The Earth is a molten core, which potentiates all matter received into the various forms that we call unique (we generally only think of the assemblies and disassemblies  that happen at the mantle levels)--when our lives shift to more virtual realities, will these meager differences (which make something more shiny, more beautiful, or more precious) matter that much?

And what will be even more heart breaking is when the tiny differences that make someone smarter, more likeable, or even more spiritual become part of easily accessible DB's and human consciousness becomes an information data core with all potentials available--it used to take drug addiction, religion, or a brain trauma to shift personas (though Daniel Day Lewis does it for a living), someday it will be as easy as logging-in.  

This assumes VR (and even more invasive technologies) becomes ubiquitous--which is no gimme, but should determine if virtual currencies become mainstream.

LOL.

Here's Evan saying that the current dash anonymity scheme isn't what you want--maybe he'll put out a white paper with the required math a few months after he's said that it's fixed. Even the "lead scientist" of dash thinks you're wrong.

Min 2:13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5sNx7SMTP8

I really need to add decentralized to that list also--how else are you supposed to make it antifragile enough to disrupt the current system?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443867.0

I had you on ignore, so tough to answer any question that I hadn't read.  

How many coins I own is none of your business, just like my paycheck is none of you business--unless you get a job with the IRS, this will continue to be none of your business forever and ever and ever.

I have one account that I post with and that is it. I think I created another one over a year ago, but never posted with it--the Mods can validate that and I'd have no problem with it.

Now, you're going back on ignore--annoying that you talk to me like I don't have you on ignore when I've stated that you are. I might have to just respond that you are on ignore so you don't play the "Look he's running from my question!" card again.

I'd rather the coin was built to standard before the official wallet was released, not vice versa. Priorities. Also, bloat is well handled by the DB and I can handle CLI, so don't worry about what me or the Monero Devs should focus on.

Considering it has cryptographers and dashers are paying for soda machines and advertisements instead of designing a cryptosystem that works as stated--I think you're projecting your own delusions onto a community that understands that technology is built on math, not empty promises.

Guess they can't treat missing sarcasm as of yet. Now we're both off-topic.

Yeah, I'm delusional.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443867.0

Polo does--they even offer XMR pairs.

I am being honest. I'd rather have a coin that delivers the best in something that I'm interested in than one that promises moon while delivering second rate in everything. I'd also rather learn CLI than use a rebranded Bitcoin wallet that some DEVs threw out there in their rush to get as much noob money as possible.

Because if you've been following, it's being done and some of us can use CLI in the meantime.

Talk about long winded. This dude topped that in one sentence.

“I'm the greatest, I'm a bad man, and I'm pretty!”  Mohammad Ali

Ceti thinks we're all Risto or smooth, and that smooth is a robot built by Risto, so he's technically Risto.

Original dash is cryptonote, so.....

Seems like you cut a lot out of my post? Must not have liked what I said, so I'll repost until it sinks in.

Did I say that? Maybe I said for a motivated attacker, but I'd like to see a quotation--I certainly don't have the resources to break any coin's anonymity unless all it requires is a blockchain explorer.

What I said, and Evan Duffield will back me up on this, is a cryptosystem that doesn't employ privacy at the protocol, is suboptimal or second rate when compared to cryptosystems that have protocol level privacy features.

I somewhat covered the "break it " argument in this thread #2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430839.msg14472374#msg14472374

Let's remember that shadowcash supporters were hectoring Monero supporters with the same "break it" argument--up until Shen broke it.

Honestly, it seems dumb to break it atm, since etholution is purported to have another privacy scheme that uses end-to-end encryption--though if you layer it with paynodes, you're most likely to end up with the same second rate privacy--would be nice to see a white paper with the required math to go along with the endless stream of promises. But, why do that, when noobs can be fooled with a few infographics and the repetition of invalid assertions?

But if you feel so strongly about your privacy features, why don't you sign up for this? Notice it's for transactions and messaging.

http://thehackernews.com/2016/04/secure-messenger.html

My guess is that experts, who understand what a motivated attacker is and does, will need about two seconds to see the obvious flaws in dash's design. But feel free to enter and have your shitty privacy coin invalidated by an authority bigger than any one that resides on BCT, maybe that reality check will free up the time I waste correcting your false assertions, but my guess is you'll go full-Cruise and say it's a conspiracy against scientology dash to prevent it from reaching its moon base.

No, you have a problem with misreading, what I said was that your accusation is that TPTB_need_war is a sham, but you're incorrectly using the word scam as a stand-in.

Also, as far as breaking anonymity is concerned, this is a fallacy that I somewhat covered in this thread in #2:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430839.0

BTW, Shadowcash was brazenly using this "prove it" argument until they weren't

The problem is that the progress thread is just an ANN page and there is already a section for that. Any thread that has little to no discussion and is chock-full-of-links as filler will get my satiric grin. As for morality, I think anyone who openly supports a coin that perpetuates the myth that it is decentralized and fairly launched while employing one of the most centralized launches in altcoin history (and topped-off with a centralizing schemes via paynodes), should have to stare at a sign that states, "Only noobs and greater fools need apply to the shitcoin I endorse, because nobody with any sense would buy into this racket" until that little ethic's lightbulb goes click and their cognitive dissonance  dissipates into the realization that they aren't practicing what they preach. Every one of Tao's marketing slogans that read "Satoshi's dream..." should be painted over with "Satoshi's Nightmare." Then, at least, you would have some truth in advertising instead of the wolf of alt street BS meant to fool lambs to financial slaughter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw7UQwMu318

Those are actual discussion threads. Same as the dash speculation thread that qwizzie created. You're using the progress thread as an announcement thread--it is just you, tungfa, and a few others bumping links and circle jerk talk. But I'm sure you can't acknowledge the difference as it isn't in your best interest to acknowledge the difference.

It's a great analogy considering it is only referencing the difference between scam and sham, which you seem to not get. I'm sure you have a problem with TPTB_need_war's appraisal of a certain shitcoin you defend, but calling it FUD, or calling its critics scammers, doesn't remove the criticism, it only distracts from it--so instead of wasting people's time with petty jokes and personal trolling, maybe find a technical basis for why the criticism is or isn't true. Though I doubt technical discussions are really your strength and the sideshow antics are the best you can do (and just a heads-up, this failure for technical merit by its defenders is probably why that coin is rated so high in scam polls).