CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[scryptr]

Guys, I have published 5% faster quark kernal for free and only recieved 0.05BTC in donations.

Do you want a continued opensource developement and a faster hashrate?
Or do I have to sell private kernals?
To keep the business profitable you need to support the developent.
0.01BTC from each of you would be nice.

SENT--

Still using release dot 74, here.  It seems very stable, as my "problem" rig has been mining Lyra2v2 for days without being difficult.  I'll try the new versions soon, but with altcoins not tracking up with BitCoin, I am looking for stability for the moment.

Thanks for your work, sp_ !  You'll get my continued support.       --scryptr

[theotherme]

Guys, I have published 5% faster quark kernal for free and only recieved 0.05BTC in donations.

Do you want a continued opensource developement and a faster hashrate?
Or do I have to sell private kernals?
To keep the business profitable you need to support the developent.
0.01BTC from each of you would be nice.

The Myth of the 5% faster kernel continues...   (infinite speed increase for infinite donation  )

[scryptr]

Guys, I have published 5% faster quark kernal for free and only recieved 0.05BTC in donations.

Do you want a continued opensource developement and a faster hashrate?
Or do I have to sell private kernals?
To keep the business profitable you need to support the developent.
0.01BTC from each of you would be nice.

The Myth of the 5% faster kernel continues...   (infinite speed increase for infinite donation  )

DOGFIGHT--

If you submitted some code improvements, I'd be glad to donate.  The main reason that I have not switched immediately to the release dot 75 (and later) is the poor neoscrypt performance.

--scryptr

[camaroqqq]

Guys, I have published 5% faster quark kernal for free and only recieved 0.05BTC in donations.

Do you want a continued opensource developement and a faster hashrate?
Or do I have to sell private kernals?
To keep the business profitable you need to support the developent.
0.01BTC from each of you would be nice.

More than fair, I'll donate .01 now

[camaroqqq]

OK donated 0.01234BTC

Not even profiting atm, but ill do that every now and then for sure.  It's the least we can do

[Daleaus]

More cuda 7.5 modding and recoding

-Faster quark
-Faster qubit
-Faster x11
-Faster x13
-Faster x14
-Faster x15


1.5.76(sp-MOD) is available here: (11-dec-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Way to go! I don't think anyone has managed to use cuda 7.5 to bennifit when mining until now!! on my 980ti cards 1.76 seems to be far more stable then 75, temps are cooler and big improvements on hash rates especially quark, I'm getting a stable 62mh. X13 is about 1.5MH slower then 1.74 and x11 is about 2mh slower. I will run 1.76 on a multi algo pool for the day and see how she goes with extended use.

Also should update the code with the cuda version number so it says cuda 7.5 when launched not important though lol

[antantti]

Testing my new wattmeter, trying to break 1000W barrier with mining quark...

.74 ~87500 MHASH
.76 ~89300 MHASH

No difference in power consumption between these builds. 970-990 Watts with insane power settings. 5 x 970 + 4690K OC + 4 x 4GB, not a pure mining rig.

Oh, and my 0.05226518 BTC should arrive soon!

-edit-

standard clocks and power limit:

.74 ~76600MHASH
.76 ~79500MHASH

860-880 Watts

[joblo]

Also should update the code with the cuda version number so it says cuda 7.5 when launched not important though lol

That is just a hardcoded string and does not reflect how ccminer was actually compiled. A more appropriate comment
would be "optimized for cuda 7.5" unless a system variable is available to read the actual compile environment.

[pallas]

I just had a chance to test the new version using cuda 7.5. It is indeed a bit faster on quark.
About neoscrypt, it is unexpectedly just some percent slower than the old version, not the total mess it was when I worked on it some months ago.
That's very good news because it is much more likely to be possible to reach "full speed" or even further.
More later when I can code a bit (I already know what to try).

[sp_]

DOGFIGHT--
If you submitted some code improvements, I'd be glad to donate.  The main reason that I have not switched immediately to the release dot 75 (and later) is the poor neoscrypt performance.
--scryptr

Djm34 never opensource anything profitable. He just see his algos are tanking because of people like me. He used to sell his optimized lyra2v2 kernals for 1 980ti a piece. Now his work is a waste. I sold my modded private kernal to...

