According to the spreadsheet, there seems to be 1 senior slot vacant.
If I am eligible, I would like to sign up.
Address: 137nnAwoYHhNEDpAwNC17CwnoVokKD27bS
Posts: 488
Accepted. Spreadsheet has been updated. It seems I only got paid 0.1248 instead of 0.13. Not a big deal but I believe I made more than 50 qualifying posts. Made 55 in total with only three that I believe were in disqualified sub forums (2 in games & rounds and 1 in off topic) I'd still like to join for another month however.
That's because only 48 of your posts were considered constructive. Normally, if users are unable to complete 50 constructive posts in a month they're removed from this campaign, but since you were so close last month I'll slot you in for another month. |
|
|
|
Can I sign up for another month or am I already re-enrolled?
I'll sign you up for another month right now. Thanks for your participation! |
|
|
|
I would like to continue please:
Name: crunck
Posts: 392
Activity: 322
Position: Sr. Member
1QKGjgmyexDKFzgnw33PWzUsyFsHPxEddN
Thanks
I've slotted you for another month. Thanks for your participation! Bitcoin Address:
1A7EJRtF7CQKCaS76mVw9AZvTnCkMhYhVt
Current Post Count: 332
Current Rank: Member
Accepted. Please update your signature and let me know when you've done so. I'll then update the spreadsheet with your info.
wow man wow i don't know which post you select as a quality of posts ?? First 14 post when i made you selected all 14 posts in "google docs" now when i have 52+ post you have selected only 20 ? seriously its sucks will you please explain me why you paid me only 0.052 btc ? and why you not consider my all posts ? what's wrong with all those posts which i made after 14 ? only the first 14 posts was quality of posts ? and in 38 posts you have selected only 6 posts ? Really disappoint man
I'll be sending you a PM shortly with all the posts that I didn't count as constructive. If you then feel some of them were constructive, we can discuss it and compensate you for posts we agree on. I think you should consult with guitarplinker, which post is qualified and which is not.
Don't forget to look google doc everyday to see your qualified post count
Did you read my post ? please read it carefully and don't talk me like that did you understand ? He was bringing up a valid point - the spreadsheet is updated with info on (almost) daily basis. You can refer to the spreadsheet to see how many posts were counted for you. i would like to continue with the campaign for another month.
Thank you as well for your participation, I've slotted you in for another month. |
|
|
|
i don't understand why i got .028 instead of .055 ? i made over 50+ post . can you clear please ?
You were only paid for posts considered constructive, and in sections that we count posts from. (You can see exactly what we consider constructive posting in the rules in the first post of this thread) Although you may have made over 50 posts, I only considered 26 of your posts in the last month constructive. If you'd like, I can send you a PM with links to all posts that I didn't count. If you feel that any were left out unfairly then I can compensate you for those posts, but I left out a lot of your posts because they were just asking for recharges, links to repayments, etc. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Address: 1KKZ9UDnU1YMSnPnsohLdhwN7ZDJUw39Sn Current Post Count: 197 Current Rank: Member I had one quick question. So we can post in the gambling section, just not the games and rounds subforum right? I will update my signature as soon as you get back to me. Thank you for reading and have a great day!  Accepted. Please change your signature and let me know when you've done so, and then I'll fill in the missing info for you on the spreadsheet. Also, to answer your question, obviously feel free to post wherever you prefer to post, but no, we do not count posts made in the Games and Rounds subforum. The topics under the main "Gambling" section are all free game though, and we count posts from that area, as long as they're constructive. |
|
|
|
what's up with the spreadsheet my qualifying post is 414 lol
Must have been a mistake on my end. I can't edit the spreadsheet right now, but I'll have that error fixed in the next few hours. Thanks for the heads up about it! EDIT: Spreadsheet has been fixed! With the link to the spreadsheet in the OP I get a spreadsheet updated 7-5-2015, is there a newer link? That's the last time it was updated. I will be updating it with post counts in an hour or two so check back then for updated info. |
|
|
|
I dont see me on there, I should maybe have said earlier but thought I'd be added at some point by now. Just checking Im in ok..
