Yup, i remember it. It was like a early prototype of this. I actually made ton of money using it. But man it was way more difficult.
I remember that buy and sell walls weren't working "cumulative" so you had to hand pick orders to buy from. And because people didn't get how it worked, some people sold too low and some bought too high. Yeah, i have to admit that was a good example of weird GUI. People don't seem to understand how weird all this is to newbs. It's way better then years ago but still confusing operation, not to mention they get hacked.

Well one strategy that i just realized is that if i would gamble on wrestling (and i mean WWE as in show wrestling). I should bet the one with lowest odds and therefore highest multiplier.

And hold on you say, isn't that predetermined? That's the beauty of it. Technically that makes every match 50/50 to me, as i can't use my insight to predict anything. Then why in the world i would settle for lower multipliers? Obviously this would not guarantee anything but it would give me slight edge over the people playing low multiplies, assuming they don't have any insight either.

Only way to get real results in this is somehow to get inside Triple H's head who presumably decides who wins. But without that it would make sense to only bet on the one with lower odds.

You know we have already seen the bottom on altcoin bear market when Sushiswap gets hacked and no one even cares that they get exploited. Imho weak hands are out and from the technical side i think we can rise any time now.



Source: https://www.theblock.co/post/225473/sushiswap-hack

But on the other hand my question is, how many dex hacks there needs to be until you would accept that current tech isn't even near for wide adoption? As we have all the responsibility of our money, even in cases of DEX hacks, how in the million years this tech would be adopted by anyone else then experimental libertarians?

Yes, everyone knows that, yet no one knows how long they are going to do that. They might stop to 50% like some projects or keep going indefinitely. What i would like to know why they are not answering to this. They are not committed to any number so they might just stop burning after 40% for all we know. They have never promised to keep going indefinitely, and at some point there are no team tokens to be burned.

For sure. Just out of interest, roughly much you need to gamble monthly to achieve that? I haven't touched that kind of bonuses as i am a tiny fish when it comes to gambling and i am mostly using slots anyway. From some point of view i am gambling a lot, even though i see it as quite little as i still won't get bonuses but then again i don't have anyone to compare myself to. I won't be gambling more just to get such bonuses but i am interested.

Wait what do you mean by this? Shouldn't we bet for a winner to win ourselves? Or are you talking about betting the order on who gets most votes and who comes for second and third? I haven't seen an option for that but i would be very much interested on that. Or have i completely missed your point? Could you elaborate more.

Price of the bitcoin would be least of your worries if dollar would hit zero. I am positive that internet money would have some value for some people, but just lack of liquidity and all the panic ensued because dollar dropped to zero would most likely wipe all interest and respect for experimental internet money. They were volatile before all the hell broke out so why would they survive absolutely apocalypse scenario? And this chaos wouldn't be inside united states only. Imagine that a world biggest superpower just lost all the power they had. The imbalance itself would cause wars when countries would try to fill it. It would be hell on earth and probably nuclear war. So i really wouldn't bet on bitcoin then.

This is so dumb prank. You are being tracked now! You can just read about it if you google how FATF operates. Why do you think we have KYCs if not for control and tracking? AML needs tracking, FATF Travel rule needs tracking. Nothing new in this video is revealed. In fact CBDCs have most likely more privacy then current system. Governments can still track them even if they are ZK tech but it means that nothing but essential info will get revealed.

Nothing has yet been decided and there are more then one opinion in the world how this thing should be done



https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2023/02/bank-of-england-developing-a-cbdc-that-will-respect-privacy
https://cointelegraph.com/news/cbdcs-should-protect-privacy-not-be-a-surveillance-tool-former-cftc-chair

There are ton of research on privacy-preserving central bank digital currency. Check dusk network's approach for starters

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

Well obviously. That's basically one of the features of crypto. Self custody. Not everyone can or should do it as some people are not going to be able to handle their finances. Claiming otherwise would be ableism. The fact is that some people will always need someone more or less to look after them and those people need extra security unless they want to get scammed. It's basically same argument that is in big vs small government.

You don't need to know this. You should assume they always do. Especially if you are winning fiat pegged money.

