I would say that neither of these applies to me. I won't be making hasty decisions to any direction because of something that just happened to me. Because i stick to my personal rules for my gambling, i couldn't even do that.

Instead have a plan beforehand and tie it with your budget, so it won't be the issue with losing or winning streak. I stop gambling if i have topped my weekly budget. That's it. I don't need a rule for taking winnings out at some point or anything like that, because it's all play money until i cash out, and it's all bonus if i don't lose my weekly budget. I can only lose 100% of my weekly budget but the sky is the limit with winnings. And usually i withdraw if i won jackpot or something, but i don't have any limits on how much i can win before cashing out.

With that token price and circulating supply of ~67.2M tokens it has a marketcap of $35.6M which wasn't much even during bear market, not to mention this market or where it's going now.

And that max supply / issuance rate?


In a year, the "token supply" which i think means just issued tokens looks to be roughly 350M, which with price of $0.53 would mean $185.5M marketcap, that's half of rollbit's current marketcap and we are then way deeper in the bullmarket. This doesn't look like it includes any estimation about burned tokens, so i think i can safely assume that circulated tokens will be far from 350M.

As markets are stupid and probably will look only at max supply and marketcap being overvalued, so who knows if there's demand from public any time soon. but what i know that with low price shuffle affords to buy & burn more of them weekly so i see this as an investment opportunity for sure. And max supply number should be decreasing weekly. Although i am not sure if coinmarketcap updates it or how often.

Cryptocurrency scene in whole is too ashamed to admit in public if that next protagonist turns out to be meme token. Even though nothing would be funnier and surreal. Because try explaining to your friends why is that happening and why crypto is the future. I would like to be fly in the wall in that conversation .

But for now sure looks like a fight between ETH and SOL now and tokens on them. ETH is a winner imho, but i have a strong feeling that SOL will have more notable moonshots with some tokens in it so it will get attention, lots of speculative investors media and shillers. There will be chains like AVAX and ADA that will be most likely profitable for some developers to build on ad they get backing from their community, but i don't see them being getting attention that any decent projects get on SOL or ETH.

What ever the winner is, it will bring a lot of projects with it, as total marketcap of combined altcoin marketcap probably beats even wildest expecations.

Dogecoin had volatile past as well, and has some occasional huge spikes. Dogecoin is like Bitcoin of memecoins, being a first with an exemption of not being developed since.

And yeah, we had memecoins that have died, but so we have altcoins that have died, NFTs that have died but some have survived this bear / all bears runs. And with every bull market there comes more new tokens and coins into this play and many of them have survived. Many of them seem dead in comparison to top 10 marketcap coins even though they might already have huge gains and bigger marketcap compared to last bullrun.

OP:s post is provocative, but i've been in this space for so long that i can't help but smiling, when ever i see people losing their minds over meme coins and NFTs are making more gains then bags they hold. Saying things like "this is the reason crypto is not being taken seriously". If you really believed on your own crypto you wouldn't mind people playing with theirs. I don't get why people are collecting physical trading cards or trading them either, or using money to level up in mobile games, but i don't call them stupid for doing so. It's their money.

There will be just more meme tokens then ever, and most of them die for sure, but that's just casino economy. We don't need to understand it for it to keep happening. Most people don't understand basic any other economic systems either. You can think meme tokens as surrealism in economics.

Here's a quick update in a pic (highlighted countries are in NATO now)

(click image for larger view)
NATO accepting Ukraine directly is way riskier move then accepting other countries that have border with Russia. Because if Russia wouldn't back off or at least stop their actions right after that, it would be in direct open war with US and Europe.

And while accepting countries that have a border with Russia might seem like a provocation, it's about de-escalation. Without joining to NATO other border countries would be next. Because after invading country of 41 million citizens, would an idea of attacking Finland that has population of 5.5 million seem impossible for them? Even though Finland has build their and securing their supply chain since last war with USSR and has comprehensive conscription service.

They get those resources by invading. But Russian's have also lived numerous generations under dictatorship, oppression and corruption. So Russian citizens have different expectations about their governments sustaining them. Tolerance level of citizens is seemingly quite high when government has total power to jail & kill opposition and when citizens kept under misinformation.

