CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[AliMan]

Yea Quark dropped a significant bit.

[scryptr]

Yea Quark dropped a significant bit.

QUARK and v45--

Quark dropped from 36.6Mh/s to 36.3Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig, but only when running that algo at default intensity and no gputhreads "-g" parameter.  If the gputhreads implementation is fixed properly, the rig will likely mine at a rate over 40Mh/s.

Currently, an AMD 290X struggles to make 5Mh/s per card for Quark with the best sgminer bins available.  I get over 6Mh/s per 750ti.  Pay the piper?       --scryptr

p.s.  It's like getting an invisible 290X that runs on invisible electricity that doesn't cost anything, and the shipping was free, too!  Not to mention that you wouldn't have any extra setup hassles...       --scryptr

[AliMan]

Yea Quark dropped a significant bit.

QUARK and v45--

Quark dropped from 36.6Mh/s to 36.3Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig, but only when running that algo at default intensity and no gputhreads "-g" parameter.  If the gputhreads implementation is fixed properly, the rig will likely mine at a rate over 40Mh/s.

Currently, an AMD 290X struggles to make 5Mh/s per card for Quark with the best sgminer bins available.  I get over 6Mh/s per 750ti.  Pay the piper?       --scryptr

I'm getting 17-18 Mh/s on a 980 and 14-15 Mh/s on a 970.

With the latest updated binary, I'm getting 5-7 Mh/s on the 980, not the precompiled release45.

[scryptr]

Yea Quark dropped a significant bit.

QUARK and v45--

Quark dropped from 36.6Mh/s to 36.3Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig, but only when running that algo at default intensity and no gputhreads "-g" parameter.  If the gputhreads implementation is fixed properly, the rig will likely mine at a rate over 40Mh/s.

Currently, an AMD 290X struggles to make 5Mh/s per card for Quark with the best sgminer bins available.  I get over 6Mh/s per 750ti.  Pay the piper?       --scryptr

I'm getting 17-18 Mh/s on a 980 and 14-15 Mh/s on a 970.

With the latest updated binary, I'm getting 5-7 Mh/s on the 980, not the precompiled release45.

WINDOWS or LINUX?

What is your OS?  My 750ti rig is Linux, I compiled the latest update and am getting 36.3 Mh/s.  --scryptr

[scryptr]

NEW SP_ FIX --

I just downloaded the git update (30 min old) and compiled.  My Linux rig is back to 36.6Mh/s.       --scryptr

p.s.  I was able to run at 36.6Mh/s with no problems or errors.  I then changed my launch config to include "-g 2" and re-launched.  The rig runs at 36Mh/s with a few "does not validate on CPU" errors.  What may be useful would be to include code that labled the thread as well as the GPU, i.e. "GPU #0 t #1: Geforce 750 Ti, 6100kH/s", or something similar.  The miner could see if all threads are running.  Currently, it appears that the combined total hash rate for all threads on a gpu is being printed to the screen.       --scryptr

[AliMan]

Yea Quark dropped a significant bit.

QUARK and v45--

Quark dropped from 36.6Mh/s to 36.3Mh/s on my 6x750ti FTW rig, but only when running that algo at default intensity and no gputhreads "-g" parameter.  If the gputhreads implementation is fixed properly, the rig will likely mine at a rate over 40Mh/s.

Currently, an AMD 290X struggles to make 5Mh/s per card for Quark with the best sgminer bins available.  I get over 6Mh/s per 750ti.  Pay the piper?       --scryptr

I'm getting 17-18 Mh/s on a 980 and 14-15 Mh/s on a 970.

With the latest updated binary, I'm getting 5-7 Mh/s on the 980, not the precompiled release45.

WINDOWS or LINUX?

What is your OS?  My 750ti rig is Linux, I compiled the latest update and am getting 36.3 Mh/s.  --scryptr

Windows 8.1

[chrysophylax]

wow guys ...

i just woke and reading up on whats been happening ...

checked the test machine on the farm and its crashed using v45 after i left it last night ... its a 5x gigabyte 750ti oc lp with stock clocks under fedora 19 x64 ...

the rest of the farm is running fine - all running v44 ...

i cant wait to get to the office and test the latest release and see if its fixed ...

what would be the best parameters to use ... ill test them anyway - but just thought id ask ... as i see -g 4 -i 10 crashes scryptrs machine and -g2 -i 10 runs but with errors ...

the test machine runs with NO parameters given except for the algo / username / password parameters ...

tanx ...

#crysx

[sp_]

-g 4 -i 10 works for x11 but you get some "does not validate on the cpu". And I think the miner will crash if you let it run for a while. But the gain is around 25% on the pool. (Testrig with Gtx 960/970/750ti). For quark you probobly need to lower the intensity.

