That's because all those Tweets that Jemzx00 shared as proof have been deleted, while I managed to find few that haven't. What I don't know though is whether kudosinitchi was covering his tracks or tweets were deleted by Twitter as it looks like classic bounty spam but in the end that doesn't really matter.

He should have found better links but it does look like he is right and kudosinitchi and autumnleaf share the same twitter account, its just that twitter account had name changed. If you check any of the tweet links below, you will see that it leads to the same account autumnleaf is using.

Nigeria government helped locals when it comes to bitcoin adoption? If anything, they made it harder for people to use bitcoin,but adoption there happened despite their efforts, not because of them. Regarding Philippines, situation there ain't perfect either as they have no tax up to $4500, and after that its 35%.



Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies, so it shouldn't matter whether its BTC, ETH, USDT or DOGE.

---

Overall, not a bad deal for Portuguese crypto hodlers, but I think my country is even more hodling friendly as at the moment we pay only 10% tax (+surtax) and  we don't have to pay tax at all if we hodl for two years.

Of course. If they were accepting it directly they wouldn't need Coinbase.  


True, but its important to take one step after another. I don't think that it is realistic to expect from such a big company like Google to start accept bitcoin directly P2P. I mean, it would be great of course, but even this is a positive thing. Slow and steady wins the race so who knows, in a few years they might start accepting bitcoin directly.  

As the title says, Google plans to start accepting crypto payments for their cloud service early next year via partnership with Coinbase. No matter  what people think about Coinbase and centralized exchanges in general this is a good news and a step in the right direction regarding crypto adoption.

Maybe for you (and me), but for some people coming from 3rd world countries having this as the only source of income this "job" is as real as it gets and it even demands some hard skills, like being able to write in a foreign language. I mean, there's bunch of altcoin bounty hunters who see that as their job, so I am not surprised at all when people come and ask questions like OP did.


Haha this made me chuckle and is spot on how it would look like if someone mentioned it in his CV and then employer started asking questions.

Well, according to info from that website he only had bitcoin on Celsius, so I guess he didn't touch shitcoins. 



He confirmed it on twitter that it was indeed him, but he also said that $56k amount was a wrong calculation and that he actually had only $0.56 worth of bitcoin on Celsius.


https://twitter.com/JasonPLowery/status/1579587441799106560

Applying for avatar campaign

Username: Rikafip
Current post count: 4941
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qre5t9np846ps44qgapephxyey3822704ty8fx9

Yep, number is constantly changing. That guy on the top has ~2080 BTC in there, which means that his total deposit was much higher at one moment, USD wise. To think that someone would send that amount of bitcoins to a third party platform for a measly 9-10% APY is beyond me, but I guess he thought it was easy money so why not and few of my friends thought the same.


Someone decided to make it easier for tax service and those who plan $5 wrench attacks.


I sure hope that they didn't put their whole portfolio there and that is just a fraction of what they own, but I saw some people having like 10-15 different cryptocurrencies deposited there so some might have used Celsius as a cold storage.

Huh, people are getting creative with that file so someone made a website that shows how much each person has (had) on Celsius and even made leaderboard according to which top loser had ~40 million USD.
https://celsiusnetworth.com/

 

Yes, all posts reported by @morvillz7z were made between June 10th and June 18th, meaning more than 2 months after he advised people not to plagiarize so he obviously knew what he was doing.


Yeah I saw that at the moment he is not getting paid for the signature, but he did apply in a couple of signature campaigns few days ago so this is just something temporary while in between two campaigns.

That mainly depends whether that person bought bitcoin for the first time, or its a seasoned veteran who buys bitcoin in regular intervals, no matter the price ( I fall into the 2nd category as I bought some bitcoin around that price but I also bought it when price was only few thousands.

I think that situation is different compared to 2018 and even newbies are more willing to hodl bitcoin through bear market as I know a couple of those who bought bitcoin for the first time during recent bull run are still (afaik) hodling so people are slowly realizing that this is just temporary and that there will be another bull run and that they will profit if they suck it up.

For the beginning, start posting outside of altcoin section because from what i can see, 90% of your posts were made there. Another thing, stop with those mindless one-liners as even if you start posting in other section where there's a lot of merit, you want get far with that approach.

Forget about signature campaigns and weekly quota, simply start communicating with others (which you haven't been doing in 5 years since you joined this forum) and post only when you actually have to say something and merit will come, and therefore higher ranks. By the way, you wouldn't be the first altcoin bounty hunter managed to change and who became an asset to this forum, so there is a chance for you as well.

Thanks, I appreciate the effort!


While I do agree that people shouldn't immediately get banned for plagiarism (imho signature ban is more appropriate, at least for the first offence), I disagree that they should plagiarize without consequences if they are fast enough to delete reported post which ain't that hard if you are using notification bot.

While certain percentage of plagiarism is probably done due ignorance (people being on the forum for the first time etc) or it was an honest mistake, I think that vast majority is intentional, like in @Mr.right85 case. Just few months before he started plagiarizing he was talking about it in his self-congratulatory post, meaning he knew what he was doing and what were the consequences of his action but he went with it anyway. Imho, in his case signature ban could be enough, but not to go without consequences like he did.

Hah yeah, it was pretty obvious that he is not a genuine newbie but instead someone whose sole purpose is to leech off this forum and I even managed to guess that he has alt accounts in bounty (kudos to YOSHIE for a nice catch!).

What's worrisome though is how easy these shitposters like @fennic farm merit, which is probably caused by lack of new members so every time someone new shows up, people shower them with merit. Well, at least many of them don't have brain to remain undetected for too long.

Heinous crime? Plagiarism sucks and I reported my share of those, but lets not exaggerate here.


That's a known fact for a long time, nothing new here. And I see nothing wrong if someone who is net positive to this forum gets signature or temporary ban instead permanent one, unlike some shitposter who is probably an alt account of previously banned account.


Situation is not so simple as you presented it. If mods ban all users who plagiarized, @Mr.right85 would have been banned already but as we can see, he still hasn't been banned so when it comes to plagiarism its case by case scenario.


First time I hear about this and honestly doesn't make much sense to me. Can you please (or anyone else) find the source of that claim?

It is somewhat different case, and he might be the original author after all as Pmalek pointed out to same mistake in the spreadsheet regarding Ledger, and he replied that its been fixed, which it is if you check the spreadsheet and the article. If he has the rights to edit those then he is behind it after all. Unless that's been sorted before and then he jumped on it to sort of prove that he is the author.

If anything, that should encourage you that getting merit ain't that hard and that you don't have to write bloated wall of text in order for someone to see your post as quality/helpful.


Just because you think that your own post is quality or helpful, doesn't mean that others do the same. One of the problems in this forum  is that members regurgitate what's already been said a couple of times before in the same topic, so naturally their chances of getting merit for that are slim to none.

Member LagOutLoud copied gmaxwell's topic word for word, for whatever reason (probably merit fishing). I am copying just a small portion of the text and that should be enough to nuke him since he is a brand new member with this being his first post.
Archive https://ninjastic.space/post/61088147

I think that risk of giving someone else the access heavily depends on the person you choose. In my case I would even say that it is safer with that person than it is with me as he lives in a rural part of country, and is ex-military who is very cautious and security oriented because of the job he did. On the other hand, if you give it to someone that is close to you and who you can trust not to steal from you but is not really cautious and doesn't care about safety, then you are asking for trouble.