Zhang is a powerful fighter but was reluctant to throw any big punches, he relied on the jab more than anything else. Even the punches that caught Parker and sent him down for the count were not exactly power punches but they had serious effects on Parker. When it looked like Parker was going to lose he came out swinging and managed to put Zhang on the back foot and eventually tired him out. Who knows what will happen in the rematch. Crazy fight, and there is a rematch already as you have said and there are a lot of scenarios here. Yeah, I do believed that if Parker won, he might have a shot as to who has the belt by that time. But if Zhang wins specially if he could really knock out Parker for good, there will be a trilogy.
So I guess Parker shouldn't be concern on his future crack at the belt. He still has to deal with Zhang again and win convincingly, no controversy like this one and it's better that the judges are not going to score it. Meaning, Parker should dominant and knockout Zhang as I think he is capable of.
|
|
|
|
|
There is one Premier League game taking place tomorrow:
West Ham United vs Aston Villa
If West Ham win they will be one point behind Manchester United. If Aston Villa win they will be five points behind Manchester City and five points clear of Tottenham. It is an important game for both teams to take all three points.
These are the results of the games played today:
Burnley 2-1 Brentford
Luton Town 1-1 Nottingham Forest
Fulham 3-0 Tottenham Hotspur
It was a great performance by Fulham they deserved the full three points. 5th placed Tottenham had a chance to break further away from 6th place Manchester United but in the end they did not even manage to get a draw and a point.
It seems as though UEFA will allow the team finishing 5th a Champions League place therefore teams fighting for a European Champions League place cannot afford to lose more points. At the moment Aston Villa have 55 points, Tottenham have 53 points and Manchester United 47 points.
|
|
|
|
|
These are the FA Cup quarter-final games taking place tomorrow Sunday 17th March:
Chelsea vs Leicester City
Manchester United vs Liverpool
On paper you would have to be confident Chelsea would beat Leicester City. As for the other game, any team could win it but even though Manchester United have home advantage it is Klopp that makes his final appearance at Old Trafford as Liverpool manager therefore they will be motivated too. It should be a good game to watch.
These are the results of the first FA Cup quarter-final games that were played today:
Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-3 Coventry City
Manchester City 2-0 Newcastle United
Many would have expected Manchester City to win their game against Newcastle United but the game of the day was between Wolves and Coventry City.
After coming back from a goal down, Wolves took the lead late in the game and it looked like a win for them but Coventry City did not give up and scored two late goals to make it to their first FA Cup semi-final since 1987 and that year they won the competition. What are the chances they will win the competition again in 2024?
|
|
|
|
I cannot be the only member that is being put off entirely by the massive walls of green and blue text. I am unable to read through his post therefore cannot understand what JackpotRacer is trying to articulate, not for that matter do I understand his constant urge to chase Blackjack.fun across various threads when as far as they are concerned the points have been answered. Even when I had my own concerns, they refused to provide evidence of when their Anjouan licence was issued but at least they are covered by that licence since 19th February 2024 (though it remains unclear what happened between 1st January 2024 - 18th February 2024). Eva (their forum representative) has claimed they have fixed/patched the exploit JackpotRacer referred to. Finally, they also took swift action and removed their provably fair logo (because not all their games including 3rd party can be verified). As far as I am concerned until/unless any serious allegations of scamming are made against them, they are going in the right direction. They have listened to forum members concerns and are trying to engage with us when we raise concerns and that is a good start. It is still unclear what he wants from Blackjack.fun at this moment in time. They are allowed to have principles too, right? Every platform has the right to set its own rules. Don't like their principles? Simple - don't use their platform. You agreed to the Terms & Conditions, remember? Besides, why didn't you answer the question: What exactly do you want from them at this point? |
|
|
|
It seems widely accepted by fans and pundits that it will be a close fight. In testament to Fury, he did brilliantly against Wilder in all three fights but it seems it might have taken a lot out of him in terms of motivation. After that trilogy he seemed to have fallen in to a flat period where he was unable to have momentum on his side. Yes he won the subsequent fights but how many of those victories had the authority of a champion? Yeah, probably after that performance of Tyson Fury against Ngannou, Usyk could have been more motivated than ever and see in his mind that he can beat Fury. And this could also be what the boxing community sees as well, that's why we shouldn't be surprised as the fight gets closer, Usyk could be the slight favorite as he is now inching closer with just couple of odds separating them. But so far our boxing fans here still has Fury as majority favorite. |
|
|
|
If you keep aside the fact it is a centralised tracker, the aspects of smart contracts still make Ethereum stand out from other crypto. ETH provides a function that has launched thousands of ICOs (and later unfortunately unnecessary NFTs) therefore it remains in demand. If Bitcoin remains the gold standard for crypto, Ethereum has sustained a number two position for a long time. In that process things will not always work the way people would expect therefore high gas fees is one of the issues they need to work on but let us not forget Bitcoin had a recent time where tx fees were excessive. I am hoping that with this Dencun upgrade will have its purpose play on the ecosystem to make all of the fees on ETH's blockchain to be lesser and cheaper soon. I've seen some progress a bit after its upgrade but that's not the kind of effect I am expecting, I like more of it to have it seen like it was cents long time ago and I don't know if it's possible to see that happen back then when everything was so cheap but then the demand has increased and made even the gas fees quite expensively.
