If you bothered to read the other posts in this topic other than the one written by OP ((even he didn't say that) you would see that Hong Kong has no plans to make Bitcoin as a legal tender and instead just make it easier for people to buy/sell/trade. While that's a positive news nevertheless, its far from making bitcoin legal tender and I have no idea how you came to that conclusion.

So you want to say that even you as a mod can't really speed up that process of getting new child boards/locking the useless ones? If that's true, it sucks big time.


Exactly. But for some reason Russian local board is the only one that created a safe place for them to spam their useless bot-like crap.

I have also been using Kucoin for years without KYC done (very occasionally though, 3-4 times per year max) but I never sent more than a few hundreds of dollars worth of crypto there because I know that they can ask for it anytime so I basically send only the amount I am willing to lose as I have no intention to go through KYC there.

What's your plan in case they ask for KYC?

That's one of the biggest mistakes you can do, think that your money is safe on Binance just because of the SAFU fund. While that can maybe cover smaller hacks, in case shit hitting the fan like in FTX case that SAFU thing will be meaningless and you can say goodbye to your money.

Lol. Did you sleep over the last year or so? Celsius CEO (Alex Mashinsky) was doxxed, FTX CEO (Sam Bankman-Fried) was doxxed as well and we can see how that ended up for their users. Just because Binance is at the top at the moment and CZ is a known person doesn't meant that things can't go south.

At one point in time Mt.Gox was even bigger than Binance is now (relative to the market size) and that didn't end up well either, meaning no matter how big an exchange is, it doesn't mean that it can't bankrupt. People should stop treating exvchanges like banks because they aren't. If you have to use CEX, use it for that they are intended for (trading) and after you are done, withdraw funds to your own non-custodial wallet.

---

While I seriously doubt that Binance market dominance is as big as claimed in the topic title, I don't think that its good for market to have exchange that controls majority because the bigger exchange is, bigger the influence on market will be in case of fail.

There are similarities in the subject of those movies, but while Triangle of Sadness is a total underdog with not a good chances for a win, Parasite was the 2nd favorite (the only one ahead was 1917) that before Oscar won a couple of BAFTA and Golden Globe awards so it already had a decent resume. I might be totally wrong here, but I see Parasite winning was in part of compensation for Roma not winning an award the previous year and making it the first non-English spoken movie that won Best Picture award. Don't get me wrong, it is a quality movie and deserving winner (albeit for me the best one that year was probably The Marriage Story) but South Koreans made better ones in previous years that unfortunately weren't recognized.



He did a very good job and these are the good odds, but they are so high for a reason. For me personally Colin Farrel did the best job while I still haven't seen The Whale (it became available today on torrents so I'll probably watch it in the next few days) and since I like the odds (~6) I will go for him.

Big part for that odds drop is due the fact that All Quiet won the most awards and that's something that barely anyone expected. I kinda expected 1917 winning many awards few years ago (it was their movie after all and it also won 7), I didn't expect so many awards for this one. I guess Brits are fan of war movies.


While odds on Coda were initially very high (~26  after nominations were released), few days before the ceremony odds dropped to only ~2 and Power Of The Dog was a slight favorite with ~1.8. I will wait a little bit more to see how situation develops and if odds keep dropping sharply I might bet on it so another CODA doesn't happen to me.

Let me guess; you tried reporting those posts in the past and reports were marked as bad, right? If Ann thread bumping spam is deleted I see no reason why this shouldn't be either, but this is just one of those things on bitcointalk that doesn't make much sense.

I think that problem here might be that even your own admin thinks that those are legit posts made by genuine users and not bots, even though its pretty obvious what's going on there.

The fact that Russian local is the only one with a special board just for HYIP scams always baffled me. I mean, who would want to have something like that in your local board that produces nothing but spam and and add absolutely no value? Imho, that cesspool should be closed and all those who want to promote that crap can do it in Investor-based games board where that stuff is usually shared.

Is there some post in your local board that explains the reasoning behind creating board just for that? Were other boards spammed with this so it was the way to contain them in one place or something along those lines?

Ja bi jos dodao na listu California Split (1974), The Color of Money (1986), Croupier (1998), The Cooler (2003), Mississippi Grind (2015) i na kraju za malo zajebancije sa ekipom Chevy Chase klasik Vegas Vacation (1997). Mozete i dodati Casino (1995) koji je odlican film ali tom filmu je casino samo setting a ne toliko tema.

He didn't exactly say that he would be fine with any random letters as he even gave a suggestion so they could have changed it to that rather than this "mxfwzzwizqbz" due the reason you mentioned in your post.

