sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 09:12:57 PM |
|
Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.
.bat please Nicehash 5.3.0 activated, not 5.1.0 The fastest kernals are up to 1000% faster than the opensource. The nicehash miner contains compiled binaries that sometimes only work on windows
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 09:16:02 PM Last edit: March 20, 2016, 09:33:38 PM by sp_ |
|
I have 6 private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).
1. 0.1BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases) 2. 0.1BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) (9 releases) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (5 releases) (x11,x13,x15,nist5,quark,lyra2v2,neoscrypt) 5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (4 releases) 6. 0.2BTC: Vanillacoin (one release) (+11% includes the decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers)
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 09:18:41 PM Last edit: March 20, 2016, 09:31:58 PM by sp_ |
|
I have located the problem with the decred miner on 5-6 card celeron rigs. I will release a fix in version 5. Same fix in the vanilla mod.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 09:26:15 PM |
|
Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 09:48:11 PM |
|
I can teach you why the kernal is displaying low numbers for low difficulty shares. (and for single cards with a low hashrate) Take a look at at https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/windows/Algo256/decred.cuand line 259 if (h[7] == 0 && cuda_swab32(h[6]) <= highTarget) { We don't care about the 4 first bytes of the hash and assume they are 0. This is to spead up the search. Here is a found decred block:(hash) 0000000000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c 0000000 000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c but when a pool asks for a low difficulty share f.eks find a number that is less than this: 00000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff We are not submitting the shares that have anything else than 00000000 in the first 32 bits of the hash ( why should we when we know that the solution doesn't give a block) If I mod the kernal to search the top 32bits only (h[7]) <= Target the mining software will work exellent at low difficulty, but not so good on higher diff.. We are searching for blocks with 14 leading zero's So I believe the current kernal is good, and the pools are fucked.. Because likely every other miner does that and so we're earning that much less because of them.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 10:01:41 PM |
|
Clever move from tvpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 10:03:22 PM |
|
r270 are getting 7mh per card with 5.1.0 version for me r270x a little more mining x11.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 20, 2016, 10:07:27 PM |
|
Nvidia users normally mine quark or lyra2v2, because the kernals are more optimized than x11. What are you getting in the quark and lyra2v2 algos on the r270?
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1122
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 01:30:32 AM |
|
Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside...
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 01:31:37 AM |
|
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes! [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo [2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e- 10
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1024
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 05:34:41 AM |
|
Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside... Suprnova, Mnpool, and coinmine... Starting to look like this is a visual bug more then a pool bug though. Would explain why I earn 25% less on yiimp and get 25% less hash on other pools. I don't think I've ever had the hashrate show up correctly with decred. Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 06:37:36 AM Last edit: March 21, 2016, 11:58:16 AM by alevlaslo |
|
Let's do a profit calculation.. The nano can do 20MHASH of x11 0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY 500$ = 1,32BTC 1.32/0.003 = 440 It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming.. How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version. 5.1.0 is not working on x11, only 5.1.1 or 5.3.0 speed 7 mh only sgminer.exe --gpu-platform 0 -k x11 --url=stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:3336 --userpass=18dr7MAFwzUv8LwxGiTK3sNCz27UL3qKmp:x --api-listen --api-port=4050 --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --nfactor 10 --xintensity 640 --thread-concurrency 0 --worksize 64 --gpu-threads 1 Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.binPlease tell me, how can i tweak same on lyra2rev2 and quark?
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 07:22:16 AM |
|
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes! [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo [2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e- 10
Did you try nicehash? Normally the low dfficulty shares problem can be solved with adding a correct --diff parameter. ie ---diff 256. --diff 65656 --diff 0.01. I will get back to my rigs tomorrow and can do some more testing.
|
|
|
|
Vaccomondus
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 07:48:03 AM |
|
Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash
yeah waiting for it
|
|
|
|
mylove2004tc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 08:10:25 AM |
|
I must test it. i have gtx 970 . thank pro tập học sinh vĩnh thịnh
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 08:12:12 AM |
|
Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.bin
darkcoin-modFujigw64l4ku0.bin to be exact 
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 09:26:42 AM Last edit: March 21, 2016, 07:54:16 PM by sp_ |
|
Would explain why I earn 25% less on yiimp and get 25% less hash on other pools. I don't think I've ever had the hashrate show up correctly with decred.
Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
The current decred difficulty has risen to from around 270 000 to 339 146 And the payouts have declined. I have located an issue with 5-6 card rigs and Celeron cpu's (2 cores with little cache) This problem is beeing worked on and will hopefully be fixed in release #5. (without 100% cpu usage) VCASH is doing good: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/vcash/?markets=all#marketsAnd is profitable to mine. -a vanilla algo. (private kernal with a 11% boost for sale for 0.2BTC. Decred buyers get a 0.1BTC discount)
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 11:37:59 AM |
|
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes! [2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo [2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e- 10
VCash sp-mod #2 sendt to the donators. I have located the bug now that caused low difficulty shares. Mine on a pool wich starts at a diff>=1 example bat that works: ccminer -a vanilla -o stratum+tcp://pool.v.cash:3001 -u VafRjT9uiVUasRPVdQi4KiKJJYW81BuDLQ -p x
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 12:20:34 PM |
|
I have added another
1.8% decred hash 0.8% vcash/vanilla hash
in the upcomming decred release #5 free for the vanilla/vcash buyers.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 21, 2016, 08:20:28 PM |
|
Decred #5 and Vanilla #3 is ready to be sendt to the donators. (0.2BTC) Let's give the FPGA's some competition from the old Maxwell chips  
|
|
|
|
|