This might fix it:
taskkill /f /im miner.exe >null
I had that, int there, before , I had copied from the files you linked me. Putting them in the same folder works for now , I hate that tho *** ok putting it in same folder fucked up things worse, now both ethminer and zlminer run in the same window wtf lol |
|
|
|
After mining it should be red as dag is deleted so you can mine primary coin
Also why don`t you put all miners in same folder, also main miner bat should include:
taskkill /F /IM miner_name
miner.exe
so there is no chance to start primary miner 2x
AMD rigs works but some don`t and they should use zill swicher till better miner is not made
switching works fine on my AMD rigs, main issue is multiple command windows i guess i could put them all in same folder Vega rigs are the ones that seem to crash |
|
|
|
lots of crashes on my vega rigs and some nvidia rigs still don't work on polaris rig it seems to work, 150mhs hash rate average for 6 gpu . but most of the time i get no accepted shares even though i see a bunch of mining spam m 21:42:51 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.67 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.19, cl2 27.51, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
m 21:43:01 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.66 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.18, cl2 27.50, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
i 21:43:02 zilminer Job: 06ed23c7... rudnik.hopto.org [142.93.85.148:5000]
m 21:43:11 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.62 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.17, cl2 27.50, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.00, cl5 26.00
i 21:43:17 zilminer Job: 19ee938b... rudnik.hopto.org [142.93.85.148:5000]
m 21:43:21 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.67 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.18, cl2 27.51, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
m 21:43:31 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.66 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.19, cl2 27.51, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
i 21:43:32 zilminer Job: 9803d194... rudnik.hopto.org [142.93.85.148:5000]
m 21:43:41 zilminer 0:32 A0 158.64 Mh - cl0 25.15, cl1 27.18, cl2 27.50, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.00, cl5 26.01
i 21:43:47 zilminer Job: 7cc1ae4b... rudnik.hopto.org [142.93.85.148:5000]
m 21:43:51 zilminer 0:33 A0 158.68 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.19, cl2 27.51, cl3 26.81, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
m 21:44:01 zilminer 0:33 A0 158.67 Mh - cl0 25.16, cl1 27.19, cl2 27.50, cl3 26.81, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
i 21:44:03 zilminer Job: 00000000... rudnik.hopto.org [142.93.85.148:5000]
m 21:44:11 zilminer 0:33 A0 158.68 Mh - cl0 25.17, cl1 27.18, cl2 27.51, cl3 26.80, cl4 26.01, cl5 26.01
m 21:44:21 zilminer 0:33 A0 0.00 h - cl0 0.00, cl1 0.00, cl2 0.00, cl3 0.00, cl4 0.00, cl5 0.00
also it freaks me out that all the cl values stay red after mining , seems like it found an error ? finally I am re-opening my miner with this command : start /d C:\LatestClaymoreEthereumMiner C:\LatestClaymoreEthereumMiner\Start.bat in my batch, but using start seems to open a new window, and Taskkill on that proccess kills the miner but will not close the window like when i call the miner from my shortcut commands in the C:\LatestClaymoreEthereumMiner folder, or click the the start command in the folder itself. when i try to use : C:\LatestClaymoreEthereumMiner\Start.bat alone it cant find the executable, seems like something simple. I just want the window to closer otherwise i ended up with 20 cmd promps |
|
|
|
|
what settings for a fury nano ? I only get 400 mhs with v4 on those , i use to get over 900 on v8
|
|
|
|
I also took the plunge. Pretty happy so far. I had some fun last night with with another subzero MN cold front. Was able to hit 100Mh on ETH. See video below: https://youtu.be/tESw7vbTuq8How much power tho |
|
|
|
Well been out of the mining loop for a while. Was hoping to re-start my ETH mining after the ETH fork if the price > $200 or so. However looks like profitability is worse now than before and nets like a nickel a day, whereas before it net a dime a day.
Wondering if anything special is coming up? I heard there is a potential XMR fork with an anti-ASIC algo and there is some ETH ProgPOW in the works. Any idea if these will actually happen ?
Too attached to my RX GPUs and R9 290 to sell them on eBay , will just keep them in the basement for a while until maybe one day they will become useful again.
It has happened to me .... My earnings have roughly more than halved from October due to a falling rate of profit in altcoin mining, so I simply turn off my rig and it almost 5 months now. I'm not lucky enough to get cheap electricity, my costs is 0.105 kwh and it's really hard to mine, an even for a new coin with high profitability because difficulty can blow up if it suddenly gets hit by huge mining power when a lot of miners know that coin have profitability to mine. Hopefully, with the next halving event expected to happen in the next year will be bringing a significant impact on altcoin mining. Unfortunately this is the wrong choice , unless you are buying crypto, might as well sell your rigs because if it does become profitable again lots of ppl will jump in and back to square one. this is the time to utilize your rigs and mine at a bit of a losss and hold your mined assets. Or trade the gear in for crypto |
|
|
|
I'm reading stuff around forums and youtube videos... Figures being flaunted like 24MH/s Ethash (who cares), 20 MH/s x16r (that's better)... If you ask me, it looks to be a very, VERY efficient card. close to GTX 1080 performance for RX 570 wattage (and price). Quite impressive.
