Any blockchain that is not the bitcoin blockchain itself is a very big scam to me and I just see it as a way people are trying to make free money all in the name of achieving satoshi vision of blockchain, bitcoin cash was the first coin that came up with the idea that bitcoin is no longer following satoshi vision since segwit was going to be implemented then, but why is bitcoin cash now, nowhere to be found because it was just a means to get free money.
Other than contributing to total crypto space's marketcap, I am not seeing anything positive with these things to crypto community. Due to continuous pumping and dumping, like XRP BCH is trying to find a good place among investors and traders but not sure how much successful it is in terms of having continuous institutional investors.
What do you mean, "Bitcoin Cash is nowhere to be found"? And it wasn't the first to realize that BTC was forced/tricked into small blocks. As far as I'm concerned, Bitcoin is no longer the protocol introduced by Satoshi in 2009. And it's not the original Bitcoin. I d say that Bitcoin is still Bitcoin, but it has different instances or implementations. With these there came up tickers after a while of stability and use, since ppl wanted to start trading. BTC is the first ticker - protocol instance, and with the Segwit fork it has not much to do any more with the original electronic cash based on a chain of signatures. BCH was first try to stay close to Bitcoin, but got CTORed away. BSV really WANTS to stay Bitcoin 's purest essence, so that's my fav. |
|
|
|
BSV = Proof of Work
As BitCoin (BSV) is capitalism's on steroids trolls will have to pay for trolling on the Metanet
Another reason why nobody would ever use it. Why would BSV boys even use it when they can troll here for free? This forum and BTC is doomed. Dream on if you think @micgoosens is smarter then rest of WO thread combined. Merit, Reddit upvotes or likes are meaningless. Controlling your own data is the way, not handing it to fakebook and co for free and let them then sell it and get nothing for it. Why get a fraction uploading a video to youtube or worse get de-monetized when you can get 90% or more uploading it to the Metanet. The house is getting built, ready to move in soon, far from finished but work in progress. Meanwhile in BTC fantasy land.  Here is the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNOWGuw9gyYAWAKENING  |
|
|
|
Ziel 9.5k? Ich setz da mal einen buy... dann kommt's nämlich eh nicht  Ziel 2K, aber ich kaufe jetzt... dann hat man wenigstens etwas worübr man sich ärgern kann Das Top war's schonmal nicht - alles gut  |
|
|
|
Checking out this 'neutral' report here https://mobile.twitter.com/thatcryptoguyyy/status/1145116618395009024https://www.pscp.tv/w/1zqKVarqzzPxBFirst. Bitcoin should not have any middle men , nor any leader to work properly That falls back to any guy or group wanting to alter the protocol away from what it initially was and specked up by the white paper. If CSW is or is not Satoshi doesn't change much, except he speaks for having a frozen protocol definition. Fine. For the case, it would be much more easier to say he is not Satoshi- than where the hack should Ira gets the money from? So Ira wants to 'make' CSW and Dave to be kinda Satoshi and since Ira messed up the tech from Dave. He really needs CSW to get to Daves coins, by any means. CSW was honestly starting that thing by telling Ira to ensure the tech from Dave but that went wrong since the two brothers seemed to live totally separated lives. Now CSW WANTED to help both Ira and now following the order but technically couldn't since he and Dave had the private keys split and only by some probable facts in the future ( either code or human postpone delivery) might get hold on them and give back the parts belonging to Dave. All in good will. So why would CSW do all that if he didn't mine all these coins and so does not be Satoshi? Most of the trolls got quite... They need more and more to bend and try to smear |
|
|
|
Someone please correct me if I am wrong. The article says that only transactions that are worth more than $1,000 will be monitored. So what will happen if an user makes multiple transactions of $999.99 during the same day? Also, since these regulations are applicable only to such users, if I have only $100 in my exchange wallet, do I have to undergo KYC?