|
|
|
|
|
The poll in this thread stands at 15 votes:
Fury win = 10
Usyk win = 5
Draw = 0
I think over time it will tilt more towards Usyk therefore will almost level out but Fury will just edge it and remain favourite. After the way Ngannou shocked him, Fury must be thinking seriously about how to make sure Usyk does not get a good start in the fight.
As for Usyk, his confidence must be high after he saw Fury knocked down by Ngannou but even he knows it will take an extremely special performance to beat Fury.
|
|
|
|
The "OddJobsForBitcoin" account will remain on my ignore list. I have decided to unwatch the thread for obvious reasons and I have appropriately tagged the "OddJobsForBitcoin" account as it has been involved in various nefarious activities. My advice to any member reading this thread is the best course of action is to ignore the OP because he is a fantasist that cannot be trusted. Watching you post in the thread on a regular basis knowing you will not receive any jobs ( odd or otherwise) makes me question your state of mind. Does it not take a toll on your mental capacity posting using different accounts that will never join a signature campaign therefore will not be monetised? How long do you intend to keep up this charade when it serves no purpose. Let's do another odd job today.
Bump |
|
|
|
|
I know it was already make known that the Fixedfloat exchange was still active after the alleged hack but their domains seem interesting. The .io domain leads to a page showing server error but the .com domain diverts to a new .io domain (ff) and it has an identical website to how it appeared before the alleged hack.
One has to question the real status of the exchange because there have not been a flood of complaints against them and they are still operating even after allegedly being hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
These are the first two FA Cup quarter-final games being played tomorrow Saturday 16th March 2024:
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Coventry City
Manchester City vs Newcastle United
There is a derby between two West Midlands teams. Coventry City are the underdogs but I will hope they will the game. As for the other fixture, Manchester City are clearly favourites but Newcastle United are capable of causing an upset because they have nothing to play for this season and would like to end it with a trophy.
