Islam hates people because People hate Islam -- simple as that.
Islam hate people? lol what you mean that Islam hates people? Islam does not teach hatred! It's because Islamists say that terrorists go to a reward in the afterlife, while the rest of us claim either 1) there is no afterlife, and so life is precious on Earth, or 2) terrorists will be punished in the afterlife.
you do not learn about Islam, so that you do not know, that there is life after death Hereafter. life on earth is temporary, so very precious to you always do good and diligent in worship. However, Islamic leaders NEVER claim that terrorists will be punished in the afterlife; on the contrary, they say that terrorists have earned their eternal rewards in paradise.
terrorists clearly would be punished in the hereafter, for the purpose they are wrong, killing innocent people. terrorists will never get happiness in the hereafter or in heaven. all the statements you really do not based in fact, I will not argue, because you do not know Islam. so there is no end if I argue with you. May I suggest?
Why don't you go to youtube and show evidence of an Islamic scholar saying terrorists will be punished in the hereafter.Waiting... Waiting.... (((Waiting...))) Killing of non Muslims (and Muslims perceived to be not really Muslims) is allowed (actually recommended) to advance the cause of Islam: total domination of non-Muslim populations and forced conversion to Islam. You'll never hear a Muslim scholar say that Allah will punish those martyrs who kill the innocent. The justification will be that those innocent people were not really innocent because they were not faithful to Allah. Islam really means: submit or die |
|
|
|
Well without proof I still believe in the life after death. I believe that heaven and hell exist. ....
That is the reason why religious scams are so successful. Religious people don't care if what they believe is actually true. They will believe it anyway, NO MATTER WHAT. |
|
|
|
If it's uknown to the public, then it's a big deal indeed. Public will be able to see how their taxes are used.
Are you suggesting that US should spend less on military satellites? That is ridiculous. They should spend more on surveillance. You know, just to to keep a close eye on rogue states such as North Korea, China and Russia. |
|
|
|
Over the years, after debating with theists on this and other forums and in person, I came to the conclusion that the religious people are not all the same.
Depending on their intelligence, they fall into one of the following categories:
50-85 IQ - severely retarded to slightly retarded people unable to distinguish what is real and what is not
Generally, these people do not understand the content of religious texts but they tend to remember
and cling on some passages that had been presented and explained to them by others.
This group is a breeding ground for extremists and terrorists.
86-110 IQ - below average to average intelligence, most likely college or university educated folks, these people understand
that most of the religious texts cannot be interpreted literally as these are historical texts and
should be interpreted in the context in which they were written. They tend to compartmentalize
their religious beliefs and their understanding of science and the world around them.
These people would most likely never hurt others in the name of the religion, but generally applaud and
cheer when others kill in the name of their religion. There are some atheists in this group but not too many.
111-135 IQ - above average intelligence. Highly educated people, some holding advanced degrees, they are masters of compartmentalization.
Less religious than the other groups, but still believe in God the creator. Pascal wagers are in this group.
This is a breeding ground for atheists as they analyze the religious texts, find inconsistencies, argue
with other religious people (often with limited success as the mental gaps are just too great).
You might find some hard core religious nuts in this group, but very few since it is very hard for
these people to reconcile religion with the reality around them. But they try despite the odds.
136+ IQ- these people are mostly atheists, most of them don't even think about God as it is not something even worth
thinking about. The question of religion is as clear as 2+2 or A8+F. They know there is no God, that God concept
was invented by people to help them understand the complex world. They see organized religions as political
and/or business entities.
So which group do you belong to?
The easiest way for a person with an average intelligence to become an atheist is to actually read the Bible, Quran and Talmud.
I can guarantee you, some of you will become atheists after reading the Bible alone, you won't have to read Quran. But I highly recommend you read all three.
