|
frontend down, cant login to add new miners, no auto worker creation, hurry fix it pls.
|
|
|
|
|
the army marches on ! go go go . . .
|
|
|
|
STOP ! the arguments, but good to have some prove ...
i've humbly requested CM to lower the fees earlier on but obviously nth was done, you don't like it, don't use it !
his cheerleader coc* suckin' fanboy comes in & bla bla bla that whatever nanonaoano shi*head stepping on everyone's toes.
i think even on eth solo mining or something, boysie had some not so good experience with the devfee.
STOP ! it ! just STOP it !
bypass it !
heh, no more fees for CM !
your a whiner right according to them lol ..... i was told the same BS when i asked for way around it or way to pay to stop it I told that ass to back off and left . lol, must be some co*k sucker bitch lolz. cm is already so bloody rich ! those who keeps track or do some monitoring. i did post up some of his add's. was just requesting a small reduction, prolly same as eth fees, it seems to be fair imo. but again, who pays the fees ? why no linux ? not that he hates linux, linux can "see" much things inside, win version a little tougher cuz it's a closed source. regardless of linux or win or osx or android, the fees are still being bypassed as he himself knows it. |
|
|
|
|
STOP ! the arguments, but good to have some prove ...
i've humbly requested CM to lower the fees earlier on but obviously nth was done, you don't like it, don't use it !
his cheerleader coc* suckin' fanboy comes in & bla bla bla that whatever nanonaoano shi*head stepping on everyone's toes.
i think even on eth solo mining or something, boysie had some not so good experience with the devfee.
STOP ! it ! just STOP it !
bypass it !
heh, no more fees for CM !
|
|
|
|
i WANNA eat some SQUID !!! how are you mate & the p2pool gang ?, long time no see, i;ve been around but at other sections. sad to see p2pool not doing to well, but i will always support p2pool, a big holla to the guys around. |
|
|
|
|
@pad, when are u gonna donate one of those beauties to me heh .. have'nt seen u in a bit guess u must bz with that project. thumbs up mate !
nicely done mate.
anything more than 7 u need linux, then u can add splitters, afaik, linux has no limitations, windows does.
|
|
|
|
1 out 7 480s (4 GB) is hashing lower than others. Is there something that could be done to fix it? Not that I am complaining, it is hashing way higher than Claymore V4, just curious what is causing 1 GPU (dev6) to hash lower.
Assuming you run with --instances 2 (default), one of the 2 sa-solver processes may have crashed for this GPU. Does it go back up to 80+ sol/s after restarting silentarmy? Most of the time the GPU at this particular location start low across several rigs, the second GPU from the very last one. I am using the following bat c:\cygwin64\bin\python3.4m silentarmy --instances=1 -c stratum+tcp://zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u hawkfish007.2H -p x --use 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 pause Should I change it to --instances=2 or 0? Thanks. i asked the same question earlier but no answers yet, i rolled back to earlier version & the particular slower gpu goes back to normal but overall mining speed is a tad slower compared to the newer version but total speed is abt the same although the particular gpu is slower because of increased hashrate from newer version. some other rigs works well no issue but on some others with the same setup & gpu make & model has this particular half speed. if you open up gpuz & montitor that gpu, it's not really working to full speed, looks like only 1 instance instead of 2. (default 1 is actually 2) |
|
|
|
nice miner, high fees, speed lower than other miner, off i go & many others too soon i guess ... let's see the next update.
470 4gb nitros getting 80+ to 90 sols = happy miner without the fees or restriction but with less features but definitely can live with it !
oh the 480 8gb is hovering around 100 sols.
So you came back to let everyone know that you left? I tell you what, it is folks like you who are back the moment Claymore is again faster, just to suck his dick very hard again.Let's see your post history. I'm not working on zcash miner currently, so please don't expect that I'll release it soon.
Though its PoW looks interesting for me and as soon as I have time I'll check if I can create faster miner.
I get a lot of requests for private miner, so I have to repeat it again: I don't have any private miners, if I create a miner I make it public.
yeps, no private miner, kudos to that but with the fees ... you're already VERY rich (at least 5M USD in eth alone) claymore, prolly lower the built in devfees ? just my 2 sats. no disrespect claymore, NOT a single doubt that you're a great programmer that made an awesome miner software that works wonderfully & you definitely deserve the fees, TOTALLY agree with your statement, if don't like it, then don't use it.
i might be wrong with the figures hence this public apology to you.
i even voted to pay the fee if you made a zcash miner. but i'm asking prolly you might want to consider lowering the fees a tad, ain't saying NO fees ! just a request to you to consider.
everything has fees, totally agreed.
SUPER GREEDY selfish dev that stole & got caught with pants down but at least he admits it so i take my hat off to you, but you were using mrb's code & you used it for commercial gains & you made a MINIMUM of 30-50 BTC from the 2.5% FEES !
You just sent 5 ZEC to mrb ?
SUPER SHAMEFUL !
cm made over hundred's of btc or more & counting just from the zec fees alone ...
how shameful of CM paying mrb ONLY 5 ZEC !
Obviously you are very interested in Other People's Money. Not contributing anything, just leeching off others work and yet asking for free lunch everywhere. Get the fuck out! newbie oh newbie .... ain't here to suck anybody's dick but seems like you're the one doing the sucking, pretty free to dig up post history, good job ! never paid any fee using cm's miner. go figure heh & never shared with anyone on how to bypass it. i'm sure many knows how to do it. since the issue between cm n mrb has been solved, ain't gonna speak much abt it. why would i be interested in other's $ ? i'm NOT the one charging fees. leeching ? seems like the only leech here is you, go dig your own history & you only leech & post on this thread. the miner is available for anyone to use & obviously miners would wanna to use the miner that makes the most profit or whichever that suits them best. so you can either go suck your own dick or cm's dick but i highly doubt that he would want that from you. ain't gonna waste much time with ya brainless newbie SUPER DUPER cm fanboy & linux hater. go use your brain before you speak your mind or even make a post. |
|
|
|
Hah, instead normal timings like You all have here, my RX470 4GB Sapphire cards have some mambo-jambo.. nothing logical.  Flip the bios switch, restart and grab other bios with gpu-z. See if its the same Its the same... Well, somebody here gave me an idea and solution is here: https://github.com/caa82437/PolarisBiosEditor/issues/2you need hex to edit the bios... on latest version of windows, it may not support elpida, not sure though but i had issues on 1 of my nitro with elpida memory, i'm back on older version of SA, works on cm v4 though. |
|
|
|
|
nice miner, high fees, speed lower than other miner, off i go & many others too soon i guess ... let's see the next update.
470 4gb nitros getting 80+ to 90 sols = happy miner without the fees or restriction but with less features but definitely can live with it !
oh the 480 8gb is hovering around 100 sols.
|
|
|
|
|
Total 418.3 sol/s [dev0 59.9, dev1 61.2, dev2 39.4, dev3 58.3, dev4 66.6, dev5 62.9] 66 shares
Total 418.2 sol/s [dev0 58.3, dev1 60.2, dev2 38.6, dev3 57.7, dev4 65.8, dev5 63.6] 66 shares
Total 414.7 sol/s [dev0 58.8, dev1 60.6, dev2 35.0, dev3 59.9, dev4 63.1, dev5 64.2] 66 shares
Total 412.6 sol/s [dev0 58.0, dev1 61.0, dev2 31.0, dev3 57.8, dev4 62.8, dev5 66.4] 66 shares
running latest version 5 on win
all gpu are 470 4gb sapphire nitros EXCEPT dev 2 with elpida memory.
was running on 1st version it's fine but after upgraded to latest only dev 2 with elpida memory acting up...
any help ?
