What if magkaroon ng background check sa mga bounties bago mapublish at kapag di dumaan sa isang proseso e automatic mawawala ito ng credibility para masabing legit ang isang campaign at para na din malimit yung mga lumalabas na campaign.
Wala naman problema dyan basta may pumayag at ikaw o sino mang mag-agree sa ideya mo ang magbabayad sa tao o grupong mag-background check. Kung hindi naman kayo payag magbayad, huwag na lang natin siguro isipin na may gagawa pa nyan. Kung sakaling successful ang isang bounty campaign, mga hunters din naman ang kumikita at wala ng iba. Kung sakaling malasin naman at hindi mabayaran, nararapat lang na mga hunters din lang ang malugi at wala ng iba. |
|
|
|
|
Nice compilation. Gagamitin ko ito as reference pero baka pwede mag-request na huwag ng lagyan ng mga kulay. Okay na yung bolded letters tapos gamit na lang ng bullets or numbers.
|
|
|
|
Cons:- Mababawasan ng pagkakakitaan yung mga namemeke ng dokumento ("gawang Recto")
Hindi ko alam kung bakit napunta ito sa cons  Sarcasm daw. Pansinin mo yung maliit na note sa baba ng mga cons (sana naman walang hindi maka-gets ng sarcasm dyan)
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: For me mas mainam paring iinvest ang pera sa GCASH kaysa patulugin sa BANK na may interest lamang na 0.3 to 0.5% per annum or year. Mas nakikita ko din itong mainam na way iinvest ang pera kaysa sa Bitcoin or other altcoins dahil sa bilis ng pagalaw ng presyo at if di ka marunong mas mabilis mauubos ung perang iyong ininvest dahil sa pagkalugi.
Yung pinili mo ay less risk, less return. Walang problema siguro dyan lalo na kung hindi ka naman talaga built for crypto trading at iba pang klase ng investment o kaya naman sa traditional business. @goinmerry also made a good point and he's coming from a businessman's point of view. Sa mga utak negosyante kasi, ayaw nilang magpatalo sa inflation. Kumbaga kumita ka nga ng 5% sa Php100K sa isang taon pero nagsitaasan naman presyo ng bilihin ng 10%. |
|
|
|
That's not a bad idea. Tutal eh mas pabor naman na maintroduce ang blockchain sa mga estudyante ngayon. It will probably take atleast three more years bago ma-implement sa mga major universities dito sa Pinas. Speaking of "gawang Recto" - Mayor Isko leads raid on ‘Recto’ diploma mill |
|
|
|
I've known https://twitter.com/anambroid to be a serial trader and you can also see it in his profile. Shitcoin bagsimalist. Mostly mining & TA content. I've seen him chart a lot of coins for hours before.
You are missing a lot of traders on the crypto twitter list but there's no need to add more I guess. Most of them have their paid group anyway and many of their subscribers & followers got rekt since last year. Besides, if they are that good, they do not need to go public. |
|
|
|
Scammers don't have to give huge promises anymore, believe me they are among us and they know how smart investors have become too, they always reshape their tactics, now projects don't have to give too good offers because they know people are aware that too good to be real offers are scam, Just how many of us evolve or adapt to changes, they too have to adjust. It's like a game and whoever has more knowledge has the edge. People often gets scammed because of their ignorance and their greed. honestly scammers are not idiots Well, there are different levels of scammers and many of them are still idiots. People keep saying good projects always have good team and brilliant ideas to solve crypto issues, I mean, those are good metrics to gauge whether a team is sincere and whether the project has potential. But they are just two of the many things to consider before investing. who tell you that scammers can't deliver all this? I don't know anyone who said that scammers can't come up with a good project and will use it to scam in the end. Like I said above, there are different level of scammers. |
|
|
|
It's quite funny actually. I don't know how the admin or mods will see this. I guess they will just let it pass until the owner of the signature complains. I doubt that Cryptotalk (Yobit) will do that though. This user has been using a similar signature design to Yobit for a long time and nothing is being done about it. |
|
|
|
|
1. Miami Heat +7
2. Detroit Pistons +5
3. Cleveland Cavaliers
4. Washington Wizards +1
5. New Orleans Pelicans +8.5
6. Memphis Grizzlies +6.5
7. Orlando Magic +9.5
8. Boston Celtics
9. Portland Trail Blazers
|
|
|
