Don't understand why you are trying to attack me but no I did not.
Lol, because you look like just another scammer sniffing around for a handout, Chahan. Or should I say Maasdamer? |
|
|
|
Refund me atleast 330 how staff says it
The only person who mentioned the number 330 is me. I'm not staff, and I have no say whatsoever what alterra57 does with the money. You've been proven to be a liar and a scammer, so no one really cares whether you get the money back or not.
~
Oooooh, ratios!?! Who's the smart boy?
Animal shelter is certainly a good idea, or some small non collateral loans to users that do actually need it, like me.
What's the matter, did you gamble away the grocery money? |
|
|
|
... then it should be returned to it's rightful owners.
When we find out that Deonnn got the 500 bucks from let's say user ABC. How much should alterra57 send ABC  Ever hear of subtraction? It goes something like this: 500 - 170 = 330 |
|
|
|
Nice work. As soon as I realized there were two conflicting scam accusations I figured the blockchain could shed some light on the truth. Should I send the difference back or punish this little scammer for what he did? I cannot be the first victim, nor the last one. I think I'll send 50 USD to khaled0111 and donate the rest to an animal shelter or something.
Stealing from a thief is still stealing. It's been proven that he stole from you, and now you've recovered that money. If there's a way to prove the remainder was also stolen, then it should be returned to it's rightful owners. Otherwise, no matter what noble cause on which you propose to spend the money makes it any less theft on your part. |
|
|
|
|
If EFS is self-scratching it seems to have taken him a long time to get it done. I'm not so sure that it is self-scratching, there are too many other possible reasons that are purely coincidental, and plausibly innocent. I don't see any reason why he wouldn't add members of the local community where he's regularly active, and it could be totally coincidental that they've left him feedback. Also the numbers aren't blatant enough to definitively say this is self-scratching.
The newer members mimicking EFS's trust list isn't that surprising, either. When I first set mine up I mimicked the inclusions of a handful of member whom I found trustworthy. It's not a bad way to get started for newbies, and if EFS is their primary example-setter since he is active in their local community, it would make perfect sense for them to copy his list.
In all honesty, I'm not seeing much here. I haven't had much interaction with EFS, but I see he was accused of some shady behavior in the past. That all seems so long ago, I'm not sure any of it is still relevant unless there's recent evidence of similar behavior.
|
|
|
|
you conspiracy nut!
 Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.  I mean, it's not like the FBI or CIA are looking like a partisan gestapo who are exposing their corruption by attacking their political opposition. If that were true, I'm sure I would have said as much before now, right? That is quit interesting. I'll have to go through that troll's post history and take a closer look. |
|
|
|
What a wierd round,all this matches that started at 16:00 went the otherway in second half. I had 7.5 points and the end barely received 1.5 points. No body expected that Leicester would lose this match especially after leading 1-0. Fulham barely won in the end for some points at least
It's been a horrible round for me so far. I got close points for the Tottenham/Wolverhampton match, and goose eggs for the rest of the early matches. If the Gunners and Bournemouth hold on to the current score, I'll exact points and win my bet on the match. Fingers crossed. |
|
|
|
|
I did a little bit searching this morning to evaluate the various search engines and their propensity to elevate the scam sites:
Search text: chipmixer
Google: Two top search results are scams, the .xyz site, and the darknetone which just redirects people to the .pro site. The third result on the page is the bitcointalk forum profile of the real chipmixer account. That is an improvement from the past, but still no .com site on the first page.
Bing: The top result is chimixer.com, the real clearnet site, right after all the kitchen gadgets. There are plenty of scam sites following, but ironically no mention of the scam site that top's google's results.
Yahoo: Similar to Bing, the top result is the real clearnet site, also followed by scams.
DuckDuckGo: Also, the top result is the real clearnet site followed by scam sites.