But you shouldn't really even compare NATO and Russia expanding themselves. Russia is expanding by invading countries that don't want in. And raping and killing kids while doing that and submitting those invaded under a dictatorship.

Like i already said, you can't compare the fees when other one has fraction of the users, so your math doesn't apply in any way.

And you are using the oldest excuse. Best platforms in crypto will stay open source, because that's how any potential exploits get spotted and fixed faster. Some cryptocurrency developers are putting millions of dollars and countless hours in open source development, not just for their financial gains but to develop this field for everyone. This place ain't about patented software that you can build around to centralize everything.

Also metamask didn't need to have a token nor a blockchain when they were building it. It's a third party software for blockchains that already exist.

Not defending Betfury at all, but i don't think i have seen any ToS:es in casinos, that aren't full of legal disclaimers made purely from the point of casino's interest.

But i think this is all just for scaring customers to back off in case anyone was thinking of suing them. As it's really hard to believe that this kind of contract would actually hold if they went to court, no matter if customers have signed it. Because ToS just doesn't override any legal obligations to protect customer funds that casinos have as financial institutions. When ToS is clearly made for clashing with consumer protection laws it wasn't a legal contract to begin with.

In comparison, you could sign a contract with some company where's a line that says they have a right to burn down your house down at any point without any legal repercussions from that, but that wouldn't hold in any court either.

If they indeed are trying to get rid of it, they need more compassion, and people who listen. But if they try to justify their actions by reasoning with illogical arguments to keep their addiction alive, i would say confrontation and critisizm are in order. Because there's a change that addicts surround themselves with yes men, and that nothing is their fault, and that they are fine as they are, then they don't need to change. Because in that way they don't have ever face the facts. They are loved as they are. No work required.

Wanting to change needs to come from inside, but what i mean with that is that i don't think any need for change would happen without clashing with real world and real people. Sometimes people need to face reality, and that can come in form of confrontation. To hear that they hurt others, to realize they need to change. Beacuse if all they get is endless accepting and no criticizim, that won't cut it for some people. As some of us can just use people as endless cargabe cans to pour their problems on. That kind of abuse happens as well, especially if addict is feeling so bad, that they don't have enough energy for empathy to see friends as humans. Then they become somekind of psychology relief machines to tell all their endless problems to. That gives them fast relief wihout needing to do any emotional heavy lifting for on themselves

So some people need to hear critizism too. Not just acceptance. It's like with our own kids when they have done something bad. We can love them as they are, even though we don't accept their actions.

We know they do that that because they are required to have auditing from third party auditors by law. It's happening frequently and constantly because one test doesn't cut it.
And i wonder what kind of proof is OP looking for. Pure data about testing or what? I am sure most people wouldn't even make sense any data analysis of an auditor. But anyone can probably ask if those auditors have time to answer questions, or about their methods.


Imagine risking a billion dollar industry by using fake audits. There's no reasonable explanation for that, especially when the biggest asset of any casino is trustworthiness and transparency.
Mathematical proof of slight house edge is the only thing they need to profit.

Israel didn't have backup, they just changed the name and the lyrics. Now, according to the rules, it's not political anymore and they can use it. That is if the band doesn't pull any stunts on the middle of the act and won't get disqualifed after all. But i doubt band would do that. There's huge money involved if they would do well.

But i highly doubt they will do well. And i am seriously wondering why they have such high odds, even though they have done well in the past, many people are protesting it, and while you can't downvote them, i am guessing points will show in jury's decision as well with lack of voters from other countries.

If there would be one country that would be a direct protest vote against israel, i would bet on that. If it was possible, i would also bet on the possibility that they are getting booed live, i would actually bet lot's of my money on that. Eurovision brands itself as apolitical, but that doesn't mean people interacting with it will.

I don't get why oil analogy would even make sense. Oil isn't really a store of value, it's a source of power. While Bitcoin is a store of value and needs power to be mined. Digital gold is better for comparison.
Also i don't see any evidence that Trump would like bitcoin or endorse bitcoin. If anything he will launch a maga crypto funding platform or something as crappy, with his own blockchain because it's need to be about him. And bitcoin isn't about him.

And about trump: Reason people hoard more bitcoin and gold when there's a change he might be president, is because there's less trust for usd and stability of US government. You know, reason why bitcoin was created in a first place, public's way to transfer wealth without working government. Fiat system might fall, and if it falls, Trump era would be my bet for that one. It's needed when government can't be trusted.