And also, is it $1000 at the precise moment of the withdrawal? Or could you withdraw $950 at one point in the day and then there's a massive price spike and suddenly your transaction is worth more than $1000? The exchanges will struggle to know which ones to report on when the price is volatile. Seems pretty dumb to measure it in fiat like that. It's going to cause all sorts of perceived indiscrepencies. This is a cumulative threshold per day, same as for fiat. And yes, there are bagatelle amounts where nothing happens. The roadmap is clear, any any try against this , mostly by bad protocol or mixer apps or shady hooks, will be bad for the global adoption, which is now starting top down and will pave the road for a very few cryptos (I bet Bitcoin impl bsv) accepted, promoted and really used (not only speculation). |
|
|
|
Yeah, some were caught tweeting during the session, now the tweets are gone, but why was my post deleted again? Some mods fear some truth? |
|
|
|
Nice dev panel about Bitcoin getting into real applications once the protocol scales and is stable as trolls hate https://youtu.be/SKvlWcWGC7w  |
|
|
|
There is something else going on with this blockalypse description and implied threat from jbreher...
He is trying to leave some kind of impression that bitcoin is broken in some kind of way and that the spam attacks that were going on between about December 2017 and January 2018 have some kind of persistence in bitcoin that resulted from bitcoin deficiencies and supposed organic growth that bitcoin cannot handle, rather than some nutjobs spending a lot of money to purposefully fill up the bitcoin blocks in order to perpetuate their dumb ass narrative (about supposed high fees and slow transaction times on bitcoin).
You mischaracterize my point entirely (for the umpteenth time, even). Whether through spam attacks or through organic growth, the strangling of tx capacity due to stubborn refusal to accommodate actual use is a very real limitation upon BTC's value proposition. Whether I mischaracterize your point(s) or not, the implications of your point needs to be cleared on a regular basis. This is a quasi-public thread, so it seems that your point(s) are misleading on a regular basis at least in regard to purposeful nature of the spam attack in December 2017 and January 2018 and the implications of that including how that information tends to be misleadingly used by bitcoin bashers and alt coin pumpers alike. U just doesn't want to get the fact, that a minority of the world, mostly anarchos and / or anonymous and scammers want to believe that SegwitCoin is Bitcoin, but it just isn't. U have no arguments left, so u fall in text walls or insults. Not that this post won't change that but it's the truth. |
|
|
|
|
JJ troll runs out of args ... needs to use personal attacks.
Usual pattern of real scammers
|
|
|
|
bsv to BTC -10.1%
In July Big blocks come (2GB) and some serious data uploading can start. Lets rev the Engines..... BSV's average block size is around 200 - 400 kb... Less than one half of 1 MB. What does it need 2 GB blocks for? To tell you more about the weather? LOL. Frankly I hope BSV's blocks get filled all the way. That's the equivalent of 288 GB a day added to the blockchain. That's 2 terabytes a week, or 102 petabytes a year. Good luck invoking Moore's law to help you there. Still, OP_RETURN data can only go up to 100 KB in size, so that means you need 20,000 transactions being sent with 100 kb of data a piece (well, a bit less than that because of other transaction data not related to OP_RETURN) every 10 minutes to reach the max. Currently, BSV has 3110 transactions per hour, so that would be a spam attack of epic proportions. Probably be worth it to see their node count drop from 445 to zero. To put things in proportion, BCH currently has 1493 nodes, and BTC has over 10,000. Some hundrets of nodes are fine - miners matter anyway. Just ignore Bitcoin if u don't like it - I 'll ignore all non-constructive trolls - give it a try Edit: Oh and thx for the nice trust decoration - lol. And no there is no scam seen - except "SegWit2X - No2X + LN never works " was. Edit: Check this Bloomberg News, they are talking exactly about the SegWitCoin scam ( Min 1- 2) - BSV will fix that https://www.cnnmoney.ch/shows/living-markets/videos/lucatelli-swiss-digital-currency-could-be-export-success |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
