it's not really true... if i m bot and buy 2 btc of sigt from my bot friend .. volume increase of 2 btc but if my friend bot sell 2 btc the volume drecrease of 2 btc.. so or this bot like to play at this game all day, and that means the scam you proclaim don't work or you are not right
Wow. Just. Wow. That is a stunning display of ignorance. Truly stunning. If A sells 1BTC worth of SIGT to B and then B sells those 1BTC worth of SIGT to A then the trading 'volume' will show two trades with a total value of 2BTC. I don't think I can make this any simpler to understand. yuo right.. so this "scam" it losing all in fee? if as you say the volume is fake? No this scam is not losing their money in fees, because in amongst the 30+ bitcoin in fake hand-to-hand bot trades will be some newbies actually believing the lies promoted by the scammers and buying some of those coins thinking it will 'moon' and make them rich. The coins they are buying will be coming from the people operating the trading bots. The trading bots keep the coin price artificially high so that they can offload their bags to newbie buyers at the highest price possible. As well as simply being able to fake daily volume and trading activity, in order to con people into believing it is a legit coin, the scammers routinely will attempt to profit from faking a sudden surge in interest off the back of false 'industry interest' posts and talk of how the switch to PoS will result in an increase in price, with plenty of sock-puppet posts pretending to be users voicing their excitement at such 'news'. Invariably the pump is short-lived, with any price increase on the market allowing them to offload more SIGT in return for BTC and, when the price drops back down, they can choose where to set the 'bottom' for their bots and, in some cases, will buy some more SIGT at the lower price with the intention of selling them off again on the next fake pump. When the 'dev team' controls what you 'know' about this coin and what you believe it to be, they can keep this charade going for as long as they want until, eventually, as *will* happen, the newbies stop buying their constant lies and hype and start trying to sell off their own coins, causing a final crash in the price as the scammers switch the bots off and exit out of the market through dumping whatever they can on to it. Then they will move on to hyping another 'innovative' clonecoin under new forum accounts and repeat the whole thing again. That is the scam. That is what pump-and-dump means.
|
|
|
it's not really true... if i m bot and buy 2 btc of sigt from my bot friend .. volume increase of 2 btc but if my friend bot sell 2 btc the volume drecrease of 2 btc.. so or this bot like to play at this game all day, and that means the scam you proclaim don't work or you are not right
Wow. Just. Wow. That is a stunning display of ignorance. Truly stunning. If A sells 1BTC worth of SIGT to B and then B sells those 1BTC worth of SIGT to A then the trading 'volume' will show two trades with a total value of 2BTC. I don't think I can make this any simpler to understand.
|
|
|
Now why would you lie so clumsily by posting something instantly refuted merely by clicking on it? It is almost as if you are desperately trying to discredit me to an unthinking audience in the absence of any objective reasoning or evidence. Whereas I, however, have clearly explained the objective reasoning and evidence of pump-posts, false 'hype' and fake trading volume demonstrating that this coin project is just another clonecoin pump-and-dump scam being perpetrated against FOMO-suffering newbies by multiple sock-puppet accounts controlled by the scammers. See, there's the difference between our argument positions. BTW, to all concerned about the trading value of this coin: there seems to be some serous bot manipulation there, so while not fake volume.. its still real volume, but its manipulated volume.
bots selling and buying at the same prices, over and over again. You fail to understand what trading 'volume' actually is. If these were legitimate trades being made between multiple interested parties, resulting in 30+BTC of volume each day, then that would mean there was sufficient liquidity to cover most instances of large sells without crashing the market. This trading, however, being only hand-to-hand bot trading, means that 30+BTC of 'volume' is not actually volume at all. For example, if a bot holds only, say, two bitcoin and uses that through the day to make multiple small trades back and forth between two bot-controlled accounts, the 'volume' would reflect the total amount of bitcoin 'traded' (30+BTC), but that would not equate to liquidity, it would merely be those 2 bitcoin being passed from one bot to another and back again in small amounts. This means there is very little liquidity on the market. The rage posts in response to these facts being raised are predominantly from the scammer sock-puppet accounts themselves, couple with the odd newbie fanbois who simply doesn't want to accept that he's being scammed. But the facts speak for themselves. All through this thread are multiple posts constantly making reference to how major cryptocurrency whales are interested in this coin, yet it lacks absolutely ANYTHING of note whatsoever in tech or commercial value. So for all this accusations of these facts being nothing but FUD and me wanting to buycheapcoinznomnomnom, it is simply the scammers repeating the same tired old tactics of using fallacies and lies to keep fooling you out of your bitcoin.
|
|
|
I can't get what's going on. So much RED large letters in SIGT theme. But there is no useful info. Signatum is only 2 month old coin with enough new hashing algo. I think it at least 6-8 month investment and I see NO scam indicator of SIGT.