|
|
|
|
These are the Premier League games taking place tomorrow 16th March 2024: Burnley vs Brentford
Luton Town vs Nottingham Forest
Fulham vs Tottenham Hotspur Most of the Premier League games that were supposed to be played this weekend have been postponed because of the FA Cup quarter-finals games that will be played. The West Ham United vs Aston Villa game you referred to will be played on Sunday. Aston Villa suffered a heavy 0-4 home defeat to Tottenham last week and they might not have recovered yet. I agree with you, West Ham should win the game. Good match between the genius Moyes and Aston Villa this Sunday. Aston Villa might be looking good but I think Moyed out foxes Emery and gets a 1 - 0 win. |
|
|
|
It seems you have tried to have access to your account granted but Bittrex have not allowed it and the way things ar looking they will never allow it because the time for withdrawal has expired. Now you are fully aware of their policy and action (and the fact they will not make any exceptions even in your case), what will you do next to try to get access to your funds? .... They close support tickets automatically.. They say the time for withdrawal has expired |
|
|
|
Hello Eva, thank you for the reply. For the licence overlap, you did not provide anything substantial to disprove the theory that blackjack.fun might not have had a licence from any gaming authority between 1st January 2024 and 18th February 2024. The fact a Curacao logo was visible with the verifiable URL link removed from 1st January 2024 until 19th February 2024 really did not look good especially when it took 50 days to replace it with another licence provider. I did mention in an earlier post, for me it would not have been an issue had one licence expired and the other issued after a gap of several weeks but making a claim the second licence from Anjouan started on 1st January 2024 and then being unable to prove it especially after you added the Anjouan licence with verifiable on 19th February 2024. It raises valid questions why the Anjouan licence was not added for 50 days even though you claim you had it. On that specific point I believe the blackjack team have not been honest. Instead of accepting they made a mistake or overlooked it until it was brought to their attention they claim something that is not true. Simply by you citing sensitive documents (as a reason to not prove when the Anjouan licence was issued) seems far more to be an excuse but that is my opinion and others will have their own. As for the other two issues, it seems your reply has covered them and I thank you for that. It is important to note if you have fixed the specific exploit mentioned by JackpotRacer that is the end of the matter related to his report. Also, regarding the provably fair claims, the provably fair image has been removed from the website and if you and your games providers make it clear which games are provably fair and how those games results can be verified before customers play, that is the end of the matter because it allows customers to make informed decisions before playing. Hello JollyGood,
Questions have already been answered. Company-sensitive documents with personal information and signatures are not public information. We are a properly licensed casino for very long time. It is not like you go to a company and ask, "Prove to me you are innocent by showing your sensitive data, or you are guilty."
The specific bug has been fixed, but new ones have emerged, and more will arise without warranties. This is a standard aspect of the process; it encapsulates the concept. There are no dates or times specified regarding when or how the development team is working and on which task. The entire question about bugs is irrelevant because it pertains to a different concept altogether. If it were a game where players take risks, it would be an entirely different story, but that is not the case here.
Regarding provably fair systems, every game provider is different. The ones who have such systems have their own way of showing it, confirming it, and so on, and it is their decision whether they advertise it or not for their games. We can only speak for our own games. When it comes to showcasing and ensuring fair game for blackjack tournaments, this will be another aspect of which we'll be very proud. We're even seeking community assistance to make it as advanced and provably fair as possible, and to determine the best way to showcase it. However, we'll address this aspect later when we arrive at that point.
Eva
Until the end of December 2023, we consistently held a Curacao License for many years. Starting from January 1, 2024, we have obtained an Anjouan license. |
|
|
|
Is it not better for the OP to lock the thread? How would he feel if an allegation was made against him but after making the allegation the accuser did not present any evidence. Furthermore, if members were ignored when asking the accuser to present evidence to back up their claim it would not be appropriate therefore in that scenario most probably would be considered as an unsubstantiated allegation. If members cannot post any evidence when making a claim/allegation why do they bother creating thread about their side of the story? I thought as much because OP has not been online for some days now after the last post made. Although OP account shows some sorth of an active account though but maybe something must be taking OP time out there.
If OP can come up with some proof or evidence to back up his or her claims, then I believe it would be looked into for proper solution because this can only be done when there is something to hold unto as back up for claims.
|
|
|
|
If there are exploits reported to a any casino/gaming website, they need to be fixed as soon as they are reported. It is fair to say any competent casino or online gaming business would do that. I could not fully understand from their post in another thread whether they have fixed the problem that was reported to them but any exploit that could be used to benefit the casino puts a cloud of uncertainty over their reputation. I am not saying that is the case here, but it would help if the casino being accused of various misdemeanours actually responds directly to the claims being made against them. They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.
I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways. Exactly! they had and still have security issues and even the exploit i found and i am sure it is costing them a lot of money in prizes they give is still not fixed as they have not confirmed the fix after many requests from me and others.
