It is not just about being searching for comrades because if in the first place OP (who is a complete waste of space) did not even start this drama then it would never have allowed for alt-accounts using the opportunity to attack Ratimov. With the filthy disgusting language used by the attention-seeker OP, this thread should never have been given any attention by Ratimov.

Since Ratimov have proven he is well above status in dignity and respect than the OP by not posting in this attention-seeking drama thread after making it clear he will not be bullied, the OP should lock it. The OP had hoped it would provide a group of members backing him against Ratimov but it is clear he failed. Given the choice for what is best for this forum, I would always choose to have 1 Ratimov instead of 1000 BitcoinGirl.Club

I will ask a moderator to lock the thread as it is serving no purpose except proving the OP has failed in his plan against a trusted and respected member in Ratimov.

This thread is not on-topic therefore I asked the OP to lock it. That in any capacity should not stop you from creating a new thread to post about whatever you want to. Enlighten us all in a dedicated thread to expose what you have done before, I look forward to reading it when I have time. I will ask a moderator to lock this post.

Yes we all can see a pattern and this is a very strange situation. Thank you for posting about another weird distribution of merits. I suppose the account in question (capoeira) could shed light on the matter if he was asked to. I have tried to understand why the OP of that thread gave away merits for literally no reason but I have been unable to come to a conclusion.

One of the things I noticed about that merit distribution in that thread was fact that several accounts tagged with negative trust.

Even the Gigabit account received 10 merits, speaking of which I hope he makes another entrance on the loginsam45 and his alleged alt-accounts: ltcrstrbrt, GigaBit and bluedeep and state if he can/cannot sign a previously used wallet from before the allegation of hack was made against him.

Thank you for pointing out the manner in which deadsea33 had tried to cover his tracks. Thankfully he was unsuccessful in his attempts to stay under the radar because of his greed after he received a neutral tag from hugeblack. He thought he would be able to portray himself as a positive contributor to the forum but he failed and lost what little credibility others thought he had.

If this same cycle is being repeated where legacy accounts are given air-merits it means there could be far more puppeteers and account-farmers that I previously thought.

You should lock this thread because it is serving no purpose. You have made your point and raised the question in the OP and also you have read the reply from the member (CryptoHFs) that left you trust originally. As there is nothing more to add and this thread is becoming off-topic you should lock it.

With his reputation on the line, one would expect an urgency to clear the matter but since the above post was made 3 days ago asking for him to sign a previously used address from before the time of the allegations, GigaBit has logged in and made 10 posts in order to meet his signature campaign quota.

What Gigabit has not done is posted here in this thread again to explain his reasons if he unable to sign any of his three known addresses from 2014/2015. We are still waiting here for his participation to defend his name while he is posting everywhere else to get the Duelbits signature campaign payout.

You definitely do care but things did not work out the way you had hoped for.

In my opinion you are making it all up.

No matter which story you invent you will not be believed when you stated that in that war-free innocent head of yours you see nothing wrong but when you innocently saw 500 members wearing Whirlwind avatars defending them, you decided to call them bitches for wearing a signature and you accused them being unfair to keep their position in the signature campaign. That was when somehow that innocent war-free head of yours saw war and you made it 2 vs 500 and that was when you ruined your forum account.

I can say without hesitation that story was nonsense. You had other motivations to support the stormbounty account as you did to support the _Hiloveua_ account.

I will reserve judgment for now but some would say not the fact you did it but the manner in which you did it clearly displayed a connection which could be deemed much more than what was being presented in the thread.

You should add the CryptoHFs member to your ignore list.

I am glad the puppeteer controlling the deadsea33 account has not logged in again after he brought unwanted attention to himself but thanks to that error he has now put the light on several other accounts clearly linked to his account-farming business.

Looking at the quality of posts being presented by the puppeteer controlling the _Hiloveua_ account clearly shows the intention was only merit hunting (as it was already mentioned the the current neutral feedback).

I have not had the appropriate time over the past few days to give this matter more time but I will definitely find time. I have already decided on several accounts which will be tagged. As mentioned earlier, I will tag all of the accounts at the same time that I feel have participated in merit abuse.

Well, it is pre-season and these are friendlies (even of there is a combative edge somewhere in the games) and anything can happen. They rotate players with too many substitutes that is the only way the manager can see what his team are capable of performing pre-season. I am sure Pochettino is not worried about the loss but Aldershot should be allowed to celebrate their moment 

I have a tendency to believe very little of what CryptoHFs is posting but I have known since reading his first post that he is an alt-account and a brief look at his post history clearly showed it. I also know he probably has more than one account.