As I already pointed out, it is a mere 100-day PoW, it didn't need a new hashing algo with 'ASIC resistance', that's only relevant for pure PoW coins. So this coin has nothing of note going for it whatsoever and plenty of highly-questionably behaviour by its 'dev team' in how they are promoting it as 'innovative' to crypto newbies who don't know any better. 'Marketplace' and 'Webwallet' are simply white-label code packs you can buy cheaply and stick your own logo on. They haven't 'developed' anything. You are all being conned and this bullshit 'masternodes' talk for when it switches to PoS is just another way to get you to buy and hold this useless coin while they offload what they already mined and manipulated through the fake trading volume. BTW, pointing out that the majority of altcoins are just as bad is no excuse for this clonecoin scam and, likewise, complaining that I'm not exposing them right now is not a rebuttal either.
|
|
|
PSA WARNING!
Be advised that this coin project has been exposed
as nothing more than the usual pump-and-dump clone-coin
scam, with fake trading volume on YoBit and frequent
forum posts containing false claims about commercial interest
in it, even though it lacks any useful tech or innovation.
Avoid at all costs.Scam accusation thread with details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198496.new#new[Update] Now including details of the scam dev team's intentions to purchase a forum account dated prior to the launch of their clonecoin, for which there can be no honest purpose to such a requirement: Update with a reference example of the type of sock-puppet shill account operated by the scammers all through this thread to pump the coin: What is this stuff? Evidence of the type of sock-puppet shill accounts used by the scammers all through this thread to hype and pump the coin. This one was only used for 12 hours yet made a series of posts encouraging people to buy the coin in the belief it was about to moon. Typical pump-and-dump market manipulation scam tactic.
|
|
|
It wouldn't surprise me either. Many of the shill accounts on that thread have similar 'tastes' in clonecoins it seems. Although some of their sock-puppetry is a bit lazy, take a look at this account created solely to create a raft of pump posts in a period of only 12 hours:
|
|
|
As I've written in the thread, you should summarize a list of account that need to be tagged.
Yeah I might do that at some point but at this time I'm trying to get a feel for which accounts are definitely sock-puppets and which are just gullible newbie fanbois suffering from 'sunk-cost' fallacy. So I tend to tag a bunch I have good reason to suspect are the scammer accounts and then can usually gauge from the subsequent behaviour whether they are. It is clear that Signatum is merely their current scam-of-choice, as there are obvious connections to some other clonecoin scams they are involved in, such as 'Virta Unique Coin' and 'Altcommunity', which appear to have been left on hold while they play this one out for all they can get. I'm also seeing suggestions of involvement with something called 'chaincoin' and a couple of others but, frankly, there are so many that at some point you just have to accept the limitations of what can actually be done to stop it and focus mostly on alerting newbies to the facts. I do remember during 2015 when a plethora of ridiculously-named coins were coming out, like 'Gorilla Bucks' with ticker names like 'NANAS', and thinking at the time that the scammers were simply taking the piss at that point and weren't even bothering to create credible-sounding projects.
|
|
|
Newbies trade all sorts of weird shit. I remember logging onto cryptsy back in the day (Like day 1?) and have it "Pick a portfoliio" for me... what a fail that was.. then I learned fast... IKR? Someone pulled me in to a thread to take a look at one of these recent clonecoin scams and it has all the usual routines of talking up some vague hand-wavy 'innovative' tech and a plethora of aggressive sock-puppet shill accounts with, of course, 'inside info' of big industry names being totes definitely interested in investing in it Soon™ so buynownomnomnom, coupled with an absurdly-obvious faked trading volume to 'prove' just how legit a project it is. I hadn't been keeping up with clonecoins, what with ICOs being the new go-to for "here's your worthless token, thanks for all the bitcoin and ether!" scams, but newbies are still lapping that old-school copy-pasta shit up! Another Garza-esque large-scale scam popping up in a rinse-and-repeat wouldn't surprise me at all. FOMO is one hell of a drug.
|
|
|
PSA WARNING!
Be advised that this coin project has been exposed
as nothing more than the usual pump-and-dump clone-coin
scam, with fake trading volume on YoBit and frequent
forum posts containing false claims about commercial interest
in it, even though it lacks any useful tech or innovation.
Avoid at all costs.Scam accusation thread with details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198496.new#new[Update] Now including details of the scam dev team's intentions to purchase a forum account dated prior to the launch of their clonecoin, for which there can be no honest purpose to such a requirement: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1909415.0Not quite convising coming from you (who arguably is more sketchy than the coin itself) tbh. LMAO, yeah do please keep posting references to ponzi scams which were started up in my name by butt-hurt scammers. Maybe the spittle-flecked rage around here being demonstrated by the scammer sock-puppet accounts over their clonecoin fraud being exposed will result in them hunting down whoever is behind those services. I'll grab my popcorn.
|
|
|
PSA WARNING!