I watched your signature for a couple days and saw that it hadn't been added, so I removed you from the spreadsheet. It has now been updated with your pay date and post count. |
|
|
|
what's up with the spreadsheet my qualifying post is 414 lol
Must have been a mistake on my end. I can't edit the spreadsheet right now, but I'll have that error fixed in the next few hours. Thanks for the heads up about it! EDIT: Spreadsheet has been fixed! |
|
|
|
Hi. I hope you pick me. I frequently play as "Grendel25" on your site. Thx :-)
Bitcoin Address: 12MRgfQTP5wGXaaFyFm7CXS6ebeUyerA4u
Current Post Count: 905 (as of this one)
Current Rank: Hero Member (518)
Denied. It appears that the majority of your posts are being made in non-Bitcoin related sections. We're looking for users who post mainly in Bitcoin related areas. Yes, I read the rules and would comply. I don't really understand your rationale. This is one of the rules of the campaign: Posts must be constructive and subject related; posts must not contain spamming, bumps, advertising, scamming, forum abuse etc. We will verify the quality of your posts. Please have the majority of your posts in a bitcoin-related area. The majority of your posts are in a non-Bitcoin related area, which is why you were denied for this campaign. Most of your posts are in Politics and Society which they don't pay for, but as long as you were aware of the rules of the campaign then you should probably be given a chance as there doesn't seem to be anything wrong or bad with your posts. Plenty of ones in Bitcoin Discussion which would be fine.
Not entirely true, this campaign still counts posts made in P&S (however I'm still looking at possible changes to this rule) but we're looking for users that make the majority of their posts in bitcoin related sections. |
|
|
|
i would like 2 buy 1 i7. can u please answer my pm's Stratobitz!
No probs, Current price including express shipping : 0.98 BTCPayment address : 1C7SvTmiyhw22s9whySzKxWKrY27fS2seD After payment drop me a pm with the transaction I.D and your shipping info. CPU will ship first thing in the morning. shiping in Ukraine is ok ?
No probs, shipping worldwide as required. Price remains at 0.98 BTC payment address quoted. They're trying to imitate Stratobitz - as you can see, the account was just registered today. Don't send any payments to this user, I'll see if I can find a user on default trust to give him a red flair. |
|
|
|
I updated from 0.9.3 to 0.10.0 and then to 0.10.1 with no problems whatsoever. I didn't have to re-download the blockchain, or anything like that at all. I simply replaced my existing app with the newer version and everything kept right on trucking.
That makes sense. I misread his quote - I thought it meant that previous versions of the blockchain wouldn't be compatible with 0.10.1, but in reality what I think happens is that 0.10.1 condenses the blockchain into mainly headers (much smaller than whole blocks) making it incompatible if you try and downgrade afterwards. So OP, you shouldn't need to redownload the blockchain again, however once you upgrade you can't easily downgrade again. |
|
|
|
Hi. I hope you pick me. I frequently play as "Grendel25" on your site. Thx :-)
Bitcoin Address: 12MRgfQTP5wGXaaFyFm7CXS6ebeUyerA4u
Current Post Count: 905 (as of this one)
Current Rank: Hero Member (518)
Denied. It appears that the majority of your posts are being made in non-Bitcoin related sections. We're looking for users who post mainly in Bitcoin related areas. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately it looks like the 0.9.3 blockchain isn't compatible with the 0.10.1 release. See the following quote: Because release 0.10.0 and later makes use of headers-first synchronization and
parallel block download (see further), the block files and databases are not
backwards-compatible with pre-0.10 versions of Bitcoin Core or other software:
However, in the 0.10.0 release, initial syncing was sped up a huge amount, so it should take less than 12 hours for your node to sync up again after updating. |
|
|
|
Yes that's what I meant. The W/GH will always be fixed but the total watts will be lower along with the hashrate when underclocked.
I don't think Antminers downclock like that, at least S1's didn't. The lower you downclocked an S1, the more efficient it became. (higher GH/W ratio) Inversely, the higher you clock, the more inefficient it becomes. Downclocking made a huge difference with S1's as well - it would run at 180GH/s @ 360W (2W/GH) by default, but by downclocking to 140GH/s it would only take 170W. (efficiency of 1.21W/GH) So as long as the S2 downclocks the same as the S1, (which I fully expect) the S2's efficiency will increase as well. |
|
|
|
I much rather have the trust depth the way it is and just have the trust system improved overall.
I agree. I tested out trust depth 3 / 4 for a couple days a few months ago, but quickly changed back to the default 2. I found that loosening the trust to level four didn't help much, and that most people on the level 2 default trust are responsible with their feedback and leave accurate feedback. I don't trust feedback as much on levels lower than 2, and I personally think that a fifth level would make things worse. I'd prefer to have time invested in fixing up issues with the current system. |
|
|
|
|
Bitmixer.io seems to be a really reliable mixing site. I've tried using Bitcoin Fog before (I don't have any reason to mix, just wanted to see if it worked) and it worked too, but I've heard some horror stories about deposits disappearing mysteriously with no help from their support.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