The really interesting part about all this is that .xyz site which tops the google results is only in the top results on google. It doesn't show up on the first page of any of the other search engines. This really piques my suspicions about the .xyz site and google being in cahoots. Given google's past behavior and the way they've aligned themselves with federal authorities of the US and China's communist party, I'm starting to think there's something seriously corrupt going on behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
~
That's none of your business, which is why I deleted that post that I shouldn't have made in the first place. You're a fool if you think that just because someone bought or earned bitcoin at $3.5k thinks the way you wish they would. Get a grip on reality, dumbass. |
|
|
|
You see $11,000 but I see $1,750
In your fantasy world 1 BTC=$3,500? So send your alt a loan and STFU! |
|
|
|
Please refrain from comments
On a discussion forum? No, thank you. I'll comment on your ridiculously sad sob-story all I want: Odds are it's nothing but an ridiculously sad sob-story, just like the hundreds of others in this section... i.e. just a story. Alas.. rest well, all.
How about you pay up the tiny loan you took using your alt, 2double0 instead of harassing those trying to keep the forum safe from deadbeats like you? Because not a single member of the forum has such funds!
You're such a pathetic troll. Do you really think you can shame or dare people into giving your alt a "loan" for $11k? |
|
|
|
hello have you tried armony wallet?
Is that a typo? Do you mean Armory Wallet? No never heard of it, i look for desktop wallets around 2011
I think he means Armory Wallet which was first released in early 2012. If you were extracting individual private keys, that might have been the wallet you used. That could explain why your seed phrase doesn't restore anything when restored in Electrum. Armory does use seed phrases, but they're not Bip39 compatible. |
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 12' 2-0 Arsenal
Game 2: 12' 0-1 Leicester City
Game 3: 12' 0-0 Draw
|
|
|
|
|
1. Oleksandr Usyk
2. Over 10.5 Rounds
3. Decision
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads-up.
Looks like a minor release mostly dealing with python updates and some legacy LN support.
The "source only" tarball is an interesting snippet. I don't imagine it'll run on it's own, or even in a python environment without the dependencies. Would it be able to run in a docker container, or is purely for development purposes?
|
|
|
|
^ROFLMFAO! OK that's the last time I'll bring it up, I promise.  Somehow, I don't believe you.  |
|
|
|
we all know how desperate those Government Motherf*ckers have become
FIFY. 
I don't understand how the US government could justify sanctioning Bisq, but that doesn't mean they're not plotting to do so. Bisq itself is nothing more than "ebay" for digital assets. I don't see Bisq as an obfuscation tool, at least not anymore than Coinbase Pro, or any other centralized exchange. The only difference is the lack of KYC and traceability, but there's no US law that has codified traceability requirements of digital assets, or cash for that matter. Because that would be unconstitutional... (as if that matters.) Bisq has implemented rules that I believe make it less prone to government sanctions; i.e. there are limits on fiat to BTC trades that allow no more than 0.25 BTC to be traded in one transaction. The rules aren't so much for AML reasons, but rather for the safety of traders. However, those ruled would make it more difficult (and less obscure) if one were to use Bisq to wash large sums of fiat. But the fact remains that with some effort Bisq can be used by bad actors. Nevertheless, I would love to see Bisq move it's source code to a decentralized or self-hosted gitlab type of hosting site. The governments of the world (and specifically the US) are starting to panic as their corruption is getting exposed. They know that their only hope of maintaining their grip on power is by ensuring they control their subjects' currency. Anything Bisq can do to mitigate a governments ability to shut the system down will ensure that the bitcoin revolution lives on. |
|
|
|
I don't make $24 million a year, but I answer texts, emails, and even phone calls on the weekend. Hell, my boss even calls me when I'm vacation; one time I answered while I was riding my motorcycle, carving the curves south of Coos Bay! WTF, JG? Current settings as far I can tell. If any of these are wrong let me know.  Looks good. OK guys, all invites are sent. I currently have a draft already set for September 2nd at 9pm eastern standard time
I made it 7est for now so you would have 2 hours before your other one. That's perfect as far as I'm concerned. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
