Heard about Bitcoin first in 2010 but didnīt take it seriously until 2014 and still waited 2 more years to finally get invested in. One is always smarter in afterwards :-)
I have been starting to buy bitcoin in 2016 and that's my big mistake consider about I joined in the late game. It looks like the majority of people were feeling the same caused by they were joining crypto as a no early adopters of crypto. |
|
|
|
|
I didn't even the developers wanna try to hear your suggestion. So many times this idea has already sounded by various person but the fact that if the decision will be going back to the team whether they wanna pay use stable coin or not.
FYI USDQ has paid me with stable coins too. It's very difficult to find a bounty that paid the participants to use a stable coin.
|
|
|
|
As for me, I no longer believe any ICO projects
But I see you're running a project, and how can you attract investors without using an ICO? Or do you intend to implement IEO at the present time? If you do IEO on small exchanges, it is like an ICO, which will surely fail that doesn't make sense to see that. IEO needs a lot of requirements and audit except if he wanna try to apply for the crap exchange site to do an IEO. ICO is still alive no matter what people said because the fact some latest icos can reach the hardcap easily as long as it's a trusted Rico. |
|
|
|
As long as TT can get help from all of the people on its social channels and then it can win the vote easily.
The problem is TT must also attract people to help the votes, especially from the binance users too. I will give my vote to the TT as this is a better project than MDT.
Look at their AMA road map as it would be a lot of support from various countries because it is a good goal for TT to win the Binance vote. Of course with the aim of AMA is to attract many investors and introduce ThunderCore throughout the world. Now the ThunderCore community is very large so this will make it easier to win in the polls at Binance. We will see that, I think that we can't underestimate the competitor's community too. I just hope the hunters who have participated in TT bounty can try to support through their votes too. It will be helping a lot for TT to win the vote. |
|
|
|
This information will attract a lot of new community to the project because if listed at Binance, this project is the project everyone is looking for. I hope ThunderCore can win and trade at Binance because I also hold some of these coins. Of course, I will wait and vote for the project because the probability of winning ThunderCore is very high. It will become a fierce battle, since both voting participant have an attractive prize to win. Indeed, I also hope this time TT community play a very good role in this matter but I'm sure MDT will also be like that, because this is binance so the battle must hard. As long as TT can get help from all of the people on its social channels and then it can win the vote easily. The problem is TT must also attract people to help the votes, especially from the binance users too. I will give my vote to the TT as this is a better project than MDT. |
|
|
|
anyone knows, what happensto the CAT tokens we are holdıng...
i did not participitate in ICO, but i bought from market
thank you for the reply in advance
The token became a worthless token caused by the team was a scammer. You must see the post that has already published about the allegation from SEC to the bitclave. It looks like the team can't run away again with the money. |
|
|
|
|
It should be the institutional investors but what about the personal investors? What do you mean about using crypto while you have stated that if the institutional investors were investing in the crypto rather than try to use it? It looks contradicted.
|
|
|
|
In the near future, the number of stable coins will even increase. However, these will be stable coins of the central banks of states, that is, their digitized currencies. The spread of coronavirus and the need to disinfect paper money is pushing states to digitize their national currencies. States and international financial organizations express concern only for stable coins of various private and other commercial structures, the circulation of which is really associated with a certain risk. Therefore, in general, there is no threat to the existence of stable coins.
I honestly don't think that these banks will be interested into making their own stablecoins considering the user of crypto sitll not massive and even if there's profit in it, it's just a pocket money for them. Most of stablecoins until now are owned by private company which reserve their fund in bank, in other word, the banks actually indirectly participating in the existence of these so called stablecoins. |
|
|
|
If you have a poll here 90% of the voters or participants will not trust ICO anymore, why would we, when they can contribute to the mess of ICO I used to check on the credibility of the projects on their list but after proving that they are giving a good rating to those scam projects because of the fee they received I lost trust on these ICO rating sites.
The fact that they provide some kind of offer for the projects that want to pay certain amount is already a dead giveaway but it seems for most of people nowadays their existence is still relevant enough that new ico ranking website keep appearing and offering their services in various groups. I guess wherever there's money there's always people that wants to make some fortune out of it. |
|
|
|
Since 2018 it feels like all hope is gone for altcoins, only top altcoins are performing bit better but new and low market cap altcoins aren't showing good sign but alas things can change anytime sooner, I'm just hoping that history should repeat itself, hopefully, fingers crossed for now
It's hard to repeat things that have already happened, although it still can but it still won't be the same as before, so it never hurts to hope for the best, but remember, it will not be the same as before, because every year there are always changes in conditions that are not we ever thought. First of all, in the past the whole market is overhyped and I'm talking about altcoin market specifically. Everything that's overhyped usually will not end well and crypto is not an exception in this case and now the market is a lot more stable than before although not as "good" as before same thing happened to stocks and many more. |
|
|
|
I'm confused why Cartesi refused to pay all reward at once, the token has huge 24hrs trading volume on binance, the whole bounty allocation won't do a thing to Cartesi value even if all bounty hunters decided to dump all tokens
as far as I know, bounty being released recklessly like that could trigger another wave of dumping because it could influence people into dumping their coins and that's maybe their main reason to halt the distribution of the rewards. However, if a project is truly good and have strong market capitalization they shouldn't afraid of that. |
|
|
|
Telegram was created to communicate people easily so the only fault for that is the scammer because they using as instrument the telegram to scam people or the investords.
