I read all of the comments. Some people didn't like the change in policy at all, of course, but continuing with the status quo isn't going to happen. Some people found the policy too vague/subjective. Some loopholes were identified. Some people found the original policy too constraining. Taking these comments into account, I adjusted the policy to this: DRAFT - NOT CURRENT POLICY
Starting Jan 1, 2024:
- Forum accounts that are obviously run by mixers are not allowed. *
- Mixer announcement threads are not allowed. **
- Promoting mixers in signatures, avatars, and profile-bios are not allowed.
- It's not allowed for mixers to do giveaways, sponsorships, bounties, paid posts, or paid ads in posts. If a thread is for paying people to do something for a mixer, then that's also not allowed. **
- Mixer URLs will be automatically wordfiltered out, but you can still discuss mixers otherwise.
* Existing accounts will be banned from posting, but will be allowed to continue sending/receiving PMs for at least a few months so they can settle any business.
** Existing threads will be locked and archived. This would replace what's currently written in the OP, and my previous clarifications in this thread would become obsolete. What do people think about this version of the policy? Does anyone think that it's worse than the original version, and if so, why? Are there any possible improvements (which wouldn't totally undermine the whole thing)?
Will you include the feedback system for filtering words?
Probably not. I imagine the Dutch Local Authorities would not be too happy
My goal is not to act in the best interests of the state. If that was my aim, I'd probably continue to allow mixers. My goal is to put in place as few restrictions as possible while keeping risks (for bitcointalk.org and its users) at reasonable levels. Centralized mixers have qualities which make them especially risky in ways which other things do not. Because it is possible to send Alice->Bob->Charlie as two on-chain transactions, and have a service, that will batch it, and put Alice->Charlie into the final block. Is it called mixing or not?
If the middleman can steal coins, it might be a mixer. But those sorts of things usually use cryptographic techniques to prevent the third-party from actually having custody of the coins at any point. 2. In case of Lightning Network, it is possible to broadcast the old state of the channel, so yes, "it is possible for the mixer to steal property
passing through it". Even though it may be hard, it is still possible, because you have no guarantee, that the attacker is not a mining pool.
My mixer definition says to assume that zero miners are evil. Lightning is not a mixer under my definition. The goal of my definition is to include the mixers that we're all familiar with, and to ideally also cover all ways of obfuscating these types of mixers, without any false-positives. If things very unlike mixers are covered by my definition, then this may be a flaw in my definition. But in reading all of the comments here, I've so far not been convinced that my definition is flawed in either classifying too many or too few things as mixers. |
|
|
|
|
Several people seem to be concerned that the current policy will be too disruptive/constraining. How about I make this modification to loosen it a bit: you can direct people to mixers by name (even in something like a "top 10 mixers" topic), as long as:
- You don't directly post their URLs.
- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.
Would this be sufficient to address the concerns?
|
|
|
|
This month 142 users were eligible. Old: HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
vizique
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
dbshck
stompix
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
SFR10
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
bobita
Vispilio
be.open
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
Bitcoin_Arena
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
Heisenberg_Hunter
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
stoos
morvillz7z
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
jokers10
Symmetrick
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
seek3r
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
New: HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
Mitchell
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
yahoo62278
zazarb
pooya87
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
The Sceptical Chymist
LeGaulois
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
ekiller
Jet Cash
holydarkness
tweetious
Yatsan
HCP
buwaytress
crwth
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
DdmrDdmr
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
The0ldl_lser
jokers10
efialtis
geophphreigh
Rikafip
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Poker Player |
|
|
|
I would just like to see this point clarified. What is considered directing someone to a mixer?
If someone says:
"We can use a mixer to break your connection"
"There are services that mix the currencies of several users, and that way you can try to increase your privacy. Search on Google."
"Yesterday I used a very good new mixing service, different from all the others we usually use. Search for 'new btc mix' and find out."
Of the three sentences, which are found in this rule?
Of those three examples, the first and second would be OK because they don't direct people to a specific mixer. |
|
|
|
I'm curious myself if there were any formal requests or warnings received
We've received no warnings or requests to change policy from law enforcement regarding mixers. It will help to know if the stand of the forum is that mixers are injurious to the public like darknet
I would prefer to allow them. I don't view using them as unethical, and I don't care about reputation. But this kind of thing is far from the core mission of bitcointalk.org, and the costs far outweigh the benefits. It wouldn't be illegal to continue allowing mixers here. That's why we're able to offer a 1-month grace period. But allowing them has become too risky/problematic, and it's only going to get worse. Imagine 5% of all active forum users being sanctioned due to being paid directly by mixers, or all participants in a big signature campaign being targets of a search warrant, or our service providers suddenly banning us due to being "associated" with mixers, etc. I think that the crypto community is near the start of a multi-year squeezing campaign against mixers; similar to the cannabis industry in the US, or Operation Choke Point, or what happened with Backpage, or the deplatforming of Parler. non-KYC exchanger converts your BTC to XMR
That's allowed unless the site is also a mixer due to eg. allowing BTC->BTC "exchanges" or advertising BTC->XMR->BTC exchanges as a way of mixing coins. Theymos, I understand this decision had to be taken to save the forum from alot of accusations in aiding fraudulent activity in the future but what next are we going to ban?
