OP, your title suggests that cryptocurrency exchanges are manipulating the price with in their platform. You may want to edit that.

I only see the "manipulation" by these big holders when they are also trading the coins that I am monitoring. It is actually fun to see when one tries to pump it and there's another trader trying to block it.  

You already posted this on Altcoin Discussion board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161673.msg51707983#msg51707983
There is no need to post the same topics in different boards. Either lock this thread or delete.

I have not seen a project that relied only on bounty and airdrops to market. Can you name one? And do you have proof?

What made you think they do not know all these things? I understand that hunters like you have all these ideas in your head and love to talk but do not underestimate the capacity of the team. They have their own marketing team for a reason.

Most of the accounts mentioned in the OP are probably trying their best to earn merit and they must have thought the best way is to create some topics instead of commenting on spam threads.

This is going to be interesting. Lampard will be sacked first. MU board is a bit cold headed compared to Chelsea and let's not discount the experience gained by Ole last season.

I don't know mate, Holms beating Nunes has a better chance than Thiago beating Jon but we'll see.

---

I'm also excited to see how Ben Askren would fare here. He had a good debut against a very tough opponent and a former champion.

As I said earlier this may seem unfair to you. You didn't like that they did not mention the additional fee earlier, but it is also a mistake on your part for assuming that the additional time they will spend to list your coin is free. I'm only trying to give you another perspective here. Anyway, you know your options here. You pay to get this all done or you decline, ask for a refund, then move on to the next exchange.

You are entitled to have your opinion as a "customer" but understand that they are also running a business. They could have entertained someone else in the pipeline but they had to do yours first and for that delay, they can charge you.

Your first payment was only for the initial listing but that did not happen because you made a mistake. Now that you've fixed it and wanted to proceed with the listing, you have to pay for their extra time and effort in listing your coin. That's how I see it. It may seem unfair but that's business.

Bounty0X must have entered an agreement with chimpion that they will have the final say regarding the stakes given to each article submitted. I would not really blame chimpion here but bounty0x for not protecting its hunters. They appeared amateurs with what chimpion did.

I do not really see much value in that coin and I wonder why people buy it. In John's case, my guess is that he must have been paid with a good bag of Doges to issue that statement  

You can also add here, check all your emails. I had a coin that was delisted on an exchange and I was not able to withdraw because I did not see all the notices sent on my email.

Do not forget about Andre Iguodala. He was instrumental and really the game changer in their first NBA finals match with Lebron's CAVS team. Since he was also traded, this current Warriors line up may still be dangerous but they no longer have that "invincible" aura. I doubt other teams will fear them now.

This doesn't stop does it? They should just go straight to the gym and beat the hell out of each other instead of having these twitter fights. People will enjoy that better than dragging the UFC here.

You don't have to hide on a new account mate.

This is not the first time a complain about locking bounty rewards has been posted here. There are two projects that comes to my mind (Dexage and Nousplatform) that locked tokens due to some reason unknown yet before the bounty has started.

Can you specify what was the reason given by the team for locking your bounty tokens?

I only heard of COSS because of Lala World. I haven't really used it yet for trading but based on the few minutes I spent navigating the exchange, I think it needs some improvements especially its UI.

No need to be confused, just read the article. You will find out that the issue is not the performance of the exchange in providing services to the users. It is actually them refusing to refund CMA for asking a refund when they found out about the unethical and scam activities of IDAX when it comes to the IEO like faking the volume.

Some are still using it, even experienced managers, but I doubt they rely on it. My guess is that they just want to make sure that participants are actually reading and following rules. BM's still asks for the POA link.

Let's not bring that victim mentality here.

I am a Filipino and I do not feel being hated at all. There are also Nigerians here who are valued by the community like CryptopreneurBrainboss
Why don't you learn from the guy instead of complaining and fighting?

Speaking of scam exchanges offering IEO's, I just read about the claims by multiple start up projects being scammed or fooled by IDAX.

When it comes to IEO's, choose those that do not fake token sale volumes like IDAX as claimed by some projects. Maybe stick to more reputable exchanges like what's listed in the OP. Better yet, do not join at all and just wait for the hype to subside