|
bumping to ask something. Has anyone notice some projects posting in different boards and bringing their hired accounts as a work around to the bumping rule? StormGainOfficial for example has been creating topics in Beginners & Help, Services, Service Announcement, Exchanges, Bounties (Altcoins), Currency Exchange, Trading, and even Bitcoin (Legal) to promote their platform ( post history) Here are the accounts that I suspect as StormGainOfficial's hired thread bumpers: The first 3 on the list are the most active, they comment on almost all of StormGainOfficial's topics. |
|
|
|
Nabawasan na oras ko sa pag-crypto kaya ano na lang siguro, (1) mas ilaan na lang yung natitirang oras sa panonood ng videos o pagbabasa ng libro para mas lalong tumaas kaalaman ko sa trading. Dagdag ko na din yung (2) mas maging mabusisi ako sa pagpili ng mga coins na bibilhin lalo na at mag-halving na sa susunod na taon. Yan lang, mas pabor sa akin yung konti lang at mas achievable. Baka hindi din kasi maka-focus kung masyado marami  No offense sa mga maraming nilagay. |
|
|
|
There are often false positive / negative results, I know but how about the level of false results with Virustotal? If I use it to check threats in links.
The best way is to try to get more opinion from people who regularly use the service I guess. In the case of Paste.ee, many would probably vouch that it is safe like Darkstar_ and alani123. I also read from this article ( How To Tell If a Virus Is Actually a False Positive) that if there are only a few AV programs that says it's malicious, then it's probably a false positive. When using VirusTotal, it is also worth checking their disclaimer: WE DO NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE SERVICES ARE ACCURATE, RELIABLE OR CORRECT; THAT THE SERVICES WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS; THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME OR LOCATION, UNINTERRUPTED, ERROR-FREE, WITHOUT DEFECT OR SECURE; THAT ANY DEFECTS OR ERRORS WILL BE CORRECTED; OR THAT THE SERVICES ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS. |
|
|
|
bumping to share something new: May nabasa akong topic kung saan pwede malaman kung ang website ay posibleng phishing site. Another preventive measure para hindi tayo mabiktima, gamitin lang natin. https://www.phishtank.com https://dnstwister.report |
|
|
|
What are legal actions he can make
It's better to just ask a real lawyer. You and your friend must have at least one relative or a friend. Gather all the evidence that the lawyer may need like which platform. and are they in real situation helpful or not? I'm not following you here. Are you asking if the contract to sell is legally binding even if it was done online? |
|
|
|
I applaud the President for standing tall against these water concessionaires. Expected na yan na kahit sinong kumpanya pa ang magpapainit ng ulo ng Presidente eh babagsak, tignan niyo na lang ang abs-cbn. Hindi biro ang economic sabotage at sana makapag-come up sila ng pro-consumers na kontrata with another company. Nagsasalita na din si leni robredo at mukhang pinapanigan pa niya ang mga kumpanyang ito. Baka daw may adverse effect sa investment sa bansa. Meron talaga yan sa mga kumpanyang apektado at nangyayari na Nabanggit pa niya na bakit hindi daw ginawan ng hakbang nung 2016 para maayos. Kakaiba din siya  |
|
|
|
Now that the wallet is refilled and the campaign is not continuing,
You mean to say continuing  |
|
|
|
The way merit are being given out to some post on this forum is turn abused, how on earth will a single post merit 30+ merit? and must of this post are just simple question or answer.
Is this 30+ merits given by several users or just one? I've seen 50 merits sent by one user only a couple of times and even admin does that. Post are not suppose to be merit more than 2-5 depends on how helpful and relevant the post. According to who? The thing is you cannot tell anyone how to spend their sMerits or how many and you cannot judge how they spend it. Merit sources are different though, they have to follow some guidelines. There was a recent case where a former staff was questioned for giving merits for a simple statement. But it now seems many person now buy it even when they don't merit have any. I don't think this was the primary aim of adding merit to this forum. This is a clear case of merit abuse. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
