What do you mean electro wallet?

Trust walet Is a fairly popular wallet, but there are a number of question marks about their safety and security and I would not recommend it.
There have been reports of them having a bad customer support system and they switched from being open source sometime back.

There are many more reputable options for a wallet software which you can use instead. What coins do you want to store?

For what it's worth, it's an inquiry about the forum and fits in the meta board. It could rub some people the wrong way and be somewhat not constructive, but heavy moderation in a discussion board related to the forum might be counter productive.

This of course means we'll have to deal with a bit of shit posts.

I'm cracking up at the thought of this. If Putin did have an active account here, it would definitely have been spammed with "Untrustworthy, I wouldn't trade with him" tags, but with much more vulgar language.

Bitcoin should never have been regulated in the first place, for it to be de-regulated. It is a decentralized network which does not need a central authority to function, it is a Peer-to-Peer system, where the users function as their own banks.

Regulations does not prevent misuse of cryptocurrency, same way fiat is misused even though it is a highly regulated system

This is quite a peculiar case. Had the amount you tried sending been sitting in your wallet for sometime, or did you just receive it?

My best guess is that the initial transaction from electrum to Wasabi was an unconfirmed parent transaction, and you tried creating a child transaction from that unconfirmed parent transaction. That unconfirmed transaction could have been invalidated by double spending.

If the address was incorrect, then you should not have gotten the notification of an incoming transaction on your wasabi wallet at all.

No, that's not how locktime transactions work.

Or you could just take more caution and double check, or triple check that address you are sending to.

• Firstly, Bitcoin is pseudo anonymous, so some users would not want to have any sort of unique name associated with their address.
• Having a system that can access and reverse erroneous transactions is same as centralization, which is the opposite of how Bitcoin was designed. You are essentially your own bank and are responsible for your actions and mistakes.

There are a couple of options to reduce tx fees
• Segwit addresses,
• Consolidating multiple inputs,
• Timing when you spend to avoid network clog,
• Calculating how much to spend, to prevent change address, etc.

---

The bottom part of this thread - Beginner's Guide to Transaction Fees I created some years back, explains some of these concepts further and contains useful links as well.

Here's a link to the news - https://elsalvadorinfo.net/nayib-bukele-approval-rate/, for those who want to review it.

It is a political development which affects Bukele and his ambitions, it's not directly related to Bitcoin and shouldn't be in Bitcoin discussion board.
You can post this in Politics & Society board.

This is the first thread I have come across regarding this issue, that doesn't represent an urgent request from the majority, it's your request.
You should be looking to back your request you with data so as to convince the admin that a local board is really needed and a thread is not sufficient to support the discussions.

That should mean that Ukrainians are not being marginalized as they are represented as moderators.
Although, admin is very selective in choosing a moderator and users who are selected usually have a low chance if being biased.

Going all into crypto is not feasible at this moment. Majority of stores and merchants do not yet accept crypto and that is just the half of it, the volatility in crypto means you will constantly be checking the market value before making any purchase.

Cash would be one of the most valuable currency during war time. Bitcoin is more useful to carry assets on you, but you would have a hard time finding where to spend bitcoins during war.

It indeed is applied to the local currency, that why citizens were switching to using bitcoin as a store of value to escape devaluation.
With E-naira however, there's no physical cash, it's a digital and the government can arbitrarily block or freeze your account as they do with bank accounts, but this would be more efficient to be controlled as it all digital with no physical version.

It was clearly a scam attempt and a poorly executed one, but that would not have been the reason the thread was deleted as scams are not moderated by the forum, regardless of how obvious it turns out to be; Many members are rather not convinced by that rule, but that is what it is.

The mods could have found whatever other reason to ban the post for as it broke more than one rule.

The reason for the ban was that the country wanted to completely regulate the financial system and use that to control the masses.
The ban came of the back of the #ENDSARS protest and how bitcoin was used as a means to evade banking limitations, so to nip it in the bud, the government banned bitcoin transactions through banks and twitter as well, blocking free speech and unregulated transactions.

E-naira adoption would definitely be low as the citizens do not trust the government and would rather not have them controlling their finances completely.

There has been no progress with the peace talks besides the fact that there has been a couple of such meetings and this is evident in how the invasion is being escalated further by the Russian troops.

The intent of Putin can not be determined, we can all but speculate what triggered the attack and what the fall out effect would be over the coming months and possibly years.

There are peer-to-peer exchanges which connect buyers and sellers together such as bisq and hodlhodl. There are also P2P options on centralized exchanges where users can trade directly with each other through a regulatory system acting as escrow.

Bitcoin was designed to be a peer-to-peer network, so it is ironic you would not risk that, but would trust a third party system.

I fail to understand the purpose of this thread, the forum rules on plagiarism is not ambiguous;
• Users do not get banned for sharing content of others as long as it is referenced or indicated that is a quote,
• If there is enough original thought and content put in, it doesn't count as plagiarism,
• Cases are handled case by case and leniency shown in different scenarios,

---

Users can report to the mods based on their personal view and mods can decide on what action to take, that does not warrant a thread. Users who report are not the problem, those who break the rules are.

I am personally not hopeful that the federal government would renege on its decision to ban banks from getting involved in crypto transactions, beyond articles like these, the benefits of bitcoin to the citizens are evident, and one of them which sticks out a lot is the freedom it gives to users, and not every country wants the people to have that kind of freedom, especially as controlling the financial system is one way countries control the people.

Cause you cannot ban the bitcoin network, you can only ban yourselves from it. As a decentralized asset, no one has control to prevent transactions.

The headline is being milked by the media for views and clicks, and the idea of bitcoin contributing to climate change and the energy consumption being detrimental is something that has for a long time been blown out of proportion a lot and does not reflect the reality.
There is no extensive damage caused by bitcoins usage and consequently there is no issue that needs to be fixed.

It does not directly help Bitcoin, but it could shape the public opinion around it. Governments turning to Bitcoin announced it as a global asset, meaning more people would want to own it, driving up demand.

They do not have to and countries/states which do accept Bitcoin would be doing themselves a favour and eojmd be ahead of the curve in the coming years considering the potential growth of the network.
Bitcoin would be fine without such adoption though.

A link between cartels and fiat will not really yield much traffic, cause people do not really care about what is done with fiat which is already accepted globally as the staple means of transacting, drug deals happen on the streets everyday with fiat, nothing new to see there. Crypto would make far more headlines and news media has been known to twist news headlines in order to create more controversy, and there's no shortage of controversy with Bitcoin.

The best approach is to debunk those news articles on social media and any other source it is published so more people are aware of the twosted facts.

If you zoomed out of the chart to a couple of months or years, then you would not notice any cause for alarm, rather an asset which has been steadily appreciating over time.
Intending investors should not focus on the last 7 days chart when choosing an investment, or they would likely be making the mistake of buying shit coins which were pumped and are going to dump. Proper research involves studying the fundamentals and also the technical aspects of the market.

This is a decentralized network and there is no system which regulates the price.