I am back and ready to repay the loan
Well, what are you waiting for? The repayment address is: 1EgbC1EHjqRFYqAiSh1EdNrPQzeSE4cyD6
|
|
|
Hallo, As wrote: Loan Amount: 650 usdt Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 715 usdt Loan Repay Date: On or before September 15 Type of Collateral: None TRC20 - USDT address: TAWMrGapnfBt6pbfkExBHuSB9bDMunnaeo address Staked here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5463193.0Are you willing to accept, and repay in bitcoin?
|
|
|
Jai dit que je ne détenez pas de collateraux crypto mais que des biens personnels
Exactement. Personne ne t'accordera un prêt sans garantie et tu prétends avoir une garantie physique. C'est pourquoi je t'ai suggéré de contracter un prêt auprès d'une personne dans ton pays, cela facilitera le transfert de ta propriété physique. Tu habites en France, n'est-ce pas?
|
|
|
La raison pour laquelle je suggère de faire votre demande dans la section française est que vous prétendez détenir une garantie physique. Pourquoi n’en avez-vous pas parlé ?
Désolé pour la traduction de Google.
|
|
|
Most of these top-grossing movies made it to the list without my support. I've seen less than half of them, and if it wasn't for parenting I could easily have missed most of the ones I have seen (highlighted.) Maverick I watched with my girlfriend, but she's too young for it to be nostalgic. As for my favorite movies; The Godfather trilogy, most of Stanley Kubrick's and Sergio Leone's movies, and anything with a cameo by Deborah Harry. 1. Avatar: $2,923,706,026 2. Avengers: Endgame: $2,797,501,328 3. Avatar: The Way of Water: $2,320,250,281 4. Titanic: $2,257,844,554 5. Star Wars: The Force Awakens: $2,068,223,624 6. Avengers: Infinity War: $2,048,359,754 7. Spider-Man: No Way Home: $1,921,847,111 8. Jurassic World: $1,671,537,444 9. The Lion King: $1,656,943,394 10. The Avengers: $1,518,815,515 11. Furious 7: $1,515,341,399 12. Top Gun: Maverick: $1,495,696,292 13. Frozen II: $1,450,026,933 14. Avengers: Age of Ultron: $1,402,809,540 15. The Super Mario Bros. Movie: $1,357,471,840* 16. Black Panther: $1,347,280,838 17. Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2: $1,342,139,727 18. Star Wars: The Last Jedi: $1,332,539,889 19. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom: $1,308,473,425 20. Frozen: $1,290,000,000 21. Beauty and the Beast: $1,263,521,126 22. Incredibles 2: $1,242,805,359 23. The Fate of the Furious: $1,238,764,765 24. Iron Man 3: $1,214,811,252 25. Barbie: $1,212,583,000
|
|
|
Who the fuck is this moron? Doesn't he know that I'm in charge?
|
|
|
France . Why ?
Since you're offering physical goods as collateral, there may be a chance you'll get a loan from someone in your local area. This the global lending section, where you'll find lenders from all over the planet making physical collateral impractical for most of the lenders in this section. Post your request here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=211.0
|
|
|
Ah okay sorry I don't know that it was necessary to specify the goods. It's a new pair of shoes worth $200 and my family heritage chain. Of course I'm ready to send them but I just don't want to sell them because they have sentimental value for me.
In which country are you located?
|
|
|
I'm not up on shitcoinery either, but man, makes me think I should put $100 in each of the alts Vispillio chooses next year. That's called survivor bias Lol. I was being sarcastic, but only kinda half-assed. Of course "investing" in alts is as much of a gamble as any game offered by a casino.
|
|
|
How's Vispilio still at 2x the value of place #2 though? I've got limited knowledge about shitcoins so what do you guys think, can his portfolio hold up until the end of the year? Last I checked, those high-risk high-profit coins don't survive for too long..
Vispilio really nailed it with Radiant Capitol, it appears that's one of the better performing alts of the year so far. It was trading at a fraction of a penny at the turn of the year, and now it's still up over 100x. I'm not up on shitcoinery either, but man, makes me think I should put $100 in each of the alts Vispillio chooses next year.
|
|
|
They asked for ID and also sent a link to a website which basically wanted to drain my Metamask wallet. "Click on this link to verify your wallet" type of bs. I'm sure OP runs this scam, there's no way he doesn't.
It would be helpful to gather some screenshots and other evidence, and submit a scam accusation. Scam Report Format [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b] [b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Copy and paste it in new thread then fill all data.
|
|
|
I can understand that many people try to scam but this is not my case. jerome above my explain what i can hear asking with my collateral i discuss with you all and come to you saying that i say anything and that i want to scam people
What JeromeTash is politely trying to say is that you don't have any collateral, which answers my initial question about the point of this request. The promise of "frozen crypto" isn't collateral, and all your doing is wasting people's time.
|
|
|
Last time I let a wallet choose the fee. ~ 2 Fucking weeks so far!
Remember that time I trolled you with a 1 sat fee rate? I don't think it took two weeks. That was funny, this is sad. I had the same issue with the same fee rate on the same day. It was a good fee when I signed the TX, at least that my story and I'm sticking with it. Eventually I got it to confirm by tacking the change onto another transaction, and having the CPFP.
|
|
|
Wearing a signature doesn’t imply full endorsement of the underlying service,
Sorry man, but this sounds like gas-lighting and deflection. To be honest, I don't care. You can use whatever logic or philosophical gymnastics you want to excuse and justify the signature you wear, that's not my point. I've worn signatures for two mixing services so far during my tenure here, both ended up shutting down due to seizures or fear of such. I've yet to advertise any scams thankfully, but in retrospect, how could I have known before hand? The truth of the matter is that any centralized mixing service is shady by design, and needs to be if the operators are to maintain their own security and privacy. That alone makes them among the services most likely to exit scam. They have little to no incentive preventing them from pulling an exit scam, and if the feds start sniffing closer, it might be the only way to avoid prosecution. That doesn't even take into account whether the service is pulling a profit or not. What's ironic is that whirlwind seemed like the most legit mixer to pop up in the post CM days, yet here we are. I'm not saying people should stop advertising mixing services, but if you do don't spread the BS too thickly, it starts to stink.
|
|
|
advised me to put my crypto in earn and the crypto is frozen
Oh, your crypto is frozen. Then may I ask how you plan to use frozen crypto as collateral?
|
|
|
I need 90$ for me and end week return totality thank you
Loan Amount: 90 usdt Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 110 usdt Loan Repay Date: On or before August 28 Type of Collateral: 100 usdt
Trc20 - USDT : TJFa4Qt4eDkdXQCKCVbmwYHENGvJwVXmgf
And Mp for speak of refund
What's the point of this? If you are using USDT as collateral for a USDT loan, why don't you just "borrow" from yourself and avoid the 20 USDT penalty?
|
|
|
a. SPFC b. 2-1 c. SPFC d. Under e. Yes f. 36'
|
|
|
a. Southampton b. 0-1 c. Southampton d. Under e. no f. 62'
|
|
|
11. Aljamain Sterling 10. Zhang Weili 09. Ian Machado Garry 08. Mario Bautista 07. Marlon Vera 06. Brad Tavares 05. Gregory Rodrigues 04. Kurt Holobaugh 03. Andre Petroski 02. Andrea Lee 01. Karine Silva
NOT go the Full Distance: 3
|
|
|
|