As far as the clearnet version is concerned I think it has mostly been under constant DDoS from when it was launched (and it did not open for me too). The Tor version seems to be opening without any issues.

You seem to be mistaken on several fronts. The project is not abandoned. Whirlwind seems to be paying thousands of USD$ every week without hassle to their signature campaign participants. They seem to have an existing support system otherwise the campaign manager would not be able to liaise with them and make payments to campaign participants.

You lost your keys and as a result of your incompetence you were responsible for your loss. You should move forward with your life and stop logging in with the other accounts you are using.

Absolute low-quality nonsense post again therefore deleted: fachant

If Bayern Munich waited for him to be a free agent he would be eligible to play for them in the 2024/25 season and they will want him as soon as possible. He scored 4 goals today but was clapping the fans as if to saying goodbye.

I would not say it is impossible though. If Henderson can make his way there for £700,000 per week then I am sure Kane can find his way there for a lot more. Money talks 

I have to say Manchester United have purchased very talent players. There are no questions on the pedigree of both Mount and Onana but the jury will be out on Rasmus Hojlund because he is just 20 years old but is largely unproven at the highest level. Sure, he has potential to be a superstar goalscorer (because of the players he will have supplying him opportunities to score) therefore he should make it there.

Reading the stories about sad events, bereavements, hospitalisation and illness (as well as drug addiction and battling relapses) could be from various movie scripts rolled in to one for your defence, which brings me to the question: Though it is highly unlikely you would elaborate, before you go would you at least make a list of all the alt-accounts you are operating?

Brighton have already received £25 million from Chelsea for their goalkeeper Sanchez (who I think will be a brilliant signing for them) to challenge Kepa. If Chelsea had made it a deal to sign both they could have completed the Caicedo deal by now. They should have purchased Sanchez on the understanding they would buy Caicedo at the same time or no deal at all.

Elsewhere, Tottenham still have to decide whether to accept the €100 million offer. It is around £86.25 million therefore they have to consider letting Kane leave next season for free because his contract will expire. Kane is 30 years old therefore could deliberately see out the remaining months of his contract and sign a deal with a new team in the January transfer window to play for them next season.

Many teams are capable of paying him millions in signing-on fees and bumper weekly pay. If you were Bayern Munich, would you prefer to pay €100 million to Tottenham now plus the weekly salary for Kane or simply wait one more season and pay Tottenham nothing, pay Kane €10 million signing-on fee plus bumper weekly pay? Sure, he will be a year older but that is something worth considering.

What would happen if Kane ended up going to the Saudi Pro League of a team offered to buy him?

Maybe the OP will decide it is time to lock the thread. He has after all made his point and he has read the replies from Hhampuz. Add to that he has read the replies and opinions of many members (which mostly do not agree with him). It is clear the OP did not get far with momentum of members behind his allegation.

Both accounts (CYBER_COWBOY and Cantlogin) are operated by the same puppeteer. There is a suspicion of the same puppeteer controlling other accounts that started posting in the Reputation and Lending boards too and then started trolling. Hopefully some more accounts will be uncovered.

If buying Caicedo now is already bringing problems for Pochettino he should let it go and wait until the next transfer window. He will buy him before the end of January 2024 if he still wants him. £90 million is too much for a player they paid £4.5 million to buy 32 months ago.

West Ham have sold Rice to Arsenal for £105 million therefore if they have money to invest. They will want to strengthen their squad because they do not want to be in a relegation battle next season. Maguire might be a good fit there, Moyes is a good manager that could help Maguire get his form back with regular playing time.

Good riddance. At least one his known alt-accounts (Cantlogin) is busy posting now. He obviously will be back with other accounts (if he already has not) therefore it is not the last we have seen of that troll. On the bright side, he certainly has walked because he talked  

I suppose he chose his words appropriately when he wrote his personal text: Don't talk the talk, if you can't walk the walk

If what you stated is true, I would like to read what Hhampuz wrote in those alleged instances and would like to know the context in which he wrote the words. Therefore regarding 1,3 and 4 can you provide links?

If you are claiming Hhampuz has been conducting himself in a wrong manner in the past, why did you not create your alt-account to post about it earlier?

They have paid £64 million for him and will pay £10 million extra after he reaches certain milestones. Hojlund has signed a 5 year contract, he is only 20 years old therefore they have the potential for a long-term player. Reports state he will be presented to the media officially on Saturday.

