https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/owb/owb-tips.shtml
  

Actually most of Dash's criticism is about the alleged distribution and what bad things that might cause i.e. FUD.

Dash is the most fudded coin in the history of cryptocurrencies. Yet those who had the vision to hold all these years despite the massive fudding are now rich. Deal with it. No amount of fudding will do a damn thing. You're all free to spend your energy however you wish though, and I know being angry is an endless source of energy. The only thing that could make Dash crash and burn is if a massive flaw would be found, even a flaw in the anonymity wouldn't matter much if at all, it would have to be something akin to the InstantX or the whole network being stalled beyond repair.

Good for you!  But no, I have no shortage of logic, I've just learned to recognise when it isn't appreciated.  "Pearls before swine" my friend calls it and it's the reason I don't post on Facebook.  Life is too short to spend time arguing with people on the internet just because they're wrong, so as soon as I realise that somebody's mind is already closed to my input I'm out of there.  It makes for a better quality of life.  Have a good day, Sir!

So you don't *know* anything either then.  Everybody has had plenty of opportunities to buy masternodes while they were affordable, including me.  I missed that opportunity too but, unlike most of the moaners on this thread, I'm not getting all bitter and venomous about it.  I believe Dash is the future and I'm happy to be a part of it.

I clearly don't belong on this thread then so I'll leave you to it.  Please resume your butthurt bitching at your leisure.

What's the highest price point of bitcoin?  Once we know that we can start estimating the potential future price of Dash from there.



True, I don't *know* but I am surmising using common sense and public knowledge.  It's said that Otoh held the highest number of masternodes at around 450, but he has since sold most of those.

Funny thing how dedicated developers remain to the success of their projects when they have a real stake.  Evan does not have 1,000 masternodes, but however many he does have are well deserved.

I heard you needed 4500 dash to put up a masternode however....is that incorrect? (damn tough mining) (I could have misread?)

There is a difference between a premine and an instamine and as long as that difference is either overlooked or incorrectly used those people will be behaving like noobs.

noob : a person who is inexperienced in a particular sphere or activity, especially computing or the use of the Internet.

Personally i dont have a problem with noobs, i just dont think very highly of them. And lets face it, there is little point discussing something with a noob unless you want to educate
that noob. I dont have the time, energy or desire to do that.

Three years in existence and there is still debate about the instamine .. (lots of hand waving....)

Does the market care ? No

Do customers care ? No

Are customers mislead about it somehow ? No

(more hand waving...)

I don't like Dash and I believe this is a perfected scam with good money available for marketing purpose, but one thing I'm tired of is the hypocrisy on people's part, do you want to tell me you will have at least 1000Dash tokens today and be calling it scam. I know soon Monero to would be pumped to reach parity with Dash price this is the market we are now.

One thing most people don't understand is that most of the tokens are locked up in Masternode and that create artificial scarcity in the market.

45% goes to the masternodes and another 10% to the general treasury, of which distribution is voted on by the masternodes, so totaling 55%. How is this not centralization?

I'm mostly waiting for the game to hopefully resume in 1666.
Also most people are reactive. Not much in the last few post for joe average to react to.

and we mute.

As has been said before, this system should specifically NOT be monetized.

I understand, that you'd need to have some means to prevent spam, since there are no real-world transaction fees.

I would think of something like this:

You basically have a modified PoS System, in which players confirm new entries in the blockchain. In exchange, they earn points that CAN NOT be transferred to other addresses, that are bound to the address that staked them. These points earn the player the right to send information.


You are right about the lag on "real time" games. But in this case; a pen and paper roleplaying game, points do not change that often and if they do, it is does not slow down the game if they need a few minutes to be confirmed. In fact, the way this would probably go is that adventures are played out off-chain and when an adventure ends or is paused, eventual point changes are sent. Point changes have o be confirmed by all involved players and the master.

I realize, that this holds abusive potential, because a group can collude to have a best possible outcome, but keep in mind, that this is supposed to be a game and it is supposed to be fun. If players are deemed cheaters by a majority of players, they may decide to ignore them, block them of there may be a built-in hardfork feature.

Additionally, I would assume that this game would use an invitation system, in which new accounts can only be created if existing accounts vouch for them.

@cryptohunter, since you are so sure about your double-standard argument, I wanted to point out how deceptive reality can be:

This is a really interesting concept, but I think the major roadblock comes from the question of where earnable assets (money, experience, etc.) come from. You can't give full reign to "masters" or you now have a centralized system. There's no real way to hand these out in an automatic and provably fair manner, unless there is some automated master that acts the same for all players? But now you run into the question of what makes this different from a regular rpg. Beyond this, how would assets be assigned value? If players buy everything with Bitcoin, it ruins the concept. But if there is no Bitcoin value pegged to it, what's the point of having a crypto?

It's a really cool idea but I think a lot of questions must first be answered, and I don't know if everything has an answer.

You can't protect and be a cheerleader for a scam to piss other shills off. Does not work like that. You are either against scams or not.

He does not need to go on every anti dash thread and challenge anyone xmr shills or not. He is simply using this as an excuse.

He tries to criticise anyone on anti dash threads for any number of reasons, and will not confirm he believes dash is a scam.

Why not?

what about the coin that were swapped from darkcoin? if they were swapped 1:1 that is like instamining, because when dash was rleased the dev instamined a shit load of coin like 1 million but i could be wrong here

xmr is seperate issue........make your own xmr threads.

this is a dash thread.



that's what you said about dash so why defend dash using xmr as an excuse?

its a diversion nothing more.

You are making it too obvious that you're now a dash shill.

Is dash a scam yes or no?

answer that... then if you must talk about monero.

I will be posting your dash is an ultra scam quote on every dash thread I see you protecting it on.

After that if you persist I will make a thread to analyse your change of heart on this matter.

Don't continue shilling for dash else your credibility will be gone and you will simply be discredited and known as a dash shill.

All your previous good work will be lost.