I don't anticipate the need for major new restrictions in the next couple of years, but it could indeed happen. Maybe Bitcoin will be banned in the US someday, and then I'll have to either shut down bitcointalk.org or find a way of moving it to some remaining territory of freedom in the world. That's the problem with centralized forums. I wish that more work was being done on creating decentralized, uncensorable, but also usable forums. I would love nothing more than to be able to shut down bitcointalk.org due to some decentralized solution making it obsolete. Find me a 501(c)(3) nonprofit working on this, and I'll donate to it. To be clear: not all .onion sites qualify as darknet, right?
Correct. And something can also be darknet without having a .onion. By "darket" I mean something that wouldn't be able to exist for long outside of the shadows because it's being suppressed by the state. How about old avatars? Many inactive and even banned users still have an avatar from a Bitcoin mixer. It's not a priority, but I might blank them at some point. Since that doesn't have any real links to mixers, it may be OK. Probably we'll leave it alone at the start and see how it looks after a few months. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk.org aims to allow about as much freedom as is reasonably possible. But this is not a darknet forum, and with mixers looking "grayer and grayer", it's no longer reasonably possible to allow linking to mixers. Even though "a cryptocurrency mixing service is not necessarily illegal," a clear pattern has emerged where mixers pop up, last for a little while, and then get taken down by law enforcement once they get too big. Allowing mixers to be posted on bitcointalk.org before they seemingly-inevitably get declared illegal and seized is not sustainable. Therefore, promoting mixers will no longer be allowed, similarly to how darknet sites are already disallowed. To avoid disruption, there will be a grace period: Nothing will change until Jan 1, 2024.Starting Jan 1, 2024: - Forum accounts that are obviously run by mixers are not allowed. * - Mixer announcement threads are not allowed. † - Promoting mixers in signatures, avatars, and profile-bios are not allowed. - It's not allowed for mixers to do giveaways, sponsorships, bounties, paid posts, or paid ads in posts. If a thread is for paying people to do something for a mixer, then that's also not allowed. † - Mixer URLs will be automatically wordfiltered out, but you can still discuss mixers otherwise. Using link-shorteners or other obfuscation techniques in order to post URLs which would otherwise be wordfiltered is not allowed. * Existing accounts will be banned from posting, but will be allowed to continue sending/receiving PMs for at least a few months so they can settle any business.
† Existing threads will be locked and archived.You do not need to go edit/delete your past posts. Links will be automatically wordfiltered-out as of Jan 1, and nobody should be banned for old mixer-related posts. You should remove any mixer signatures/avatars/etc. soon after Jan 1, though. Definition of a mixerFor clarity, here is a detailed definition of what we mean by a "mixer". Most people know intuitively what a mixer is and don't have to read this. Something is considered a mixer if it meets all of these requirements: 1. It has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property. a. Even though you can sometimes use non-mixers to mix coins by depositing and then withdrawing, this doesn't make it a mixer because this is an incidental use of the service; the service isn't advertised as privacy-enhancing. b. If a site is not primarily a mixer but has a mixer function, such as a mixer function on a gambling website, then the whole site is considered a mixer. c. If the site takes coins, gives you a possibly-transferrable IOU, and will convert this IOU back into mixed coins much later, then the temporary conversion into a different type of property does not prevent it from being considered a mixer. d. If the site internally converts your deposit into other things as part of its mixing, but ultimately the point of the product is to get your original type of property back, then that's a mixer, not an exchanger. 2. It is possible for the mixer to steal property passing through it. Assume that the sender does everything as correctly as possible. Also assume that no miners/verifiers on the base-layer cryptocurrency are evil. But assume that every other actor involved is evil (everyone able to vote in a DAO, every coordination server, every counterparty, every member of a multisig, etc.). Ignore short-term software bugs which are expected to be quickly fixed. 3. The service does not collect KYC-type info from all users. (This is not an endorsement of KYC generally, or a condemnation of non-KYC services generally. Non-KYC services of other types are still allowed, and in many cases they are a good idea.) Examples of things that are not banned mixers include exchangers (unless they have a mixing function), CoinJoin-supporting non-custodial wallets, and Monero. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk.org is not a darknet site. Linking to illegal services is not allowed. As mentioned in the law-enforcement press release, "a cryptocurrency mixing service is not necessarily illegal." But a seized mixer is rather different from just any old mixer. Sinbad, if still operating, is now clearly a darknet site, and therefore not allowed on bitcointalk.org.