IQ tests are designed by slick business people to sucker a certain brand of people into working for them and making them a lot of money. They do this to find the people who love money rather than God. Why? Because these are the kinds of people they need to make money. When it comes to God and religion, all people are equal, but often the people who have been suckered into working for money have rejected the truth of God, which shows that their "truth" IQ is a lot lower.  That is a very communist thing to say. All people are definitely not equal. Some are smarter than others. Do you want evidence? Read posts in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Over the years, after debating with theists on this and other forums and in person, I came to the conclusion that the religious people are not all the same.
Depending on their intelligence, they fall into one of the following categories:
50-85 IQ - severely retarded to slightly retarded people unable to distinguish what is real and what is not
Generally, these people do not understand the content of religious texts but they tend to remember
and cling on some passages that had been presented and explained to them by others.
This group is a breeding ground for extremists and terrorists.
86-110 IQ - below average to average intelligence, most likely college or university educated folks, these people understand
that most of the religious texts cannot be interpreted literally as these are historical texts and
should be interpreted in the context in which they were written. They tend to compartmentalize
their religious beliefs and their understanding of science and the world around them.
These people would most likely never hurt others in the name of the religion, but generally applaud and
cheer when others kill in the name of their religion. There are some atheists in this group but not too many.
111-135 IQ - above average intelligence. Highly educated people, some holding advanced degrees, they are masters of compartmentalization.
Less religious than the other groups, but still believe in God the creator. Pascal wagers are in this group.
This is a breeding ground for atheists as they analyze the religious texts, find inconsistencies, argue
with other religious people (often with limited success as the mental gaps are just too great).
You might find some hard core religious nuts in this group, but very few since it is very hard for
these people to reconcile religion with the reality around them. But they try despite the odds.
136+ IQ- these people are mostly atheists, most of them don't even think about God as it is not something even worth
thinking about. The question of religion is as clear as 2+2 or A8+F. They know there is no God, that God concept
was invented by people to help them understand the complex world. They see organized religions as political
and/or business entities.
So which group do you belong to?
The easiest way for a person with an average intelligence to become an atheist is to actually read the Bible, Quran and Talmud.
I can guarantee you, some of you will become atheists after reading the Bible alone, you won't have to read Quran. But I highly recommend you read all three.
|
|
|
|
... Then spread what you find out in the Bible so that people stop the mass shootings because they are saved and want to obey their loving master, Jesus. I try to do this everyday. Unfortunately your Bible is commanding people to kill gays: Leviticus 20-13. And other shit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1367154.0God (aka Jesus) wrote the old testament according to you. Not the 40+ people over the course of few generations. |
|
|
|
For example i don't know how many times i hear Americans on forums saying how. 22lr is just a toy, how many nevwr bother to check if clear when doing anything with the gun...
I've never heard Americans say 22lr is just a toy. I've heard them seriously talk about shooting deer with a 22. Bunches of times. 22LR can inflict some serious damage. It is a preferred round for Mossad, used in special operations. Not sure about the deer though. Unless you don't mind looking for it all day  I guess if you are up close and place your shot, it might be ok. |
|
|
|
Don't worry about lunatics. You are perfectly rational.
Religious people are insane.
well thank you sir, i am not accustom to having people back me up online. it feels good.  np. take care. Here is what these people really think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfUSzaKrxD8 |
|
|
|
In the future, people like this priest will be locked up. They are danger to themselves and others. They are walking, ticking bombs. Just like Muslim Jihadists. Moloch is right, religion poisons people's minds. |
|
|
|
Is it a coincidence that god hates fags, yet appears powerless to stop them?
God doesn't hate fags. Leviticus 20:13 He wants them dead. |
|
|
|
Is it a coincidence that flesh-eating bacteria exists, or is it gods work?
Is it a coincidence that the primary cause of death is heart disease, or is that gods work?
Is it a coincidence that god hates fags, yet appears powerless to stop them?
