I am Satoshi Nakamoto
Hy66Nz55o/0+JzQuxHFgx2TurPNdDChlHgUHmEdtX6Z/Q1YCEHATosHPTIcFnDZ2MUu/BkpLP9/udhtxu4QQeZs=
Hey! Me too: Hy66Nz55o/0+JzQuxHFgx2TurPNdDChlHgUHmEdtX6Z/Q1YCEHATosHPTIcFnDZ2MUu/BkpLP9/udhtxu4QQeZs= |
|
|
|
Awesome!  Man Gavin got extremely fooled.Matonis as well of course. Gavin yesterday: "I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi."Gavin today: It's certainly possible I was bamboozled.Who will take this guy ever serious again? He is so done!!This is totally true. Obviously Gavin doesn't understand the meaning of signing something and how to use a signature to prove something. Andreas and Vitalik got it right. When there is a sure way, using the unsure way is probably bullshit. Gavin looks very dumb now. |
|
|
|
One photo does not make them disrespectful towards women. I doubt if this was even done with the intent to be rude towards that lady. Some people are a little sensitive about small issues and things like this is hardly noticed, because it's rather an exception than a rule.
I challenge OP or whomever else, to find more examples of this to substantiate the claims being done here. ^hmmm^
It is only hardly noticed by sexist pigs who don't want women to participate. I think it is a glaring announcement - not 'hardly noticed'. |
|
|
|
"At least women are represented by her shoes and feet, but there is ZERO representation for niggers, spics, gooks, zips, etc..."
No. I never said anything like that you moron. I think there are already way, way too many zips in Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't rush to judgement yet, for all we know the image was one they found online or through some other third-party. If someone can find the original photo at some point with evidence she was cropped out (not saying she wasn't but we have very circumstantial evidence) then I'd be more inclined to believe that CoinDesk is at fault.
They published it. Doesn't matter where it came from or how it was manipulated. It is so clearly disrespectful to the lady with the shoes in photo to be excluded from the panel. |
|
|
|
Look, Vitalik is not a native english speaker so sometimes when you are operating in a second language, these misspeaks happen. I am gonna give him the benefit of the doubt here.
Boolean operators work identically in Russian, French and English. All other languages too. |
|
|
|
Buterin, playing contrarian, however, dismissed the idea with his assessment of the evidence.
"If you have a good way or a noisy way to prove something and you choose the noisy way, it means that you can’t do the good way," he added. Technically, he should have said: "If you have a good way and a noisy way to prove something". Doesn't it seem unlikely that Buterin would fuck up a Boolean operator in a sentence? Clearly he must know how to use these really well for programming. |
|
|
|
This is a photograph published by CoinDesk today:  In this panel, the entire worth and contribution from the only women - is represented by her shoes. While they are nice shoes, they clearly cut the only female out of the story and quite disrespectfully left a mere tiny slice of her representation. Shameful. It is no wonder women don't feel welcome in this group. |
|
|
|
|
Now that we know who Satoshi is, can we get him to tell Greg Maxwell and Blockstream to fuck right off and raise the blocksize immediately so we can all get back to work doing useful things rather than pissing in the wind?
|
|
|
|
See what I mean?! lol You guys are all the same.
|
|
|
|
Satoshi or not.... he seems like a bit of a cunt doesn't he?
No. That's just how Australians are. It is normal for them. |
|
|
|
just skimmed through the thread and couldn't find any proof (or an explanation of what it is.). the article are also lacking citations/sources for the important parts. so, bottom line, the media are just being stupid again, am I right?
Pretty much. Nothing was shown/proved in the BBC article. I'm sure a laymen could easily be fooled but what is more concerning is Gavin Andresen seemingly buying this bullshit. Very alarming. I have since learnt that Gavin was paid for his participation. His site did not get hacked - but he received a little something for playing along. Gavin knows how to check whether a message was properly signed. He did not get fooled. He did not get hacked. He got paid. |
|
|
|
Did he get hit in the face with an ax? |
|
|
|
|
I'll bet the real Satoshi laughs his damn head off when this shit happens. He must be having a big belly laugh again today. Hey Satoshi! Give us a sign! lol Freaking Auzzie is crazy like a lark to try to pull this off.
|
|
|
|
I can understand he could have been able to fool the media outlets, but how was he able to foll Gavin and Jon Matonis?
It is impressive if he really got Gavin to believe this. Fucking hilarious. Now they revoked Gavin's commit key for being an idiot. It doesn't get better than this. |
|
|
|
User adoption remains near zero. All merchants have disengaged. Party over. |
|
|
|
|
Gold is better than bitcoin if you are trying to make a watch. Especially if it is a gold watch you are trying to make - then bitcoin is for shit.
|
|
|
|
|
"what happens if the bitcoin disappear ?"
Same thing that happens if your dick disappears. nothing. You weren't using it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
"what happens to Bitcoin if internet goes down?"
- same thing that happens if gravity goes down. The probability of this happening is about the same also.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