[sp_]

Oh, and my 0.05226518 BTC should arrive soon!

standard clocks and power limit:

.74 ~76600MHASH
.76 ~79500MHASH

860-880 Watts

Thanks

This is real opensource optimalizations of the most profitable algos.

[sp_]

Way to go! I don't think anyone has managed to use cuda 7.5 to bennifit when mining until now!! on my 980ti cards 1.76 seems to be far more stable then 75, temps are cooler and big improvements on hash rates especially quark.(...)

Neoscrypt is fucking slow with Cuda 7.5

[sp_]

The Myth of the 5% faster kernel continues...   (infinite speed increase for infinite donation  )

The quark hashrate on Nicehash/westhash has dropped from 100GHASH to 20GHASH because of private kernals.

The quark opensource kernal does 2MHASH on the AMD r9 280x
The Sharkcoin and the clones hasharate  is currently around  100 000 AMD radeon r9 280x  shitcards.
The current Etherum hashrate is 15000 AMD r9 280x cards. And they will go POS.

Out of bugdet

[djm34]

DOGFIGHT--
If you submitted some code improvements, I'd be glad to donate.  The main reason that I have not switched immediately to the release dot 75 (and later) is the poor neoscrypt performance.
--scryptr

Djm34 never opensource anything profitable. He just see his algos are tanking because of people like me. He used to sell his optimized lyra2v2 kernals for 1 980ti a piece. Now his work is a waste. I sold my modded private kernal to...

first point first: I never opensource when it isn't profitable (to me), current vtc price is low, no point in opensourcing.
I never sold my optimized lyra2v2 or neoscrypt codes, have a shit load of pm coming from people  asking me for a private version, but I haven't sold one... (yeah I am very picky... not everything is about money... (well actually it wouldn't be profitable to the buyers)

If you can find someone who has it, beside me, then he is just lying (but I am getting accustomed of people inventing stuff about me... still need to clear a few things though   ).

[sp_]

Way to go! I don't think anyone has managed to use cuda 7.5 to bennifit when mining until now!! on my 980ti cards 1.76 seems to be far more stable then 75, temps are cooler and big improvements on hash rates especially quark.(...)

Neoscrypt is fucking slow with Cuda 7.5

Hey DJ

Please keep working as a DJ

[djm34]

Way to go! I don't think anyone has managed to use cuda 7.5 to bennifit when mining until now!! on my 980ti cards 1.76 seems to be far more stable then 75, temps are cooler and big improvements on hash rates especially quark.(...)

Neoscrypt is fucking slow with Cuda 7.5

Hey DJ

Please keep working as a DJ

what ? (I understand you want to keep your thread on the top, but at least say something which makes sense...  )
For a small fee, I can troll your thread more often  

you welcome   (that was a free sample)

[s7icky]

Not trying to talk smack sp_ but i run 4 x 980ti... and really have never seen any BIG improvements in hashrates. Dont get me wrong i love ur work. but constantly asking for moonies and saying something is a whatever increase and no one really ever seeing it? Kinda bullshit if you ask me.

[djm34]

Not trying to talk smack sp_ but i run 4 x 980ti... and really have never seen any BIG improvements in hashrates. Dont get me wrong i love ur work. but constantly asking for moonies and saying something is a whatever increase and no one really ever seeing it? Kinda bullshit if you ask me.

   Thanks for your support... that's what I have been saying like forever 

[hashbrown9000]

chrysx, i have been running .conf files for ages now under kopiemtu.  I can switch algos like lightning over ssh and can also start and stop mining very quickly with a single command:

mine "stop", "start", and "status"

the .conf files are stored in a known directory. issuing the mine "switch" command cycles through all the conf files in the directory and writes to a miner.conf file which ccminer will read from the next time it's launched with mine "start".

it's very convenient and the reason i've stuck with kopiemtu, even with the broken stats and monitor program.

it would be nice to have all the switches available in ccminer spelled out for usage in JSON-RPC format, instead of the single letter abbreviations in command line mode. (i.e. "algo" instead of "-a")

[antantti]

Not trying to talk smack sp_ but i run 4 x 980ti... and really have never seen any BIG improvements in hashrates. Dont get me wrong i love ur work. but constantly asking for moonies and saying something is a whatever increase and no one really ever seeing it? Kinda bullshit if you ask me.

How much is a BIG improvement?