Is it a coincidence that god puts the death penalty on 613 things, but christians only know 11 of them? (10 commandments +that verse about fags in leviticus)
Is it a coincidence that god hates disobedient children, shellfish, eating meat and dairy in the same meal, or cutting your sideburns? (death penalty for each of these)
Those rules are not the current rules, those rules were set for barbaric people on ancient times who had a cult of offering their childs alive to be burnt in a statue of a god called "moloch" and played drums to silence the screaming of the child. Are you calling the God of the bible barbaric? |
|
|
|
In the known universe Earth is the only place where total eclipses occur because of this
For what it's worth... we have only investigated roughly 0.00000000000000000000001% of the universe... we have no clue how common or uncommon this is Also... god does not exist... so no, its definitely not "because god" Just stop already... fucking stop trying to blame god for everything in the universe... THERE IS NO GOD God created the universe and He is. If he exists, ask him to post here, ask him to sign his message with my bitcoin address private keys. If he does not post, he does not exist. Case closed. He is not going to reveal Himself to nonbelievers. Sure. Still waiting....Ask him to hurry up. I don't have all day. Ask him to post for believers... |
|
|
|
In the known universe Earth is the only place where total eclipses occur because of this
For what it's worth... we have only investigated roughly 0.00000000000000000000001% of the universe... we have no clue how common or uncommon this is Also... god does not exist... so no, its definitely not "because god" Just stop already... fucking stop trying to blame god for everything in the universe... THERE IS NO GOD God created the universe and He is. If he exists, ask him to post here, ask him to sign his message with my bitcoin address private keys. If he does not post, he does not exist. Case closed. |
|
|
|
Had a discussion with friends over this while we drink inside a bar.
so should women be blamed for wearing daring dress like showing their belly button and cleavage why they got raped?
Complemented on, hit on, yes. Raped no. It is like saying you should rob rich people, because they flaunt their stuff. But if you are a criminal, go ahead: rape, rob and kill. Justify it with your alcohol induced logic: "she looked like she wanted it, so I raped her" "he was rich so he would not mind if I rob him" "that old lady was really old, she would die anyway...so I helped her by killing her" etc.etc. You should not rape any woman even if she was walking around naked. |
|
|
|
... Russia wants Crimea and eastern Ukraine and safety from western encroachment... Who the fuck wouldn't find that rational?
Ukrainians and Tatars |
|
|
|
There isn't any crazy stuff in the Bible. There are only those who interpret some Bible things as crazy. They do it because they are the ones who are crazy, and interpret many other wonderful things as being crazy, as well. You are an ignorant imbecile. And that is a complement. You are ignoring most of the crazy shit in the Bible. A book on which you base your world view. I wish you Christians clean up your Bible, drop the vile BS and publish a new version. Ignoring the crazy stuff will not make them go away. The crazy shit is right there. Read the OP for verses. Sounds like offering you eternal life with God in Heaven is crazy, right? But God is so great, and eternity is so long, that we need even an ignoramus like you just to have a little company up there. So come and join us in Christianity, because it will be a lot worse for you in Hell. I would. It sounds all good, except it is not true. Huston, we have a problem! |
|
|
|
There isn't any crazy stuff in the Bible. There are only those who interpret some Bible things as crazy. They do it because they are the ones who are crazy, and interpret many other wonderful things as being crazy, as well. You are an ignorant imbecile. And that is a complement. You are ignoring most of the crazy shit in the Bible. A book on which you base your world view. I wish you Christians clean up your Bible, drop the vile BS and publish a new version. Ignoring the crazy stuff will not make them go away. The crazy shit is right there. Read the OP for verses. |
|
|
|
Might as well throw your lot in with Trump. After all, many of the things that he wants to do he can't. And the few things that he can do just might be for the better. After all, the current situation is only taking us towards a blasted banking crash end. You can jump in the TRUMP train anytime you want. No sharia laws against you if you decide later to jump out, while moving at 300mph... You could always compare a list of all the people in the States, name by name against all the people who registered to vote. Then you could start looking for me in the other group. Good luck. (There isn't any such thing as "luck," btw. Everything is pre-programed by cause and effect.)  Make America Great AgainŠ = pre-programed by cause and effect  = convert all the other religions (including atheism) to Christianity. ... All roads lead to TRUMP Tower... = if it is God's will. = Everything is pre-programed = God pre-programmed it = if it was God's will = except that He goes back in time to the Beginning and jiggles the programming somewhat now and again. Who am I to question God and what HE does with HIS creation. No jigglings needed. His creation is perfection. HE does not even need a deLorean. Everything is pre-programed to help TRUMP win... Sometimes God needs a little help with his plan |
|
|
|
They aren't representers of islam.
