This is a very valid perspective.
For a country which is very antagonistic to Bitcoin growth and development, having to train individuals in blockchain tech seems incongruent with the stance so far. It could be a political propaganda from the government to influence elections, although I doubt it would have much of an effect on the more educated members of the populace.

Neither would I.
The association with BSV is shady and with lots of information clouded in secrecy, I would await more details on how the training program would work, and how the incubation program would also work

A random mention of Bitcoin in a movie scene does not indicate price action or movements. As mentioned already, it could be a sort of "click bait", to help with advertising of the movie, by getting users to share that particular scene and publicize the movie. Movies do this with subtitles and use of certain trending topics to boost the marketing.

$1.25 million is a probable amount within the next 5 decades or so, but who would hold that long?

I can't see the correlation between the topic title and the content. If you have learned a this g or two on the forum, you don't need to announce that in a thread; teach others or apply what you've learnt practically.

You have cleared off all of your bounty spam posts, but are yet to replace then with actual quality content. And with only 3 posts in 2022 and none in 2021, there's little to no activity on your account. You of course could be reading around the forum, without actually joining the discussions, and good for you if that's the case.

Every industry with a a wide customer base could play a huge role in the adoption of blockchain technology.
Sports and entertainment are one of the largest global industries and has had a role in the growth of several crypto related niches over the years.

People act on their personal gain or interest. We have had companies, trust funds, payment gateways and even individuals like Elon associate with Bitcoin to market themselves or their services.
If musicians or sport teams do not see the personal gain, they would most likely not associate with the technology.

YouTube tutorials are a great help. I am very new to programing but find that I learn twice or three times as fast on YouTube than I would on some course platform, even on the interactive ones . And it's also more practical as you feel you have a personal tutor (which is the best way to learn imo).
I'll check out the channels you included, thanks for sharing them.

That's the best advice, but it's the only way many know how to (especially for those that use Android devices). They need to find a way to stay safe regardless and being security consciousness would help to prevent majority of phishing attempts.
People do not value data much and easily allow multiple permissions just to use a game or live streaming app risking their privacy and funds.

And 100% of people who use mobile devices as a means of storage hope they would not be the 1% who gets ripped off.

I personally keep a little amount for daily transactions on my mobile device, but no more than that. The frequency of transactions I make determine how much I leave in an address and how well I secure it.

Google play store is literally the worst way to download sensitive applications, as they can very easily be phished, and even after reporting, it takes ages for them to be removed, only for new ones to pop up almost immediately.

I would be reporting and urge people to verify the authenticity of any app they download, especially to a device where they hold funds (fiat or Bitcoin).

If you got the cash; then do the research.
There are tons on information out there on inflation and the investment qualities of Bitcoin, sift through that and make your decision to invest.

Majority of the time members have an issue with their deleted posts, it turns out that they were spam posts which were rightly deleted.
Keep working on improving how you post and joining more constructive discussions.

Maybe, the more you post, the more visible your account is, and the more likely your spam post is to be seen and reported. Moderators after checking would act on the reports based on their discretion.

The pressure is mostly self inflicted by the user. I find it to be newer member who discuss merits more, giving tips on how to I get them and how not to.
There is a certain fascination with ranks, coins and privileges associated with those ranks, but that doesn't create any desperation, except the user already has one or develops one.

Aptly said.
Many people are introduced to the forum as a means of earning an income, and start chasing ways to rank up inorder to unlock the opportunities required, leading to spam and merit buying.

It's definitely smarter than buying loads of altcoin within a highly correlated market in a bid to diversify your investments.

Know the right stock to pick and the best ways to invest are key in making an entry into that market.

Digital money is not a competition to Bitcoin which serves as an alternative asset and an investment.
Digital money is already wide spread around the globe at this time with lots of people using it, and those who don't, do not use Bitcoin either, so it's safe to say both have the same consumer base at this time.

I do not see the connection between spread of digital money and need for crypto exchanges. Bitcoin would thrive regardless and would need a platform for exchange.

You can just get advice on a topic, you will need to do research, gain knowledge on it, and then ask questions when you get confused.

The forum has lots of posts about different topics and you can use the search option at the top icons to research on them and possibly join previous conversations.

It's not a matter of should it come to that, but when it comes to that.
About how it keeps them at their jobs, I talked about only few transactions occuring on chain, most of which expected to be large transactions, while the bulk of transactions occur off chain at little or no fees.
This of course is just a hypothesis, and there are many more of such out there.

Miners already process transactions based on priority or higher fees; the higher the feerate paid, the closer the transaction is to the tip of the mempool.
What exactly do you mean by swift transactions?

Years before this point, it should already be evident how much Bitcoin would function without mining rewards. Infact, within the next decade, over 99% of the total Bitcoin supply would have been mined already, leaving the final 1% to be spread out over a ~century. What this means is that the network would shape up how exactly it would function without any more coinbase rewards.

On chain; it would function as designed, miners would earn only from transaction fees as a form of incentive.
This could lead to a bulk of transactions occuring off chain, but that remains to be seen.

This doesn't seem reason enough to go through the stress of creating new wallets every month and safe keeping multiple seedphrases.

If it becomes necessary to keep up with changes in how transfer protocol changes, having a little fund kept away in a wallet which can be used to play around with and keep up to date.

---

The idea doesn't seems unnecessary in my opinion and exposed they user to a lot of risks.

Much worse when the edit button is not necessarily needed on the app and the fact that there's none is a huge 1 up the platform has over the competition.

I am yet to see the end result of the debacle regarding the percentage of bots on Twitter, if the amount was indeed around the touted percentage, then it's a huge deal and a serious overhaul would be necessary to get it back on track.

Suppression of certain voices is also a huge problem on twitter, especially when it seems to be a biased censorship.

In the short term Bitcoin may be more likely to drop in value than to rise, and your friend might have to cut their losses if they invested money they can afford to spare.

Bitcoin doesn't meet daily needs, that's what a job does.
Bitcoin is a currency which doubles as an investment for many.
I would not advice your friend to try earning passive income through any of the DeFi or staking methods as they are very high risk.

What wallet do you use?
Also, do you have an idea how it got compromised?
If it's a case of granting permission to the wrong (d)app or script then you can manually find a way to disable it.

Give full details and avoid getting scammed again into paying for a bot to help you fix your existing bot issue.

You made an error in your calculations, I'll use the BTC assumption to correct it, but it applies both ways;

• €10,000 to €114,000 is a growth of €104,000,
• This is a percentage increase of 1,040% and not 114%,
• This implies that the asset multiplied over 10 times from it's initial price,
• With an investment of €100, you would have €1,140 with that percentage growth. I have no idea how you ended up with over €10k.

It doesn't matter technically in the hypothetical situation, but in reality the risk of investing in a low value coin exists and you could easily be left of with 0 after a few months or years.