[chrysophylax]

-g 4 -i 10 works for x11 but you get some "does not validate on the cpu". And I think the miner will crash if you let it run for a while. But the gain is around 25% on the pool. (Testrig with Gtx 960/970/750ti). For quark you probobly need to lower the intensity.

im running it at the moment with 2/3rds of the farm on westhash with qaurk at the moment as a test ... the rest of the 1/3rd is either amd 280x or crashed ...

i havent implemented the -g parameter as i didnt want to push the machines too much ... and im not in the office yet ... did this remotely ...

you can see for yourself how they are performing on westhash if you like ... the bitcoin address is 15umzHXF8NzXA4FywmeFbrDHgL8WcPs3wx to look the performance up ...

https://www.westhash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=12&addr=15umzHXF8NzXA4FywmeFbrDHgL8WcPs3wx - is the farm as it stands ... i will reboot the crashed systems when i get back in the next few hours ...

let me know what you think regarding this performance in the 'real' world as opposed to test bench ...

tanx ...

#crysx

[Slava_K]

Look on WhirpoolX whith -g 2... +80%

[fenomenhaa]

Thanks for sharing SP, I tried with remote from home but ccminer crashed a lot, will try when at office..

[scryptr]

Look on WhirpoolX whith -g 2... +80%

WHIRLPOOLX --

The Whirlpoolx algo runs at 464.6Mh/s without the gputhreads switch, and over 510Mh/s with "-g 2".  Before, with v44, my six 750ti rig was getting 448Mh/s.       --scryptr

[chrysophylax]

sp - ive reverted back to just using no other parameters as it seems to be quite unstable and crashes a great deal when using combinations ( and singularly ) the -g and -i parameters ...

if you look at the westhash test that is being performed ... it is stable and pretty constant ( apart from the dips from the different coins that get mined by renters ) ...

ill play with the settings a little later tomorrow when i get back into the office ...

tanx for the great work though ...

#crysx

[Slava_K]

WHIRLPOOLX --

The Whirlpoolx algo runs at 464.6Mh/s without the gputhreads switch, and over 510Mh/s with "-g 2".  Before, with v44, my six 750ti rig was getting 448Mh/s. 

my 3x960STIX_OC befor 410Mh, after 770Mh...

[AliMan]

For whirlpoolx,

The '-d' parameter is broken when using alongside with '-g 2'. So that speed increase only works when using all the cards together, but it can't run individual cards with '-g 2'. And running all the cards together gives a lot lower performance because of overall lower shares.

[antonio8]

For whirlpoolx,

The '-d' parameter is broken when using alongside with '-g 2'. So that speed increase only works when using all the cards together, but it can't run individual cards with '-g 2'. And running all the cards together gives a lot lower performance because of overall lower shares.

You try my bat?

[AliMan]

For whirlpoolx,

The '-d' parameter is broken when using alongside with '-g 2'. So that speed increase only works when using all the cards together, but it can't run individual cards with '-g 2'. And running all the cards together gives a lot lower performance because of overall lower shares.

You try my bat?

Yea man, I was missing the --cpu-priority parameter, but with that, it runs the cards in two's, like the first and fourth, or first and third and so on.

[opus.224]

Quark algo is doing fantastic - between 31550 and 31600 with 5 x 750Ti.
Anyone know what coin it is: block 1544717?

[antonio8]

For whirlpoolx,

The '-d' parameter is broken when using alongside with '-g 2'. So that speed increase only works when using all the cards together, but it can't run individual cards with '-g 2'. And running all the cards together gives a lot lower performance because of overall lower shares.

You try my bat?

Yea man, I was missing the --cpu-priority parameter, but with that, it runs the cards in two's, like the first and fourth, or first and third and so on.

Not sure then. It works fine on my end.

[mendoza1468]

Im getting : does not valid on the cpu error !!
im using the last version ccminer-1.5.45-git-spmod (ive tried last one too)
is there a way to reduce those or repair the problem (lower intensity or idk) and what does it mean, my cpu is like at 3% runnin ??
Gtx 970 X2
16 bg ram
ccminer -i 18,18.5 -o stratum+tcp://us-east.multipool.us:11111 -p x -u xxx.xxx

Thanks for all you guyz doin a real good job !!

Windows 7 Édition Intégrale 64-bit SP1
AMD FX-8150 4.2ghz   32 °C
Technologie Zambezi 32nm
 16,0 Go Canal-Double DDR3 @ 802 MHz
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (Socket 942)   25 °C
ASUS VG278HR (1920x1080@120Hz)
4095 MoNVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (EVGA)   62 °C
4095 MoNVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (EVGA)   56 °C
Version ForceWare: 350.12
111GB INTEL SS DSC2CT120A3 SATA Disk Device (SSD)
 2794GB Seagate ST3000DM 001-9YN166 SATA Disk Device (SATA)   25 °C
 DTSOFT Virtual CdRom Device
ASUS DRW-24B1ST c SATA CdRom Device
 Realtek High Definition Audio