|
I'm locking this because of the lack of responses. Of you're interested later on, pm me to reopen this topic.
|
|
|
|
Yes, it was mistake.
A casino that makes users pay for their mistakes? That's very bad for your image. |
|
|
|
It does not depends someone wins or not, we made a mistake and forgot to add term about negative feedback on Bitcointalk.
Mistakes happen, and you can fix them for new entries. But changing the rules after accepting someone makes you look unreliable. Was the 10 mBTC maximum winnings a mistake too? |
|
|
|
|
It doesn't seem right to change the rules of a giveaway when someone wins.
Take this from someone who ran several giveaways in the past. If you can't set up clear rules up front, you should honor them.
|
|
|
|
Here's their original post: http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5362/53623665.htmlThe way I see it, they owe you up to 10 mBTC. Update: quoting myself: Yes, it was mistake. So, to summarize: you made 3 mistakes: You're a professional casino, you should be very good at creating strict conditions. Even if you made mistakes (which you've admitted!), you should man up and don't make the user pay for your mistakes. You've confessed to the allegations, so I've supported the Flag against you. I really believe what I wrote here: It's also wise to ask yourself before leaving feedback: "Does my feedback make Bitcointalk a better place? And if it's negative: is it worth destroying someone's account and reputation over this?". Consider using Neutral feedback if neither Positive nor Negative is justified. I am not single-handledly going to destroy your account over this, so I'll leave neutral feedback instead of negative. The type 3 Flag against you needs 2 more DT-supporters to become active. Note that the Flag system requires the Flag creator to withdraw his Support for the Flag when you make the victim(s) whole. My neutral feedback stays as a warning. I can't believe you risk having your account and business reputation destroyed over this! I truly believe I did not see that was there when I made my post you with my username. I think LoyceV can confirm it since he catches nonedited posts in a fraction of seconds. I can confirm this: |
|
|
|
I will delete my post
Since you've published the addresses, you should mix the funds again if you want it to be private. |
|
|
|
Hum. I tried to scrape data from bitcointalk months ago, but I haven't found the trick to avoid cloud flare protection.
How do you skip that?
I don't do anything, it just works. |
|
|
|
I've removed the https to make the link work. I can get you full data by scraping all profiles, but using my deleted posts viewer is faster. |
|
|
|
Was the nnn668 from you?
I don't know what this refers to. |
|
|
|
|
I tried 0.05 and 0.002 tBTC, both failed.
I already funded your on chain testnet (a bit) earlier.
|
|
|
|
I've been breaking my head over this since the start of the year, but I have no idea  |
|
|
|
|
LoyceV add this: show the raw Trust list for blacklisted users, this shouldn't be a loophole to hide their Trust list from my viewer!
|
|
|
|
exactly what are you reselling?
State secrets? Launch codes? Fake IDs? Or probably nothing at all. Even if OP is honest, shady shit like this means both other parties are probably not honest either. Add the fact that it sound illegal, and I'm not touching this with a 3.05m pole! |
|
|
|
Instead, why don't you allow anyone to input their ID and check?
Check what? You can click your profile to see you're Trust score, that's not what this topic is about. |
|
|
|
We shall likely NOT return at all again after the next 2 days.
Great! Enjoy your life, find things that make you happy. |
|
|
|
By the way, even with the Web Service, it's encrypted with 256bit AES and deleted after a while.
It seems you are accusing somebody or some product even without checking the fact
Fact is: you are asking people for their private keys, while claiming it's encrypted. Let me guess: you can and will decrypt the private keys. Reminder: member never trust anyone with your private keys! |
|
|
|
|
Starblocks!
The Lightning testnet transaction is PENDING.
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent 0.1 tBTC on chain. I'll send the 0.04 LNtBTC when the channel is ready. My existing channels have the capacity spread out over multiple channels, and Eclair doesn't allow me to send LN to myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
