Can you fix the links? "?topic=1234.msg1234#1234" doesn't exist. Fixed. I forgot to edit the link from the sample format. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
I was wondering what ethereum dapps could have caused the massive increase in transaction. I was thinking there's no way! and then I read about USDT in the end Are we going to see more transactions on the ethereum blockchain but with less fees once the upgrade and move to POS is completed?
|
|
|
Pa-confirm naman neto mga long time coins.ph users. Tungkol sa TXID Actually kahit coins.ph to coins.ph makikita yun sa blockchain and maipopost din ang transaction ID... Once na posted na sya click mo lang yung transaction details then lalabas na dun ng TXID And just in case na PESO to PESO... may reference ID din si coins.ph. Just a Reminder: Makipagtransact lang po tayo dun sa Verified User ni Coins.ph...
|
|
|
I am not that familiar with the technicalities of coinsph but from what I understand, if both the sender and the receiver uses coinsph generated addresses, you don't see the transaction on the blockchain. Only a reference ID on the app will be shown.
All Coins transactions are settled in Bitcoin using Blockchain technology. https://support.coins.ph/hc/en-us/articles/206113102?input_string=transactionsI emailed them to know more info about this. It looks like it. Here is one of the comments in our local board where majority are coinsph users. ...hindi coins.ph to coins.ph ang transfer para maipost na din ang transaction ID for reference ng loan just incase meron hindi magbayad madali mapulahan
Actually kahit coins.ph to coins.ph makikita yun sa blockchain and maipopost din ang transaction ID... Once na posted na sya click mo lang yung transaction details then lalabas na dun ng TXIDAnd just in case na PESO to PESO... may reference ID din si coins.ph. Just a Reminder: Makipagtransact lang po tayo dun sa Verified User ni Coins.ph... Actually, the transaction can still be seen on the blockchain even if its coinsph to coinsph and you can still post the transaction ID....Once posted, just click transaction details then the TXID will appear. (tried my best with the translation)
@Dontme how about following the guide from cabalism13 (see above) to show the payment transactions from coins.ph and update the spreadsheet? This may settle the non-payment issue.
|
|
|
You forgot to read the succeeding comments.
Are you an alt of Dontme? You quickly posted the same line ''I paid everyone''. Coins.ph has a target interval of sending batch transactions at a maximum interval of 2 minutes, if not sooner. - SourceIt looks like he didn't send the btc to his alts maybe he was trying to be smart. I think dontme & his alts need to read this whole thread carefully. Alt? Nope. My application was rejected in my first attempt (week 1). I went to the thread you quoted and read the previous replies which you did not include. The person you quoted also acknowledged payments were made. I am not that familiar with the technicalities of coinsph but from what I understand, if both the sender and the receiver uses coinsph generated addresses, you don't see the transaction on the blockchain. Only a reference ID on the app will be shown.
|
|
|
This should be count here too! it looks like pretty_me & Wonder_woman alts too. They didn't receive the payment & said nothing about this on signature thread. At least I would not mark it paid if it's not paid yet. -snip
You forgot to read the succeeding comments. ^ I read payment is done thru coinsph. Maybe that'll explain some of the "irregularities".
Thanks for the info. Upon checking, the manager said this Hello there mate. I’m using an app wallet. Coins.ph. Kindly wait and I will send it right away on this wallet. Thankyou I did check it, that's probably why there are a lot of unknown transactions. So of all the people that are included in the campaign, the majority are Filipinos? That's quite a coincidence. Hmm. Anyways, just pointing it out. -snip
It's quite convenient for the users to use a service like coins.ph to distribute the payments. It saves them time and the transaction fees are non-existent so which is good. It's great that they are using that, I wasn't aware the first time I looked into it. Nevertheless, at least they got paid.
|
|
|
Wow he gave up for that? If he had been mexican he could have been killed for that by angry betters... I think he had been very lucky to only face few insults and "UFOs" It's not the ordinary eye poke we've seen before where opponent extend his arm with open fist. That's a scratch with some force to it. I guess you will never know how it feels until someone does that to you. A guy who prepared months and paid thousands of dollars for training camp is not a quitter for sure and doesn't deserve to be ridiculed like that.
|
|
|
Task force para pagaralan ang fintech, digital assets at cryptocurrency - Nirekomenda na!Mas maayos siguro na topic title yan. Iniimagine ko binabasa yan ni Mike Enriquez o kaya ni Noli De Castro
Pagkatapos mag-apruba ang BSP ng mga VCEs, mag-issue ng lisensya ang CEZA at ang pag-draft ng SEC ng mga guidelines para sa mga palitan, welcome din ang balitang ito. Patuloy na gumagalaw ang gulong ng Cryptocurrency sa Pilipinas!
|
|
|
It's also a rarity that someone who has seen it all actually share his/her experience to educate users here. Thanks!
