Despite their poor start to the season, Camp Nou has remained a fortress and Barcelona are unlikely to lose there. The fans and atmosphere appears to elevate the performance of the team to a level they can not match when on the road.

Inter are also a very good side and just had a strong win against Lazio. Conte is doing a very impressive job over at Italy.

The odds would be modified 15 minutes into the game depending on where the tides of the game flows. So the game might not be so attractive for a single bet if the odds drop lower.
I would expect Sevilla to win the game though, with their performances I've watched, they are a very good side on their day.

That may be the case, but for some of the top teams in England, the league cup and the Carabao cup could be the best chance for a title this season. City and Liverpool are on levels above anyone else and would likely compete for the league.
We saw Tottenham drop out in the last round and the Spurs fans continue their wait for a title in many years.

Manchester City all but debunked that idea last season. A team does not stand a better chance of winning one competition of it loses in another, if anything it has a psychological effect on the team for the next couple of weeks.

City won all three domestic titles, Liverpool won the UCL despite competing for the league title till the very last day.

The coach in his press conference after the match, said it was a 'discomfort', and they didn't want to risk it, that's why he was taken off. He was probably also jetlagged as he was in Italy for the FIFA Thebest ceremony, just a night before the match. He shouldn't have started.


Ansu Fati can also help out, if he gets more playing time. I understand he's young and needs to be properly managed, but he produces chances when he plays.
Another tough match away next, every away matche is tough for Barcelona this season. I won't be expecting lots of goals from the fixture, under 2.5 perhaps.

The ability to adjust with changing circumstances is what most subscribers are looking for.
I don't usually check how much time it takes my withdrawal or deposits to reflect and only check on it much later. But others may be quite different and may need it at specific times.
I wouldn't mind the withdrawal fees being lowered marginally though.

This became quite evident very recently. At the boom of the ICO market when Bitcoin rallied to it's current all time high, there were lots of altcoin signatures whose payments were very substantial when they hit the market and even better a few weeks or months later. I can even think of some of the top of my head.

I can't speak for the altcoin market now, as I don't really participate or follow their discussions. But if the altcoin general value is anything to go by, it's not a very good period.

He did stand a chance. But Messi takes the award tonight, and deservedly so, in my opinion. His stats were incredible to normal standards, and good to 'Messi standards'.
This was the best chance of the award coming to the EPL for a long time.

There's still the ballon d'or coming up, they sometimes do not pick same winners as #thebest.

There is no way for your friend to have come to that conclusion as reason for post deletion is not given on the message sent out.
So, I guess.he was aware that his post had poor grammar and hence felt that was the reason, and he should consider working on it.
But perfect grammar is not necessary for communication on the forum, and would not get you censored. He should also review his content quality.

I highly doubt this, 'good posters' do not need incentives to make quality contributions. True that rules, like 'posts in XXX board is compulsory' could affect their posting shouldn't get take up such campaigns. But with lots of research, that could still give out quality posts in such scenarios.

The top of teams have been playing 'hot potato' with to the top spot on the log, as it has been changing ever so often, and it's going to change again tonight in the Sevilla - Real Madrid fixture.
One top team which hasn't got on top in a while is Barcelona, and after another disappointing away outing yesterday, there are lots of causes for concern. Barcelona have scored the most goals (joint) so far this season, and also conceded (joint) the most. The lack of consistency would likely cost the club later on in the season.

When the underdogs get something to hold onto in a match, they usually dig their teeth in and hang on for as long as they can. It makes it more difficult for the opponents to penetrate. And the longer the match wears on, the more frustrated they would get.
However, it only takes a moment of magic to breakthrough.

Chelsea on the other hand will need more than a single moment of magic, as they are two goals down already.

Initially, I saw merits as unnecessary (and oddly unattainable) since it wasn't a necessity for one to get to jr member rank and wear a signature. Then came the enhanced newbie requirements, which demoted my account.
At that point the 'one merit requirement' seemed an almost insurmountable task.
But I took on the challenge and realized that with a little effort, you would get noticed


My journey has actually taught me lots more about cryptocurrency than I would have made the effort to learn if the one merit requirement wasn't put in place. I didn't settle for one, I wanted two and then three and so on.
I am still a long way off in the list of merited users, but I'm also a a little way off from were I was before.

I would attempt to advice newbies even though in sort of one myself; do not make quality posts simply to get noticed, it's fulfilling to be helpful to someone else and you would also be developing yourself in the process. Merits is just like a 'pat in the back' for a job (already) well done.

I do not think it can be considered as plagiarism. But it is definitely spam and against the forum rules as @actmyname stated above.


Best way to report is to include the evidence, as links. This would make the check much easier for the mods. You already got their attention when they check your report.

Bournemouth are currently leading by a goal. Josh king also just had a goal disallowed (25 mins) after the VAR review adjudged him to have been offside, still plenty of football left to play.
Nathan Ake scored the opener after just ten mins

I agree. Much more realistic than the $200k predictions in one year and those who try to predict the price in five or ten years time.
If this happens, it would be surpassing the current all time high, I was very optimistic of that happening a few months ago, but not so much now. It's very possible, but by my calculations, I do not think we would reach that mark this year.

But it could affect the merchants receiving the payments. If they accrued higher than the maximum amount and have a policy of depositing into the bank, they would be paying a charge on the excess amount daily - https://twitter.com/cenbank/status/1174982489288237058?s=19
This may force them to use incentives to coerce customers to pay using the internet or POS.


It technically affects everyone who handles lots of cash daily.
I really do not mind much, as the world is going cash less already. But such policies, forcing the citizens down a path, does not sit well with me. Instead of penalizing cash transactions, why not reward cashless ones? The citizens shouldn't bear the cost of transition.

I believe you're referring to ICOs IEOs or STOs, since the coins are not yet listed at the point of investing.
This is largely an unregulated field, and while more exchanges may not be required, the developers are not targeting any particular problem to solve, rather they are mostly looking for a way to profit from the market.

Stick to the reputable exchanges (centralized or DEXes).
Do not submit your personal information to just any website.

Crypto enthusiasts have the tendency to lump altcoins together. I have been trading altcoins for almost two years, and some projects have been steadily giving me profits, even during the bear period of BTC, it's almost about finding the right project and sticking to it.

ICOs are largely passed and new developers would struggle to raise funds for their projects, but already existing ones with a good use case offers investors options in revenue and also it's application

I am having a hard time deciding if you are being sarcastic or not. Crime will not be completely stopped if bitcoin transactions were regulated, it is not the major source of financial crimes.
Some would even argue that the transparency of blockchain transactions makes it a more difficult means of money laundering.