Vise frendova je tako stalo nakon nekog vremena jer nisu mogli podnijeti brz tempo, dernjavu i sav taj kaos tako da me ne iznenadjuje da ni ti nisi odgledao do kraja. Meni je isto trebalo neko vrijeme da se prilagodim jer nisam ocekivao tako nesto ali nakon tog pocetnog perioda film me skroz uvukao jer sam shvatio da je takav pristup zapravo odlican da se prikaze unutrasnji i vanjski kaos u zivotu jednog kompulzivnog kockara. Uglavnom, film je takva adrenalinska bomba da mi je trebalo neko vrijeme da se skuliram nakon sto sam ga odgledao po prvi put.

Mozda da das jos jednu sansu? Tako sam ja svojevremeno prekinuo jos jedan Sandlerov, Punch-Drunk Love u kojem PTA koristi izuzetno naporne zvukove svaki put kad je glavni lik nervozan sto mi je strasno islo na zivce pa sam tek kasnije probao ponovo.

Vecinu proslog tjedna sam proveo gledajuci The Vietnam War. 10 epizoda i preko 16 sati materijala cine ovo najdetaljniji dox o vijetnamskom ratu. Ide se bas u detalje, od sredine 19 stoljeca i francuske okupacije pa do perioda nakon rata. Ima tu hrpa tajnih snimaka razgovora americkih predsjednika i njihovih savjetnika, dosta nikad prije vidjenih video snimaka te ono sto mi je bilo posebno zanimljivo svjedocanstava vojnika s obje strane sukoba. Uglavnom, koga zanima tematika mislim da nece naci nista bolje od ovoga.


Uncut Gems
Nisam planirao tako brzo ponoviti gledanje s obzirom da je film vani tek par godina, ali iz nekog razloga me povuklo da opet gledam ovaj cirkus. Uglavnom, pratimo Adama Sandlera u ulozi karijere kao degenericnog kockara. Film je intenzivan, brzog tempa i dosta kaotican tako da nece svima sjesti takav pristup (a meni je bas zato ovaj film vrhunski) ali je vrijedan barem dati mu sansu. Mislim da sam pogledao sve relevantne filmove na temu kocke ali ovaj mi je najbolji.

I definitely didn't see that coming but congrats to him. He could have at least chose a "normal" username instead what it looks like a bunch of random letters. Maybe he thought that he will be more anonymous that way. 

I used to have (or at least I thought that I had) a profit staking strategy but then I realized that every time bitcoin would reach my set price, I would sell only a small portion of what I initially planned and just kept hodling the rest while waiting for another bull run. So far this tactic worked great and I have way more bitcoin that I thought I would several years ago.

With that being said, I do spend bitcoin on the regular basis on everyday stuff (monthly sub for VPN, IPTV, Netflix, Disney etc - some are done directly with bitcoin and some via crypto debit card) and I try to time big expenses when (house renovation, new car etc) I think that bitcoin price is high enough.

If you don't think that All Quiet on the Western Front wouldn't be a worthy winner, what would you say about the last year's winner CODA (an average remake of an already average french movie made few years earlier)? Even better, take a look at the last 10-15 winners and name me a few that will be remembered in a few decades as great movies? Just to add that its not the best movie of the last year for me neither, but it wouldn't be undeserved if it wins in the end as we had far worse movies winning in the past.


Of course it doesn't and I don't think that anyone said that. All it does is affects the odds slightly and that's about it.

I might be wrong here, but I think those "proof of authentication" post are seen as similar to the signature campaign applications so that might be the reason why they don't get deleted even if you report them. And I don't think that bounty hunters get any tokens in exchange for writing them so it can't be seen as breaking the rule about incentivizing posting.


Imho, the main reason why bounty managers still stick to bounty reports inside bounty topics instead doing it via Google form is because that way their bounty campaign gets bumped to the topic, making it visible to other bounty hunters. I mean, that seems like the only logical reason to still insist on them because Google form makes way more sense if you want to make your job as easy as possible.


Not gonna happen as theymos is not a fan of any type of newbie jail. After all, why should forum staff even have to deal with that, it should be bounty manager's job to sort it out.

In that case I think that you might wanna read LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system so you have a full understanding on how it works before you start sharing feedbacks and adding/removing people on your Trust list.

Grammarly is used to correct the grammar mistakes in the text written by yourself, you don't have to worry that you will be accused of plagiarism. On the other hand, chatbots like ChatGPT write texts by themselves so in that case it may be considered plagiarism if you try to pass it as your own.

Just because you are not on DT yet doesn't mean that you shouldn't leave feedback. The only way to end up there is by DT member adding you on his Trust list and that won't happen until you start leaving feedbacks. So, if you think that someone is scammer, leave appropriate feedback.


They offer return in their tokens (and they can mint those as much as needed) not in other currency that they don't control. Whether those kind of shitcoins can have any value is another question, to which answer is quite obvious.