It really depends, maybe in the future the company need to implement or atleast creating their own currency for their platform sort of token using blockchain technology no one knows but one thing for sure is the fact that technology is always advancing and company like Google always invest so much into developing and adapting a new technology.

People are usually overly hyped if it's about money and some media are taking advantage of this. I do agree that people should know or be able to distinguish the differences between blockchain and bitcoin because some people everytime hearing word blockchan they'd simply think that it's just another name for bitcoin which is really wrong and could potentially lead to misinformation just like what most of the media with lack of "information" did with thes rather clickbait titles.

There should be reasoning as to why BNB will grow in the future though, most of the BNB price pump driven by the IEO and now it's stuck because there's no real utility other than being as ordinary as any other token released by yet another exchange which is to get the fee discount. If that's the only utility left I think the price should just equal or a little bit more than any other token with same utility.

Kinda makes sense considering bitcoin was initially start from zero and climbing all the way up to what it is now though if there's no altcoin and ICO boom last year I must admit that the growth might not be as significant as it is today meanwhile ETH was already having the price stated in early stage of its ICO. Overall, bitcoin is like a gold of digital currency, everyone would prefer it over everything else.

Let's be honest here, bitcoin can't even lift the economy of third world countries with debts that amounts only a dime compared to what the US has simply because using bitcoin is just like using any currency out there, I can't see how it could save a country from its national debt and considering that US is kinda "against" crypto most of the time, it's just a wishful thinking.

No one knows for sure what will be happening but I hope they replenish the wallet and allow people to withdraw though this will surely wound their reputation in the future. Refunding people's money is one way to heal the reputation but man I'll be honest i won't deal with this kind of exchange even if my coins happen to only have listed in this specific exchange.

you just don't know what other problem could be resolved because maybe you rarely look up to some cases that could potentially being solved by blockchain. imagine democracy election being more transparent and not vulnerable to manipulation using the nature of blockchain which is decentralized and all votes recorded in each block and saved up forever. there are so many cases out there that can be solved although not everything can be solved using blockchain simply because it was initially not made to solve all the problem in this world but instead just for a core system of a cryptocurrency.

It's the other way around and wont change anytime near yet. I can't imagine USD being backed up by bitcoin, what does that thinking and reasoning comes from anyway. if there comes the time when USD being backed up by dollar i'm sure this USD is as good as having nothing. It just doesn't make sense to be honest. it'll make more sense if USD when the value dropped so hard will be supported by being backed up by petrol or such.

Well they are becoming such big company not for nothing, if they already planned to release it in 2020 big chance it will happen despite all the backlash they received from the government. Probably they are going to launch it outside US who knows, the whole world has known them and if a flicker of news regarding Libra release goes to public, peolpe will automatically know and get curious.

even if it does dominate the crypto market it will just add yet another flow of capital to the whole crypto market because Libra is just another stablecoin and won't affect bitcoin that much. They are just taking advantage of the blockchain technology and make it seems like a crypto. They'll just become other method for people to buy bitcoin or vice versa, it's just literally that.

most of alts are created out of thin air with the premise of an "idea" to back up its value meanwhile this "idea" doesn't really mean anything at all. It's not a rocket science to understand that most of alts are prone to dumping and will hardly being pumped again meanwhile BTC with its more matured market have equal chance of increasing and decreasing its price. I do agree with your statement that BTC even in the bearish market could still drive some profit out of the circumstances.

Well, everyone need money but your statement isn't really wrong though. Ethereum's premine is simply too much and I'm pretty sure that the developers still got so many ethereums left in their wallet. But, that's what people have agreed since ICO back then so I guess majority of people will be fine. However, I'm not really fond of ETH that's also why everytime I got ETH i prefer to convert it to something else.

Metamask extension in chrome will be fine even if they banned it from the chrome store you could simply download it from their own official website and the chrome store for extension is bloated with garbage extensions anyway even there are some that trying to disguise as metamask wallet but different thing if it's banned from playstore which where most of the people are downloading it from. However, there are many alternatives that are safe so I guess it'll be fine.

It's often despite delivering product they are still failing. It's just the matter of whether a project is deemed useful in the eyes of people or not. Same situation with many startups nowadays, good idea but just solving the problems that are nonexistent to begin with. Also to note, price of alts heavily relies of Bitcoin and it seems that bitcoin dominance is still increasing therefore don't expect too much from a project that barely significant to the market.

they really want to get ahead and takes all the benefit of crypto implementation without even waiting other countries to make move. It's no wonder that their technologies are decades ahead of many countries in the same continent. it also seems that japan already giving influence to its neighbouring countries and with the emergence of many blockchain company it really clear what's the whole asian countries direction is going, though some of rather "strict" countries are still afraid and reluctant.

Every exchange that turns out to be scam always perform good at its debut and then gradually decreasing their performance and as a result disabling the withdrawal function thus trapping people's funds or a more harsh way to say it is exit scam. It's the same cycle and people are still falling into it and honestly I've never heard the name BCNEX even once before but people really need to be cautious before trying a new exchange like this.

if that turns out to be true I wonder how they can handle the government backlash across the world and which users are they targetting. I don't think it's possible for them to run it where even the government disapprove the whole project to begin with? and if the investors are leaving Libra, their coin will supposedly smaller than what initially planned? to see they plan to speed up the launch process really outside my expectation.

The exchange will definitely put that account under suspicion if you do it that way and therefore will be forced to take the KYC and well the result is a disapproval. Exchange also have a fair reasons to not accept some customers as it's their business and they can't risk it by breaking the law and taking risks. Also, most of VPN are usually detected by the exchanges beforehand and it's a piece of cake for them to do that. As people said here, better not to force things and to consider than things have gotten tensed up regarding Iran might contribute to the reason the exchange has.

Most of IEO are largely overvalued. Some of them also simply recycling the old idea and bringing it up for IEO in order to gather money from the masses. There's actually no distinct difference to ICO in term of result than just being seen as a more legitimate way to earn money after going under review by the respective exchanges. if people are hoping that the result by all these IEO somehow turns out different than ICO out there, they are mistaken and these things couldn't result in different outcomes.

Craig is never satoshi and it's better to just ignore him. You need to think why he's just garnering all these attention to him and act like a clown for purpose. Despite how most of people who have knowledge consider him as sort of delusional person he seems targeting those who are not really well informed regarding crypto. Sort of creating fake information to misled some group of people into believing that he's satoshi nakamoto. as a result you can see how many medias out there getting trapped into believing that he's "satoshi nakamoto" atleast that's what my brain tells me.