Be advised that this coin project has been exposed
as nothing more than the usual pump-and-dump clone-coin
scam, with fake trading volume on YoBit and frequent
forum posts containing false claims about commercial interest
in it, even though it lacks any useful tech or innovation.
Avoid at all costs.Scam accusation thread with details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198496.new#new[Update] Now including details of the scam dev team's intentions to purchase a forum account dated prior to the launch of their clonecoin, for which there can be no honest purpose to such a requirement: lol get outta here you troll Sure, because a troll provides evidence and reasoning as to why this clonecoin is an obvious scam preying on the gullible and misinformed. This project, just like 'Virta Unique Coin' and 'Altcommunity' is merely a copy-pasta clonecoin with white-label 'marketplace' and 'webwallet' code with a new logo stuck on it. They are all being run by the same group of scumbags who want to defraud people of their bitcoin through pretending like they are legitimate cryptocurrency projects of substance and scope.
|
|
|
Have a look at the OP's trust you muppet. just you with another account So I negatively rated another account TWICE for posting ponzi threads and it has one in my name, so it must be my account? Because, as I already pointed out, it is absolutely impossible for anyone other than me to register a domain or social media account with this username, right? Muppet.
|
|
|
People recently saying it is a scam/bad coin etc. But can anyone explain why the price went from 2cent to around 3-4 cent recently? I would think all this scam talk suggestion would push the coin south.
Which part of "the coin market for this coin is being manipulated by the scammers" confuses you? It is what a pump-and-dump scam is.
|
|
|
Have a look at the OP's trust you muppet.
|
|
|
its your personal opinion without any facts, Signatum has a pretty huge community and its still growing.
with all you spamposts you only make yourself more ridiculous
Naive newbie or scammer account? Because you also appear to be into that other bullshit coin the SIGT scammers promoted on their cryptovore.com website: Dear Friends,
First of all apology for delay in reply as every team member is very busy and we couldnt spare time to respond you. We have decided to finish every part of development before time.
Good news, We are very close to finish up the things and update as and when the final testing is over.
There are Little changes in the project therefore the publication of white paper has not been released yet.
We are coming with a very big announcement of Virta Unique Coin, This is going to create new benchmarks in the Crypto Currency world.
The investors who have shown their faith on our project and holds VUC will enjoy the big profit very soon. We personally recommend not to sell VUC for next 6 months. This is going to be very huge in fact beyond imagination.
Stay tuned....
sounds great, any sneak preview?
|
|
|
You dont know anything about coin, you didnt even know about existing of sigt before it was listed on yobit. 95% of all coins is pump and dump for profit - what is wrong with it Admitting they are pump-and-dump scams is not justification for them. The rest of your 'facts' are utter bollocks, that is why I didn't bother answering to them. 1. All the people, who mine signatum from the begining knows, that DEV team dont use bitcointalk at all. They are all in the discord and telegramm. The information in the 1st post is old and dev doesnt care. Doesn't change the fact of the project being a pump-and-dump scam with fake 'industry interest' and fake exchange volume for a coin with zero technical value promoting itself as 'innovative'. 2. 43 btc is a shitty low volume for sigt. Signatum got 800btc for 1 day and about 100-150 btc for a week. Of cause, this volume was made by speculations and bots - but this is how big exchanges works to make profit, there is nothing about coin itslef. All the "fake" volume in the exhanges is about exhanges itself or professional traders woth a much numbers of trading bot. So you admit the trading volume is fake but think that's perfectly fine because...reasons. It's still fraudulent misrepresentation for financial gain. 3. You are speaking something about 100day pow and asic-resistance, but the real asic-resistance is a Skunk algo actually, one more fail from your side. It's resistance cs of combining 4 different algos together. It doesn't matter if it is combining 1000 algos together, 'ASIC resistance' in a 'new algo combination' for a 100-day PoW is irrelevant when there are already plenty of algorithms available to use for which ASICs do not exist. There is NO VALUE to this 'feature'. What is so hard to understand? 4. It could be a scam, if dev team got any premine, while they dont. Research the first 1k blocks history of transaction and you will admit it. The devs mined the shit out of this coin and set about creating fake volume and fake forum posts pretending there was real industry interest in this coin. That is the scam, selling their bags of shitcoin for bitcoin! Nobody with half a brain in this industry would consider this 'innovative' coin to have any innovation of value whatsoever, they are lying to you! 5. Signatum have no purpose ? Another lie. Sigt got marketplace, willl have a masternodes, will have a signatum pay. Dev team stick to the road map. FFS man, do some research! Every other clone-a-coin scam buys white-label marketplace and web-wallet code that they simply stick their logo on! It costs next to nothing to do and is not evidence of utility in any way whatsoever. As for 'masternodes', they are simply another way for the market-manipulating 'devs' to con you all into buying coins from them, or hodling the ones you have mined instead of selling them, in the hope you'll get a 'masternode' of some future-value for a coin which lacks ANY value. You are being conned, grow up and accept it.
|
|
|
I mean, yeah, it may pump/dump. That doesn't mean it is a scam.
