This spam/scam has been going on for months. Just report it, Mods should nuke it.
There's a thread in Meta about it, but I can't find it on Mobile.
Account is now nuked. Scammer annihilated.  |
|
|
|
Well, let us know if they make you whole. If you forgive them, I'll have to remove my support from the red tag. Then I'll create a yellow tag since it's clear that they are trying to dupe people to get 90 bucks out of them for 18 bucks. |
|
|
|
Yes, I went ahead and supported your flag. Also, I just edited my above post. |
|
|
|
|
Hey Bitmover, Please make a red scammer tag for this user. Only a victim can make a red scammer tag and then people can support it.Sorry that you got dicked around.
|
|
|
|
I am not sure why you believe he is getting paid more than 0.02/week. The majority of his posts are one liners that don't have any real insight, nor is any real effort put into his posts. I don't see why any reasonable person would even accept him into a signature campaign that isn't accepting anyone with a pulse.
The loan does give a motive for Hhampuz to steal from BestMixer, however proving the existence of the loan or that hhampuz would not otherwise be able to repay the loan is not necessary to prove that money was stolen from BestMixer. There remains blockchain evidence that Hhampuz stole money from the BestMixer signature campaign and moved it to chipmixer to hide where it went next.
Hhampuz is the campaign manager for the Fortune Jack signature campaign. Each participant gets paid .02 BTC per week. I would think the campaign manager would get paid more than the participants. Especially since he is also wearing the signature. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3248711.0 |
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing tvplus006 and hacker1001101001.
Sadly tvplus006 is banned. He has an appeal thread, but it has not resulted in a temp ban and sig ban. |
|
|
|
|
Supported them all. I wish that I had a clue on how to create a script. That was tedious.
|
|
|
|
~snip~ You forgot about the Fortune Jack campaign. However, the participants are paid via their Fortune Jack account. Each participant gets .02 BTC per week. Hhampuz probably gets more than that... |
|
|
|
I hope that you will self-reflect one day and realise how much you come across as a mouthbreather. I bet he has a lot of trouble paying a few bills with 1+ BTC a month.
What if he has a pill addiction, that can be costly. Just saying. I mean there is about as much evidence of that as anything else. Oh my, it appears Hhampuz needs an intervention.  Rehab can be expensive. Perhaps we should put a fund together so community members can pitch in. We will have QS act as escrow. But will Hhampuz even go? |
|
|
|
Is this still a thing? Has it been put out to pasture? If it's still going, how do account farmers manage to create so many UID's without being hit high fees? (Better still, don't advertise the answer, just in case any of them have learned to read...)
Let's hope that they are too stupid to figure out the work around. |
|
|
|
Is Hhampuz able to flag QS for this thread? Potentially trying to harm him gaining new clients, so technically couldn't that be considered personal loss?
I believe Hhampuz already has supported this flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79 I'm not certain that he can invoke a red flag, since I don't think the terms of the signature campaign specified implicitly or explicitly that anyone butthurt by getting the boot couldn't cook up some conspiracy theory. |
|
|
|
No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.
No, Hhampuz is not clairvoyant. It's obvious that he is an agent working undercover for the Dutch government. Hhampuz knew the shit was about to go down by the 10th, so he asked Darkstar_ for the loan. After all, it was a Friday, and Hhmapuz wanted to have a wild weekend. Hookers and blow don't come cheap. |
|
|
|
The negative trust by these two seems pretty shady to me. I don't think there was any credible evidence of polo scamming in 2017.
Polo was way behind on their support tickets at the time. They also had taken down their trollbox at the same time. I can see where people were getting leery that another exit scam was looming. Polo has since changed ownership, anyway. So the tags should probably be revised. Unfortunately, Zepher can't revise his.  |
|
|
|
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz
He would have a red box if a victim of his actions came forward. As it stands now, he is a high risk individual with a yellow box warning. Perhaps if Hhampuz has a loss of business or a certain person in socal gets harrassing phone calls we can put a proper red box on him but for now this will have to suffice. Theymos should create a special banner tag just for Quickseller. It should be flashing blue and red color. |
|
|
|
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz
If anyone is to be tagged under a new trust system, it is Quickseller and his alt accounts. I don't have a link to the thread where his escrow scam got exposed, but I'm sure you're aware of it.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.0 And I'm certain there are plenty of delightful piles of "goodness" strewn about the forum, to step in. |
|
|
|
|
I lost a very nominal amount due to Cryptsy's exit as well. I was one of the lucky ones that was able to withdraw the bulk of my funds. Supporting.
|
|
|
|
You can't flag any alt ring with any flag-type without violations. If the alt-ring has successfully abused at least 1 bounty, then you can use flag type 1 which is basically worthless (nobody cares about any "#" symbols nor yellow warnings). Enjoy.
Can't we encourage the bounty manager to make a level 3 flag, though? After all, if the OP of the bounty thread specifically states that you cannot enroll alt accounts, than the bounty abuser is in violation of a written contract. My understanding is if you participate in a bounty campaign, you are agreeing to follow the rules. |
|
|
|
This is a topic for theymosisms, and likely does not relate to BSV. I don't think we should discuss about BSV here. Did you really publish your post in wrong topic, that would have been published in BSV's ANN topic. For Steamtyme, yesterday, theymos made announcements on Trust Flags, that is totally new system in the forum, with lots of clarification posts. I suggest Steamtyme to create new section for this in the topic. Say Bye to Trust Drama, Welcome FlagsI think theymos may have said something to that effect in some PMs he sent to a few members. However, this is what he stated on the open forum. ~snip~
I hate having to "defend" BSV and BCH, which were created with deception in mind, are technologically bankrupt, and are run by huge assholes, but you can't say that their supporters broke a contract with you when they didn't. Give them a newbie-warning flag if you want, but not a contract-violation flag unless they actually broke a contract with you. (Note that you might have a case for breach of implied contract if you were actually tricked into buying one of these coins instead of BTC.)
|
|
|
|
LOL, since when were the rules clear around here? Even the list of rules that are pinned to the board are "unofficial."
This is pretty clear Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. Yes, and now it is clear that one of the ways that theymos will seek to remove people from DT ASAP is to PM a recommendation to DT1 members. Since it is now clear that this is indeed a recommendation rather than a demand, those DT1 members are free to either take these recommendations to heart or take them with a grain of salt. I am uncertain if this matter will be accelerated any further if it does not go in the direction theymos is expecting. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
