Wrong! Just use Google to research it, or simply use it even with a test account instead of guessing based on the nomenclature.
You can daytrade, scalp, or swing trade on both spot and futures. There is no such thing as "buyers and sellers agree on a trade to be carried out in a future". You can do whatever you want. buy now and sell in a second or after a year. The only difference is that in spot trading you are buying and selling real assets, and in futures trading you are not even tauching a real coin/bond/metal. In spot trading, you need to have the asset to sell it (or borrow it from someone who has it), in futures you only need to find a person willing to buy, and you can sell as much as you want. You are just finding a person who is willing to accept the opposite side of the transaction, and no one has to own a coin. You just agree with each other that from now on I earn on the rising price and you on the falling price.

What an entertainment! Why read books, skydive, play games, meet others, when you can put your savings into a shitcoin with a capitalization of nearly $ 1 billion. $ 1 billion for a meme...
It is mostly the money of manipulated people. Manipulated with the vision of quick buck by the whole marketing machine based on the psychology of depth.


Dogecoin was a true meme coins. Funny for some, an interesting social experiment for others. Everything after the doge is just an attempt to catch the train of all the scammers. Repeating a joke that no longer amuses anyone and only deceives amateurs of quick profits without knowledge of the risks.




We don't want it. We want to invest in new technologies, watch how the market develops, as it becomes available to everyone and displaces traditional finances ... and not give money to scammers launching the manipulation machine to inflate the price of another shitcoin.

No worries. There are many gold investors in here because hold is also a system collapse hedge type of deal. We are not a "bitcoin the only god, bitcoin the only savior" kind of sect

Where are you from? often local mints issue their gold coins. You can use local retailers and buy in person. I don't think shipping halfway around the world is needed here. What is important to me when buying physical gold is to avoid KYC
and leaving any trace of yourself (so preferably cash payment). So that then the local government wouldn't pursue me like in the USA in 1933, when they come up with a gold ban "
Executive Order No. 6102"

Was the financial operation related to this financial instrument (USDC staking on this platform) described in TOS? Meaning, were you informed that this is how your USDC will be used and that you are taking the financial risk of it? if it was so-called "defi staking" and everything was described in the description, then I'm sorry to say but you should take responsibility. It was a risk/reward type of deal. You earn on luna not collapsing by taking a risk of luna collapsing.

If, on the other hand, you were not informed that you were exposed to UST and its possible collapse, then I think a lawyer will be useful here.

it doesn't matter who is responsible for the attack and what types of transactions are flooding the blockchain... someone is paying for this.

"For instance, in the case of bitcoin, each valid block encompasses an average of 2000 transactions."
https://originstamp.com/blog/how-many-blocks-are-in-a-blockchain/

"Bitcoin Average Transaction Fee is at a current level of 30.91"
https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

so you have 60 000$ per 10 min = 9 mln $ per day. No matter if its bitcoin attacker that wanted the price to collapse, or pepe kids excited about new use case, sooner or later they will run out of cash. And there will be only one winner. bitcoin miners = bitcoin security = bitcoin network

"Bitcoin has died 474 times"

Every chain that have active users and is not centralized was congested at least once. its normal. Either we will fix it with a fork, or people who are currently spamming the network will run out of cash and everything will go back to normal. Ether was stuck because of crypto cats, defi bubble, nft bubble, even 1inch airdrop affected in spike in fees. 

Nothing to see here, its just another "bitcoin is dead" event.

Binance won't list a 2 YO project that is slowly dying. They list projects that generates high volume, no matter how shitty this project is just like they listed PEPE few days ago. SATOZ daily volume is below 1000$.

They also list projects of which they are business angels or those who pay dearly. Not a proof of stake token build on proof of stake chain with fake proof of burn mechanism to cheat investors with 200k marketcap.

"Bisq to zdecentralizowana giełda kryptowalut założona w . Obecnie na giełdzie dostępnych jest wiele walut (5) i pary handlowe (16). 24-godzinny wolumen Bisq jest zgłoszony na poziomie 82 928,62 $,"
https://www.coingecko.com/pl/gie%C5%82dy/bisq

Dzienny wolumen całej gieldy to 80k$. Spready sięgają 10% a całość bardziej przypomina platwormę do dogadywania się między jednostkami niż szybkie, wydajne swapy na innych chainach.

Ale swoją droga to dzine, że rynek już nie ma pomysłu na nic wartościowego, zajmuje się meme coinami, handlem obrazkami małp i odmienia defi przez wszystkie przypadki, a nie potrafi zrobić dobrego bridga/swapa.

The author makes 2 fundamental mistakes. The first is small-sample error and the second is confusing correlation with causality. in every noise you can see some patterns, but this does not mean that they are permanent,
and will be repeated in the future and mean something more than fortune-telling from tea leaves or fingerprints and that's what we see here. In my opinion, there is no regularity here, only a temporary correlation, if at all.

CME volumens are too low compared to large crypto exchanges to matter.

1- you think BTC is going to 1 mln $
2- you have 1 mln $
3- you buy 30 BTC @ 30k$/BTC and wait
4- you enjoy 29 mln $ profit

That's what normal people do. Coinbase CTO go to twitter to made a bet, risking the same 1 mln $, but to earn 1 mln $ intead of 29 mln $.

So it was the dumbest bet in a history of dumb bets maybe ever... betting against the CTO of Coinbase, all you had to do was hedge the bitcoin exposure and enjoy almost free money.

It was just pure marketing.