Many scammers in the telegram so people need to be vigilant of what they joining and investing because people are don't aware once they want to get more profit they invested even they are risky to invest.
Nobody forces people at gunpoint to send money to scammers' wallets, people do it voluntarily by not noticing that scammer is talking to them. Often, they do not even suspect that they can be deceived, which leads precisely to such consequences. can't really blame people while the percentage of people who really know what they are doing in term of technology not to mention crypto which rarely known deeply by people. Although sometimes it's annoying how people keep getting scammed because lacking knowledge I think we still need another countermeasure for that. |
|
|
|
|
Never expect even a single thing for china in term of crypto, not to mention that the decentralized nature of crypto is totally against their ideology, it only make sense for them to ban every crypto out there except theirs. although if it turns out to be wrong that will be a better outcome.
|
|
|
|
neither the duration of short-term or long-term bounty is a problem, but the biggest problem is that it depends on the project itself. we can't know whether the project will be successful? most projects add a long duration and end badly, don't pay and sometimes end up a scam.
It's not a problem. If that was running by a good project and the hunters will have gotten their payment. The problem is we don't know for sure what will be happening. There was a lot of projects were running their marketing campaign in the short term and they got a good result and the hunters got paid. |
|
|
|
Does Anybody know a crypto project that is really great but failed to materialize? I'd like to see one in your comment.
There are many projects that have an excellent foundation when they are released, they did very well but in the end they end up a failure, it's one reason why I hate Hype and FOMO, for example I will like to made metion of few projects that aren't living up to their standard anymore 1. Pundix 2. Miracletele 3. Kuverit 4. Apollo currency 5. Stratis Not all these projects turned scam but they aren't that good unlike when they come into crypto space. Personally I hate the XVG project, they created a big hype in 2017 about their project. It has caused the price of XVG to increase hundreds of times, but until now they have not done anything. All are lies from the project and make investors lose in the past 2 years XVG has done a crap partnership and that's the result for years of development progress. It's not all lies but the developer can't keep the promise to create a good partnership. Remember there was a lot of loop holes on its blockchain that has made XVG got hacked several times. That's a garbage chain with no usefulness. |
|
|
|
There is an old saying: "trust, but verify." On the Internet, with a strong desire, you can find everything, and having spent not so much time you can learn a lot about the team, and if you decide to invest your money in something, then the time spent will not be in vain, people who are naive in essence believe everything and do not even want to verify.
I would prefer to not trust anything before I can confirm it legitimate though, that will help us being a lot more skeptical thus motivate us to dig below the surface and eventually reveal the true nature of that project. tbh, a lot of people in term of investing are rather skeptical about literally anything. |
|
|
|
Once I got into such a story because of my stupidity. The ICO project has written achievements and plans that did not apply to it. So I got to the scammers, but after this incident I always study both the team and the information about exchanges. (GraphenPower project)
The team will show us how good the ico is. I remember i have participated in so many campaigns and then some campaign has been lying in term of distribution or even turned into the scam project. Team matters a lot but we must remember if we must take a look at the track record from the team members and the product as the main consideration. |
|
|
|
|
It varies depending on exchange but for most of the time they demands fee either in form of money or if they see potential in your project they will demand tokens instead. there are also some requirement if you want to get listed into most reputable exchange. After getting listed though you will need to maintain the trading volume of your coin by keeping the project alive otherwise it'll get delisted .
|
|
|
|
|
Still wonder how people who knows exactly that XRP is "not" a decentralized crypto currency didn't expect this to happen. Even if there's millions signing your petition it will do nothing for the simple fact that they need money for many things and it's not as simple as just stop selling xrp.
|
|
|
|
Those rankings are mostly paid. I don't trust any scores and prefer to judge myself, after personal experience and researching of the subject. Other brains will never replace yours so that work on your own opinion.
They are still useful to make quick judgement though and if the reason behind why we look up certain project in ico ranking is not as crucial as investing. The sole reason of that site existence is for money and that's why many websites similar like that eager to advertise themselves in many crypto groups, to gather views which means a lot more money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
