Bitcoin Forum
October 19, 2021, 06:48:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 [1225] 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3914035 times)
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1070


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile WWW
November 24, 2014, 09:21:26 PM
 #24481

Divs!   Grin

0.0000543

So they really went for the minimum possible.

Funny that they fell for the old misinformation about the dust threshold being 5430 satoshis.
This means that people with 1 share will not get a dividend, as the transaction will be rejected.
Not quite.  Just received my dividend payment on my two shares of AM100 for far less than 5430 satoshi's.

Havelock must be crediting user-accounts off-chain after they get dividend payment batch from asicminer.  Off-chain transactions aren't subject to the 5430 satoshi limitation per transaction.

With havelock it probably makes sense to send a batch payment to some address
Then they can set it up internally to distribute the coins they tiny divs all the time.
(What assigned addresses are for after all) and if you bunch them all together it processes fine

Ah right this one
https://blockchain.info/address/1J5fvfUrDcZj8rrpVHMgn8u7sXee84QkPd

Smallest payment from the sent list I see is 543 sat all divisible by it for the most part so that is the confirmed div amount.
https://blockchain.info/address/1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq
1634626087
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634626087

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634626087
Reply with quote  #2

1634626087
Report to moderator
1634626087
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634626087

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634626087
Reply with quote  #2

1634626087
Report to moderator
1634626087
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634626087

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634626087
Reply with quote  #2

1634626087
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1634626087
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1634626087

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1634626087
Reply with quote  #2

1634626087
Report to moderator
Melbustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 09:51:44 PM
 #24482

pure noob question here but if HF patent is so kul, why they selling it instead of producing?? i mean, not that previous HF chips missed their spec too..

There were no "previous HF chips."

HF only made one chip, and it greatly exceeded spec (400GH spec vs 750GH given enough power).

Then they ran out of money.  Their misfortune is providing AM with the opportunity to catch up and dominate the 16nm frontier.


Sorry, not gonna let you sugercoat these guys, even though your core assertion is likely correct.

They "ran out of money" because their angry victimscustomers sued the pants off of them. While the silicon itself was indeed a solid design capable of outperforming their target spec, I sit here today with a HashFast BabyJet in my office running at *exactly* advertised spec with zero headroom whatsoever (despite much hype from the company about how overclockable the system would be).

As you very well know, the reason is because they sucked beyond belief at absolutely every other aspect of the business: board design, logistics, customer service, FTC compliance, funds management, PR, customer service, strategy, damage control, legal matters, board design (yes, they sucked at this at least twice), and last but not least: customer service.

It's a real shame that despite HF being good at chip design, they turned out to be far far better at pissing off customers and screwing up PCBs.


Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
toffoo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 407
Merit: 261



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:15:50 PM
 #24483

Divs!   Grin

0.0000543

FYI it looks like one of the txs sent 0.000054 / share:

https://blockchain.info/tx/626a90531c57e22b5b937b08bd977b001f1cb23dc663f22348fe510c51cd2c57

in case your #'s don't work out exactly.

dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:26:28 PM
Last edit: November 24, 2014, 10:44:25 PM by dhenson
 #24484

I've partially updated the shareholder spreadsheet and it would appear that this round of divs excluded the bitfountain and board member addresses. Unless payments were made out of more than one address, only 74,685/400,000 shares received divs.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uBfB6IoNYzs_JDSZAVOSyaLrZj4eiTe_VfEQCaYXoKQ/edit?usp=sharing

I'll update the ownership columns as time allows.

edit... it is the second tab at the bottom of the spreadsheet.
MichaelBliss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 526
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:38:35 PM
Last edit: November 25, 2014, 12:00:36 AM by MichaelBliss
 #24485

I've partially updated the shareholder spreadsheet and it would appear that this round of divs excluded the bitfountain and board member addresses. Unless payments were made out of more than one address, only 74,685/400,000 shares received divs.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uBfB6IoNYzs_JDSZAVOSyaLrZj4eiTe_VfEQCaYXoKQ/edit?usp=sharing

I'll update the ownership columns as time allows.

You did not update the "shares" column yet?  Otherwise I believe the entry for my shares is in error.

Edit: just saw the 2nd tab - it's correct.  Sorry!
ujka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:38:57 PM
 #24486

This time, AM used this address, also:
https://blockchain.info/address/1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq
Caesium
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:40:54 PM
 #24487

Unless payments were made out of more than one address, only 74,685/400,000 shares received divs.

Still waiting for a dividend on my direct shares - anyone else?

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:43:44 PM
 #24488



That is the address I used.
ujka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 24, 2014, 10:49:24 PM
 #24489

4 more tx (for about 16 btc total) are at
https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:16:06 PM
 #24490


Thanks, I've added the new rows but it would appear that the (newly added) payments were sent out as .000054 / share instead of .0000543.
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:16:56 PM
 #24491

So they just spent $80,000+ USD to verify where the accounts are? Yeah I'd say things are going really well...

$8,000
MichaelBliss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 526
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:17:02 PM
 #24492

So they just spent $80,000+ USD to verify where the accounts are? Yeah I'd say things are going really well...

They didn't "spend" it, they issued it as dividends.  Presumably future divs would be less that amount.  Unless you mean that's what was spent on transaction fees?
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:25:43 PM
 #24493

Random thoughts:

Jutarul and Rockxie both increased their holdings.
We've only lost one board member since I last updated the spreadsheet.
991 vs. 1343 rows (some addresses are shown in multiple rows so this isn't the distinct address count).

The previous amount column is a vlookup from the previous sheet and may be returning the wrong row for comparison.  When I have more time I'll combine the addresses and only display one row per address.
Dexter770221
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:27:49 PM
 #24494

That divs is only ~23BTC. Thats half of BTC mined daily for AM by AMHASH. Future is bright gentlemans Wink

Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 24, 2014, 11:55:43 PM
 #24495

....  Unless payments were made out of more than one address, only 74,685/400,000 shares received divs.

Is havelock's address and shares included in that 74,685, or are those 'in additon to'.. ?

That was prior to finding out that they sent the divs from two separate addresses.  After adding the second address, we have 380,866/400,000 shares accounted for.
Fordee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 12:00:13 AM
 #24496

Awesome... and a big thanks to Dhenson for the time put in to updating the spreadsheet!
Caesium
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 12:03:50 AM
 #24497

Fucking brilliant. No dividend for me, guess my shares have gone missing.

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 25, 2014, 12:08:47 AM
 #24498

Fucking brilliant. No dividend for me, guess my shares have gone missing.

There are ~20,000 shares that haven't yet received a dividend. It's possible that it will go out soon.

If you notice a deposit on your address, please post the sending address so that I may update the spreadsheet.

Thanks.
Caesium
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 12:11:37 AM
 #24499

Fucking brilliant. No dividend for me, guess my shares have gone missing.

There are ~20,000 shares that haven't yet received a dividend. It's possible that it will go out soon.

If you notice a deposit on your address, please post the sending address so that I may update the spreadsheet.

Thanks.

Will do.

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1149


Will read PM's. Have more time lately


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 03:58:47 AM
 #24500

Got my direct share divs and havelock divs. I was wondering where these came from as friedcat did not use his usual address.

My BTC Tip Jar: 1Pgvfy19uwtYe5o9dg3zZsAjgCPt3XZqz9 , GPG ID: B3AAEEB0 ,OTC ID: johnthedong
Escrow service is available on a case by case basis! (PM Me to verify I'm the escrow!)

Pages: « 1 ... 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 [1225] 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!