Tell, please for the users of this Forum some main facts of ISIS in direct contrast with Quran. Isıs claims fighting in name of islam but kills mostly muslims. And they are a terrorist group supported by Israel, UK and US. In that way, they hit two birds by one stone. One, they will create chaos for cheaper in target country and their soldiers will not die. Two, They show muslims bad and terrorists by allegedly representing islam. All muslims condemn terror, terrorist organisations like ISIS and their supporters like Israel, UK, US and Russia Well, we got one Muslim killer: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/18/world/paris-attack-salah-abdeslam-fingerprints-capture/index.html many millions to go... |
|
|
|
It is very simple. Some people should not be allowed to own or use guns. Guns should be confiscated from those people as they are endangering themselves and others around them. Yes, guns will be used to confiscate guns from them. How in the world you got to the hypocrite part? Do you even know what the word means?
How do you disarm a lunatic with a gun in a theater? With other guns. No sure what is your point?
If you change the laws, that 2nd amendment right will not apply to you if you don't meet new legal requirements. So your guns would be confiscated from you. If you resist, guns will be used to force you
to comply with the law. If you confront police with fire, you'll be dead. Just like today, if you try to fire at a cop, you'll be dead within minutes, hours or days.
Which part of my argument you don't understand?
Actually, its not simple at all. Your idea is simple. The reality of implementing it is not simple. Who shouldn't have guns? Who decides this? Based on what standards? Who enforces these standards? What is stopping them from abusing this system to strip gun rights from people who should rightfully be allowed to own guns? Your "simple" point is fraught with tons of holes, which is why most pro-gun people reject any form of gun control outright, because nothing is stopping the government from abusing that process until no one can be armed. Like he already said before, in the USA, the constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any law counter to the constitution is not lawful, including your half baked gun control plans. "How do you disarm a lunatic with a gun in a theater? With other guns." Absolutely. Now please tell me the magic powers that a costume and a badge grant people to do this better than any other law abiding citizen with a gun, and please don't tell me training, because most Police in the US are extremely poorly trained. In fact a lot of them are criminals themselves, which is exactly why citizens need to be armed so they are not so easily victimized by these thugs in costume operating under color of law. Even assuming they have your best interests at heart, they still get there in minutes when seconds count. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cops-civil-rights-prosecutions/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/weekinreview/09baker.html?Did I say to strip citizens from the right to own or carry arms? I said to take away guns form people who give guns to 4 year olds and get shot in return (for example). People like that are dangerous. They should not be allowed to own guns, EVER. US gun regulation (or lack of) is out of control. So blame YOURSELF for blindly supporting 2nd amendment next time a kid takes a gun from their parents, shoots them dead, gets to a mall or school and kills 20-30 people. Blindly supporting laws that allow insane people to own, have access to guns or to store them unsafely, is nuts and irresponsible, IMHO. I understand it is not easy, NRA political grip is strong, any bills that attempt to restrict 2nd amendment will not have enough support to even be introduced. I'm saying it should be a grass roots movement to correct the wrongs of this law. Once enough people would agree that the changes are needed, politicians will go with it. But rejecting any proposals to reform gun control laws, you'll be just counting bodies of innocent people who died because of your blind support of a really bad idea. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