When he said he did not know how to see the trust list, I knew it was another minor attempt to misdirect. He added and excluded members two weeks ago yet he is claiming he does not know how to view it.

The 1xbit forum representative has not been using the forum since 25th May 2023 therefore it might be a very good idea for us all to stop posting here and bumping the thread.

From time to time newbies will post here alleging they have been scammed but (whether they are telling the truth or not) the process was and still is the same. Victims should first contact their local police station. Victims should ask the domain registrar to shut them down. Posting here with their allegations and most of them without presenting evidence has become repetitive.

There really is not any reason to give the 1xbit/1xbit1 websites any more free mentions.

Ratimov has contributed to this forum immensely way beyond anything you or any of your alt-accounts could ever have managed.

Just by reading the low-level words you have used (in your post to try to attack him) clearly demonstrates your correct status within the community. You can only aspire to be a positive contributor in the forum but you will never be considered as one.

Whirlwind are not scammers. You lost your private key without making a back-up and for that reason are trolling.

CryptoHFs, are you still standing beside that guy? He is still asking for his funds but nobody apart from your CryptoHFs account and his stormbounty account is stating Whirlwind owe him anything. The truth is Whirlwind owe him zero and you are riding along in the thread for the sake of attention-seeking.

I think this is a perfect time for the puppeteer controlling the deadsea33 account to make a post. What he started by creating a thread to argue about a neutral tag (that hugeblack gave him) has spiralled in to an investigation of mass merit abuse.

It is not the only time account farmers have challenged tags and then found their account examined which led to the uncovering of nefarious conduct using multiple alt-accounts: Questionable Merit History From: deadsea33

Regardless of the last active times, what has to be noted is that the Rbolisna and Ripon9909 accounts have not participated in the thread.

Also, as of yet the _Hiloveua_ account has not answered the questions here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5460557.msg62594722#msg62594722

Now that you have asked your own questions let us see what the reply would be when eventually _Hiloveua_ posts it.

I thought the £8 million offer made by the Saudi Pro League team for Ziyech was far too low because even mediocre players going to that league are being sold for millions of USD$ more than they are worth. Chelsea paid £33.3 million just three years ago to buy him now they face a substantial loss.

At the end of the season I have no doubt Burnley will be fighting a relegation battle. Many better teams have been promoted to the Premier League and then have been related immediately.

Having said that, Burnley host the game and therefore it is Manchester City what will travel there with a squad that no longer has several key players. Gündogan, Cancelo, Mahrez have been sold and Walker seems to be heading for Bayern Munich. They still have all the quality to win the game but I suspect they will not win the Premier League because they will become complacent after winning the treble.

Burnley will give 100% to win the game and just might upset the Premier League champions.

Pharmy I mean Scepty  

The problem quite often is that many newbies happen to be accounts created for farming purposes and no matter what facade they try to display, sooner or later many of them end up give themselves away. The manner in which the OP is writing throughout the history is somewhat ridiculous when demonstrates someone deliberately writing well below their real capability as far as the English language is concerned.

I do not think he was told about it, he found it. As you rightly stated, what was he doing checking feedback when newbies do not really know much about it. Also, simply by the way he is writing it seems it is designed to come across as a novice non-English speaker but he failed to fool.

Check grammar here when he posted for merits but must have was disappointed as received zero especially after the good grammar applied with a few deliberate mistakes. Compare it to the way he wrote the OP.

You probably do not know the situation but I think the puppeteer controlling the CryptoHFs account probably gave up on it because of two significant occurrences. First, his account was tagged as someone who would not ask for a loan in future and second he put a spotlight on himself by posting nonsense in the Reputation and Lending boards.

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

Having said that, if you look at the feedback history of CryptoHF you will see that he is relatively new here. His account was created around 4 months ago and with his low quality of posting, he has not contributed to the community in a positive manner.

If you take a look at the feedback for the CryptoHF account, it has been tagged by several members as it deserves. The feedback he has left for members demonstrates he cannot be taken seriously and for that being one of the reasons, I will tag his account with appropriate feedback too.

We need more input from loginsam45 in this thread.

For now at least, I am not stating loginsam45 is telling the truth nor am I stating you are the one who is truthful but as a point of interest we should have some clarity on what was mentioned by _BlackStar. Can you sign any of your three known addresses from 2014/2015?

If you are unable to sign any of them please explain why.

Please note, I am on the verge of tagging your _Hiloveua_ account (and several others) on the basis of being farmed engaging in merit abuse operated by the same puppeteer controlling the deadsea33 account. Having said that I ask you to be clear in your defence.

_Hiloveua_ without conducting in incoherent ramblings and by giving straight answers only, can you address the following questions: