Blazed
Casascius Addict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
|
|
November 17, 2014, 04:17:34 AM |
|
Well Amhash already sold more than I would ever though would be possible. I mean who in his right mind would right now buy anything that revolves around mining...
amhash is probably the best cloud mining out there currently between the price and low maintenance fees I bet it still does not make you a profit though
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
November 17, 2014, 11:23:53 AM |
|
Well Amhash already sold more than I would ever though would be possible. I mean who in his right mind would right now buy anything that revolves around mining...
amhash is probably the best cloud mining out there currently between the price and low maintenance fees I bet it still does not make you a profit though You are saying that amhash must make profit after 15 days? If he is a small investor/speculator (<5000 shares on that thin havelock market) amhash made him a profit (ipo: 0.00125; paid divs so far: 0.00014467; selling above 0.00110533 still makes a profit)
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 17, 2014, 01:53:57 PM |
|
... From AM shareholders perspective, selling AMHash is pretty much the same as selling miners without the need to pay for delivery costs.
Depends on how much AM is charging AMHash for its miners. Apparently, AMHash is being charged 0.0BTC/ea, judging by the divs you're getting You do not need to sell yourself miners, are you confused? Apparently. Are AsicMiner and AMHash one and the same?
|
|
|
|
webbrowser
|
|
November 17, 2014, 02:36:34 PM |
|
No and maybe.
All theoretical profits of AMHash units sold at IPO are distributed as dividends. AM had better have received sales proceeds for the miners supporting the AMHash units sold at IPO.
As for the AMHash units that did not sell at IPO, there is no information as to the operational concept.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 17, 2014, 04:59:42 PM |
|
No and maybe.
All theoretical profits of AMHash units sold at IPO are distributed as dividends. AM had better have received sales proceeds for the miners supporting the AMHash units sold at IPO.
As for the AMHash units that did not sell at IPO, there is no information as to the operational concept.
What you just said is completely wrong. AMHash is a 5 Ph/s mine created by AM using AM hardware. AMHash is simply a service of AM just like the Prisma is a product of AM. The profit from selling AMHash units are not distributed as dividends to AMHash holders at all. That profit goes to AM. What gets distributed as dividends to AMHash holders is the proceeds form mining, just like someone who bought a miner would get BTC from mining. As for the units that don't sell, they mine for AM, because it's an AM service.
|
|
|
|
benm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:35:21 PM |
|
No and maybe.
All theoretical profits of AMHash units sold at IPO are distributed as dividends. AM had better have received sales proceeds for the miners supporting the AMHash units sold at IPO.
As for the AMHash units that did not sell at IPO, there is no information as to the operational concept.
What you just said is completely wrong. AMHash is a 5 Ph/s mine created by AM using AM hardware. AMHash is simply a service of AM just like the Prisma is a product of AM. The profit from selling AMHash units are not distributed as dividends to AMHash holders at all. That profit goes to AM. What gets distributed as dividends to AMHash holders is the proceeds form mining, just like someone who bought a miner would get BTC from mining. As for the units that don't sell, they mine for AM, because it's an AM service. I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:44:34 PM |
|
I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
You'll believe what? That AMHash is simply an ASICMiner service? AMHash1 is the first of a series of mining contracts.
In this contract, the hashrate is provided by ASICMiner, the management is provided by RockMiner, and the platform is provided by HavelockInvestments. ... Risk control 1. Before IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of IPO price * 100.5%.
2. During the first 45 days after IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of (IPO price - total payouts) * 120%. The notification period is 3 days.
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:55:00 PM |
|
I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
Id like to see the amhash ID too. Supposedly they are mining on ghash.io, see the chart halfway on their homepage: http://www.amhash.com/Im assuming thats not a fake chart, but would like to verify. That doesnt say much about the relationship with AM though. Its clear as mud as to who is taking the mining risk (and reaping the rewards).
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 17, 2014, 06:14:13 PM |
|
I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
Id like to see the amhash ID too. Supposedly they are mining on ghash.io, see the chart halfway on their homepage: http://www.amhash.com/Im assuming thats not a fake chart, but would like to verify. That doesnt say much about the relationship with AM though. Its clear as mud as to who is taking the mining risk (and reaping the rewards). From AMHash thread: Update1. We released our mining addresses days ago: 1HtUGfbDcMzTeHWx2Dbgnhc6kYnj1Hp24i 1ERszMSERwHNR9Xty73KZXpsg1jjBXWcHh 1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6 2.We also made video proof of our account: http://amhash.com/We only supply true hashrate!!!
|
|
|
|
Gws24
|
|
November 17, 2014, 06:32:49 PM Last edit: November 17, 2014, 06:50:14 PM by Gws24 |
|
From AMHash thread: Update1. We released our mining addresses days ago: 1HtUGfbDcMzTeHWx2Dbgnhc6kYnj1Hp24i 1ERszMSERwHNR9Xty73KZXpsg1jjBXWcHh 1K7AuMJwVfZg3UVjinnjT2HzG4pJvACat6 2.We also made video proof of our account: http://amhash.com/We only supply true hashrate!!! Interesting to see the btc received per day for those adresses: So mining stopped around march/april and that correlates to the last div which was the 30th of march. Also, just like FC stated mining had begun again in august: the third address started mining in september: EDIT: all 3 addresses combined recieved a total of ~7105 BTC since mining began again in august. (whether or not that is all from mining or also from franchise payments etc would require more analysis)
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 17, 2014, 07:50:20 PM |
|
I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
You'll believe what? That AMHash is simply an ASICMiner service? AMHash1 is the first of a series of mining contracts.
In this contract, the hashrate is provided by ASICMiner, the management is provided by RockMiner, and the platform is provided by HavelockInvestments. ... Risk control 1. Before IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of IPO price * 100.5%.
2. During the first 45 days after IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of (IPO price - total payouts) * 120%. The notification period is 3 days.
So... Where the divs at?
|
|
|
|
bones
|
|
November 17, 2014, 08:36:13 PM |
|
It was said at the outset of the venture, that monies taken would be used to produce more miners, not paid out in divs. I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
You'll believe what? That AMHash is simply an ASICMiner service? AMHash1 is the first of a series of mining contracts.
In this contract, the hashrate is provided by ASICMiner, the management is provided by RockMiner, and the platform is provided by HavelockInvestments. ... Risk control 1. Before IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of IPO price * 100.5%.
2. During the first 45 days after IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of (IPO price - total payouts) * 120%. The notification period is 3 days.
So... Where the divs at?
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 17, 2014, 10:07:00 PM |
|
It was said at the outset of the venture, that monies taken would be used to produce more miners, not paid out in divs.
And this can't be an infinite loop because...?
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
|
November 17, 2014, 10:08:39 PM |
|
It was said at the outset of the venture, that monies taken would be used to produce more miners, not paid out in divs.
And this can't be an infinite loop because...? i know paid shills against bitcoins, but who pays you - there is someone paying you 100% certain
|
ok
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 17, 2014, 10:13:30 PM |
|
It was said at the outset of the venture, that monies taken would be used to produce more miners, not paid out in divs.
And this can't be an infinite loop because...? i know paid shills against bitcoins, but who pays you - there is someone paying you 100% certain Satoshi! Now really...FC is allowing me to exist. Without him I am nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
ninjarobot
|
|
November 19, 2014, 03:17:22 AM |
|
It appears the KNC site is being DDoS'ed right now but from what I understand their 16nm 'Solar' chips scheduled for deployment in Q1 2015 will achieve 0.07 W per Gh/s.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
November 19, 2014, 03:28:49 AM |
|
It appears the KNC site is being DDoS'ed right now but from what I understand their 16nm 'Solar' chips scheduled for deployment in Q1 2015 will achieve 0.07 W per Gh/s.
They are planning to launch early 2015 so by KNC's standards it should be around July/August.
|
|
|
|
gogxmagog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1010
Ad maiora!
|
|
November 19, 2014, 03:32:39 AM |
|
let the arguments about specs begin! AKA Here we go again! as far as KNC goes, I will believe it when I see it. As far as AM goes; I'm hanging on to the dream. So far neither have done anything tangible in a while. so any FUD on either side is meaningless at this point. this game is giving me an ulcer.
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 19, 2014, 03:51:20 AM |
|
It appears the KNC site is being DDoS'ed right now but from what I understand their 16nm 'Solar' chips scheduled for deployment in Q1 2015 will achieve 0.07 W per Gh/s.
lol
|
|
|
|
|