Only resposible answer anyone could give you is, yes, if you have money to pay your debt, maybe you should do that.
I might not do that though, but i am someone who is risking a lot by not doing that. Also it depends if i had still some in crypto or if i had to cash out everything to pay that debt.
Because if that's just part of your investments, it's a no brainer that you should pay it, i would too.

Also you don't mention if that's only way you can pay your credit card debts, can you sell something else to pay it, or can you save money to pay it? Because i have a feeling that ETH is going way higher later on, so i might leave some eth for that. So ask yourself would it be horrible, if it did go $20k and you didn't hold any eth at the moment? Some of us can watch from sidelines easily without holding crypto and watch it moon. But it can be devastating for some people, so i can't ever recommend selling everything. Always leave at least a small moonbag

I don't know where you even got the idea they ever would be happy for you in the first place? Especially if you get rich by winning? This is why people advice you to not ever tell anyone if you won the lottery, or what ever you won. And biggest reason for not telling is: No one needs to know. You might want to tell people, but ask yourself why you even want that.

People will envy you, that's right. One proof of that is this myth that keeps on living, that most lottery winners end up being broke and miserable in the end. There are no stats that would back this up, and while some people might mess their lives by drinking etc, not everyone obviously will do that. Those negative stories keep living though, because people love to read about them. They are kind on confirmation bias, as majority wants lottery winners to suffer, they see those stories as comforting because they aren't ever goingt to win.

But people around you can be very envious, not everyone but enough of them are a good reason not to tell around about your money. Especially when they think you didn't "earn" the money, but only were lucky. You see this envy with people's attitude towards crypto rich as well. Actually even more with those.

Some of your friends will avoid you. Some because of envy, some because they are extra careful and don't want you think that they are only with you because of money. For some reason people don't seem to do that when you have earned your money slowly with work. At least none of the rich that i know (i know few people that got rich and one of them quickly with cryptos).

And i don't know what common topics and common interests are you talking about, but i never lost them with my friends. All being rich brought to them was financial security and peace of mind because they don't need to live from hand to mouth anymore. And few other obvious perks as well.

1. I don't know what you mean by bet stores as we don't have those, almost every store is a bet store here. But i think we have around 50/50 ratio on women and men gambling. In fact in physical slot machines they are majority and i know personally couple older women who play way more then i do online.
2. I feel sorry for them as addiction is a real problem. Big part of the winnings in my country are directed to help gambling victims. Which some people in here see hypocritical, but i rather see them do that then not. Other way would be just ban gambling and i don't think it's ever going to happen in here. Those people, who want to do that wouldn't get voted in the government-
3. It doesn't feel good to lose, but it's part of the fun not to win all the time.
4. I am using winnings for either investing or living and buying something cool for my kids and my girlfriend
5. I am NOT lending anyone money for gambling, and i prefer people wouldn't lend me money for that if i would ask. That's really horrible idea, both lending and asking. Maybe my friends are smart enough so they haven't even asked.
6. I am watching my budget closely and never go over it. It's my rule nr 1 in gambling. Because i know my gambling addiction kicks in if i ever cross it. That's just how addiction works. It needs absolute rules to keep in check. For some people it could mean never gambling ever, and i totally understand why. Everyone has their own ways to not to get in trouble.
7. I have thought about this. I might quit for a while and have a vacation. At least i wouldn't be gambling anything that takes a lot of my time. As time is money and that's what i am buying with my money.

Why? Because there's a higher growth potential with smaller marketcaps and smaller marketcaps tend to be more volatile, so higher gains can be achieved in shorter time frame. And it's not like all altcoins are the same.

It's like asking "Why are you buying these other stocks? Why aren't you buying only microsoft stocks when it has the highest marketcap?" Maybe people see better future or short time future with other coins.

Some of the young people are only in this for meme value, buying meme coins because why not? Bitcoin was the outsider fringe money against the suits for a long time. Now when suits are buying it, it's the meme tokens that are money against the suit. Obviously suits don't want it or buy it, because they think it's dumb and that's the point. They also thought bitcoin was stupid and a scam at some point. Some still do.