Well first i would be asking why exactly did your KYC fail according to them. There can be numerous reasons why KYCs fail. Anything from identity theft (by which i mean that someone else stole your identity), to the fact that you are citizen of a sancioned country, or that you can't prove source of your income.

So which one is it? Did your friend fail KYC or didn't he/she follow the ToS of the bonus money. Sometimes those can be pretty complicated and even misleading. I am usually asking lots of questions about the details before trying to get bonuses.

I mean i love metamask and people don't remember what hell it was to use early versions of MEW compared how smooth you can connect with metamask.

And that said, why it took them 5 years to implement something like this? I totally understande that we don't owe them anything, and i might seem like self entitled annoying user when i even ask this as i haven't done anything for them. But 5 years of scams is a long time to figure out what could be done. One would think that security of the non tech savvy users would be high on the priority list.

Congratz! Not you get hooked and buy more . I still remember buying my first. I am pretty sure there are same feelings still involved, but i remember checking my portfolio constantly few weeks and buying more.
After few days i realized that i was looking at the price too much, and constant excitement wasn't good for me. It caused me to lose sleep. After a while i learned to relax. So take my advice and learn to relax and don't stare the price.

Answer to your question is: it changes from time to time and it depends what kind of gear you have. But mine only if you don't care about your graphics card or your processor. But as price of electricity has risen with everything else, you might be better of just buying the coins and to mine only if you want to support the chain. I wouldn't mine random coins just because they would be slightly profitable.

Short answer is: google is your friend: https://whattomine.com

What you don't get is that pravda propaganda is aimed against Russia, not us. And moving some rockets around is not any kind of significant tactical move especially against nato. They just want to be seen as doing something so they move some rockets and trucks. That's supposed to be signaling Russians as a show of some sort of strength. It's empty muscle flexing for anyone who understands Russian point of view. Meanwhile whole west is facepalming to this nonsense. They can't do anything about Finland joining NATO, they just wish they could.

You clearly have no idea what's going on. So what's your point and are you talking about? How would our elections would have anything to do with this? You really think that our government lead by "kokoomus" would have any different relations with russia then SDP and Sanna Marin? Fuck no. If anything "KOK" is going to be more nationalistic. So you have no idea what you are talking about.

I totally disagree. Yeah, digital payments are somewhat controlled, but not in a level you seem to think. Banks are technically obligated to follow money trails etc, but most of them don't have resources to do that all the time. There are not transparent way between banks to see every transactions and most of them just rather trust the word of the customer when they ask where's the money coming from.

Money laundering still happens inside banks too today and they get caught all the time for that so not even binance or any casino is a exception to that. Regulators can't follow or control everything. That's one of the reasons cbdc is coming. To have more control over the confusing ledgers. And i am not saying casinos and exchanges would be laundering money willingly, but accidents in oversight happen and KYCs are a way to make money laundering more difficult. While not having any KYC and fiat money transactions would guarantee that people would laundering momney and avoid sanctions.

Problem i see with PVP games is that they are most likely skill based, and when we add inventives like money for the winners, the probablility of using hacks, bots or third party programs to help opponents rises exponentially. I have always wanted to play for example computer games for money among my friends, but that's because i trust my friends. However trolls and hackers use mods and hacks to cheat on online games all the time and they are not even doing it for money. So imagine how much those cheaters would rule every game when there would be money involved and an opportunity to cheat.

Tribalism always happens, there's no way to avoid it. But that doesn't even matter as law is blind and doesn't care what the cheerleaders say about their team or if they think something is legal or illegal, as that's not for them to decide.
If the team leader (no matter which side) breaks the law, district attorney decides how to proceed, as he/she is the expert on that field. Their jobs depend on them being neutral and it's not like they would like to lose their jobs..

They were white/gray hat hackers. This is usually fastest way to get the attention of the teams about any security issues. It's a dangerous route however, as you can be flagged as criminal as well especially when you take a bug bounty without a concent. And for a smaller project even when they get their money back, just a fud and panic can kill a project after this.

With larger projects it's nearly impossible to kill them no matter how much you steal. Like in 2016 there was infamous Dao hack where 3,641,694 ETH were stolen (over $50 Million worth of ETH at the time). Eth nearly was killed but they just forked and survived.