ivcelmik
|
|
March 20, 2016, 07:41:20 PM |
|
HI guys can someone help me with a version of ccminer that work on x11 with cuda 7.5 thx in advance
|
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
|
March 20, 2016, 07:45:53 PM |
|
Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.
.bat please Nicehash 5.3.0 activated, not 5.1.0
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 20, 2016, 08:49:20 PM |
|
980Ti = US$ 6 / day @ nicehash... @ alevlaslo: nicehash miner, no .bat
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:08:51 PM |
|
The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.
your post is confusing, 5.4 a day with a 980ti mean 2.7 with a 970, which is not that good comapred to 5-6 with etheruem an other algo and btw on what coin, dash? I wrote profitable. Not the most protitable. The 980ti and the 970 make the same mining etherum. $5-6 only 22Mhash What are you getting on your private miner for x11 on a 970? I think its around 8.5mhash@1366 core. I just did another + 0.5% will be released in version 6 to the donators. (Unreleased)
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:12:57 PM |
|
Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.
.bat please Nicehash 5.3.0 activated, not 5.1.0 The fastest kernals are up to 1000% faster than the opensource. The nicehash miner contains compiled binaries that sometimes only work on windows
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:16:02 PM Last edit: March 20, 2016, 09:33:38 PM by sp_ |
|
I have 6 private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).
1. 0.1BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases) 2. 0.1BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) (9 releases) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (5 releases) (x11,x13,x15,nist5,quark,lyra2v2,neoscrypt) 5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (4 releases) 6. 0.2BTC: Vanillacoin (one release) (+11% includes the decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers)
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:18:41 PM Last edit: March 20, 2016, 09:31:58 PM by sp_ |
|
I have located the problem with the decred miner on 5-6 card celeron rigs. I will release a fix in version 5. Same fix in the vanilla mod.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:26:15 PM |
|
Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
March 20, 2016, 09:48:11 PM |
|
I can teach you why the kernal is displaying low numbers for low difficulty shares. (and for single cards with a low hashrate) Take a look at at https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/windows/Algo256/decred.cuand line 259 if (h[7] == 0 && cuda_swab32(h[6]) <= highTarget) { We don't care about the 4 first bytes of the hash and assume they are 0. This is to spead up the search. Here is a found decred block:(hash) 0000000000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c 0000000 000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c but when a pool asks for a low difficulty share f.eks find a number that is less than this: 00000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff We are not submitting the shares that have anything else than 00000000 in the first 32 bits of the hash ( why should we when we know that the solution doesn't give a block) If I mod the kernal to search the top 32bits only (h[7]) <= Target the mining software will work exellent at low difficulty, but not so good on higher diff.. We are searching for blocks with 14 leading zero's So I believe the current kernal is good, and the pools are fucked.. Because likely every other miner does that and so we're earning that much less because of them.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 10:01:41 PM |
|
Clever move from tvpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
|
March 20, 2016, 10:03:22 PM |
|
r270 are getting 7mh per card with 5.1.0 version for me r270x a little more mining x11.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 20, 2016, 10:07:27 PM |
|
Nvidia users normally mine quark or lyra2v2, because the kernals are more optimized than x11. What are you getting in the quark and lyra2v2 algos on the r270?
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
March 21, 2016, 01:30:32 AM |
|
Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside...
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 21, 2016, 01:31:37 AM |
|
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes! [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo [2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e- 10
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
March 21, 2016, 05:34:41 AM |
|
Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside... Suprnova, Mnpool, and coinmine... Starting to look like this is a visual bug more then a pool bug though. Would explain why I earn 25% less on yiimp and get 25% less hash on other pools. I don't think I've ever had the hashrate show up correctly with decred. Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
|
March 21, 2016, 06:37:36 AM Last edit: March 21, 2016, 11:58:16 AM by alevlaslo |
|
Let's do a profit calculation.. The nano can do 20MHASH of x11 0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY 500$ = 1,32BTC 1.32/0.003 = 440 It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming.. How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version. 5.1.0 is not working on x11, only 5.1.1 or 5.3.0 speed 7 mh only sgminer.exe --gpu-platform 0 -k x11 --url=stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:3336 --userpass=18dr7MAFwzUv8LwxGiTK3sNCz27UL3qKmp:x --api-listen --api-port=4050 --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --nfactor 10 --xintensity 640 --thread-concurrency 0 --worksize 64 --gpu-threads 1 Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.binPlease tell me, how can i tweak same on lyra2rev2 and quark?
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 21, 2016, 07:22:16 AM |
|
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes! [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo [2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e- 10
Did you try nicehash? Normally the low dfficulty shares problem can be solved with adding a correct --diff parameter. ie ---diff 256. --diff 65656 --diff 0.01. I will get back to my rigs tomorrow and can do some more testing.
|
|
|
|
Vaccomondus
|
|
March 21, 2016, 07:48:03 AM |
|
Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash
yeah waiting for it
|
|
|
|
mylove2004tc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:10:25 AM |
|
I must test it. i have gtx 970 . thank pro tập học sinh vĩnh thịnh
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:12:12 AM |
|
Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.bin
darkcoin-modFujigw64l4ku0.bin to be exact
|
|
|
|
|