TIA
|
|
|
|
dont work for me (((  maybe SA don't understand russian, read the readme ! always, u have to install some other stuff before it will work. |
|
|
|
|
WINDOWS version please . . .
i'm sure you'll get donations instead of a closed source with fixed fees ..
thx for the great work mrb
|
|
|
|
|
cm made over hundred's of btc or more & counting just from the zec fees alone ...
how shameful of CM paying mrb ONLY 5 ZEC !
|
|
|
|
I had to remove v1.0 and v1.1 from google drive and mega, because I was pointed that I used a small part of mrb's work.
It will take up to 24 hours to revise my code and create own implementation, then I will upload updated version.Details are: mrb> Claymore, you took and reused my blake.c code and didn't include the copyright notice as required by silentarmy's MIT license:
mrb> https://forum.z.cash/t/silentarmy-v3-now-a-full-miner-multi-gpu-stratum/3580/640
mrb> I request that you cease infringing by:
mrb> (1) either including the full "License" section of silentarmy's README.md along with your distribution of your zcash miner,
mrb> (2) or stop using my blake.c code.
mrb>
mrb> Of course this is only ~100 lines of code, and we are all lazy programmers and I understand why you did it :) but you ought to do the right thing.
mrb> Thanks,
mrb> -Marc Bevand
[/quote]
Oh, you are correct, I really missed this point. I was in a big hurry to release first version asap, so I concentrated on main Wagner's algo,
blake is not interesting for me at this point since it takes only 10% of total GPU time and it's trivial in fact, blake algo is not that I can call something new.
But to make some start point asap I included your blake.c into my sources and then forgot about it and did not create my implementation. That's what happens if you are in a hurry.
It is very unpleasant situation for me, I will do the following:
1. I remove v1.0 and v1.1 versions of my miner. In fact, I already removed current packages from google drive and MEGA, I will upload updated versions soon.
In next version I will remove your blake.c from my sources.
2. I apologize, it's only my fault that I used this part of your code. I was not going to do it in public version.
3. I want to send you some compensation from my ZEC dev fee if you don't mind, just send me your ZEC address.
4. I'm not going to hide my fault in any way, I will post this message in my miner thread in first post.
Thank you for doing the right thing. I fetched your new tarball Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v1.1 Beta - LINUX - Catalyst 15.12.tar.gz and can confirm you included the MIT license as mandated in your "Readme!!!.txt" file, as quoted below. You are in no way obligated to "pay" me. But if you feel this can help re-establish some of your image and reputation, feel free to publicly send to my donation address t1cVviFvgJinQ4w3C2m2CfRxgP5DnHYaoFC You are now fully compliant with the MIT license. I hope my SILENTARMY code was useful to you  ==========
This miner uses some code of SILENTARMY OpenCL GPU Zcash Equihash solver:
# License
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Marc Bevand
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
-Marc Bevand I'm happy that we close this issue! I also donated 5 ZEC to your address t1cVviFvgJinQ4w3C2m2CfRxgP5DnHYaoFC SUPER GREEDY selfish dev that stole & got caught with pants down but at least he admits it so i take my hat off to you, but you were using mrb's code & you used it for commercial gains & you made a MINIMUM of 30-50 BTC from the 2.5% FEES ! You just sent 5 ZEC to mrb ? SUPER SHAMEFUL ! |
|
|
|
So quick question: This miner says that I'm mining at 192 H/s. However NiceHash is reporting 140 SOLS/s. My question is does 192 H/s translate to 140 SOLS/s, or should NiceHash be reporting what the miner's saying which, again, is 192 H/s?
difficulty changes & FEES ! when it's mining devfee it kinda stops mining for you hence the drop, it should go up again after dev gets the fees. |
|
|
|
you forgot +20% fee by developers from each mined block dangggg yeah the BIGGEST fee ! so it's just too much fees ... jeeeeez |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