SMH. A pump-and-dump is, by definition, a scam predicated on creating fake substance for, and interest in, a project for which there is nothing of value whatsoever in order to sell it to the gullible in exchange for their bitcoins.
|
|
|
Holding pays off 90% of the time, even if it's a dead end project.
No it doesn't, what an utterly arbitrary claim to make and one that clonecoin scammers rely on people to believe so they can keep encouraging them to hodl because...[insert future moon reason here]. All the while they're offloading their shitcoin for bitcoin to any sucker they can con.
|
|
|
you dont worry about FUDsters that have a lot of fake accounts and do FUD there,you can call a new member BOT,but FUDster with 3-4 accounts with almost same names is normal.
Sure, because every time a shitcoin thread is exposed for being the shitcoin the fanbois and shills scream "FUD!!!1!11!!!". The points I raised are valid and proven, this coin has absolutely nothing of value going for it, yet it has been hyped and promoted with bullshit 'inside info' claims repeatedly posted throughout its thread and has an artificially high trading volume. This is all so very old as far as cryptocurrency scams go. If you can't accept that you are either suffering from serious sunk-cost fallacious reasoning or you're part of the scam.
|
|
|
Apparently one of the 'dev team' for this scam is looking for someone to sell them a bitcointalk account that has to be at least older than the date of when his shitcoin was launched: Because there's nothing suspicious about what he might want that particular requirement for, right? I'll give you a hint, it won't be for anything honest. Update with today's repost of his quest for buying a forum account so he can do something fraudulent with it: Update with a reference example of the type of sock-puppet shill account operated by the scammers all through this thread to pump the coin:
|
|
|
Who does this scam accusation concern?The 'SIGT' Signatum coin project.Updated: The new moderated thread for the scam 'reboot'Why is it considered a scam?Because it bears all the usual hallmarks of every other shitcoin pump and dump operation that has gone before, from forum accounts routinely posting false claims of 'insider news' about major industry interest, to insanely high trading volumes on YoBit exchange which are abnormal for a coin lacking in any useful tech or innovation. It was launched in July off the back of claimed technical innovation: But the only feature it apparently has is a supposedly 'ASIC resistant' algorithm which, as any person knowledgeable in cryptocurrency would know, is only relevant for coins which are pure Proof-of-Work (PoW) based. This coin, however, has but a 100-day period of PoW before it is due to switch to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which means the entire basis for its claims towards innovation are utterly irrelevant. Its 'whitepaper' is devoid of anything of substance, bar for the repeated reference to said 'ASIC resistant' algorithm and is, clearly, merely designed to fool those new to this field into believing it to be a coin with technical and potential value. In its OP it also attempts to claim that a 'user' (not a 'team member') has written an article on it, in an attempt to imply again industry interest which doesn't exist. That 'user', however, and their website, is simply just another layer of the fraud: WhoIs: Cryptovore.com Domain Name: CRYPTOVORE.COM Registry Domain ID: 2131504319_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com Registrar URL: www.publicdomainregistry.comUpdated Date: 2017-06-07T09:00:01Z Creation Date: 2017-06-07T08:59:59Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2018-06-07T08:59:59Z Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Registrar IANA ID: 303 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibitedRegistry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry Registrant Name: Domain Admin Registrant Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org) So a private domain sets up a blog only a few weeks before this shitcoin launches and advises how to mine this coin as well as posting 'exploratory' analysis of just why this coin is totes legit and should be mined/bought: Don't forget to note how this is from a 'user', right? Very detailed info about Signatum & mining written by user Dan Jensen But of course it is actually from one of the 'dev team' as nobody outside of scammers and noobs would give this bullshit 'innovative' coin a passing glance Its ANN thread Is currently being swamped by scammer sock-puppet accounts attempting to bury this information exposing it as an obvious pump-and-dump scam, which of course simply serves to prove it is not a legitimate project. Avoid at all costs and, more importantly, learn to spot the signs of these scams, they aren't exactly subtle but newbie FOMO and inexperience means that these scumbags are often able to fool many into parting with their bitcoin to buy or mine-and-hold these useless coins.
|
|
|
|