Most of IEO are largely overvalued. Some of them also simply recycling the old idea and bringing it up for IEO in order to gather money from the masses. There's actually no distinct difference to ICO in term of result than just being seen as a more legitimate way to earn money after going under review by the respective exchanges. if people are hoping that the result by all these IEO somehow turns out different than ICO out there, they are mistaken and these things couldn't result in different outcomes.

Craig is never satoshi and it's better to just ignore him. You need to think why he's just garnering all these attention to him and act like a clown for purpose. Despite how most of people who have knowledge consider him as sort of delusional person he seems targeting those who are not really well informed regarding crypto. Sort of creating fake information to misled some group of people into believing that he's satoshi nakamoto. as a result you can see how many medias out there getting trapped into believing that he's "satoshi nakamoto" atleast that's what my brain tells me.

I'd never consider a coin that has gone thousands percent up from its initial price as a sleeping giant even in the slightest. The premise about this PoS switching is promising but doesn't necessarily make it any better than it's now.
Quite the opposite I think, once people realizes that these platform like ethereum which shares the same category as EOS or anything out there gives no real meaning, it becomes overvalued.

Actually saving your money in exchange "temporarily" until they sell or buy order executed is okay and most of the traders do that, though for a long term investor it's indeed discouraged to do that.
I agree with portfolio doesn't need to be managed everytime, people are confusing trading with long term investment. for long term investment managing portfolio is probably the last thing they'd do in "short time" but instead they just leave it be.

To be frank even in the past ethereum become popular thanks to all the ICO that are hyped so much. After that phase, Ethereum's popularity starting to fade slowly and even nowadays there's no relevant discussion regarding the coin anymore except some measly things and the POS update. They really need to speed up their pacing.

Facebook should add data breach into their company culture as a yearly event. Yeah, they are big company, everyone targeting them but to be breached so many times it's stupid. Good thing their Libra is not approved and I guess in the future the project will be cancelled.The things are, facebook have made two grave mistakes and these are violating their own users privacy and getting data breached frequently. It's just a big warning for whoever soul out there trying to convert their money into Libra if their project is launched which I don't think will.

Mining using illegal resources is like a time bomb, just waiting to be raided by the authority. But, losing 7000 machines is nothing though the difficulty will adjust after 2006 blocks and everything will be fine as if these machines are not exist.

Don't really think this news will necessarily trigger fud among people anyway.

But first of all they need to go through strict regulation and being approved even before thinking of conducting an ICO and making fuss like is the same as taking risk of making wrong business movement which could put their business in danger. If they are about to release a coin, it'll only have the utilization of being a local currency and nothing more. overall it's just doesn't benefit them enough.

The hard truth to swallow dominance affects a lot and it's a sign that more people are interested toward bitcoin and less toward alts. Yes, there might be some coin out there that are undervalued and deserve the investment. However, if the bitcoin dominance keep increasing that means the altcoin being crushed even further though some alts may just follow the flow like what it used to be back in the past.

The unfortunate thing is, no system is safe. It doesn't matter how much you invested into the security there'll always be a hole that could be penetrated by the hackers though if invested massively to the security it could somehow bring more security or at least buy time for yet another improvement like all those internet giants for example google. I guess hacking activities will still occur in the future but I hope I'm wrong.

Simply because being ignorant and greedy. Though, we can't predict when will someone turn into a greedy creature and then exit scam but trusting our fund to someone else in the first place is just really wrong. if you are being confused as to why people could get easily scammed that way, you must see those people who joined multi level marketing or ponzi scheme. they are dumb enough to just believe stranger's word as if being a scam victim is like a natural selection.

sudden lost of massive hash power could also lead to blockchain not functioning properly and probably will take a really long time before adjusting after 2000 block. just imagine if today is the difficulty is really high then at a sudden the next day the hash power just around 2% left and the difficulty still stagnant at the really high level. it could potentially cripple the blockchain for some serious moment if it really to happen.

Price being too high is not a problem if it can be obtained by the decimals or in other word small portion of bitcoin. This flexibility is what gives or make people who want to buy bitcoin being able to buy it easily without worrying about how much money they needed to invest and yeah, the fact that bitcoin always have a fiat pair whether it's local currency or USD also contributes.

Though bitcoin staying to be the only one crypto is not against my favour but dont you think that if the market have more than one reliable currency it will be better?. The idea of making bitcoin code open source by satoshi himself Im sure is to facillitate people into creating their own cryptocurrency whether for public adoption or private.

There's literally no use of investing into stablecoin as it's just a safehaven to save your wealth from fluctuation and nothing more. Though, there's possibility that the value could also deflate due to being backed up by various assets but Libra is far from being deployed anyway so it's just better to just ignore it at this point and not being approved by government is like a dead end for the project.

This forum has known P2PB2B to be a shady exchange. there are so many accusations against this exchange and even by mentioning it people would've already guessed that this project is gonna be another garbage project hosted by shady exchange. I'd recommend you to just give up promoting your project in this forum.
Exactly what a shady exchange and project would say.

It's to be expected that some investors will blame binance for it because the major reason they invested into this coin is because it's kind of being endorsed by binance at the initial phase of IEO and now facing problem they are desperately seeking for the spacegoat though Binance can't be completely blamed for this problem. It's the developer's self initation that causes this problem.

Just because there's someone with that kind of opinion doesn't make the original Bitcoin any less "Bitcoin" and everyone have their own opinion and vision regarding bitcoin anyway and they are already being facilitated with forks and whether to judge a bitcoin is the real one or not depends on the people themselves but I'd definitely prefer the one that already existed ever since the first emergence of blockchain-based cryptocurrency.

I must admit that coinbase really successful when it comes to advertising and it seems their target audiences are those people who want to try crypto. Meanwhile, Binance's users consist of somehow experienced users in term of crypto whether it's trading or staking though. I agree with you that binance users have more potential for staking their assets in the exchange. But, if coinbase could successfully elaborate staking to their users, the potential they may get out of it couldn't be underestimated.

It's to be expected that the scammers will become more sneaky and at the same time people are becoming more aware. but see at the positive side nowadays scammer could only scam some people who are really greedy and not those who think using their logic. currently scammers are having a hard time dealing with all the prevention measures applied to most of exchanges like KYC and moreover people are less trusting toward ICO with no legitimacy or approval from the government. though that might hurt the decentralized side a little.