The OP is banned. This topic is archived. The onion address is wordfiltered, and bypassing the wordfilter will get you banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Unexpectedly, Javier Milei won the presidency in Argentina. I'd been following this story because it's interesting to see a Milton-Friedman-style libertarian (or at least someone who identifies himself that way) suddenly get put in charge of an ultra-statist, pretty-screwed-up country.
I hope that he does really well and turns Argentina into a libertarian paradise where I can move someday. But I expect that it's going to be a huge disaster. Milei appears to be a bomb-thrower (like Trump or Bolsonaro) rather than a serious policy wonk, which absolutely will not help him now that he's the one in power. When he tries ending popular programs and firing government employees, people will riot. If I was him, I'd get a diverse group of really serious experts (mostly but not entirely libertarian-leaning), and see if they can come up with some sane policy changes which won't cause riots.
Any Argentinians here with an opinion? I'm not very familiar with Argentina, and I've only read a handful of articles on Milei, so my knowledge is only surface-level.
|
|
|
|
This month 133 users were eligible. Old: gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
Mitchell
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
Lesbian Cow
cryptodevil
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
condoras
holydarkness
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Vispilio
be.open
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
El duderino_
Best_Change
Trofo
icopress
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
Husna QA
Bthd
abhiseshakana
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
jokers10
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
n0nce
New: HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
vizique
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
dbshck
stompix
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
SFR10
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
bobita
Vispilio
be.open
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
Bitcoin_Arena
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
Heisenberg_Hunter
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
stoos
morvillz7z
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
jokers10
Ratimov
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
seek3r
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim |
|
|
|
Isn't this statement contradicting itself?
The word "misconduct" implies bad intent. This was a moderator getting tricked. Since Ratimov was turning his old topics into garbage on purpose
He wants to delete his posts, but he can't delete the topics, so he's editing them to be "blank". This is common and allowed. then he moved his trash in the Russian local board
This is a rule violation, but it's fairly minor. A veteran forum member isn't typically going to be banned without warning for moving their topics incorrectly. (These topics were blanked and then deleted over the course of ~3 days before the issue was noticed. It wasn't part of an ongoing pattern AFAICT.) If he continues to move topics incorrectly, this would warrant a temporary ban. I would argue that even self-mod threads that Ratimov cleaned out should be restored and locked, if that's not done already.
It's allowed for topic-starters to delete all replies to their self-mod topics. Restoring the posts would only be considered in special cases such as if their account had been hacked. Also, if a topic has no more replies, moderators will typically delete the topic on request, since then there isn't the issue of deleting other people's replies. That's why the empty topics were not restored. |
|
|
|
Sorry for bumping an old thread. But I did not want to create a new topic just to ask this simple question. The URL is not valid anymore. So where the Bitcoin wiki was moved? Is it the Bitcoin Wiki subforum? Or https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki is the official wiki of Bitcoin? Who controls this website at this moment? As far as I know, Bitcoin.org is in control of Cobra, and bitcoincore.org was separated from Bitcoin.org as well. Who controls the bitcoincore.org website? There was a dokuwiki wiki on bitcoin.org from very early on. At the same time bitcointalk.org was split off from bitcoin.org, this wiki was as well. But IIRC it was shut down shortly after, since bitcoin.it had become much more popular. bitcoin.it and the bitcoin.org wiki existed at the same time for several months, and they sort of competed with each other during this time. I wrote most of the content on the bitcoin.org wiki, and I moved most of it to bitcoin.it at some point. For example, if you look at the edit history for the Privacy page, you'll see that I created it on Dec 19, 2010 with the edit-message "Copy from old wiki". There were several pages like this. (You'll have to do some more research if you want to figure out the exact timeline; I don't remember it off-hand.) The bitcoin.it domain is owned by the forum, but it's always had a totally independent admin team. I've never been an admin there, nor appointed any admin. However, nowadays it seems mostly abandoned, with only 5 edits in the last 30 days (about half of which look like spam); I've been thinking for a few years that I should appoint some new admins or something, or maybe just shut it down and set up a redirect to bitcoinwiki.org. Bitcoincore.org is run by the Bitcoin Core developers. I don't know off-hand who controls it. There is no "official" anything. |
|
|
|
I see no evidence of misconduct, though it was incorrect to delete topics with substantial replies. All of the deleted topics with replies have been restored to Archival. [d.] He reports other's posts from the topics.
