CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Amph]

You didn't get it from me. So I guess someone else have sold it to you cheaper.

Sorry, but for 1 card owner 0.1btc is nonsence, so I did.

Are you sure the exe is the same? I think my work has been stolen and the exe file hacked..

stolen? so you have not sold it to anyone so far?

[ioglnx]

Lets face it you can't keep software always secure.
Same what they thought about Denuvo. *R.I.P*

Since u sold it to many guys or not one of them decided to share.. that the weakest chainpart.
A fish rots from the head down.

[sp_]

Since u sold it to many guys or not one of them decided to share.. that the weakest chainpart.
A fish rots from the head down.

Somebody modified the exe so that it mines with a 5% fee to a dash adress and sold it to stupid russian miners.

[pallas]

Since u sold it to many guys or not one of them decided to share.. that the weakest chainpart.
A fish rots from the head down.

Somebody modified the exe so that it mines with a 5% fee and to a dash adress and sold it to stupid russian miners.

OMG that's so funny! I thought they'd just remove the fee, while that's much more evil ;-)

[go6ooo1212]

Since u sold it to many guys or not one of them decided to share.. that the weakest chainpart.
A fish rots from the head down.

Somebody modified the exe so that it mines with a 5% fee and to a dash adress and sold it to stupid russian miners.

OMG that's so funny! I thought they'd just remove the fee, while that's much more evil ;-)

Which miner you are talking about , mates ?

[bensam1231]

lol... If that's true, that's pretty hilarious...

[Amph]

Since u sold it to many guys or not one of them decided to share.. that the weakest chainpart.
A fish rots from the head down.

Somebody modified the exe so that it mines with a 5% fee and to a dash adress and sold it to stupid russian miners.

OMG that's so funny! I thought they'd just remove the fee, while that's much more evil ;-)

how they can remove the fee if there is no source?

[ioglnx]

Well didn't you obfuscated your code?
Yeah the russians ...they learned quickly to hack all they can since they got the computers to do it :-D

But this is better than aiming with a AK47 to the nose of a 5year old boy of an soviet occupied country.

Amph per Assembly/disambling the exe :-D fairly easy if you didn't obfuscated the code.

[Amph]

Well didn't you obfucated your code?
Yeah the russians ...they learned quickly to hack all they can since they got the computers to do it :-D

But this is better than aiming with a AK47 to the nose of a 5year old boy of an soviet occupied country.

Amph per Assembly/disambling the exe :-D fairly easy if you didn't obfuscated the code.

i mean that with obfuscation how can he remove it, clymore i'm sure has hidden his code, so you can't simply modify it with any tool

[sp_]

With enough work a skilled cracker can modify any program. Claymore's dual miner is no exception.

[go6ooo1212]

..And how could you disassemble the exe , when it contains no assembly in it ?

[sp_]

If it's an exe file it contain assembly instructions and can be disassembled. (to the language of the cpu) Claymore's miner needs to be decrunched first. So you need to read the header code and write a decruncher.

[ioglnx]

Every code has its machine code..since it is all compiled so the cpu can work that instructions..basics of computing.

[Amph]

well yes the old "if you can run it you can crack it"...there must be someone who is using clymore without fee for sure or reselling it with higher fee

[djm34]

SP miner is totally illegal and violate GPL licensing. Sp should definitely stop using other people miner without their consent.
And actually he should be prosecuted.

[sp_]

I don't violate anything with my private kernels.


The first version of the LBRY cuda port was written by me. Here are the commits. (15 july 2016)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/adb5e588886ef2097b634a860de2c3d0fbbbf8bf
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/adb5e588886ef2097b634a860de2c3d0fbbbf8bf
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/562650926f8ed485e36be7317834641a189200ad
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bf91f65c7110bc9e7f0e75cc05664fc20594651c
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bf91f65c7110bc9e7f0e75cc05664fc20594651c

The GPL licence allow me to give beta binaries of my work to private individuals who donate for my work on the opensource sp-mod project.

[Epsylon3]

you dont even have changed the miner version on your fee miner

http://zpool.ca/?address=3Bw8cTQ26td7MWui5KEs3F3XWHPaNie6Dp

[djm34]

I don't violate anything with my private kernels.


The first version of the LBRY cuda port was written by me. Here are the commits. (15 july 2016)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/adb5e588886ef2097b634a860de2c3d0fbbbf8bf
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/adb5e588886ef2097b634a860de2c3d0fbbbf8bf
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/562650926f8ed485e36be7317834641a189200ad
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bf91f65c7110bc9e7f0e75cc05664fc20594651c
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/bf91f65c7110bc9e7f0e75cc05664fc20594651c

The GPL licence allow me to give beta binaries of my work to private individuals who donate for my work on the opensource sp-mod project.

Here the terms of conditions of GPL:
The terms and conditions of the GPL must be made available to anybody receiving a copy of the work that has a GPL applied to it ("the licensee"). Any licensee who adheres to the terms and conditions is given permission to modify the work, as well as to copy and redistribute the work or any derivative version. The licensee is allowed to charge a fee for this service, or do this free of charge. This latter point distinguishes the GPL from software licenses that prohibit commercial redistribution. The FSF argues that free software should not place restrictions on commercial use,[50] and the GPL explicitly states that GPL works may be sold at any price.

The GPL additionally states that a distributor may not impose "further restrictions on the rights granted by the GPL". This forbids activities such as distributing of the software under a non-disclosure agreement or contract.

The fourth section for version 2 of the license and the seventh section of version 3 require that programs distributed as pre-compiled binaries be accompanied by a copy of the source code, a written offer to distribute the source code via the same mechanism as the pre-compiled binary, or the written offer to obtain the source code that the user got when they received the pre-compiled binary under the GPL. The second section of version 2 and the fifth section of version 3 also require giving "all recipients a copy of this License along with the Program". Version 3 of the license allows making the source code available in additional ways in fulfillment of the seventh section. These include downloading source code from an adjacent network server or by peer-to-peer transmission, provided that is how the compiled code was available and there are "clear directions" on where to find the source code.

The FSF does not hold the copyright for a work released under the GPL, unless an author explicitly assigns copyrights to the FSF (which seldom happens except for programs that are part of the GNU project). Only the individual copyright holders have the authority to sue when a license violation takes place.


Although you are allowed to sell a modified version of a GPL licenced stuff, you must always deliver the source with it.
You are not allowed to sell private miners (as it restrict GPL licencing ==> "This forbids activities such as distributing of the software under a non-discolsure agreement or contract)


ps: and we all know, you are not doing any optimization anymore, you just attempt to sell, what other created without even improving it...

[ioglnx]

Sure there is somethign fishy but guys wouldn't it be better to combine your brains to make a perfect miner then?
The people are willing to donate thats for sure. Its just how you guys would share the cake ...as Siri said when you devide 0 by 0..in the end the cookiemonster is said :-D

The are chance to do something good..I already thought of helping porting ccminer to VS2015 and Cuda 8. why not say lets do it?

[Epsylon3]

there is no "port" to do, just all deps to recompile. And for cuda 8, 2 lines to change in the project. Still waiting their release

else, sp, the main problem actually its most users are now contacting me to get a better version... but unlike you, i try to handle at the best all platforms at once.

Im not fully against the fact you "improved" it, its more about your posts everywhere which also alert all farms to mine (and dump it)