Being around crypto since 2017, I would have to agree. I have also seen many start ups that I supported before end up being dead. A lot of them has brilliant ideas on how to do this or that but when it comes to the execution, they failed.
If I may add, shitcoins and scamcoins also have teams that tend to hype their project a lot.
|
|
|
I believe these exchanges are already familiar with Dash features before they delisted it. Maybe it's not about the number of users using the CoinJoin mixing but the fact that they always have that option to make their Dash transaction private. Can Dash eliminate the CoinJoin feature?
If push comes to shove, and it's a choice of being delisted everywhere or removing coinjoin, I'd think the devs would simply remove the privacy features from the code and make it an optional additional service similar to btc. That assumes it's easy to decouple. From qwizzie's response, it's possible. Dash have other features developed so I guess removing the privacy part may have a lesser impact on the coin's marketability. Now logically it shouldn't make any difference whether it's part of the wallet or not. I mean, in reality the results would be the same, so it's kind of silly. But crypto doesn't always work with logic so well, I guess. Apparently, these exchanges who delisted privacy coins sees it differently. I would assume that they no longer care whether or not users can still make their transactions private using third party services. No idea what coins like Monero will do though. Monero's main or should we say only selling point is privacy/anonymity so it will be interesting to see what they will do.
|
|
|
To answer this question let's look at the demand let monero coins. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/monero/.Based on the information received, it can be concluded that the demand for this coin has remained.Therefore, the ban on its use on 2 exchanges says nothing.FATF is good, but why do other exchanges not prohibit buying and selling anonymous cryptocurrencies?So bans are not quite so strong.That's because exchanges are not yet required by governments where they are registered to do so. The travel rule is a mere recommendation as of now from what I understand but who knows if they will be enforced in the future. These Korean exchanges thinks it is going to happen. but it's Dash believe that optional privacy on its transactions is a necessity, not to be discarded lightly.
And this may be the reason why it's been delisted together with other privacy coins. If other exchanges will follow the Travel Rule, I don't see Dash not getting delisted also.
|
|
|
These injury talks reminded me of the time D. Rose (Bulls) was cleared by team doctors but doesn't feel like he was physically and mentally healthy to play . The same goes for Kahwi (Spurs). This is something each team has to consider too before letting them play.
|
|
|
51 weeks is a very long campaign for sure. From the image, there was already a reduction in the bounty pool after IEO. Then after the final computation, there is another cut of almost 600K MYO? Am I understanding this correctly? 3. We have asked the team at telegram and team said Please clarify such questions with the bounty team. I'm not familiar with the bounty in any way link: https://t.me/mycrojobs/34269The team should step in here. Did you asked if the 1.2M tokens is still with them? You mean the bounty manager deleting his or her own comment? Or you mean to say edited the bounty original post? I believe you can also create a flag against Mycro if they do not step in here.
|
|
|
No the point is I cannot trace the address I used the right Mnemonic but the set of address that are showing are not on those lists I even reach 250 pages but the address is not there
That shouldn't happen. I don't know mate but it's either you entered a mnemonic for a different set of addresses or you simply used a different wallet. How many mnemonic phrase do you have?
|
|
|
I am not familiar with Mycrypto but if you created the wallet on MEW, then just do the following steps to access the wallet you previously picked: Step 1: Log in to to MEW using your mnemonic phrase Step 2: Look for address and click " switch" Step 3: Enter you mnemonic phase again and after that, you should be able to see multiple addresses again. Step 4: Pick the address you previously used, accept the terms, then click access. Let me know if that helps.
|
|
|
Why do you think that everyone is afraid that some of the new projects some people without doing any research, They despise a project, which makes other people agree. is this lack of literacy in the study makes them fail ? Does this lack of information bring down a project, that MAY have a bright future ?
Because investing in new projects exposes us to more risk. Let's accept the fact that we are no longer in 2017. Back then, a lot of new investors got hyped and put money on many of these start ups only to be really disappointed a year later. Consider also the fact that bitcoin dominance is ever increasing and that the competition among these altcoins to stay ontop or to survive is getting tougher. Would you rather put your money at riskier investment?
|
|
|
Dash can comply to the FATF travel rule to the same extend as Bitcoin. Both Bitcoin and Dash have open blockchains, both have public senders and receivers of which data can be gathered and both Bitcoin and Dash have a very low level of optional CoinJoin mixing activity on their network (less then 1%).
I believe these exchanges are already familiar with Dash features before they delisted it. Maybe it's not about the number of users using the CoinJoin mixing but the fact that they always have that option to make their Dash transaction private. Can Dash eliminate the CoinJoin feature?
|
|
|
I have to read other sources that covers this story to somehow grasp this new tampering rule. I don't understand why the writer of that article calls it dumb. It's pretty fair imo for the NBA Board to review these rules and enforce it. As what has been said before, it levels the playing field and making sure everyone complies.
|
|
|
|