20% faster on the 750ti. 80-90MHASH I guess the 980 will be closer to 400..

Still working on it..

Thanks. Very interested as you know.

JUST NOW--

SP_ , your github is bubbling at the moment!  I cloned and built your latest code, then I ran it.  It jumped out of the gate at 36625kh/s (Quark) and is running at about 36600kh/s as I type.

I switched to whirlpoolx, and the miner crashed on launch 2X.

I switched to Qubit, and the 6x750ti FTW Linux x64 rig is getting 29350kh/s.  This is a 400-500kh/s improvement over the last version (v44a) for the rig as a unit.  I am calling the current version "v44d", it is the 4th clone of v44 that I have mined with.

I hope a release is imminent, as I would like to mine with my GTX 960 SSC and see the improvements on my Win 7 x64 box.       --scryptr

[sp_]

Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...

[scryptr]

Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...

VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)

Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti.  These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.

Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos".  Might be poolside...
 
These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low.       --scryptr

[sp_]

Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...

VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)
Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti.  These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.
Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos".  Might be poolside...
 These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low.       --scryptr

How much faster is SKEIN than the 1.6.1 ? (tpruvot version)


75MHASH is around 25 times faster than x11. Yamp is paying 0.0152 per GHASH. is 0.0152 *25 =0,38 per GHASH (x11 adusted rate )

mining x11 directly will only give you 0.199 per GHASH with the current rates..

[sp_]

the rates on nicehash:

WhirlpoolX   3343   19.3342 GH/s   0.0036 BTC/GH/Day  (25*0.0036 ) = 0,09 (x11 adjusted 750ti)

So even if I optimize 750ti to run at 316MHASH, you will earn more mining skein.

[scryptr]

Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...

VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)
Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti.  These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.
Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos".  Might be poolside...
 These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low.       --scryptr

How much faster is SKEIN than the 1.6.1 ? (tpruvot version)


75MHASH is around 25 times faster than x11. Yamp is paying 0.0152 per GHASH. is 0.0152 *25 =0,38 per GHASH (x11 adusted rate )

mining x11 directly will only give you 0.199 per GHASH with the current rates..

NEW ALGOS--

I agree.  However, no-one is getting shares for Groestl accepted at Yaamp just now.  I saw sgminer v5.1.1 receiving 100% rejects, and CPUminer v2.3.2 receiving 100% rejects, and with your code I got the same.

Looks like a poolside problem.

I'll try tpruvot's miner sometime today.

Another note, my quark rate dropped slightly with this hours-old build, 36600 to about 36430 for the rig.

I have trouble making sense of Yaamps graphs, charts, and payout rates.  Staying on their website is a real load for my system, also.  It cuts mining performance 20-25%.              --scryptr

[sp_]

I think yaamp sometimes have bandwidth problems. Curent hashrate is 9.2GHASH @ quark..

7.2% fee but the payout is 0.37BTC/GHASH

If you are testing the 1.6.1 release on linux, please test the quark performance as well.

[king_pin]

QUARK with SP_-44:
GTX 750Ti - 6,400Mh/s @ 1220/1350 MHz/s
GTX 970  - 15,200MH/s @ 1320/1753 MHz/s

This are my results!
How much do your cards make?
Does increasing the MEM give any additional Mh/s or should I decrease it to lower Power?

[fenomenhaa]

i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))

[Schleicher]

i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))

-a skein is ok.
What ccminer version are you using?

[fenomenhaa]

i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))

-a skein is ok.
What ccminer version are you using?

sp 44 ))

[flipclip]

i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))

-a skein is ok.
What ccminer version are you using?

sp 44 ))

It's not in release 44 (it was only added two days ago).  You would have to compile from git or wait until release 45.

[tbearhere]

Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...

VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)
Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti.  These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.
Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos".  Might be poolside...
 These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low.       --scryptr

How much faster is SKEIN than the 1.6.1 ? (tpruvot version)


75MHASH is around 25 times faster than x11. Yamp is paying 0.0152 per GHASH. is 0.0152 *25 =0,38 per GHASH (x11 adusted rate )

mining x11 directly will only give you 0.199 per GHASH with the current rates..

NEW ALGOS--

I agree.  However, no-one is getting shares for Groestl accepted at Yaamp just now.  I saw sgminer v5.1.1 receiving 100% rejects, and CPUminer v2.3.2 receiving 100% rejects, and with your code I got the same.

Looks like a poolside problem.

I'll try tpruvot's miner sometime today.

Another note, my quark rate dropped slightly with this hours-old build, 36600 to about 36430 for the rig.

I have trouble making sense of Yaamps graphs, charts, and payout rates.  Staying on their website is a real load for my system, also.  It cuts mining performance 20-25%.              --scryptr

The same here scryptr.... yaamp cuts mining performance 20-25%. Correction... I have a lot of disconnects.

[tbearhere]

I think yaamp sometimes have bandwidth problems. Curent hashrate is 9.2GHASH @ quark..

7.2% fee but the payout is 0.37BTC/GHASH

If you are testing the 1.6.1 release on linux, please test the quark performance as well.

And they charge 2% BTC fee. wow.