Nope, trust is unmoderated on this forum. I think the only situation where it would result in a ban is if a user is posting huge amounts of spam trust ratings.

So I've read through the thread, and the discussion of the ban reasoning. It's been mentioned that users can be banned for consecutive posting with a paid signature, but not without a paid signature. Can we have any confirmation from a staff member that this is the case? If this is the case, why wouldn't this rule apply to all users regardless of if they're wearing a paid signature or not? Consecutive posts like Mitchell posted as examples seem to clog up discussions on the forum, and it's so easy to put all of them into a single post.

Accepted, you'll be slotted in shortly.

This campaign is now full!

Alright, sounds good. I'll slot you in shortly.

Accepted as well.

Denied due to poor English.

I'd be willing to accept you, but remember that if you're unable to make 50 constructive posts for the month, you'll be removed from the campaign. If you're alright with that, let me know and I'll slot you in.

I wouldn't be able to accept you due to poor English.

That's a very good question, and it's something that I haven't considered before. I think for now we'd like to try and keep it to one account per user, just so that everyone has a fair chance at a slot in this campaign (since the rates are quite high), but no, there are no rules in place right now that prevent users from enrolling two or more accounts at a time. It's something that I'll have to look at in the near future if I sense that a select few users are filling the campaign with a few of their accounts each, preventing others from enrolling their Twitter accounts in the campaign.

Replied to your PM, looks like we have this slot filled again.



I'm going to have to deny all of you, because this slot has already been filled.

Payments for February 14th were just sent out. TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/8f1de9426d3b0458d5100ad78fe097466ce239f49598949cb2adab522de7306d

---

Also, one slot in this campaign is now open. If you're interested in joining, please apply!

Updated the spreadsheet, thanks!

You probably don't want to make spam posts regardless of if you're in a signature campaign or not. The staff here will ban you either way if they see that you're making spam posts. Besides, as I mentioned, quite a few of the posts in the last couple of pages wouldn't be considered constructive for this campaign, so I'm not willing to accept you at this point in time.

I had replied to your application on the last page:


Sorry, we're not willing to assume that previously inactive users will be able to make 50 posts per month. Plus, I don't really have an accurate estimate of your recent post quality due to your lack of posts. I'd suggest actively posting for the next week or so, and then re-applying to the campaign again then if there are still some slots open.

---

Also, this campaign is introducing a new initiative to cut down on forum signature spam. Please read the message below, or in the first post of this thread.

Accepted, you'll be slotted in momentarily.

Denied due to poor English in your posts.

Accepted, you'll be slotted in shortly.

Denied, it appears that the majority of your recent posts wouldn't be considered constructive in this campaign.

Denied due to poor English in your posts.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you as well, due to your lack of recent posts, plus quite a few posts in your last few pages of posts wouldn't be considered constructive for this campaign.

Denied due to lack of recent posts.

Our rates are more than fair. For example, a Hero member in our campaign is paid 0.0016 BTC per post without the Rollin avatar, or 0.0018 BTC per post with the Rollin avatar. According to the "Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns" thread, this is the highest payment per post rate for Hero members.

Unfortunately I'd have to deny you due to a lack of recent posts.

Did you receive a signed message transferring over ownership of the account to you when you purchased it? I'm afraid if you don't have any signed message proof, "funkymunky hacked" will probably be able to get the account back from because he has proof of ownership from last week.

I'm going to have to deny you due to a lack of recent posts.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you as well. I'm not seeing a ton of posts that would be considered constructive.

Denied due to lack of recent posts.

Denied due to poor quality posts.

Denied due to poor English in many of your posts.

Sorted this out with you via PM.

To any users having similar issues: Try copy/pasting the signature again and the problem should go away.

Denied due to poor English in your posts.

Denied because of poor English in your posts.

---

In other news, I am holding 1.6 BTC in escrow for the first month of this campaign.

Proof:

Accepted.

Denied due to lack of recent posts.

Denied, our campaign only counts posts in English for payments.

You are all accepted.

Denied due to poor English.

Sorry, right now there isn't any way to only join with an avatar.

Accepted. You'll be slotted in shortly.

Thank you. Feel free to apply for the campaign as well.

Accepted, I'll add you in a moment. The campaign avatar isn't required so no worries if you don't want to wear it.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you due to the poor English in many of your posts.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you due to poor English in your posts as well.


Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you too, due to lots of posts in sections we don't count, and of the remaining posts, most of them wouldn't be considered constructive in this campaign.

As per our PM discussion, and my discussion with the Rollin admin, you're accepted.

Thanks for the suggestion on having people specify if they plan on doing the avatar deal as well. I'll update the application template in a moment.

Unfortunately I'm going to have to deny you. I've gone through a few pages of your recent posts, and I wouldn't be able to count the majority of them as constructive posts.

Accepted. I'll slot you into the spreadsheet in a few moments.

Denied, you aren't using the Rollin.io signature.

Accepted, I'll slot you into the spreadsheet.

The market for signature sure seems to be slow these days. Thanks for the advice on rejecting alts - right now we don't have any policies against alt accounts in this campaign, however if I see that an alt of a user with negative trust is attempting to enroll in this campaign, they will be denied.

Accepted, I'll slot you into the spreadsheet in a few minutes as well.

Denied to due lack of posts, and lack of constructive posts.

Accepted, you'll be slotted in shortly.

I'm willing to accept you on the basis you aren't planning posting more posts similar to your last ten or so most recent posts. Your posts older than that are fairly good quality, but the last ~ 7 posts or so aren't great quality.

Denied due to lack of recent posts + abundance of spam posts in the past.

Bump to the top! This campaign is now open again and accepting participants! Some rules have changed and payment rates have changed, but this campaign is now back in action!

Account tagged, let me know when you get your account back and I'll remove that negative trust.

This all seems a little odd though, with the address you signed from being posted only a week and a half ago. Any chance you'd be able to sign a message from the following address?

1J2xys9Pqtzc6jqgzGDWFuNDambCAKXBJ5 - TXID posted in this thread was sent from this address, address was posted here , here, here and here.