Yeah that ETH number is meh but 20 on x16r isn't that bad.. but my 1080tis are barely breaking even on x16r as it is with $0.11 power. how much power and hash with your 1080ti's on x16r 1080s ti does like 25 to 30 , not looked at power use tho |
|
|
|
|
2080 or 2070 seem the best cards rtx wise for mining
|
|
|
|
|
How to use this miner with awesome miner and lol miner for beam?
|
|
|
|
|
So does a 1080ti work with c31 on windows 10 or not?
|
|
|
|
I heard a rumor a few weeks back (Jan 19th) regarding ASICs on the network - supposedly there was a batch of 5000 miners manufactured for a private Chinese farm that went online just recently. It seems to be pretty feasible after comparing against some analytics done on the nonce ranges of historic blocks: https://github.com/noncesense-research-lab/nonce_distribution/blob/master/nonce_distribution.ipynbConveniently enough, this analysis concludes the miners came online around Jan 9th. Some chit-chat from IRC matches up as well: <@solar> i got some confirmation about asics too
<@solar> there's at least 1 group with cnv2 asics, 65nm
<@solar> supposedly a batch of 5000
<sech1> So after a thorough analysis of the winning nonces for blocks 1760000-1765000 I can say this about ASICs that are on the network now:
<sech1> 320 cores (10 chips x 32 cores?)
<sech1> each core processes nonces with 2^22 step - from 0 to ~1.34e9
<sech1> Single core speed is 400 h/s - calculated from the area of spikes (which come with 2^22 step) on winning nonce graph
<sech1> Overall ASIC device speed = 128 kh/s (400*320)
<sech1> Around 4000-4500 ASICs online now
<sech1> M5M400 they do mine on public pools: f2pool, viabtc, poolin - they all submit blocks with winning nonces strictly in ASIC nonce ranges
<sech1> all 3 are Chinese pools ironically
<sech1> so we can just count them in "unknown hashrate" part
<sech1> which leaves only 230 MH/s known
<sech1> and 641 MH/s = almost exactly 5000 * 128 kh/s solar
At the time of this post, network hashrate is 850 MH/s (640 MH/s being 75% unknown), putting us squarely in the danger zone for network-level attacks. This is also a major drain on public pools - with only 230MH/s of "legitimate" miners popular pools are operating at a significant loss, having only 60-70 MH/s on average (e.g. SupportXMR at 0.6% is just below $1300/mo, while their server expenses are approximately $5000/mo). With the next hard fork still a few months out this is a completely unsustainable scenario and will eventually lead to the closure and consolidation of the public pools, not to mention a mass exodus of "legitimate" miners. 5000 a month expenses thats where the problem is . They should not spend more than 1k max |
|
|
|
|
Surprises me that ppl are still buying cards , all my cards are paid off but no way am I buying more lol
|
|
|
|
Nicehaah yuk it’s time to change algos lol |
|
|
|
|
how to set grin pool AND WORKER PARAMS ?
|
|
|
|
Spoiler alert !The prices for EB and SRRv2 are down by 40-50$ due to low demand and high stock  Lol been waiting for this time to order a few tonight lol |
|
|
|
|
My question is it better to mine c31 with 1080tis or c29
There’s really no real explanation of the pros or cons, I have a mix of 1080tis and 1070tis and 1070s all on win 10
|
|
|
|
1070TIs say out of memory but they have 8gb same with 1080s |
|
|
|
I will buy BTC for 60k.. wait 3 months.. sell half of the bought BTC for 60k. Remaining 60k , split in 6x10k and buy 6 different coins for 10k each
Invest in Solar panels ... you will get much more % ROI and steady returns for 20-30 years .
Simple is always better .
Thank you guys for your answers. However the question is what miners you should buy and why youre not getting it dummy they said don't jesus |
|
|
|
Monero team has to urgently prepare new fork. Network is heavily centralized by some some strong FPGA pool.
We tired to tell the clueless monero devs that a the simple changes they were making to the algo every 6 months were trivial for fpga devs and even asic devs to implement. on thier github we pleaded with them to implement something like a memory hard change or better yet a progpow like algorithm to stymie fpgas and ASICS for a longer period but they ignored it |
|
|
|
same problem ({"code":-32501,"message":"Share rejected due to low difficulty"}) for me too.
bminer 12.1.0 at grin-pool.org worked perfectly since 2-3 days.
is this low diff problem not also a huge think at grinmint.com pool since yesterday?
yes! Working on it.. the problem is that I always have problems to connect to grinmint / grin-pool, which makes it hard for me to validate. Will be fixed soon. also need a fix for the /RigName issue for some reason bminer wont start if you specify your rig name after email, which makes it hard to trouble shoot rigs on the pool |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