Maybe they have no interest in fixing this dangerous exploit and who knows how many similar exploits there are. a casino can profit from such exploits. |
|
|
|
Well, it has been coming on to 10 days since the OP created the thread to tell us about his experience. It is very difficult to take a scam accusation seriously without being presented with some sort of evidence to peruse therefore what are we to make of the situation if every accuser was going to be believed as soon an accusation was made. I think the will not waste his time posting about this issue again. OP must have had a bitter experience with the accused by it coming to here to accuse them without any backing evidence makes no point even though the accused is already defamed and being noted for such act. A proof can be okay not just mere words. From this one that does not know the history of the accused can comfortably and conveniently say that wazirx is being accused falsely for lack of evidence. So OP must or should be able to present proof to back up their claims.
|
|
|
|
Why have we not seen more cases of a similar nature regarding Bittrex. How many other accounts were closed in the same way and how many of their customers are trying to get back assets that were frozen if they can pass KYC. It has been over a week since you told us about the ID card rejection and request for a passport that you did not have therefore has anything happened in the interim? In the those years, did you ever manage to apply to have your first passport issued? .. I am curious, if they did not accept your official documents in 2020 when you tried to resolve this issue,
They did not accept my country's ID card Only passport that I did not have |
|
|
|
The entire concept revolves around developing games from scratch in collaboration with the entire community. Our team actively engages with players, making it a normal part of our daily operations. Given that our product is still in progress, encountering numerous bugs is expected, and that's precisely the essence of the process. No one incurs any financial losses because no one cant make any bets with their money.
While many bugs existed on some time frame in the past, we acknowledge the existence of others, and more bugs will appear while team is developing. However, having bugs in our unfinished product is an integral aspect of our approach. I understand that this concept might be unfamiliar to many, but a glance at our history illustrates that the entire blackjack.fun project thrives on community feedback and suggestions.
Currently, we went private with our community, collaborating with players who comprehend and embrace the concept without any complaints.
This way we can peacefully continue.
Eva
Eva, keeping #1 aside for now, can you provide answers to the following questions? You have never given a satisfactory or direct answer in response to the questions below. I think it is unfair to post sporadically as you do and then you have not given clear answers to questions that are being asked multiple times because they remain unanswered. 1: Has the exploit mentioned by JackpotRacer been fixed? If it has not been fixed please explain why (and when you expect to fix it). 2: Can you provide verifiable proof that you had both licences at the appropriate times you stated (one for 31st December 2023 from Curacao licencing and one for 1st January 2024 for Anjouan licencing)? 3: How do you intend to inform customers before they play which games are/are not provably fair? Question for community: What now?
Eva |
|
|
|
With the offer he made to promote signatures it seems clear he did not intend to take a break, only he can explain the discrepancy in his statement but if we are being honest it will not have been the first time he has sent out conflicting messages. I could never fully work out why he would have a particular anti-agenda against the number of members and companies he chose to post about. Furthermore, the hypocrisy about what he would not promote and why, followed by the completely opposite course of action. Are we surprised? I quit my signature campaign because I was taking a break from the forum. Not the other way around. Well, not really. Whatever the reason for your leaving the campaign, that was maybe a convenient excuse, but not the truth. You applied to a new one just a few minutes later, and we all know inactive accounts don't participate in campaigns. But to make your claims sound even more ridiculous, you even created your own topic offering your signature space and "promising" at least 100 posts per month. How would you be able to do that if you were planning on "taking a break from the forum"? |
|
|
|
It was a really good match, you could tell the Liverpool players absolutely believe in the Klopp philosophy and they would do anything for him on the pitch. Guardiola also has the Manchester City players believing in his style of play and philosophy therefore it was going to be a great game to watch. In the end, it would be the final time Klopp would face Guardiola in the Premier League but there is a chance thy could meet in the FA Cup. Arsenal have again proved the doubters wrong by playing brilliant football and challenging all the way for the Premier League title. This will go down to the wire. ^ Didn't watch the match but I heard Liverpool vs Man City was really one of the most intense matches that was played by two top clubs in the EPL this season. And yeah, I decided to drop over here because I just saw the league table today and I was really surprised that Arteta got his squad to get the lead at the table. It's pretty close between Arsenal, Liverpool and Man City too. This could be one of those memorable season enders just like when Mancini won Man City the league title for the first time. And Joey Barton kicking Aguero and getting a red card for it added to making it even more memorable. Lol.
I'll look for a replay online or the highlights in YT for the LFC vs City match and see how these guys play. City has been playing more of a gegen pressing style like LFC does.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