[e.] Moderators delete the reported posts because now these posts are irrelevant in the discussion This didn't happen. In all of Ratmov's deleted topics, only 3 replies were deleted by moderators in the last 2 years, and none of these deletions were by xandry or Xal0lex. |
|
|
|
|
It was the same weird thing which caused a few hours of downtime 6-12 months ago, and I think it's what causes the few minutes of downtime people observe every few weeks. I've never been able to figure out what causes it. It looks like the network gets cut between the web server and the database for a while. It seems to always happen at around the same time, so I suppose it's probably some automated maintenance process messing something up, but I don't have anything running at this time, so I wonder if it's something in the web-host's networking infrastructure, or something like that. It's difficult to diagnose, since it happens rarely, and usually when I'm sleeping.
I'm planning on upgrading the main servers sometime in the next few months. (Just as part of standard maintenance: there will be no user-visible changes other than perhaps slightly improved speed.) Maybe that'll fix it just by virtue of moving things to different areas.
(The few minutes of downtime just now was due to me doing something, and is unrelated.)
|
|
|
|
This month 132 users were eligible. Old: theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
Carlton Banks
philipma1957
Cyrus
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
LoyceV
LeGaulois
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
ekiller
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
finaleshot2016
crwth
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
Best_Change
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
shahzadafzal
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
The Cryptovator
1miau
The0ldl_lser
YOSHIE
efialtis
Ratimov
geophphreigh
Rikafip
FatFork
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrCryptHodl
n0nce
New: gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
Welsh
Mitchell
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
Lesbian Cow
cryptodevil
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
condoras
holydarkness
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Vispilio
be.open
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
El duderino_
Best_Change
Trofo
icopress
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
Husna QA
Bthd
abhiseshakana
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
jokers10
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
n0nce |
|
|
|
|
Done, thanks! What a monstrous regex...
I'm 95% sure that this change is correct, but if anyone notices this breaking any posts, let me know.
|
|
|
|
This month 134 users were eligible. Old: gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
dbshck
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
BitcoinPenny
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
condoras
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
webtricks
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
imhoneer
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
Best_Change
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
Bitcoin_Arena
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
efialtis
Ratimov
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrCryptHodl
n0nce
New: theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
Carlton Banks
philipma1957
Cyrus
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
arulbero
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
LoyceV
LeGaulois
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
ekiller
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
finaleshot2016
crwth
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
Best_Change
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
shahzadafzal
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
The Cryptovator
1miau
The0ldl_lser
YOSHIE
efialtis
Ratimov
geophphreigh
Rikafip
FatFork
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrCryptHodl
n0nce |
|
|
|
|
Added, thanks!
It would be better if message-links didn't have the topic in them, but I'm worried that changing the links in [quote]s etc. would break something, so this will only be used by people in-the-know about it, not in any forum-generated HTML.
(I've also been meaning to write a very simple API which would allow bots to function more efficiently in general, but I haven't gotten to it yet.)
|
|
|
|
This month 127 users were eligible. Old: theymos
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
wwzsocki
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
LFC_Bitcoin
sandy-is-fine
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
TwitchySeal
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
holydarkness
Lafu
Coin_trader
tweetious
HCP
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
bavicrypto
dragonvslinux
sheenshane
o_e_l_e_o
logfiles
joniboini
masulum
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
cryptofrka
madnessteat
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
YOSHIE
Ratimov
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
FatFork
NotATether
bullrun2020bro
decodx
n0nce
New: gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
dbshck
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
BitcoinPenny
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
condoras
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
webtricks
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
imhoneer
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
Best_Change
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
dragonvslinux
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
Bitcoin_Arena
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
mole0815
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
Lakai01
Husna QA
fillippone
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
efialtis
Ratimov
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
MrCryptHodl
n0nce |
|
|
|
This month 126 users were eligible. Old: theymos
qwk
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
wwzsocki
jeremypwr
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
sapta
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
actmyname
LeGaulois
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
Jet Cash
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
webtricks
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Vispilio
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
El duderino_
Best_Change
KTChampions
Coin-1
bavicrypto
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
sheenshane
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
logfiles
joniboini
masulum
GazetaBitcoin
TheBeardedBaby
tvplus006
coinlocket$
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
abhiseshakana
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
1miau
The0ldl_lser
YOSHIE
efialtis
Ratimov
geophphreigh
Rikafip
Lachrymose
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2020bro
BlackHatCoiner
MrCryptHodl
New: theymos
gmaxwell
OgNasty
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
wwzsocki
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
Avirunes
buckrogers
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
BitcoinPenny
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
LFC_Bitcoin
sandy-is-fine
klarki
LoyceV
LeGaulois
TwitchySeal
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
holydarkness
Lafu
Coin_trader
tweetious
HCP
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
bobita
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
bavicrypto
dragonvslinux
sheenshane
o_e_l_e_o
logfiles
joniboini
masulum
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
cryptofrka
madnessteat
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
YOSHIE
Ratimov
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
Lachrymose
FatFork
NotATether
bullrun2020bro
decodx
n0nce |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