And don't pretend bitcoin doesn't have any risk. Richer you got with it, higher risk you took. And early in bitcoin, risk was insanely high. Why people didn't buy microsoft or apple then? Why they risked it and bought btc?

I totally agree it's worrying that people are giving away of their consumer rights, by accepting many of these ToS:es. But i can't find any reason why any casino would agreeing on doing anything like this.

Because building that kind of list of reasons would need to be bullet proof, and wording would have to be very careful, so that it leaves to space for interpretation. And if someone found a loophole from that list of reasons (that would be probably long as bible), are we saying that casino couldn't freeze the account and that user could just lawfully keep abusing the casino until they accept the new rules?

Even laws gets fixed all the time because people keep finding new loopholes, so it would definitely happen with a list that promises to cover every specific reason for freezing an account.
So as that list would keep constantly changing to fix and prevent exploits, we would need to keep researching it every day what's been updated and accept that.

I am not trying to be difficult here, i am just thnking this from the point of a casino lawyer. Maybe i am overthinking this but i am sure there must be some other way to deal with this.

That special military "operation" was just a matter of time. That's why we (Finland) joined. They have also violated our airspace with freaking fighter jets when ever they had to show a power move. Because they knew we wouldn't respond too harshly as we wouldn't like to rock the boat. They have used paid agitators and russian troll factory on our finnish forums and but they are pretty easy to spot, as finnish is one of the hardest language to master, and non-Finn pretending to be native Finns make make errors constantly by using translators and pushing Kremilin's propaganda. It sticks out.

Before we joined, Russia stated that it would mean serious militaristic and political consequences against Finland. But before it our airspace was constantly violated by Russian Jets as a power move as they knew we wouldn't want to rock the boat by responding too harshly. And here's Dmitry Medvedev mentioning finland and threating with nuclear missiles because of nato.

We follow closely to Russian media and are aware of their blatant lies and how they have been now building an image of Finland as an enemy. They have even changed their school textbooks to rewrite Russian history that fits to that. They have also lately been removing Finnish soldier's graves in and memorial plaques Russia.

And needles to say we don't have any diplomatic relations with them as Russia has declared Finland as unfriendly country.

So is anyone going to vote those non-favourites? I just reclaimed my JUN airdrop, so i am cashing that and wagering it for Finland.
Finland had 67x multiplier in bc.game (biggest one i've seen), so i wanted to try there. But since i didn't recall if i had registered yet, i tried to search all my emails from "bd.game", and nothing came up.

So i made an account there, and while i looked around before depositing, i spinned that flashy wheel with those free JB tokens as a bet. There came a popup screen saying that i wasn't eligible for the prize as someone has already registered an account from my ip or my computer. Now i am afraid to use that site anymore, because it will probably look like double accounting on purpose.

Stake had just 66x multiplier, so that's gonna do fine. But i would like to see odds for other crypto casinos for comparison and i didn't find eurovision from others you listed, even with google. Maybe you can give direct links?

Seems like such a stupid idea it could be a winner, except with your attitude you aren't going anywhere. If you just want attention for free and without risk, this isn't happening.

If you need a permission from random people before you do what you genuinely think could be fun, you are missing the point. People win in this space because they take risks. This isn't a tv and there are no test audiences to pander.

Don't be afraid to flop, because that's most likely what's going to happen anyway. It doesn't matter what people say in here. It will probably flop no matter how many of them are in board, or how many say that they are not. Only way to guarantee to lose is not to try.

Imagine wanting to do stand-up comedy, but refusing to go on the stage before everyone is cheering. This is what your post looks like to me. Just do it, don't ask permission or acceptance. The whole point of this token creation is that you don't need to.

Hydranet is interesting, i have to admit, and with $10M marketcap it seems cheap as hell.

But competition for uniswap? Let's be realistic. You can't even start to compare fees when Hydranet has fraction of the volume of rune or uniswap, that seems like you are misleading newbs purposely.

And please tell me this is actually open source but i can't just find the code, because downloading closed source software for something this is just stupid.

And while $10M marketcap means there are lots of space to grow, it needs more then smoke and mirrors to rise and compete with big boys. And with all those cross-chain bridge attacks and stolen money last year, this or any other cross-chain tech doesn't seem like sure bet to me. It's going to be an important development sector, but i rather keep using CEXes and traditional DEXes for the time being.