Też nie spotkałem się z takim dexem. Zwykle dexy działają wewnątrz jednego chaina. A na sieci bitcoina nie ma jeszcze stablecoinów czy innych tokenów z którymi można by tworzyć pary walutowe. Jest kilka cross-chain swapów (np. hashflow), ale są rzadkością i żaden z nich nie ma zintegrowanego bitcoina tak samo zresztą jak i wielu innych popularnych chainów (np. trx). Może bitcoin nie jest jeszcze na to gotowy? Musisz więc korzystać z innych sieci a co za tym idzie z zwrapowanego bitcoina. Możesz próbować dogadać się z kimś P2P, nawet tu na forum, albo skorzystać z bitomatu jeśli niechęć do cexów i KYC powoduje, że szukasz alternatyw.
odwrapowanie bitcoina pewnie nie będzie tańsze niż wypłata z binance.

The only burning that matters is when a project generates regular profits, part of which is allocated to lowering the supply. Increasing supply to decrease supply is like sitting in a sandbox and pouring sand from mold to mold in the hope that it will somehow move the entire sandbox setting it on a trip to the moon.

No to nam się bitcoin zapchał. Obecnie 280 000 transakcji czeka na dopisanie do sieci, co przebiło rekordy z 2018 roku.



@garlonicon @vjudeu Jak myślicie, jak poważny jest to problem? Z tego co czytam, to albo sam autor nie wie (na przykład przypisując zapchanie sieci bańką na meme coinach), albo wie ale tłumaczy tak, że ja nie ogarniam

I think we are not even close to "worst already happened"

the current collapse is aleady bigger than 2008 trigger event:


https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/05/worst-year-in-us-bank-failures-will-get-worse.html

and that's how it went:


https://twitter.com/byHeatherLong/status/1653036404241309699

The housing bubble is also bigger than in 2008. More blood is yet to come.

Just like with BTC, each consecutive halving has lower fundamential impact on price:


I don't expect any effect on the price. Other factors will play a much more important role, such as the environment (f.e. bear/bull market on bitcoin). Especially since the previous halving did not give much, so unlike bitcoin halvings, there is not even a psychological impact on the price here.

XDXD

Who cares? what is the problem of creating a token, generating 1 billion units out of thin air, putting 1 million into circulation, and burning remaining 999 million worth 0$? That's how we got a project that has 99.9% of the tokens burned ... only it's no different than a project that just has 1 million tokens and nothing has been burned.


Ohh so its like you burn 40 of your tokens to get 50 freshly generated from the air. isn't that the same as locking/staking 40 tokens and getting 10 tokens every block as reward? the net result for supply is the same - +10 tokens per block. So the whole project is based on building a POS token (with an additional marketing layer designed to confuse investors) placed on the POS blockchain. So the whole project makes no sense.

The total size of SBF and FTX collapse is around $10B. But a lot of that is air-inflated shitcoins. The real impact on the fiat positions of banks was probably negligible (like $1-5B?) compared to the whole catastrophe we are currently seeing:



In my opinion, not such businesses collapsed and the banks managed. For example evergrade:

"How big is the Evergrande problem?
$300 billion
Evergrande, China's most indebted developer with $300 billion in liabilities, has been at the heart of the country's real estate troubles since last year. It defaulted on its US dollar bonds in December after scrambling for months to raise cash to repay creditors, suppliers and"
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/01/economy/china-evergrande-miss-deadline-restructuring-plan-intl-hnk/index.html

There is no need to look for the guilty among individual bank customers. the real problem is a broken banking and financial system. if everything worked well, then one client wouldn't be able to do anything dangerous

First Republic Bank customers was rescued not bank. Bank is dead and everyone will pay for it.


i don't think there is any event that can push btc price +20% in 4 hours. Its not 2015 anymore.



not only two enemies. Market participants that see what is going on also play an important role. And now seems to scream "check" giving many signs of doubt in the power of the FED.

nowy lauchpool binance - SUI

Dziś rusza handel na tym tokenie. Chciałem wszystkich przestrzec przed wskakiwaniem na gorąco i kupowaniem. Robię to, bo widzę, że zarówno twitter jak i youtube pełny jest filmików shillujących ten projekt nawet w języku polskim, nawet wśród największych "celebrytów krypto". Chodzą plotki, że projekt jest tworzony przez zespół libry (którą tworzył facebook) a sam jest niesamowicie innowacyjnym pogromcą SOL (jakby było co pogromiać po upadku FTX XD), konkurent Aptosa, o którym było głośno jakieś pół roku temu. A czemu przestrzegam? Bo oficjalny handel na sui startuje za 2 godziny, a od 2 tygodni handlowalny jest SUI IOU z ceną ponad 2.5$:

"Please note that this page only reflects the price of the IOU, which may not be transferable across exchanges. Exercise caution while trading and always DYOR. To view the native SUI asset, which has yet to go live, please click here. "
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sui-iou/

A ta cena odpowiada kapitalizacji równej 25 mld $, czyli więcej niż XRP - okolice top 5 CMC co jest absurdem dla świeżo odpalonego projektu bez produktu i bazy użytkowników. Najlepiej odpuścić, bo projekt jest przehypowany. Nie ważne jak innowacyjny pomysł maja, wciąż to tylko pomysł, bez produktu, wyceniony tak wysoko jak firmy - eBay, HP, dell, EA, które już teraz dostarczają produkt, który używa cały świat.

50 BTC each block times 788 040 blocks = 39 mln BTC - we would have such a supply of bitcoin today if there were no halvings.
19,5 mln BTC - current supply.
It means that all 3 halvings together reduced current supply by half. so if we assume that the capitalization more or less corresponds to the amount of capital pumped into the project (project with fair coin distribution) and we assumed it to be a constant in the equation, then all the halvings we have had so far can only be responsible for doubling the price. Nothing more. 20x after first halving was not caused by halving. I still think people confuse correlation with causation.
Especially now they pay too much attention to halving, when in real terms each subsequent halving is less important for the foundations of bitcoin.