Brighton paid $4.5 million to buy him from Independiente del Valle (an Ecuadorian club) when was just 19 years old, just before the January 2021 transfer window closed. Lampard was manager of Chelsea at the time (his first time) and he was interested in Caicedo but the deal did never materialised.

Maybe Pochettino should let the Caicedo deal go and concentrate on finding a replacement because Brighton are trying to blackmail Chelsea by holding out for more. Two years ago they paid just £4.5 million to buy him therefore they should not be greedy to that extent.

Now Brighton are stating they have received an offer of £80 million from an unnamed club. What are they trying to do? Caicedo will fit in with Pochettino and his plans therefore the players wants to go to Chelsea and he will be happy playing under a Spanish speaking fellow South American manager. Pochettino is from Argentina and Caicedo is from Ecuador.

Brighton paid around $4.5 million for Caicedo, they should sell him and invest the income on strengthening their squad.

Thank you for clarifying your denial and for stating loginsam45 created a false narrative and allegation against you. It is now up to loginsam45 to come back and refute your denial to be taken seriously otherwise you are no obligation to prove anything.

It has also been noted you are unable to sign an address from 2014/2015 for the reasons you already gave that you do not have access to them.

Would you be able to explain why your posting patterns have changed from September 2018 when you were last active before coming back to post in April 2022?

Just when you think you will probably not hear anything new related to (non-Cloudflare) errors, this one comes along. I have never seen this type of error before. Maybe theymos will confirm if this is specifically related to tabs in merit pages or if can be replicated elsewhere.

I agree.

Regardless of whether the Gigabit account was hacked or not, thankfully what has happened here (by bringing the Gigabit account in to the spotlight) is that we can all look at it conclude one way or another if the original owner/creator is still operating it. All that is missing is a little more input from the accuser (loginsam45) which might back up his claim to connecting the remaining accounts.

Define "targeted by others"

This thread is titled: Hhampuz using his position on forum to vindicate scams therefore where is the vindication?

If you can provide evidence of your particular claim you should be open about it and use your real forum name. If you have no claim at all and are simply a spectator that seems to think Hhampuz is behaving inappropriately then you have made your point, others have read it.

Until or unless you are prepared to use your real forum name to make a complaint you are doing a disservice to the community therefore you should lock this thread.

And what moral authority does that one member provide to your allegation? It is one member that you singled out from thousands and used him as an example of behaving positively/fairly but how does it bring any credibility to your claim from that one member? He is literally a nobody with no moral authority in the forum therefore what type of elevated status are you personally granting him?

What you are implying is that if members wearing a signature managed by Hhampuz post here, you will say their posts are fair/unbiased if they support you and any that oppose your claim will be dismissed because of alleged allegiance to the campaign manager. Do you realise how ridiculous you are sounding?

Imagine if you were enrolled on one of his signature campaigns, that would be highly embarrassing for you. Maybe that is why you are not using your real member account.

This is about as accurate you could get with the general manner in which scam accusations are being made (against any business) when usually other information provided by the accuser or not released earlier puts their claim in doubt at the least.

In all honesty, any notion that Hhampuz is using his position as a campaign manager to give scams the green light, is preposterous. With his years of management within the forum, for any allegation against Hhampuz to be taken seriously there needs to more than an aggrieved member not happy with positive feedback which he mistakenly sees as an endorsement of a scam.

First of all, if a manager such as Pochettino decides he wants a player for his team because he fits in to his ethos then that alone is a massive compliment but when the club currently owning the player decides to use that against them in order to try to get more money then they are taking a risk especially as the manager can refuse to get in to any negotiations.

I can understand there is a need for clubs to hold out for a higher price before any of the transfer windows close (summer or winter) but overpricing players have one serious outcome and that is the chasing club will go elsewhere to find a replacement.

Yes the onus is on the accuser but Gigabit made an entry in the thread to deny wrongdoing then ignored the subsequent request for clarification. Instead of addressing it he decided to make a huge number of posts to meet his signature campaign quota before returning here with clarification. That was not the expected conduct by most members looking to explain they have no association with the hack allegations made against them.

It does not indicate guilt but it certainly does not look good when you read through post history and come to a conclusion something is not right there.