pallas
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
 |
December 09, 2015, 12:06:21 PM |
|
I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.
Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-) I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 12:32:07 PM |
|
I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.
Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-) I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that. I have managed to reach cuda 6.5 speed now with some register tweaking /launch bounds on the 750ti. But on the gtx 970 x11 is still 5% slower with cuda 7.5 |
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
December 09, 2015, 02:26:58 PM |
|
I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.
Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-) I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that. I have managed to reach cuda 6.5 speed now with some register tweaking /launch bounds on the 750ti. But on the gtx 970 x11 is still 5% slower with cuda 7.5 RELEASE dot 75 -- Compiled with CUDA 7.5? Well, hmmm. I am hoping for stability, even if the speed is a tiny bit less. Keeping a watch for the actual release, now... --scryptr |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 02:39:49 PM |
|
You need to wait some more. I will re-tune all the kernals, and hopefully the speed will be restored in all algos.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 03:00:32 PM |
|
yep, i expect a new cuda version soon, with the Pascal support.. but well... if you have some time to do that
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 04:29:33 PM |
|
I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.
Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-) I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that. Neo scrypt is broken in cuda 7.5. But I will build release 75. Quark is up 150khash on the 960 and 300khash on the 970 |
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 04:32:58 PM |
|
I have now upgraded the project to cuda 7.5
Submitted some adjustments and quark +300KHASH on the gtx 970.
It will take some time to repair the lost hashrate since the compiler has changed.
x11,x13,x15 is down.
lyra2v2 is down.
Good timing choice. Now that the profit is down, better do the spring cleaning, to be ready when it'll go up again ;-) I'll have a look at neoscrypt as soon as possible. I already tried 7.5 some months ago with no luck, maybe the new drivers are better. I'm just very busy this week and the next, I should have some free time to work on it after that. Neo scrypt is broken in cuda 7.5. But I will build release 75. Quark is up 150khash on the 960 and 300khash on the 970 There are some dirty tricks to make it work on 6.5 that are probably messing with 7.5: part of the code, when simplified and compacted, works fine on 7.5, but slower. |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:04:55 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2015, 05:36:09 PM by sp_ |
|
-Now compiled and adjusted for cuda 7.5 -Faster quark on compute 5.2 devices -Neoscrypt is 50% slower. -Most algos are slower or same speed.(0-5%) 1.5.75(sp-MOD) is available here: (9-dec-2015) https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/The sourcecode is available here: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminerPlease post you hashrates guys. |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:54:46 PM |
|
Release 75:
My gigabyte windforce G1 factory overclocked does 17.9MHASH in the quark algo on standard clocks.
my 2x 6pin EVGA 970 does 15,7MHASH
|
|
|
|
|
dominuspro
|
|
December 09, 2015, 06:54:25 PM |
|
Release 75:
My gigabyte windforce G1 factory overclocked does 17.9MHASH in the quark algo on standard clocks.
my 2x 6pin EVGA 970 does 15,7MHASH
A quick quark test on my rig: [2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:45:30] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7121
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:32] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 94889 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22162
[2015-12-09 19:45:33] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 94893 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7126
[2015-12-09 19:45:35] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 94914 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22032
[2015-12-09 19:45:37] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 94909 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19356
[2015-12-09 19:45:39] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 94913 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7124
[2015-12-09 19:45:40] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 94931 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17936
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18124
[2015-12-09 19:45:45] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10627
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22074
[2015-12-09 19:45:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22279
[2015-12-09 19:45:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19376
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546773
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19162
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10661
[2015-12-09 19:45:50] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 94977 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 26/26 (100.00%), 94970 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:51] accepted: 27/27 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18355
[2015-12-09 19:45:53] accepted: 28/28 (100.00%), 94965 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18051
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19239
[2015-12-09 19:45:58] accepted: 30/30 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22093
[2015-12-09 19:46:00] accepted: 31/31 (100.00%), 94964 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17930
[2015-12-09 19:46:05] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10564
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22041
[2015-12-09 19:46:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 21844
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19370
[2015-12-09 19:46:07] accepted: 32/32 (100.00%), 94953 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10623
[2015-12-09 19:46:09] accepted: 33/33 (100.00%), 94951 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18056
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17828
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17771
[2015-12-09 19:46:10] accepted: 34/34 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18061
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 35/35 (100.00%), 94936 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19347
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 36/36 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:13] accepted: 37/37 (100.00%), 94938 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546774
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22143
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7130
[2015-12-09 19:46:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17911
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10649
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18186
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19250
[2015-12-09 19:46:15] accepted: 38/38 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17834
[2015-12-09 19:46:17] accepted: 39/39 (100.00%), 94954 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17962
[2015-12-09 19:46:18] accepted: 40/40 (100.00%), 94958 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] quark.eu.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2546775
[2015-12-09 19:46:22] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 960, 10631
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 970, 19303
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 970, 18069
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] accepted: 41/41 (100.00%), 94957 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 22058
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7127
[2015-12-09 19:46:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 17885
[2015-12-09 19:46:32] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7132 Seems some more Hashes for each gpu. But non profitable nowadays  |
|
|
|
|
impulse2000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2015, 08:37:29 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2015, 09:06:18 PM by impulse2000 |
|
| Algo | 75 release | 74 release | 66 release | | Lyra2v2 | 5060-5100 | 5167 | 5218 | | Quark | 7189 | 7287 | 7264 | | Qubit | 5530 | 5450 | 5448 | | X11 | 3513 | 3498 | 3498 | | X13 | 2645 | 2745 | 2745 | | X15 | 2285 | 2361 | 2377 | | Neoscrypt | 93 | 210 | 213 | | Groestl | 9265 | 8827 | 8914 | | Keccak | 165000 | 191000 | 189965 | | Bitcoin | 240000 | 233600 | 234200 | | Whirpoolx | 82136 | 83360 | 83464 | | Nist5 | 10800 | 11013 | 11015 |
Minercontrol.conf "algorithms":
[{ "name": "x11", "hashrate": 3500, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer75.exe", "aparam3": "-a x11 --no-color" },
{ "name": "x13", "hashrate": 2740, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a x13 --no-color" },
{ "name": "x14", "hashrate": 2160, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a x14 --no-color" },
{ "name": "x15", "hashrate": 2370, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer66.exe", "aparam3": "-a x15 --no-color" },
{ "name": "nist5", "hashrate": 11000, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a nist5 --no-color" },
{ "name": "lyra2v2", "display": "Lyra2REv2", "hashrate": 5200, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a lyra2v2 --no-color" },
{ "name": "quark", "hashrate": 7250, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a quark --no-color" },
{ "name": "qubit", "display": "Qubit", "hashrate": 5520, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer75.exe", "aparam3": "-a qubit --no-color" },
{ "name": "keccak", "hashrate": 191000, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer74.exe", "aparam3": "-a keccak --no-color" },
{ "name": "lyra2", "display": "Lyra2", "hashrate": 1000, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a lyra2 --no-color" },
{ "name": "whirlpoolx", "display": "WhirlpoolX", "hashrate": 83300, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer66.exe", "aparam3": "-a whirlpoolx --no-color" },
{ "name": "neoscrypt", "hashrate": 210, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer66.exe", "aparam3": "-a neoscrypt --no-color" },
{ "name": "groestl", "hashrate": 9250, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer75.exe", "aparam3": "-a groestl --no-color" },
{ "name": "sha256", "hashrate": 240000, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer75.exe", "aparam3": "-a bitcoin --no-color" },
{ "name": "scryptn", "display": "Scrypt-N", "hashrate": 253, "power": 60, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a scryptn --no-color" }],
|
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 09, 2015, 08:45:58 PM |
|
like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ... now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ... ill test today if there is any chance to ... tanx for new update sp ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 09:23:09 PM |
|
like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ... now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ... ill test today if there is any chance to ... tanx for new update sp ... #crysx I have just tuned a few kernals in quark and x11 (qubit). Lyra2v2, neoscrypt, x13,x14,x15,x17 etc. will be done later. Optimizing for compute 5.0 is hurting 5.2 performance. I should split the kernals and make seperate versions. New compiler alot of work.. Please donate some beers  |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 09, 2015, 10:46:32 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2015, 11:04:13 PM by chrysophylax |
|
like i was mentioning many times earlier - cuda 7.5 was working and compiling fine on my fedora 22 x64 systems ... and were on par - if not better ( by a little bit ) than cuda 6.5 ... now that you are tuning the kernels to this compile - this should be a nice update in hashrate - though the rates that a lot of people are getting here are in no way related to what im getting on stock clocks ... ill test today if there is any chance to ... tanx for new update sp ... #crysx I have just tuned a few kernals in quark and x11 (qubit). Lyra2v2, neoscrypt, x13,x14,x15,x17 etc. will be done later. Optimizing for compute 5.0 is hurting 5.2 performance. I should split the kernals and make seperate versions. New compiler alot of work.. Please donate some beers ill set a miner on the donation link when i get back into the office ... let it mine for a while ... http://donate-sp.granitecoin.com/ ... i think a split would be good - as the kernels are now becoming quite a task to optimize and keep compatible to both compute versions from what i can see ... tanx sp ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 09, 2015, 10:48:27 PM |
|
Seems some more Hashes for each gpu. But non profitable nowadays Seems like Etherum is the only profitable algo at the moment on the NVIDIA unreleased gpu's |
|
|
|
Daleaus
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
December 09, 2015, 11:04:07 PM |
|
My tests with 2x evga 980ti's overclocked 1485mhz
Qubit------1.75 - 39100mh 1.74 - 43000mh
Quark------1.75 - 60572mh 1.74 - 59500mh
x13--------1.75 - 20500mh 1.74 - 24000mh
x11--------1.75 - 26100mh 1.74 - 29000mh
Neoscypt---1.75 - 544.83kh 1.74 - 1.65mh
Lyra2rev2---1.75 - 33048mh 1.74 - 33000mh
|
|
|
|
|
techcoin12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2015, 11:18:41 PM |
|
Nice work once again SP_
Daleaus
thanks for the numbers ...
what are your temps on those 980Ti's ?
any idea on watts ?
|
|
|
|
|
Daleaus
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
December 09, 2015, 11:24:19 PM |
|
Nice work once again SP_
Daleaus
thanks for the numbers ...
what are your temps on those 980Ti's ?
any idea on watts ?
Mmm about 75 degrees on stock fan with window open lol No idea on watts but they honestly don't use much more power then my old 660's, i don't notice a difference on my power bill anyways. Good cards, mine run 24-7 when I'm not gaming. |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 10, 2015, 01:47:35 AM |
|
My tests with 2x evga 980ti's overclocked 1485mhz
Qubit------1.75 - 39100mh 1.74 - 43000mh
Quark------1.75 - 60572mh 1.74 - 59500mh
x13--------1.75 - 20500mh 1.74 - 24000mh
x11--------1.75 - 26100mh 1.74 - 29000mh
Neoscypt---1.75 - 544.83kh 1.74 - 1.65mh
Lyra2rev2---1.75 - 33048mh 1.74 - 33000mh
great hashrates ... is there anyway - you would reproduce this test for 25mins on each algo using stock clocks please? ... no oc for this card would still be high - and not an exact comparison to the gigabyte 980ti g1 cards ... but would be a much closer comparison ... if not - thats fine - as 25min tests on stock would take some time ... much appreciated ... #crysx |
|
|
|
Daleaus
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2015, 02:50:32 AM |
|
My tests with 2x evga 980ti's overclocked 1485mhz
Qubit------1.75 - 39100mh 1.74 - 43000mh
Quark------1.75 - 60572mh 1.74 - 59500mh
x13--------1.75 - 20500mh 1.74 - 24000mh
x11--------1.75 - 26100mh 1.74 - 29000mh
Neoscypt---1.75 - 544.83kh 1.74 - 1.65mh
Lyra2rev2---1.75 - 33048mh 1.74 - 33000mh
great hashrates ... is there anyway - you would reproduce this test for 25mins on each algo using stock clocks please? ... no oc for this card would still be high - and not an exact comparison to the gigabyte 980ti g1 cards ... but would be a much closer comparison ... if not - thats fine - as 25min tests on stock would take some time ... much appreciated ... #crysx My tests with 2x evga 980ti's overclocked 1485mhz Qubit------1.75 - 39.100mh 1.74 - 43.000mh Quark------1.75 - 60.572mh 1.74 - 59.500mh x13--------1.75 - 20.500mh 1.74 - 24.000mh x11--------1.75 - 26.100mh 1.74 - 29.000mh Neoscypt---1.75 - 544.83kh 1.74 - 1.65mh Lyra2rev2---1.75 - 33.048mh 1.74 - 33.000mh Stock clocks 1290mhz 25 min tests Qubit------1.75 - 35.533mh 1.74 - 38.856mh Quark------1.75 - 52.569mh 1.74 - 52.226mh x13--------1.75 - 18.387mh 1.74 - 20.37mh x11--------1.75 - 23.045mh 1.74 - 25mh Neoscypt---1.75 - 549.62kh 1.74 - 1.429mh Lyra2rev2---1.75 - 30.039mh 1.74 - 30.354mh By the way these evga 980ti's are the SC version so they come factory clocked at 1290mhz i run them at 1485mhz with modded bios |
|
|
|
|
|
